good afternoon chair melgar. preston and supervisor peskin planning staff. >> the historic preservation commission reviewed the neighborhood land mark. grand theatre at the hearing on november 15th 2023. >> grand theatre designed by architects gashing albert and f lee construct in the 1940 the left movie theatre built prior to world worry 2 a single screen from 1940 through 88. it significant for association with the network of neighborhood, theatres the concentration of movie theatres in the mission during the early to mid 20th century. building is significant it embodies the characteristic of a large scale stroll line building that is representativive of the work of 2 architects of merit. >> at the public hearing the preservation commission heard comment in support and voted unanimous low to approve a resolution recommending landmarking of the grand theatre. am i'm here for questions. thank you. >> i don't see questions from clothes, thank you. let's go to public comment, please. mr. clerk. >> thank you, if you

good afternoon chair melgar. preston and supervisor peskin planning staff. >> the historic preservation commission reviewed the neighborhood land mark. grand theatre at the hearing on november 15th 2023. >> grand theatre designed by architects gashing albert and f lee construct in the 1940 the left movie theatre built prior to world worry 2 a single screen from 1940 through 88. it significant for association with the network of neighborhood, theatres the concentration of movie theatres in the mission during the early to mid 20th century. building is significant it embodies the characteristic of a large scale stroll line building that is representativive of the work of 2 architects of merit. >> at the public hearing the preservation commission heard comment in support and voted unanimous low to approve a resolution recommending landmarking of the grand theatre. am i'm here for questions. thank you. >> i don't see questions from clothes, thank you. let's go to public comment, please. mr. clerk. >> thank you, if you

chair as amended. on that motion, preston? aye. melgar. >> aye. >> clerk: madam chair, there are three ayes once again. >> and then as to the duplicated file i would like to continue that one week to incorporate the amendments that we started and stopped so that we can vote on those hopefully next week and refer that to plan to go catch up with the file that we just rereferred. so motion to continue the duplicated file one week. >> clerk: as it duplicated contains no amendments. >> correct. >> clerk: on the motion offered by member peskin that the duplicated file now be continued to february 12, press ten aye, member peskin. >> aye. >> chair melgar. >> aye. >> clerk: chair there are three ayes once again. >> okay, that motion passes. let's go to our last item number 5, please mr. clerk. >> clerk: just a moment while i correct a few things on my notes. very good. agenda item number 5 is an ordinance amending planning certain fees for projects along the corridor of the downtown rail extension affirming the planning department's consistency.

chair meal gar. --melgar. >> aye. >> clerk: there are three ayes. >> madam chair, i would like duplicate that and continue that item for one week. hold on. >> okay, go ahead, deputy city attorney, please. >> deputy attorney anne pearson is there need amendment to be beyond the affective date? >> so there is a consideration instead of the secondary institution that supervisor dore see would like it to be corrected but it sounds to us or i think, you can correct me if i'm wrong, because then that is quite expensive and therefore the legislation has to be rereferred back to planning commission with that amendments of education institutions. so we thought we wanted to make sure as proposed the motion proposed by president peskin to have the retro activity date and then continue for a week because the sub?nd stancetive date with the discussion of expending the education institution at planning commission but move forward with the retro activity date. >> okay. did you get that mr. clerk. >> so, the agenda item numb

good afternoon chair melgar.visor peskin planning staff. >> the historic preservation commission reviewed the neighborhood land mark. grand theatre at the hearing on november 15th 2023. >> grand theatre designed by architects gashing albert and f lee construct in the 1940 the left movie theatre built prior to world worry 2 a single screen from 1940 through 88. it significant for association with the network of neighborhood, theatres the concentration of movie theatres in the mission during the early to mid 20th century. building is significant it embodies the characteristic of a large scale stroll line building that is representativive of the work of 2 architects of merit. >> at the public hearing the preservation commission heard comment in support and voted unanimous low to approve a resolution recommending landmarking of the grand theatre. am i'm here for questions. thank you. >> i don't see questions from clothes, thank you. let's go to public comment, please. mr. clerk. >> thank you, if you have and to give

vice chair melgar. >> present. >> vice chair present. commissioner peskin. >> present. >> commissioner preston. absent. commissioner ronen. >> [off mic]. >> present. commissioner safai, absent. commissioner stefani. present. commissioner walton. >> present. >> commissioner safai is now present. we have quorum. >> thank you so much madam clerk. i believe we have a public comment announcement. >> yes, i do. thank you. for members of the public interested in participating in this board meeting we welcome your attendance here in person in the legislative chamber in city hall or watch cable channel 26 or 99 depending on the provide eror stream the meeting live at our website. for those wishing to make public comment remotely the best way is by dialing 415-655-0001 and when prompted enter access code 2662-307-4053. and press pound and pound again. you will be able to listen to the meeting in real time. when public comment is called for will item you wish to speak on please press star three to enter the queue to speak. do not press star three a

chair melgar, aye. madam chair, 3 ayes. >> thank you. thank you so much. let's go to item number 4 now please, mr. clerk. >> item 4 is ordinance amending the planning and administrative codes to correct typographical errors, update outdated cross-references, and make non-substantive revisions to clarify or simplify code language; affirming the planning department's determination under the california environmental quality act; making findings of consistency with the general plan, and the eight priority policies of planning code, section 101.1; and adopting findings of public necessity, convenience, and general welfare under planning code, section 302. >> okay. thank you. i thought we were going to get a presentation by mr. aaron star, but see we will get a presentation by ms. malone. >> thank you chair melgar. planning department staff. this ordinance is before you last week. we realized due to the passage of several other ordinances since the drafting of this legislation technical amendments were needed.

vice chair mandelman. >> aye. >> melgar, aye. >> aye >> chair chan. why aye. >> thank you and motion passes. call item 11. >> a resolution approving a continuation payment under a predevelopment agreement with potrero collective and the city. acting by and through the mta. dated as of november second, 2022. and making environmental findings under the california environmental act. madam chair? >> i guess i'm chairing, for a minute. >> mta hear about item 11. >> good morning chair chan and supervisors and chair mandelman. i'm public affair's manager for the sfmta building progress program and the sfmta is here today to request approval are a continuation payment for the potrero yard modernization project which is needed to continue to the next phase of the project's predevelopment agreement. this mile stone payment is needed in order to continue work for the pda phase of the project following the adoption of entitlements and ceqa certifications. as background the adoption of entitlements will be coming before the board next week is what triggers the tim

peskin and preston voted in favor and chair melgar was opposed. we're almost done at the full board this week, the code corrections ordinance passed its final read, and the downtown rail extension fee waiver passed its first read. that's the conclusion of the board report. thank you. thank you. i do not see the zoning administrator here to give you a report so we can move on to general public comment at this time, members of the public may address the commission on items of interest to the public that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the commission, except agenda items with respect to agenda items, your opportunity to address the commission will be afforded when the item is reached in the meeting. when the number of speakers exceed the 15 minute limit. general public comment may be moved to the end of the agenda. good afternoon, commissioners tom radulovich with livable city. yeah. here to talk a little bit more about why i think you should plan the city. um i, i've talked before about this, but, you know, land use planning and transp

chair. and joined by mandelman and supervisor melgar. our clerk is brent jalipa and like to thank sfgov.org james. do you have announcements. >>. yes. to those here silence devices so as to not interrupt. should you have documents to be include submitted to myself. public comment taken on each item on the agenda when your item come up and comment is called lineup to speak to your right. along the curtains and while not necessary provide comment we invite to you fill out a comment card and leave them by the television chair left. by the doors if you wish to be recorded for the minutes. you may submit public comment in rieth e mail them to myself the clerk at brent. jalipa sfgov.org. if you submit comment tell be forwarded to the supervisors and include part of the official time you misend them by postal service to city hall. 1 dr. carlton b. goodlett place, room 244, san francisco, california 94102. items acted upon today are expected to appear on february 6. unless otherwise stated. >> thank you. mr. clerk. and before i call item one wou

and continue to the february 7 meeting of this committee as amend vice chair mandelman. >> aye >> member melgar. >> aye. >> chair chan. >> aye. >> thank you the motion passes and with that mr. check call 3 and 4 together. >> items 3 and 4 resolutions authorizing office of contract administration modifications to contracts between the city and the following for the purchase of electrical materials. supplies and if i can sures 3 executes modification 3 the contract with san francisco and alameda electric inc. increasing it by 600,000 for a total amount 2.5 million. with no change to the total contract of may first 2018 through april 30. and item 4 modification 8 to a contract with buckle myth electric increasing the amount by two million a total contract amount not to exceed 19. 5 million with no change to a contract of july 5 of 2016. through june 30, 24. >> thank you, mr. clerk and we have office of contract administration here. good morning share chan. i'm manager with office of contract administration and i'm here to present 3 and 4 together. the contract modification in front of you for buck

i'm chair mandelman i chair this board and commissioner melgar thank you, jeanette is from sfgov and madam clerk please call the roll. >> chair mandelman present. >> commissioner melgar? madam clerk can you speak into mic please. turn the mic on it helps. >> commissioner stefani absent. >> commissioner walton present. >> we have quorum. >> thank you, madam clerk i think you have a couple of comments for >> location: legislative chamber, room 250, city hall watch sf cable channel 26 or 99(depending on your provider) watch www.sfgovtv.org. or watch cable channel cable channel >> location: legislative chamber, room 250, city hall watch sf cable channel 26 or 99(depending on your provider) watch www.sfgovtv.org. may watch them on demand. >> phone number: +1 (415) 655-0001 access code: 2664 215 8026 # # to raise your hand, press *3 when public comment is called press star three and do not press it again or you'll be removed from the queue the live operator will allow you to speak. >> channel 26 or 99 (depending on your provider) or may visit the sfgovtv website(www.sfgovtv.org) to stream t

. >> i'm chair mandelman vice chair of the board and supervisor melgar and thank you, sfgov and our clerk is yvette madam clerk, call the roll. >> supervisor chan, aye. >> domineered supervisor dorsey present and supervisor engardio present chair mandelman present. >> supervisor melgar present. >> supervisor peskin present. >> supervisor preston present. >> supervisor ronen present. >> supervisor safai? is absent. >> a supervisor stefani absent. >> supervisor walton madam clerk use the mic please. i'm sorry. >> oh, i'm sorry a can you hear me now? >> supervisor walton is present and we have quorum. and thank you, madam clerk and i'll note that supervisor safai reached out to me will be delayed but i'm going to grant that request. could you please read the public comment. >> yes. >> yes. >> remote participation: members of the public may attend the meeting to observe and provide public comment at the physical meeting location listed above or may watch sf cable channel 26 or 99 (depending on your provider) or may visit the sfgovtv website(www.sfgovtv.org) to stream the live meeting or may w

. >> i'm chair mandelman vice chair of the board and supervisor melgar and thank you, sfgov and our clerk is yvette madam clerk, call the roll. >> supervisor chan, aye. >> domineered supervisor dorsey present and supervisor engardio present chair mandelman present. >> supervisor melgar present. >> supervisor peskin present. >> supervisor preston present. >> supervisor ronen present. >> supervisor safai? is absent. >> a supervisor stefani absent. >> supervisor walton madam clerk use the mic please. i'm sorry. >> oh, i'm sorry a can you hear me now? >> supervisor walton is present and we have quorum. and thank you, madam clerk and i'll note that supervisor safai reached out to me will be delayed but i'm going to grant that request. could you please read the public comment. >> yes. >> yes. >> remote participation: members of the public may attend the meeting to observe and provide public comment at the physical meeting location listed above or may watch sf cable channel 26 or 99 (depending on your provider) or may visit the sfgovtv website(www.sfgovtv.org) to stream the live meeting or may w

supervisor melgar. >> thank you chair chan. thank you mr. monard. this project and the population it serves is very much needed. it is a very under-served population, but really very little about the loan amendment makes me feel good. the fact that it is so expensive that we are putting in more money for damages to the next door structure, but what particularly bothers me the most is that we are now saying the childcare, which was such a integral part of this project is no longer feasible, so i like to understand why it isn't feasible when we have millions of dollars rolled over from baby prop c for this use and i know that for transitional age youth parents the rates of child abuse and neglect are higher then anyone else's so child care and services for this population is like really really important for their success. i want to know what options were explored, why it is no longer feasible and who made that decision? >> thank you. good question. sheila director mohcd. child care spaces by state licensing are required to have a certain amount of out

supervisor melgar. >> thank you chair chan. thank you mr. monard. this project and the population it serves is very much needed. it is a very under-served population, but really very little about the loan amendment makes me feel good. the fact that it is so expensive that we are putting in more money for damages to the next door structure, but what particularly bothers me the most is that we are now saying the childcare, which was such a integral part of this project is no longer feasible, so i like to understand why it isn't feasible when we have millions of dollars rolled over from baby prop c for this use and i know that for transitional age youth parents the rates of child abuse and neglect are higher then anyone else's so child care and services for this population is like really really important for their success. i want to know what options were explored, why it is no longer feasible and who made that decision? >> thank you. good question. sheila director mohcd. child care spaces by state licensing are required to have a certain amount of out

madam chair , that completes our queue. >> thank you, public comment is now closed. supervisor melgarwould it mess you up if we continue this a week? >> through the chair, thank you supervisors. yes, this has been continued since december when we had the initial conversation. we had lots of time to work with the chair's office. we met with many members all most all the members of the board on this. we are currently in our contracting work frozen. the lack of clarity where we are going and authority over the next few month has only focusing on existing contract amendments and completely stalling our work to open new projects so while one week at the board doesn't seem like a particularly long time, that pushes us out until april before we'll know where we-before this is enacted and my concern is our staff capacity. they have receiving very mixed messages where we are going with this ordinance and what authority and our contract staff is in a state of frozen limbo waiting for the direction of the board so we know how to move forward with something like 50 contracts that need to be amend

i'm supervisor melgar chair and joined by the board president aaron supervisor peskin and preston the clerk is john carroll.

member melgar. >> aye. >> chair preston. >> aye. >> i have three ayes. >> thank you, the motion passes. and thank you again supervisor melgar for your work on this and for being here. let's go ahead and call items 4 through 9 together, madam clerk. jaolt 4 through 9 are res loosesing receiving and improvement annual report for fisherman's wharf soma west, fisherman's wharf, union square, improvement district and downtown community district, excuse me community business district. for fiscal year, 21-22. >> thank you, madam clerk, so we have the remainder of our benefit district annual reports, looking forward to hearing these again, thank you for all the work on this as well as the thorough briefing of our office in advance of the hearing. and these items are sponsored some of them by supervisor dorsey and some by supervisor peskin we're covering six different cbds here. i want to thank all the executive directors, i know we'll be hearing but thanks to all the folks leading this. let's go back to ms. hazelwood, you can continue and thank you for the initial overview of uh cbd reporting

come to order the february 28 budget and finance i'm connie chan chair, i'm joined by vice chair mandelman and melgar. our clerk is brent jalipa. and i want to like to thank corewin cooley from sfgov.org for broadcasting meeting. . >> thank you a reminder those in attendance make sure to silence electronic device not to interruptr

i am supervisor melgar, chair of the committee joined by president peskin and dean preston. the committee xlerk is john carol and i would also like to

i am myrna melgar, vice chair of this board. our chair rafael mandelman is away on another civic duty today. thank you to jennette from sfgtv and our clerk today is yvette lo

member melgar. >> aye. >> chair preston. >> aye. >> i have three ayes. >> thank you, the motion passes. and thank you again supervisor melgar for your work on this and for being here. let's go ahead and call items 4 through 9 together, madam clerk. jaolt 4 through 9 are res loosesing receiving and improvement annual report for fisherman's wharf soma west, fisherman's wharf, union square, improvement district and downtown community district, excuse me community business district. for fiscal year, 21-22. >> thank you, madam clerk, so we have the remainder of our benefit district annual reports, looking forward to hearing these again, thank you for all the work on this as well as the thorough briefing of our office in advance of the hearing. and these items are sponsored some of them by supervisor dorsey and some by supervisor peskin we're covering six different cbds here. i want to thank all the executive directors, i know we'll be hearing but thanks to all the folks leading this. let's go back to ms. hazelwood, you can continue and thank you for the initial overview of uh cbd reporting

member melgar. >> aye. >> chair preston. >> aye. >> i have three ayes. >> thank you, the motion passes. and thank you again supervisor melgar for your work on this and for being here. let's go ahead and call items 4 through 9 together, madam clerk. jaolt 4 through 9 are res loosesing receiving and improvement annual report for fisherman's wharf soma west, fisherman's wharf, union square, improvement district and downtown community district, excuse me community business district. for fiscal year, 21-22. >> thank you, madam clerk, so we have the remainder of our benefit district annual reports, looking forward to hearing these again, thank you for all the work on this as well as the thorough briefing of our office in advance of the hearing. and these items are sponsored some of them by supervisor dorsey and some by supervisor peskin we're covering six different cbds here. i want to thank all the executive directors, i know we'll be hearing but thanks to all the folks leading this. let's go back to ms. hazelwood, you can continue and thank you for the initial overview of uh cbd reporting

i'm chair mandelman i chair this board and commissioner melgar thank you, jeanette is from sfgov and the roll. >> chair mandelman present. >> commissioner melgar? madam clerk can you speak into mic please. turn the mic on it helps. >> commissioner stefani absent. >> commissioner walton present. >> we have quorum. >> thank you, madam clerk i think you have a couple of comments for >> location: legislative chamber, room 250, city hall watch sf cable channel 26 or 99(depending on your provider) watch www.sfgovtv.org. or watch cable channel cable channel >> location: legislative chamber, room 250, city hall watch sf cable channel 26 or 99(depending on your provider) watch www.sfgovtv.org. may watch them on demand. >> phone number: +1 (415) 655-0001 access code: 2664 215 8026 # # to raise your hand, press *3 when public comment is called press star three and do not press it again or you'll be removed from the queue the live operator will allow you to speak. >> channel 26 or 99 (depending on your provider) or may visit the sfgovtv website(www.sfgovtv.org) to stream the live meeting or may w

considered it at the land use committee and we approved it unanimously. >> thank you land use chair melgar thank you president peskin. i just wanted to call the fire marshal up to ask a clarifying question i thought he said and i thought when i heard him say it made me feel a lot better. did you say--i don't want to misquote, but did you say 5 foot minimum was what would be required as part of the ordinance for being code compliant but there still was flexibility given certain circumstances of a particular application that you have the ability to make adjustments to smaller then that? when you said projects in the sunset that might be 20foot lot. can you talk about that a little bit more? because i feel like that sheds a lot of clarity on the subject in terms of compliance with state law and allows for the flexibility and i think that is a important point. >> thank you for the question supervisor safai. you are correct. the building department through the application does have a process which we know as ab005. anybody can ask for anything that doesn't meet the code. the difference is, if w

. >> good morning ing supervisors, chair chan, vice chair mandelman, supervisors melgar, ronan and stefani for joining as well. i know this isue is extremely important to all of us. i also just at the top before i know we will get into many complex questions, really appreciate supervisor mandelman your thanks. i am very lucky to be at dph and with a team who's work this represents who are committed, hard-working, want to make things better working their hearts out, including to be responsive to your collective concerns and questions. this is-these are thorny and important issues that we all care deeply about, the problems are the result as you point out from decades of disinvestment and inadequate policy choices at levels of government at the federal and state level that result in a significant number of challenges at the municipal level. which i happily dig into, but it is vexing at time. i want to share with you as you describe our behavioral health residential bed types and current inventory. estimates of our growth losses and staffing capacity. estimation of needs and try to lay out bo