i, to, chair kilmer, i agree with you. about the committee on house administration. may be a very good place to be doing that now. and i have to say that i speak for myself, individually. because it seems like the timing is right, my fear in that is that we don't come back to the serious modernization issues, in a real manner weekly. >> would you do every three congresses? you would make it permanent? >> every other. every other. >> do you agree with that? >> i'm fine with that. i think you can set the floor a minimum of every x number. as conditions arise, you jump to it. necessary conditions arise. >> yeah. it's funny. i thought about this a lot. thank you for being here, he asked, what did the committee not take up that we should've had? i spent a lot of time thinking about. this a lot of it is things outside our jurisdiction where it's tricky to get two thirds of the vote. if you ask me some of the things that are broken in congress, i would say, the role of money, the way district boundaries are drawn, and the way members are selected through primaries, probably

joe kilmer -- derek kilmer knows chair kilmer knows where i stand. they permanent subcommittee -- a permanent subcommittee on making this institution better. that is the standing committee, the house that should be focused on making this institution better. we hear what our pie in the sky discussions. we could do that through joint interaction with the senate rules committee. let us make sure that we highlight the fact that they discussions and the debates we have here have got to continue. i not going to continue. -- i am not going to continue. it will be up to you in the institution to make sure that the great work these folks have put in and the staff have put in is not forgotten. i would like to see and look as we plan ahead to the majority and i laid out my priorities to my folks and my successors. that would create a subcommittee. a modernization within the committee of house administration. i hope to populate massive committee. -- populate that house committee. that means we have to have continued focus on members on this subcommittee who may

the chair now recognizes the gentleman from texas, mr. kilmer for five minutes. miss downie, with regard to ideas that congress could implement given national park attendants more authority to address the problem of overcrowding what do you recommend should be changed in order to affect that? >> thank you for the question, representative gohmert. there is a real opportunity for congress to help facilitate some of the partnerships to get this done. representative moore touched on the lodge act. i think some of those approaches are really essential. a lot of these partners already to help with some of these things. there needs to be a message from congress, in coordination with the national park service, that there is real opportunity here. it should be supported, some of the red tape should be removed. i think, for example, in grand teton national park, concession areas now run all of the campgrounds. certainly there are questions about reservations, how do you get those and all of that. i think it is really telling that the park has found a way to say, here is an