but i would submit that that is for ssly unfair comparison chamberlain, because at the time chamberlain had that paper that he got hitler to sign that caused him to say this is peace for our time, he said peace for our time, at the time chamberlain did that, hitler had not violated every international agreement he had entered. he hadn't done that. iran has. at the time that chamberlain said this is peace for our time, hitler had not been saying death to england. death to france. death to the countries. he had not been saying that. iranian leaders have been, including the eye tolla. at the time -- ayatolla. at the time that chamberlain said peace for our time, hitler had not publicly stated that he was plotting the overthrow of any of the countries in the area. iran has. they are plotting the overthrow of israel and to take out the united states. our friend tom cole said in the rules committee this week said that this agreement will be an arms race and he is exactly right. and that was confirmed as i was over that week. the saudis are working a deal to buy nukes. iran is going to have th

in 1938, chamberlain said, "peace for our time." we may wish he had been correct, but such an outcome was so unlikely, the deal so risky and ill-advised that it was merely a wish, albeit a dangerous and deadly wish. in 2015, secretary john kerry has called the current deal "a plan to ensure that iran does not ever possess or acquire a nuclear weapon." did you hear that, mr. president? not just for our time or for a decade but never, according to the distinguished secretary of state. president obama says this agreement marks one more chapter in this pursuit of a safer and more hopeful world. such statements have a familiar and troubling ring. such words could have been uttered in 19348. 19-- in 1938. and i wonder if mr. chamberlai mr. chamberlain's followers ever said in defense of o the action, this isn't such a good deal but what other choice do we have? i'm willing to bet some people actually said that. the other choice might have been to stand up against a murderous bully, to stand by a friend. mr. president, this resolution of d

this is the original letter that neville chamberlain brought home.is is the letter signed by neville chamberlain that he wrote to the hitler youth where he explained to the hitler youth that he had just met with their leader, and their leader wanted as much peace as neville chamberlain and the west did. upon his return the masses cheered as chamberlain stepped from his plane and announced peace in our day. but just as it was then it is now, a lie. there cannot be peace with anyone who chants for death of the jew. there can be no peace with people who chant for death of anyone. chamberlain's accord only gave evil more time uncontested to build the nazi war machine and genocide machine. peace in our day was the lie that hitler gave to the west. and it is the lie of the ayatollahs today. and today our acceptance of this lie is made out of ignorance, out of wishful thinking, out of desperation, out of party politics, or at worst collusion. frankly, it does not matter which it is. what matters is today the world must hear someone say this is a false premi

well, obama, i think, is pretty much like neville chamberlain. he's expecting to sign a peace agreement with the monster and we are all going to pay for it own the road once the ink is signed. the -- 1938 agreement lasted one year. war started in 1939. i think everyone here who are listening will pay a terrible price for what the democrat party has done and obama with israel and it's going to bury our country. host: more of your calls ahead. can you see we have been showing you the scene of reporters gathering waiting to hear from house speaker john boehner. about a half-hour we'll get to the house floor. they'll gavel in and begin consideration shortly thereafter. the rule for debate on three measures, the three pieces to the iran nuclear deal. remember they had originally, house had originally planned to take up a resolution of disapproval. that was changed yesterday. house rules met yesterday evening. so the plan is seven hours of debate on three separate measures. one would say that the president, administration, had not submitted enough info

at least, at least chamberlain can say hitler lied. at least chamberlain can say i negotiated with the furor, he -- with the fuhrer, he told me to my face if you give me, i'm done. we all know that chamberlain was a chump and hitler actually meant what he said when he wrote a book. the question is does this man mean what he says when he tweets yesterday? the ink is not dry on the deal. one thing you can say about the ayatollah, who is crazy, who is a religious nazi, at least he's honest. he doesn't want you to be confused as you vote as to what he wants to do to your friend israel. see, he doesn't want you to mistake what this deal means to him. you obviously are writing him off. you obviously believe he doesn't mean it. i guess he has a polling problem in iran. he's got to get his numbers up. he needs to say these things because he doesn't mean it but he has to keep his people happy because they like hearing this stuff. all i can tell you, his people tried to rise up against him in 2009, and our president said on the sidelines it didn

the other ones besides chamberlain and obama. i made one of president netanyahu and obama. see who you agree with. >> we cannot and will not allow a regime that calls for the destruction of israel to obtain the means to achieve this goal. we will not allow iran to have a nuclear weapons capability. >> we should be able to achieve a resolution that respects the rights of the iranian people, while giving the world confidence that the iranian program is peaceful. >> those international community who refuse to put red lines before iran, don't have a moral right to place a red light before israel. >> iran, cuba, venezuela, these countries are tiny compared to the soviet union. they don't pose a serious threat to us. >> iran will try to remove sanctions by offering cosmetic concessions while preserving its ability to rapidly build a nuclear weapon. >> our goal here is to be able to verify that iran does not have a nuclear weapon. >> i'm with prime minister netanyahu. now, that's a sad thing as an american i have to say that our president is naive to be negotiating with people tha

. >> this is the letter signed by neville chamberlain that he wrote to the hitler youth where he explained to the hitler youth that he had just met with their leader and their leader wanted as much peace as neville chamberlain and the west did. >> as president of the united states, were i there or any sane person be president of the united states, this is not tough at all. >> only in an orwellian obama world, full of fairy dust born from atop his unicorn as he is peeking through a kaleidoscope, would he see safety for america or israel in this treaty. >> we need to echo, never forget, never forget, never forget, never forget, never forget, never forget! >> in a lot of ways, today's rally was a throwback to the classic tea party protests of 2009 and 2010 complete with t-shirts calling obama various contradictory names and clever second amendment themed tank tops. given the iran deal focus, we got to see #jewish lives matter, ask god, and obama/hillary/kerry fulfilling hitler's dreams. a day after ted cruz found himself overshadowed, today was supposed to be his time to shine preaching to th

i look at this deal, and from the very beginning, the same way i think i looked at it when chamberlain came back with peace in our time. >> warner: so when you bring up the chamberlain example, are you essentially saying that wittingly or unwittingly those who support this deal are engaging in appeasement? >> i think so, absolutely. >> one of the big concerns for me as i reached my conclusion about this, is a concern about what i call the a word in the american jewish community which is appeasement. if i honestly thought this was appeasement, i wouldn't go anywhere close to it. >> warner: also playing a role in this debate are mixed feelings about both prime minister netanyahu and president obama. a majority of jews are democrat, and some have been offended by netanyahu inserting himself so vociferously into a u.s. domestic debate. >> he's the prime minister of a sovereign country. about which i care deeply. but the way he is intervening politically, i find deeply troubling. >> warner: yet schrager also harbors doubts about president obama's resolve to enforce the deal. >> i have been

. >> you compare obama's iran deal to neville chamberlain appeasing hitler in mune anything 1938.eally? >> yes. >> larry: that is bull [bleep]. jon was right. okay. so you are going to open with linking obama to hitler, that's how you are opening it. billy joel doesn't open with "piano man" did i just link piano man to hitler? sorry, billy joel. all right, but maybe it got better from there. what else did cheney have to say. >> we did a lot to limit nuclear proliferation in the region when you interest mr. opinions but the centrifuges went from 0 to 5,000. >> they may well but that happened on obama watch, not on ours. >> no, no, no, by 2005 they were at 5,000 -- >> no, no, no, no. no, not-- hold on a second, a few things here, number one, you just got caught in a lie, okay. number two, you didn't even act caught. you acted like we're in some sort of abusiveship where lying is to be expected, right. whatever, baby, you knew i lied when you started going with me. what? go get me some courvoisier. and number three, and probably the most important, if chris wallace hadn't called you

historical analogy that helps you understand this, go back to munich in '38, where churchill said of chamberlain, "you had a choice between war and dishonor. you chose the latter. you shall have the former, as well." >> that has to be the last word. we'll be right back with more "inside story." >> "inside story" is presented by temple university. temple fuels students with academics and opportunities to take charge. plugged into the city, powered by the world. temple.edu/takecharge. okay. so everyone is saying, "hey! you've gotta get fios! but why? why fios? well, fios is a 100 percent fiber optics networks to the home, so you can get 100% out of all your devices. and access to the fastest internet and in home wifi available. with big capacity too, so everyone in the house can be online all at once. only fios has 500 meg download speeds, with equal upload speeds. so you can upload your favorite videos up to 5x faster than cable. and with the fios mobile app, you can view your entertainment at home, or on the go. but the main reason to get fios? we're rated number 1 in customer satisfaction. why

chamberlain claimed his pact with the nazis would lead to peace for our time. in 2015 i spoke in opposition to the deal that led to the 2030 iranian nuclear attack because i well remember the words of the thee logeon van hoffer who died in a nazi torture chamber. he declared that silence in the face of evil is evil itself. god will not hold us guiltless. not to speak is to speak. not to act is to act. in 2015, many of us spoke, many of us acted but the powers of evil still won the day. and now the innocent dead of 30 call out with the question, how did the leaders of 2015 let this happen? the answer is simple and sad, because despite our best efforts we couldn't stop the deal that funded, armed and unleashed nuclear hell from the mad men of iran. we allowed the power and persistence of the foolish to deliver a corrupt contract with a nation of terror, and in 2030, the day of reckoning arrived. and for that i'm truly very, very sorry. may god have mercy on us all. the speaker pro tempore: the time of the gentleman has expired. the chair recognizes the gentleman

barack obama makes chamberlain look like patton.s the iranian terrorist regime to inspect its own nuclear sites, to continue uranium enrichment, to build advanced centrifuges, to perfect their icbms, to spend $150 billion on terrorism and in the end to secure nuclear warheads and as one democrat after another, one congo line of democrat after another supports this surrender it's clear that the democrats no longer represent the party of hillary-- harry truman and john f. kennedy. it's now the democrat party of bill ayres, and barack obama. and the democrat party will have the blood on its hand as a result of this deal for the rest of time. lets me be clear, this deal sows the seeds of war. the enemy is emboldened and the enemy will be well armed and seek regional and world domination keratotomy no? they told us so. what of the republicans? the republicans, the republicans control that building behind us right now. you see that scaffolding up their? they should take some of that and use it on their dm spies. [cheers and applause] >> t

in 1938, chamberlain said, "peace for our time." we may wish he had been correct, but such an outcome was so unlikely, the deal so risky and ill-advised that it was merely a wish, albeit a dangerous and deadly wish. in 2015, secretary john kerry has called the current deal "a plan to ensure that iran does not ever possess or acquire a nuclear weapon." did you hear that, mr. president? not just for our time or for a decade but never, according to the distinguished secretary of state. president obama says this agreement marks one more chapter in this pursuit of a safer and more hopeful world. such statements have a familiar and troubling ring. such words could have been uttered in 19348. 19-- in 1938. and i wonder if mr. chamberlai mr. chamberlain's followers ever said in defense of o the action, this isn't such a good deal but what other choice do we have? i'm willing to bet some people actually said that. the other choice might have been to stand up against a murderous bully, to stand by a friend. mr. president, this resolution of d

being likened to nevill chamberlain. sound familiar? the conservative national review magazine in may of 1987 had a cover with the title "reagan's suicide pact." president reagan eventually agreed but then secretary of state schultz -- with then- secretary of state schultz that arms control would and improve national security. in december of 1987, reagan and gorbachev signed the intermediate-range nuclear forces treaty of, comightd the two super-- committing the two superpowers to eliminate all our conventional and ground-launched comistles with ranges of -- missiles with ranges of 50 to 500 meters. this was the first on-site negotiations for verification. do you know who coined the phrase "trust but verify"? it was op ronald reagan in his negotiations with the soviet union. it took five months after this agreement was reached for this chamber to vote 93-5 in favor of that treaty at a time when the democrats had a majority. i could go through the long list of democratic senators who supported president ronald reagan in his efforts to tr

derschwitz goes on to ask if we have learned nothing from north korea and from neville chamberlain. for those who the chamber who are not history buffs, let me explain how i interpret mr. derschwitz' question. in 1994, the united states and north korea agreed to a road map for the denuclearization of the korean peninsula. several rounds of six-party talks were held between 2003-2009. but north korea continues nuclear tests and -- pardon me. but north korea continues nuclear tests and ballistic missile launches. the president seems to be heading down a similar path with iran. as for neville chamberlain, he was the british prime minister when england entered into world war ii. he is best known for his policy of appeasing germany in advance of world war ii, signing the munich pact that gave part of then chief czechoslovakia to germany. germany avoided that pact and then invaded poland. should we really think that the supreme leader who calls us satan will abide by the deal? he does so by pointing out the enormous deal between the -- difference between the deal that dismantles iran's nu

being likened to chamberlain. the national review magazine, in may, had a cover with the title, reagan's suicide pact. president reagan agreed that arms control could and would improve u.s. national security. in 1987, reagan signed the intermediate forces treaty, committing the two superpowers to eliminate all their missiles with ranges of 500 to 5,500 kilometers. this treaty, soviet union arms treaty relied on expensive on-site negotiations. do you remember, trust but verify? it was ronald reagan in his negotiations with the soviet union. it took fiveing month -- it took 5 months to agree. because of that agreement, more than 2,000 missiles were destroyed. our relationship with the soviet union didn't improve overnight and we still have our problems with them today. going back to what i said earlier, the russian's sat on the same side of the table in this negotiation, to end or delay the threat of nuclear power in iran. imagine if 47 senators with reagan had written, in the middle of those negotiations and said,

finally, they are preparing to run newspaper ads this month savaging ronald reagan as a new neville chamberlain, signing an accord with hitler, and protecting, quote, peace for our time. these were conservative republican critics of ronald reagan, who was negotiating with the soviet union to try to limit the spread of nuclear weapons being likened to neville chamberlain. sound familiar? the conservative national review magazine in may 1987 had a cover with the title, reagan's suicide pact. president reagan eventually agreed within secretary of state schultz that arms control could and would improve u.s. national security. in 1987, reagan and gorbachev signed the treaty, committing the two superpowers to eliminate all their nuclear ground launch and ballistic cruise missiles with ranges of 500 to 5500 kilometers. this treaty, the reagan-gorbachev treaty, was one of the first to rely on expensive on-site negotiations for verification. you remember who coined the phrase, trust but verify? it was ronald reagan. it has negotiations with the soviet union. it took five months after ronald reagan reach

history has proven whether those strive just to have peace like chamberlain, he never achieved freedom. the best example is reagan late in his second term where he's in iceland with gorbachev. he sits down, pretty much gets almost everything he asked for. gorbachev asked for that one last item, to end the research of s.d.i. reagan said no, but i'll share. gorbachev said no. regularans got up and walked away from the table. had reagan not left, would the berlin wall have collapsed? would the soviet union collapsed? peace without freedom is meaningless. a little sidenote. realize call -- do you what our current president barack obama has in common with jimmy carter? both those presidents won the nobel peace price. reagan did not, but he brought more freedom. the fourth peace of advice would come from reagan. he would tell us, seek the truth about our enemies and ourselves. we can't be afraid to call the enemy what it is -- radical islamic terrorism. we also can't be afraid to say the truth about america. we are exceptional and we are the force for good in the world. as reagan said at the

wilt chamberlain and marcus haines. great guys. we are bringing the tour to new york city after christmas. december 27. go online, get your tickets. they are on sale now. barclays center. and harlem globetrotters. >> we can vote on which ones you guys are going to wear, right? >> yeah, on the website. harlemglobetrotter.com. vote on the uniform. angela simmons designed them. >> how did you get involved and how do you learn to do all the tricks you all do? >> good question. we have training camp next week. so we have to work on our craft. we work on, i would say, antics. you know, confetti, water bucket. it's just about getting better, working on spins and becoming a better basketball player and a better person. >> beautiful. >> beautiful smile, too. >> thank you. >> well, you can vote on which uniform the style of the globetrotters will wear during the 90th anniversary world tour by visiting cbs 7ny. >> happy ninth anniversary. >> we are not done yet. he is a copycat. >> michael jo so, i needed to deposit a check. i was about to he

. >> you compare obama's deal to neville chamberlain and hitler in 1938. really? >> yes. when you look to the respect of the iranian deal, the only winner were the iranians who got everything they asked for. the losers are the united states, are the friends and allies of the united states in the region, israelis, saudis and others. the overall outcome, i think, will be the shift significantly to balance the power in that part of the world for the iranians. i think they will end up dominating, partly not because of the nuclear deal but because of the embargo and ballistic missiles and conventional weapons. so i think it's a major defeat in my mind in terms of the opposition in the region. >> but secretary of state kerry says if the u.s. backs out now, that our european allies in the u.n. will lift their sanctions and will be all alone. here's a clip. >> it is clear that if we reject this plan, the multi-lateral sanctions regime will start to unravel. the pressure on iran will-lesson and our negotiating leverage will diminish if not disappear. >> liz, kerry says that there'

cena, the guys from "impractical jokers" one more time. [ cheers and applause ] thank you jimmy chamberlain happening gang? carson here with tonight's "last call" from kroq and coming white fence from los angles is the music from burgerama.

cena, the guys from "impractical jokers" one more time. [ cheers and applause ] thank you jimmy chamberlain, and also the 8g band. stay tuned for "carson daly." we'll see you tomorrow. in ha >> carson: what's happening gang? carson here with tonight's "last call" from kroq and coming white fence from los angles is the music from burgerama. we got cory branan in our snapshot. but first up, brian unger returns to the show to talk about his latest hosting gig, hosting the new travel channel series "time traveling with brian unger." here's tonight's "last call" spotlight. i'm trying to appear on a horse in ever single show, even when it's not appropriate. new orleans jazz history? i gottsobe on a horse. nasa? i gotta be on a horse. i ask the producers every time, can we get a horse involved here? and they say, "brian, we'll see what we can do." which is a producer's way of saying no. but did you know that john wilkes booth's get away horse had one eye? >> is that relevant? >> it's not relevant but it's an interesting fact. >> if that horse had two eyes -- >> one eye. he would've gotten away wit

vice president, in your book you compare obama's deal to neville chamberlain apiecing really? >> yes, if you look at what happened with respect to the iranian deal, the only winner are the iranians. they got everything they asked for. the losers are the united states, are the friends and allies of the united states, the israelis, saudis and others. the overall outcome will be to shift significantly the balance of power in that part of the world to the iranians. i think they'll end up dominating because of the nuclear deal and the lifting of the embargo and on conventional weapons. i think it's a big deal, a major major defeat in my mind in terms of our position in the region. >> and but secretary of state kerry says if the u.s. backs out now, that our european allies and the u.n. will lift their alone. here's a clip. >> it is clear if we reject this plan, the multilateral sanctions regime will start to unravel. the pressure on iran will lessen. and our negotiating leverage will gish d diminish if not disappear. >> liz kerry says there's no deal. >> well, you know, secretary ke

favorite things in the state, pittsburgh beat philadelphia as city you will want to live, wilt norman chamberlain is state's greatest athlete and bradley cooper is favorite living pennsylvanians, topping kevin bacon and taylor swift. >>> sister radio station wogl is holding its annual radio thon benefiting children's hospital. >> ukee joined the crew this afternoon. he was in there. i was outside answering phones, as they helped raise funds for the the important work of one of the best hospitals in the country, over the last 13 years wogl radio-a-thon has raised more than six million-dollar for children's hospital. >> they do a great job, young lady at chop a few days ago, sage, from south jersey, she had a a form of leukemia. sage just graduated high school last spring, and last week started a freshman year at will accounts. the she's studying to be a pediatric oncology nurse. >> wow. >> fantastic work over there a special, special day for all. >>> there is still time to help children who could, use it. two day radio-a-thon continues through 7:00 o'clock tonight and then starts bright and early

vice president you compare iran's deal to chamberlain and munich in 1938. really? you look what happened with respect to the iranian deal the only inners are the iranians getting everything they asked for. the losers are the united states, the friends and allies of the united states in the region, israelis, saudis and others and the overall outcome will be to shift significantly the balance of power in that part of the world to the iranians and they will dominate not because of the ago deal but because of the lifting of the embargo and ballistic missiles. it is a big deal and major, major defeat in my behind in terms of our position in the region. >> the is the state kerry said if the united states backs out now our european allies in the u.n. will lit their sanctions and we will be all alone. shear a clip. >> it and clear that if we reject this plan the multi-lateral sanctions regime will start to unravel and the pressure on iran will lessen and our negotiating leverage will diminish if not disappear. >> there is no chance according to john kerry of negotiating a

the one thing you can say about chamberlain, at least hitler lied. at least he told him this is all i want. you cannot say that about this deal. the ink is not even dry, and they still chance death to america, death to israel. what i would suggest, ladies and gentlemen, if you are looking to us, and created a deterrent for us, you made a huge mistake. why should we put that burden on our friends in israel? that is not the answer to this dilemma to assume that israel will deter iran. the answer to this dilemma is to make sure that america reasserts herself. time to set the world back in order before it gets completely out of hand. one thing i can say about israel a new beer weapons. -- and nuclear weapons. not one arab state has felt the need to go down the nuclear road because of israel's nuclear weapons. think about that. it is widely believed that israel has a stockpile of nuclear weapons. every arab let -- leader believes that. not one arab leader has felt the need to acquire one to counter israel -- why? they believe israel will not wake up and w

we have all heard about chamberlain, or his major. there was a bayonet charge. not far from here, on this spotsylvania, the week starting the assaults that week of may 10, there was reportedly tremendous bayonet fighting and along those entrenchments could there is an example of kennesaw mountain where soldiers engaged with the bayonet. but is not the primary weapon it was in previous wars. to look at how the rank and file viewed bayonets and shifting to that, we take a look at the army in tennessee, june 1863, lieutenant colonel arthur fremantle, the british of hisr, gained most fame because he's tagging along with the army in northern virginia at gettysburg. this is fremantle as he was dressed during his time in the united states. he did not wear his regimental uniform. this is how he generally dressed. he started his visit with the army of tennessee around the time of the tennessee campaign, and he was shocked to see half the army of tennessee did not have bayonets, which is corroborated by the returns for the regiment at that time. he asked around about it a

history has proven that most strive to have police like chamberlain. they never achieve freedom. the best example is reagan late in his second term. when he is in iceland with gorbachev. he sits down and pretty much gets almost everything he asks more. gorbachev asked for the one last item, to end the research of fbi. reagan said no but offered him something more, a share. gorbachev said no. reagan got up and walked away from the table. left, with the berlin wall have collapsed, with the soviet union have collapsed? peace without freedom is meaningless. a little side note. do you realize what the current president barack obama has? those two presidents both won prize.el peace reagan did not, what brought people freedom. reagan would say, speak the truth about our enemies and ourselves. we cannot be afraid to call the enemy what it is. radical, islamic terrorism. we also cannot be afraid to say the truth about america. we are exceptional. we are the force for good in the world. as reagan said at the world institute of national affairs and london, when three people cease telling th

chamberlain made a deal with a adolr hitler and that turned out very well. we know that's the same kind of deal. host: do you want to start? guest: i don't think it is that disastrous. i think this is a challenge for us to be able to, you know, look back at periods of time when we thought we were achieving a certain degree of peace and in reality we were mortgaging the situation to later on. and it is a very bitter harvest at the end. so i think this is what the real challenge is with this deal, that we are going to have some capacity to be able to maintain, constrain iran for the first 10 or 15 years. in reality, once you are past the hurdles, iran, yes, the ability to breakthrough that regime, the inspections reseem is something that is going to be difficult for the international community to snap back all the sanctions, put back military pressure, because 15 years from now, this is a totally different world. host: mr. parsi. guest: these comparisons to munich is an example of the fear propaganda. there is absolutely no compare son between these situations

at least, at least chamberlain can say hitler lied. at least chamberlain can say i negotiated with the furor, he -- with the fuhrer, he told me to my face if you give me, i'm done. we all know that chamberlain was a chump and hitler actually meant what he said when he wrote a book. the question is does this man mean what he says when he tweets yesterday? the ink is not dry on the deal. one thing you can say about the ayatollah, who is crazy, who is a religious nazi, at least he's honest. he doesn't want you to be confused as you vote as to what he wants to do to your friend israel. see, he doesn't want you to mistake what this deal means to him. you obviously are writing him off. you obviously believe he doesn't mean it. i guess he has a polling problem in iran. he's got to get his numbers up. he needs to say these things because he doesn't mean it but he has to keep his people happy because they like hearing this stuff. all i can tell you, his people tried to rise up against him in 2009, and our president said on the sidelines it didn

history has proven when those strive just to have peace, like chamberlain, never achieved freedom.ample is reagan, late in his second term, where he is in iceland with gorbachev. he sits down, pretty much gets almost everything he asked for. but gore chaff asked for that one last item. to end the research of fbi. reagan said, no, but offered him something more. i'll share. gorbachev said no. reagan got up and walked away from the table. had reagan not left with the berlin wall have collapsed? would the soviet union have collapsed? peace without freedom is meaningless. little side note. do you realize that our current president, barack obama, has with the president before reagan, jimmy carter, those two presidents won the nobel peace prize. reagan did not. but who brought people nor freedom? the fourth built of advice would come from reagan. he would tell us, speak the truth about our enemies and ourselves. we can't be afraid to call the enemy what it is. radical islamic terrorism. but we also can't be afraid to say the truth about america. we are exceptional. we are the force for g

you know, history has shown chamberlain just wanted peace. history has shown at other times in america where presidents have stood up and stepped back and got a better agreement. ronald reagan wanted to end the nuclear weapons when it came to the soviet union. in the end of ronald reagan's second term he sat in iceland with gorbachev. he sat down across the table and he got almost everything he had asked for, but gorbachev asked for one more item. he asked that america would end their f.d.i. investment. ronald reagan had a choice. ronald reagan said no, but he said, i'll do something even better. i'll provide you the technology as well so everyone in the world could be safe. gosh shaff said no -- gorbachev said no. so that's a defining moment, not for that man but for this world, and ronald reagan got up and walked away. some people criticized on political basis, but i ask you this -- would the soviet union have collapsed with the berlin -- or the berlin wall collapsed at the time it did had reagan kept his firm and word for a better deal? pe

history has proven when those strive just to have peace like chamberlain, never achieved freedom. best example is reagan late in his second term. he sits down pretty much gets almost everything he asks for. gorbachev asks for that one last item, to end the research of sdi. reagan said, no. he offered him something more. i'll share. gorbachev said no. reagan got up and walked away from the table. had reagan not left with the berlin wall had collapsed. peace without freedom is meaningless. little side note. do you realize what our current president has with the president before ronald reagan, jimmy carter? those two presidents both won the nobel peace prize. reagan did not. who brought people more freedom? the fourth bit of advice would come from reagan. he would tell us speak the truth about our enemies and ourselves. we can't be afraid to call the enemy what it is. radical, islamic terrorism. but we also can't be afraid to say the truth about america. we are exceptional. we are the force for good in the world. as reagan said at the royal institution of national affairs in london,

obama doing like a chamberlain. what doesn't make difference if they are -- by lion or 100 white coyotes. iran is run by medieval preachers causing all problems in syria, lebanon and iraq. and military iranian are too much inferior. obama want iraq to have lots of arabs and the war in iraq was a just war. the problem, they did not break it evenly between sunni and shia. let me tell you one thing. i'm an agnostic. there is no love left for obama. i talk to syria every day. this lady talking out of her has. obama is an insult. and eisenhower kicked israel d and -- iran need to be bumped. iran is nothing but menace. you know what they say? the evil will win when good man do nothing. i'm fully behind the man from rhode island. i'm muslim and have no problem with israel. the jews in israel are realist i ic. all my friend jews. i'm a retired professor. i have a problem with iran fanatics. obama put red line. she's talking sympathy. my daughter lives there. she should talk two years ago when assad gassed people and obama p

weber: neville chamberlain spoke to the crowds. he said the settlement of the czechoslovakia problem has been achieved. he said this morning i had another talk with german chanceler hitler and here's his signature that bears mine. we see this as symbolic of the our two peoples never to go to war again. later that day he read again. he said, my good friends, for the second time in our history a british prime minister has returned from germany bringing peace with honor. he said, i believe it is a peace for our time. we thank you from the bottom of our hearts. go home and get a nice quiet sleep. mr. speaker, we all know how that turned out. y friends, if this deal passes and make no mistake, it is quite a deal for iran, americans will not get a quiet night's sleep as long as barack hussein obama is in office aiding the iranian terrorist regime, we will not be safe and americans will not sleep well. this is a bad deal. you don't argue. you don't make deals with the devil. deals with the enemy. do we not learn from history? did we not l