, but we do not need to take a risk just because someone in the white house thinks that is a good place to put our money. host: mich., chad, on our independent line. caller: i want to comment on what seems to be targeted dissonance between your guests statements and positions, and what the and act truly would be. for instance, -- the impact truly would be. for instance, she talks about things like health care in freedom, but it seems to me -- and freedom, but it seems to me the mindset she represents is more about protecting their freedom to impose their will, and it seems to be a fundamental misunderstanding about what government is there to do, and that is to protect those that do not have the financial wherewithal to protect individuals who, like your guest, might prefer to cite a company. in a neighborhood where did not have the financial wherewithal to protect themselves against environmental degradation, dangers that might be created through oil pipelines, because i certainly believe 100% that none of this stuff will be anywhere near the neighborhood she lives in. guest: thank you for the call. you are right on many