d.j. >> good morning chair peskin and vice chair mandelman. the last chance i got to see and everything that he's doing. but i also want to say, thank you to the mayor for having faith in my leadership and time on the police commission: i've been in the city and county for the last eleven years. i have been a public servant. i am the executive director of young community developers which is one of the leading workforce developments in district 10. i've been apart of that organization for over ten years where we've grown from nine folks and during that time was also able to really focus on violence prevention in the work that we do around community engagement in the southeast part of san francisco. i have serveded on the mayor's workforce development board. i have workeded on the controller's bond oversight committee and most recently one of our san francisco police commissioners where i want to say thank you to my colleagues. our vice president cindy elias and we've been able to push forward a lot of reform, a lot of department general orders,

without objection. >> next item, please. >> chair peskin. >> yes, supervisor chan. >> chair peskin. this is a discussion more if i may ask or make a comment really. you know, i think that this is not -- should not be a reflection of mr. minta's qualifications. from my experience from the appointee that withdrew mr. gonzalez from sheriff oversight committee through the questioning we had last week. let's be more thoughtful moving some of these great candidates but may not be suitable for the body. they are probably very committed community members to do the right thing, let's be more thoughtful when we start moving forward and sending appoint beties to the rules committee for appointments and to think through about the qualification and interest and the expertise of these individuals. that is all i have to say. thank you, mr.minta, for submission of your application. >> thank you for those very well-taken, very mature comments. supervisor mandelman anything to add or subtract? >> i think this is a nomination like this raises interesting questions. in general i would like to defer to

was before the committee ask to recuse myself and turn the gavel to vice chair mandelman. >> on the motion to recuse supervisor peskin, supervisor chan. >> aye. >> vice chair mandelman. >> aye. >> thank you. >> supervisors peskin is recused from item 210479. >> we have applicant to hear from and thank you for serving and those interested in serving. i'm going to work my way through the folks as they appear in the agenda and if you have questions put yourself in the chat. mr. paz? >> uh-oh. mr. clerk. >> looks like he logged off we can come back. >> i believe he had to leave at 11:00 so he may have left but if he's hearing us and want to come back he can come back. >> hello. my apologies. my computer kicked me off. >> you two minutes. >> thank you, honorable supervisors and members of the rules committee, i'm mario paz i'm the director of the good samaritan research center we're a 127 anchor institution founded as a settlement house for newcomers and that continues steadfast. i'd like to show my support for sarah sousa and our great chair. they have shown exceptional leadership and it's been a privilege to serve by th

without objection. >> next item, please. >> chair peskin. >> yes, supervisor chan. >> chair peskin. this is a discussion more if i may ask or make a comment really. you know, i think that this is not -- should not be a reflection of mr. minta's qualifications. from my experience from the appointee that withdrew mr. gonzalez from sheriff oversight committee through the questioning we had last week. let's be more thoughtful moving some of these great candidates but may not be suitable for the body. they are probably very committed community members to do the right thing, let's be more thoughtful when we start moving forward and sending appoint beties to the rules committee for appointments and to think through about the qualification and interest and the expertise of these individuals. that is all i have to say. thank you, mr.minta, for submission of your application. >> thank you for those very well-taken, very mature comments. supervisor mandelman anything to add or subtract? >> i think this is a nomination like this raises interesting questions. in general i would like to defer to

supervisor chan. >> supervisor chan: thank you, chair peskin. i know you are in the process of preparing the language, so i do look forward of seeing the language itself. but also to provide an exemption for accept and expend legislation. i guess i'm trying to understand better. does that mean that for an interested party, that donates through the city through accept and expend process. >> chairman: so the notion there is if a -- the action before the board, that the board takes is the approval of accept and expend. so in taking that action by accepting a donation from a third party, that would not prohibit a member of the board of supervisors from soliciting behested payments from a party that had made a distribution to the city that the board had to vote on to accept. does that make any sense? because the board has had to take action. so i'm differentiating that in the board, approving a contract. so if we approve a contract with the xyz corporation, it would be prohibited that a member of the board of supervisors go to the xyz corporation to

peskin has your hand. did you want to tell us? >> thank you chair preston. so mister russo, you didn't give them the scope of what supervisor chan gave you look at any of the wreck and park related to someaccounts at the parks alliance, did you ? >> we did not. >> this is clearly an area that needs more research let me ask miss madeleine on behalf of wreck andspark , what isthat some account ?can you characterize what it's been used for western mark is used for staffdevelopment , staff including but not limited to travel by the general manager? >> i can and actually it's usually chair.i can and in fact there's an item later on in your agenda that is our angle of expense for those items. i apologize i don't have it in front of me but it falls in the general category of supporting our volunteer services program including our teenagers progra at our staff recognition program . and i believe there's some other effects of it but again that's another item on your agenda is our prospective amd every time we bring tothe board as necessary . >> all right item number

chair. >> thank you, mr. clerk. i want to acknowledge supervisor peskin has joined us. welcome, supervisor peskin. i participate your parts on this item. and so vice chair chan will take a lead on this item introduced and i believe we'll hear from bla controller and perhaps others. i want to remind folks we're trying to stick to 10 minutes to each presenter and with that i'll hand it to director chan. >> clerk: would you like me to call the item? >> commissioner: i forgot to ask you to do that, mr. clerk. please do. >> clerk: item 3, a hearing to discuss the parks alliance with the focus on renewing the gate park 150th anniversary agreement between sf parks alliance and recreation and park department, to determine whether the terms of this agreement have been incorrectly categorized as a permit when they substantially resemble a contract, which has different public oversight and approval processes; and members who want to provide comment call the number, 1-415-655-0001. the meeting i.d. is 2496 330 1479. after you've entered the meeting i.d. dial the pound symbol twice to connect to the meeting and

chair? supervisor peskin. will you take roll on that, please, madam clerk? >> clerk: yes. on the motion to continue the item to the call of the chair -- [roll call] >> clerk: you have three ayes. >> chair melgar: thank you. that motion passes. thank you very much, supervisor ronen, for your leadership on this. >> supervisor ronen: thank you so much. i'm going to stick around for the next item, if it's okay. >> chair melgar: okay. please call the next item, madam clerk, please, item 4. >> clerk: thank you. item 4 is a hearing on the city's need to address workforce housing across the full range of worker incomes as identified in jobs housing fit reports, including new and strengthened policies to support housing affordability and stability and requesting the planning department to report. members of the public, if you wish to provide public comment, dial 415-655-0001, meeting i.d. 2499-520-1468, then press pound and pound again. >> chair melgar: thank you. presenting this item, we have supervisor mar. supervisor mar, the floor is yours. >> supervisor mar: as we are recoverin

especially on resourcing our treeplanting strategy and course working with the supervisor peskin and our budget chairhat as well. colleagues, any other questions orcomments . well, thank you supervisor peskin, thanks again calling for this hearing. and these are very important issues that don't often get the attention that they need or deserve given all the pressing issues that we're dealing with as a board and as a city so this is an important opportunity to get updates and look at how we can practice our urbancanopy to a higher priority . so i think i would suggest or move that we file this hearing and then we can. >> we need to take public comments mister chair. >> chair: madamclerk, public comment . >> for those who wish to speak on this item please press star three to enter the q will indicate you have raised your hand. that will be yourcue to begin your comments . it appears we have five in the queue. please bring the first caller forward. i am the chair of the parks and trees to many and also the producer and director of a movieabout birds who love trees , the wild parrots of telegraph hill. i

i am chair aaron peskin joined by mandelman and chan. mr. young, do you have any announcements? >> the minutes will reflect the committee members are participating through video conference to the same extent as if present. public access to city services is essential. public comment will be available on each item on the agenda

chair. pleasetay role. >> supervisor peskin. >> aye. >> supervisor preston -- i'm sorry supervisor chan. >> aye. >> supervisor melgar. >> you have three ayes. >> motion passes. thank you very much for attending director hillis. >> thank you, chair melgar. >> thank you. madam clerk will you please call the last item, number 4. >> ordinance amending the planning code to repeal article 12 which contains regulations governing land use activities associatessed with oil and glass exploration, development and possessing affirming the planning department's determination under the california environmenttal quality act. call 415-655-0001 and press pound twice. press star three to peak. >> madam chair. >> supervisor chan thank you for this piece of legislation. we continued it from last meeting. we did hear the presentation and took public comment on it. you know we held it because there were some amendments not ready by the city attorney. i will turn it over to you. >> thank you, chair melgar and thank you colleagues for area patience. my apologies it was not ready last week. i will jump into it. i am

the call of the chair and that we find a time to continue this hearing in january. >> chair: thank you, supervisor peskin, and i'm happy to make that chair and i do just want to say that i know that we've got a lot of inquiries, you know, in the recent months around these issues, and we very much appreciate how your office has been and you have been on top of this issue and working with the departments and making sure that -- that everything possible is being done and i appreciate you calling this oversight hearing and we'll look forward to continuing the conversation at a future hearing date. so, mr. clerk, can you call the roll on the motion to continue to the call of the chair. >> clerk: [roll call vote] mr. chair, there are two ayes and member mandelman is noted absent. >> supervisor preston: the motion passes and thank you supervisor peskin for your leadership on this. and, mr. clerk, do we have any further business before the committee? >> clerk: there is no further business. >> supervisor preston: thank you, we are adjourned. >> thank you. at this time i like to call the november 1 meeting of the

amendments you're talking about. >> duly noted, and i will, supervisor peskin. >> supervisor peskin: no problem. >> chairng to take public comment, but these are not substantive? >> that's correct. the legal interpretation -- >> supervisor peskin: okay. i'll look at them -- i'm looking at them right now. >> that is correct. it is my understanding, as well. they were filling in blanks that were left as place holders for motions and dates. >> chair melgar: okay. so if there are no further comments or questions, let's go to public comment. madam clerk? >> clerk: thank you. d.t. is checking to see if there are any callers in the queue. if you have not already done so, press star, three to enter the queue. if you have already done so, please wait until the system indicates you have been unmuted. madam chair, maria indicates there are no callers in the queue. >> chair melgar: okay. would someone please make a motion? supervisor peskin? >> supervisor peskin: so moved. >> chair melgar: madam clerk, can we take a roll call on the amendments? >> clerk: on the motion as stated -- [roll call] >> chair melgar: thank

the call of the chair and that we find a time to continue this hearing in january. >> chair: thank you, supervisor peskin, and i'm happy to make that chair and i do just want to say that i know that we've got a lot of inquiries, you know, in the recent months around these issues, and we very much appreciate how your office has been and you have been on top of this issue and working with the departments and making sure that -- that everything possible is being done and i appreciate you calling this oversight hearing and we'll look forward to continuing the conversation at a future hearing date. so, mr. clerk, can you call the roll on the motion to continue to the call of the chair. >> clerk: [roll call vote] mr. chair, there are two ayes and member mandelman is noted absent. >> supervisor preston: the motion passes and thank you supervisor peskin for your leadership on this. and, mr. clerk, do we have any further business before the committee? >> clerk: there is no further business. >> supervisor preston: thank you, we are adjourned. adjourned. >> shop & dine in the 49 promotes local businesses and challe

the call of the chair and that we find a time to continue this hearing in january. >> chair: thank you, supervisor peskin, and i'm happy to make that chair and i do just want to say that i know that we've got a lot of inquiries, you know, in the recent months around these issues, and we very much appreciate how your office has been and you have been on top of this issue and working with the departments and making sure that -- that everything possible is being done and i appreciate you calling this oversight hearing and we'll look forward to continuing the conversation at a future hearing date. so, mr. clerk, can you call the roll on the motion to continue to the call of the chair. >> clerk: [roll call vote] mr. chair, there are two ayes and member mandelman is noted absent. >> supervisor preston: the motion passes and thank you supervisor peskin for your leadership on this. and, mr. clerk, do we have any further business before the committee? >> clerk: there is no further business. >> supervisor preston: thank you, we are adjourned. >> >>[music] >> i came in with her impression of what i thought it was g

. >> thank you, chair peskin. i am more than happy to have this conversation continue on. it is worth the wait to really make my comments. it is really not a question because i look forward to the controller's report on the finances of s.f.m.t.a. is really what i am looking at. i know about all of these. i hope it is true. in the coming months your conversation in terms of discussing about the service restoration, all of the things that s.f.m.t.a. is doing is temporary. to see finances and the deficits pre-pandemic. how do we fix this long-term? it is what i look forward to. i also want to respond to what chair borden mentioned when it comes to tradeoff and equity. that could be true. again, i want to look through the controller's report. resources is always going to be limited. resources have to be limited even before pandemic. it is the mentality how do we manage resources and to break down the mentality that we can fight against that and fight back against that to make sure that people who have been before the pandemic and more so now during the pandemic and after, hope

peskin. >> thank you, chair preston and supervisor chan and mandelman for the opportunity to bring this item before you. i wish that the 301 mission street mel enemy yum tower -- tower behind us but that is not the case. as you know, going back to 2009 when the first unit in that building were sold the tower had already begun to sink differentially, to tilt far beyond what the projections in the environmental analysis yielded which is tropical. so far as this board of supervisors actually recently held a hearing on a different building and were concerned about the lack of seismic and geotechnical information in that report. in this instance over the life of the structure, there was projected to be four to six inches of uniform. the building not differential settlement, no tilt. this building like the one we considered the other day is in an area of town that was not originally tera fir mabut filled reclaimed lands. when i started the hearings in 2016 on the sinking and tilting, the building had already tilted almost a foot and a half to the northwest and sunk approximately a foot. there was

. >> thank you, chair peskin. i am more than happy to have this conversation continue on. it is worth the wait to really make my comments. it is really not a question because i look forward to the controller's report on the finances of s.f.m.t.a. is really what i am looking at. i know about all of these. i hope it is true. in the coming months your conversation in terms of discussing about the service restoration, all of the things that s.f.m.t.a. is doing is temporary. to see finances and the deficits pre-pandemic. how do we fix this long-term? it is what i look forward to. i also want to respond to what chair borden mentioned when it comes to tradeoff and equity. that could be true. again, i want to look through the controller's report. resources is always going to be limited. resources have to be limited even before pandemic. it is the mentality how do we manage resources and to break down the mentality that we can fight against that and fight back against that to make sure that people who have been before the pandemic and more so now during the pandemic and after, hope

i am chair aaron peskin joined by mandelman and chan. mr. young, do you have any announcements?ccess to city services is essential. public comment will be available on each item on the agenda channel 26,

>> supervisor peskin: thank you, mr. vice chair. i have amendments to supervisor safai just referred to that are before you. a couple of those are good suggestions by the city attorney and covered in the legislative digest, specifically clarifying that the park patrol has the authority to enforce the park code and issue citations. that is something that a deputy city attorney remembered that former city attorney buck delventhal thought should be clarified, a couple of pieces of cleanup. what it also does and i mentioned at the full board is insofar as this cedes board of supervisors authority to the m.t.a. on park property, it does require that once the m.t.a. -- or when the m.t.a. sets forth their dynamic pricing model, that that would be approved by the board of supervisors in the future. so that is the sum and substance of the amendments before you. i understand and i believe that supervisor chan has voiced her support for the amendments, and if not, i would ask that you would adopt those amendments and send them to the full boar

i am chair aaron peskin joined by mandelman and chan. mr. young, do you have any announcements? >> the minutes will reflect the committee members are participating through video conference to

patrick. >> thank you, supervisor peskin and chair preston for holding this hearing. we have not signed off on the reduction from 52 to 42. it is currently being reviewed. >> mr. reardon, while i you on here. it is not fair to ask mr. ferrara. can you tell us how the members of the engineering design review team were selected? and who they work for? >> yes, supervisor. i wasn't in that department at the time either. i believe it included the city administrator at the time and decision was made in consensus with d.b.i. along with the city administrator to select this team of professionals. >> do you know how it worked? >> i am not aware exactly how that happened at the time, supervisor. i can get back to you with that information. >> so they were originally hired and paid for and worked under then city administrator naomi kelly and that function was transferred to d.b.i. they are now consultants to the department of building inspection, is that correct? >> that is my understanding, yes. >> supervisor peskin, i want to go to supervisor chan with a comment. >> thank you.

>> supervisor peskin: thank you, mr. vice chair. i have amendments to supervisor safai just referred to that are before you. a couple of those are good suggestions by the city attorney and covered in the legislative digest, specifically clarifying that the park patrol has the authority to enforce the park code and issue citations. that is something that a deputy city attorney remembered that former city attorney buck delventhal thought should be clarified, a couple of pieces of cleanup. what it also does and i mentioned at the full board is insofar as this cedes board of supervisors authority to the m.t.a. on park property, it does require that once the m.t.a. -- or when the m.t.a. sets forth their dynamic pricing model, that that would be approved by the board of supervisors in the future. so that is the sum and substance of the amendments before you. i understand and i believe that supervisor chan has voiced her support for the amendments, and if not, i would ask that you would adopt those amendments and send them to the full boar

>> supervisor peskin: thank you, mr. vice chair.s to supervisor safai just referred to that are before you. a couple of those are good suggestions by the city attorney and covered in the legislative digest, specifically clarifying that the park patrol has the authority to enforce the park code and issue citations. that is something that a deputy city attorney remembered that former city attorney buck delventhal thought should be clarified, a couple of pieces of cleanup. what it also does and i mentioned at the full board is insofar as this cedes board of supervisors authority to the m.t.a. on park property, it does require that once the m.t.a. -- or when the m.t.a. sets forth their dynamic pricing model, that that would be approved by the board of supervisors in the future. so that is the sum and substance of the amendments before you. i understand and i believe that supervisor chan has voiced her support for the amendments, and if not, i would ask that you would adopt those amendments and send them to the full board. >> supervisor

. >> thank you, supervisor peskin and chair preston for holding this hearing. we have not signed off on the reduction from 52 to 42. it is currently being reviewed. >> mr. reardon, while i you on here. it is not fair to ask mr. ferrara. can you tell us how the members of the engineering design review team were selected? and who they work for? >> yes, supervisor. i wasn't in that department at the time either. i believe it included the city administrator at the time and decision was made in consensus with d.b.i. along with the city administrator to select this team of professionals. >> do you know how it worked? >> i am not aware exactly how that happened at the time, supervisor. i can get back to you with that information. >> so they were originally hired and paid for and worked under then city administrator naomi kelly and that function was transferred to d.b.i. they are now consultants to the department of building inspection, is that correct? >> that is my understanding, yes. >> supervisor peskin, i want to go to supervisor chan with a comment. >> thank you.

chair. pleasetay role. >> supervisor peskin. >> aye. >> supervisor preston -- i'm sorry supervisor chan. >> aye. >> supervisor melgar. >> you have three ayes. >> motion passes. thank you very much for attending director hillis. >> thank you, chair melgar. >> thank you. madam clerk will you please call the last item, number 4. >> ordinance amending the planning code to repeal article 12 which contains regulations governing land use activities associatessed with oil and glass exploration, development and possessing affirming the planning department's determination under the california environmenttal quality act. call 415-655-0001 and press pound twice. press star three to peak. >> madam chair. >> supervisor chan thank you for this piece of legislation. we continued it from last meeting. we did hear the presentation and took public comment on it. you know we held it because there were some amendments not ready by the city attorney. i will turn it over to you. >> thank you, chair melgar and thank you colleagues for area patience. my apologies it was not ready last week. i will jump into it. i am

our vice chair is supervisor peskin whom i'm going to excuse. our clerk is britney nolton.take our role. >> clerk: [roll call]

i mentioned chair haney, president walton, peskin, mar, ronen and chan as well. hopefully, that is a growing list. this effort as i mentioned is predicated on prop i passed last november with support of 58% of san francisco voters. the voters overwhelmingly approved prop i with the understanding the money would be split evenly between the rent relief and social housing in the first two years and later exclusively used for social housing and this board unanimously approved a resolution reflecting that understanding in august of 2020. the controller has projected that prop i, their original projections would generate approximately $128 million in new revenue this year. that's what this appropriation is based on. four months into the fiscal year we know that the actual amount raised is far exceeding that. it's already $82 million just in the first four months on phase 2, far exceeds the projected amount. in creating the housing stability fund, the board created a companion oversight board to provide guidance and recommendations on the use of prop i funds. despite de

our vice chair is supervisor peskin whom i'm going to excuse. our clerk is britney nolton. madam clerk, will you please take our role. >> clerk: [roll call] >> chairman: i also need to excuse commissioner ronen who is absent because of a family emergency. >> clerk: [roll call] supervisor safai. >> supervisor safai: absent. just kidding. no one reacted. i see you saying something, connie. i'm coming down to talk to you in a minute. bye. >> clerk: [roll call] we have quorum. >> chairman: great. thank you, madam clerk. i believe that you also have some announcements. >> clerk: i do. i'll have an announcement about public comment. call 4156550001 and when the prompt comes on the screen 24923008482 and then pound and pound again. once you join, you will be able to speak in the meeting as a participant. do not press star three again or you will be removed from the queue. when the system says your line is unmuted, you will be allowed to -- when your minutes are up, we will want the next caller. best practices are to speak slowly and clearly. if you wish to comment during the meeti