melgar i chair chan i chan i we have three eyes. thank you. and the motion passes. thank you. and with that, mr. clerk, please call item seven. yes. item number seven is a resolution approving and authorizing the director of the mayor's office of housing and community development to execute an amended and restated loan agreement with sunnydale phase three infrastructure, llc for a total loan amount not to exceed approximately 52.4 million. to finance the third phase of infrastructure improvements and housing development related to the revitalization and master development of up to 1770 units of replacement public housing, affordable housing, and market rate housing, commonly known as the sunnydale hope sf development or sunnydale project, and adopting findings that the loan agreement is consistent with the adopted mitigation monitoring and reporting program under the california environmental quality act, the general plan, and the eight priority policies of the planning code. madam chair, thank you and, please go ahead and with your presentatio

chan i chan i we have five ayes. thank you.and the motion passes. and with that i am going to go to sfpuc. and then also to call items. after. after. then we'll call item 11 through 13. ten. yes madam chair and members of the committee, our recommendations for the public utilities commission are summarized on page 38 of our report. a recommended reduction to the proposed budget. total $4,795,592 in fiscal year 24, 25 of that amount, $4,506,936 are ongoing savings, and $286,656 are one time savings. these reductions would still allow an increase of $232,138,474, or 13, in the department's fiscal year 2425 budget. our recommended reductions to the proposed budget total $6,049,702 in fiscal year 25, 26. of that amount, $5,621,067 are ongoing savings, and $428,635 are one time savings. these recommendations sorry, these reductions would still allow an increase of 129,000 219,000 $129,219,384, or 6.6. 4, in the fiscal department's fiscal year 2526 budget. our understanding is that we have agreement on all of our recommendations with

chair chan. i had the same concerns as supervisor mandelman. i mean, if you're saying we're going to continue having conversations and talk more about this, then i'm okay with that because i know the director of the hrc was here to, present more of what our budget, the mayor's budget team was discussing. but i do just want to say, like, i have to say this publicly, philosophically, we budget for two years, but we do not budget for two years. our budget is a year budget. and we come back next year and do it all over again. so to say that these these are second year costs will come back to the table next year. and this thing will be baked and cooked and look different. so we don't budget two years in san francisco regardless of what we say, i beg to differ when it comes to people. i agree that when it comes to like, i should say when it comes to like employees and city workers, it is true that we don't budget for contracts and from time to time in grants that like by two years, sometimes actually w

chan i chan i we have five ayes. thank you.and the motion passes. and with that i am going to go to sfpuc. and then also to call items. after. after. then we'll call item 11 through 13. ten. yes madam chair and members of the committee, our recommendations for the public utilities commission are summarized on page 38 of our report. a recommended reduction to the proposed budget. total $4,795,592 in fiscal year 24, 25 of that amount, $4,506,936 are ongoing savings, and $286,656 are one time savings. these reductions would still allow an increase of $232,138,474, or 13, in the department's fiscal year 2425 budget. our recommended reductions to the proposed budget total $6,049,702 in fiscal year 25, 26. of that amount, $5,621,067 are ongoing savings, and $428,635 are one time savings. these recommendations sorry, these reductions would still allow an increase of 129,000 219,000 $129,219,384, or 6.6. 4, in the fiscal department's fiscal year 2526 budget. our understanding is that we have agreement on all of our recommendations with

chan i chan i we have five eyes. thank you. and the motion passes. and now that we are going to continue these conversations, let's i. we also have a budget and finance committee schedule at 1030. so what i'm going to do now is that we're going to go on recess. to 2:00, and, but i don't think we need a motion for that because it's less than 12 hours. no, madam chair, thank you. and so that with that, the budget and appropriation committee is on recess. budget and finance. he's going to ask me. what do you mean? let us know. sfgovtv, i see what you mean. i am ready, i can go, aaron and shamann. all right, so two. here. aaron.

chan i. we have three eyes. thank you. and the motion passes. thank you. and i just wanted to say we hope you will be able to enjoy the wag brigade today, as they are here from 10 a.m. to 230. in case you need any doggy cuddles. so thank you so much. room 278. room 278. thank you. forward to it, and with that, mr. clerk, please call item number five. yes. item number five is a resolution authorizing adoption of the san francisco mental health services act. three year program and expenditure, or integrated plan for fiscal years 2023 through 2026. madam chair, thank you. and today we have our department of public health. it's quite a long title. the office of justice, equity, diversity and inclusion, behavioral health services. yes. thank you. thank you. supervisors, hello. my name is jessica brown. as i stated, i'm the director of the office of justice, equity, diversity and inclusion and the behavioral health services act. i am here today to present to you the three year integrated plan for f

chair chan. i just want to associate myself with the comments of the chair and just also just state for the record, i think it's a major slap in the face that we're eliminating community ambassadors for communities like bayview-hunters point, visitacion valley, where we have lots of monolingual speaking seniors and families, and also on our muni lines. but yet we are providing resources for folks to give directions to tourists, that's very problematic for me, and i really think it's a slap in the face to the residents here in san francisco. and so again, i just want to associate my comments with supervisor chan, we have constituents and residents that we have to look out for, and most certainly a budget item like this doesn't feel like we're being equitable across san francisco. thank you. supervisor melgar. thank you, chair chan. so i thank you very much. director phillips, i really appreciate the, you know, your, sort of vision and what you are putting forward, i have, misgivings about some of

chair chan. this is though a currently operating shelter, right? that is correct. yes. and i mean, i regardless of what happens with the current operator, i would imagine that we're not anticipating. i mean, you're not suggesting that this money would somehow become available to us because we would be shutting this shelter down. that's correct. we're not recommending that this money be cut from the budget, but put put on reserve so that the committee can have the department come back and provide updates on progress or lack thereof, in oversight of this organization that is having some challenges. okay. i kind of get where vice chair mandelman is going to because i am in agreement with that. i think the goal is not to reduce or, or, cut out funding for the for oasis hotel. we want to continue to fund the services on site to support the family. it's something that we, the families is something that we, we want to do. i think the question more or less is that whether providence foundation is given i

chair chan second. and then, with that, a roll call for the motion for continuance to the call chair to the cult or till next thursday. whatever. the call of the chair is. fine because i think let's do call the chair so. very well. create a little bit flexible. yes. on that motion by member melgar, seconded by chair chan, that this ordinance be continued to the call of the chair. vice chair mandelman mandelman absent member melgar. aye. melgar i member walton. walton i member. peskin. peskin. absent. chair. chan i chan i we have three eyes for the vice chair, mandelman and member. peskin absent. thank you. the motion passes. before i do, let the department of early childhood go though, i just wanted to actually again reiterate, just like any city departments that i have stated before, i think that the budget and legislative analyst, you know, team is going to really comb through every city department and, just really scrutinize both the ftes existing fte. we have done this before. i think, last year as

supervisor chan chan i. supervisor dorsey. dorsey i supervisor engardio engardio.i supervisor mandelman i mandelman i supervisor melgar. melgar i supervisor peskin i. peskin i supervisor preston. preston i supervisor. ronen i. ronen i supervisor safaÍ. safaÍ. i supervisor stephanie. stephanie i and supervisor walton i walton i there are 11 eyes the motion is adopted. madam clerk are there any immemorially? i have none to report. mr. president, we are adjourned. >> (music). >> my name is - my business name is himself mexican america. >> i started my business a year ago the process was a year ago by business by waving (background noise.) about $1,000 and also guided me there the whole process. (background noise.) that was helpful i was already paying the construction and other fees for the restaurant the city we put together to honor my city and comes with (unintelligible) on the (background noise.) and. >> (multiple voices.) >> and some go with ebbs and eggs (unintelligible) and a side of roadways and beans. and be able - have my restaurant here in the district of t

supervisor chan.ust the department is asking for some serious waivers and they have a bad track record of managing projects. so i understand that part of what we're doing here today is handing this over to public works, which i have a lot more confidence in. they do a tremendous job in most cases, but what i want to understand the genesis of this, and i also would like to know what the list of projects are. supervisor chan , did you want to chair. thank you. chair walton, through the chair, first, i wanted to have our deputy city attorney and pearson here to actually explain a little bit about the legislation itself. and this is clearly actually, first of all, i am the legislation, sponsor and i initiated this as a, as a way to really talk about, discuss the sense of urgency. we, as you know, as also commission on the county transportation authority have time and time questioned, sfmta why these vision zero projects have been long delayed and i have really requested and thanks to our deputy city attor

chan i chan i we have four eyes with member. peskin. absent thank you. and the motion passes, so with that, i just want to be on the record. we did not today make decision and acted on items 12 apart. the park code, court reservations fee, as well as item 13, which is the appropriation for the assessment appeal fee. and so those two items still need to be, acted on within, by by wednesday, of next week. so with that mr. clerk, do we have any other business before us today? madam chair, just a bit of housekeeping. pardon me. this is always an awkward part. okay, so, so we did declare items one. five. six. seven. eight and nine. ten. 11. 14 and 14. as decided and acted upon on this body. and we have the undecided matters of items two, three and four, which is the hearing and the appropriation and salary ordinance and. important part 12 and 13 legislation. yes. 12 is still undecided. 13 undecided. and, 15 undecided. and 16 and 17 undecided. oh, yeah. because those are the legislation we need to add it on tomorrow, colleagues. for the for the city department

please call the roll,. >> clerk: motion to excuse member chan. vice chair stefani. >> aye. >> clerk: chair preston. >> aye. >> increase daily occupancy to less than 60 to increase occupancy amount from less 130 to less than 149 dollars and to require review in the september 27, 2027 through september 2029 time fwraim by the controller of the exemption amount for the purpose of considering adjustments in the amount. >> thank you and we have sunny angulo for president peskin, here today, the floor is yours. >> hi guys, i i'll be quick, i think this is the second time that we have adjusted the xem ption for what is called hotel tax, i think right now it's 14 percent, for hotels, airbnb and the reason we start today do it in like 2021 because we had amended in the airbnb agreement the settlement agreement. so this essentially after the controller and i admit i don't know the mythology or how the controller comes to this, just augmenting or reducing the amount, the threshold that you have to meet in terms of revenue that you collect if you're paying a

chan i chan i we have four eyes with member. peskin absent. thank you. motion passes . would you like to make a motion to full board? we'll make the motion to full board. so i would also like to make a motion that we move this forward to the full board, with a positive recommendation, as amended. second and a roll call. and on that motion by member melgar, seconded by chair chan, that this, that this ordinance be forwarded to the seven nine, to the july 9th, full board meeting with a positive recommendation. vice chair mandelman mandelman i member melgar i. melgar i member walton. walton i member. peskin. peskin. absent chair. chan i chan i we have four eyes with member. peskin absent. thank you. and the motion passes. thank you. and then with that, if i may, i'm going to call up the. i'm going to call things a little bit out of the order. the department of children, youth and their families. and with that, mr. clerk, could you please call item seven? yes, madam chair, item seven is a resolution approving a grant agreement for a contract for the japanese

chair chan.d afternoon, supervisor melgar. supervisor walton, thanks for the opportunity to return and discuss the recommendations, as noted, we are in agreement with the recommendation recommended reductions. with the exception of the recommendation that pertains to the downtown enhancement. we look forward to getting that and getting into that with you. we also have a few slides to address some of the questions raised by the policy recommendations on downtown enhancement and the welcome, ambassador, before we begin, i did just want to clarify, and i know this has been an issue for supervisor walton, that the budget reduction impact on our cid and workforce programs, given the realignment in dki funding, which you heard about last week, is less than looked on the sheet. so just to clarify, again, workforce reductions absent outside of the dki realignment, total 4.3 million. and community economic development reductions outside of dki realignment totaled 2.58 million. great. thank you. alessandra

chan i chan i we have five ayes. thank you. and the motion passes.and with that, supervisor melgar. thank you, chair chan. so i do have questions about the ambassador program, but i think that's why my colleague, supervisor preston, is here, so i'm going to, like, let him tackle that one, my questions are about, you and i have talked about this before. our plan to electrify our fleet, and, you know, i notice that what is in your plan is what is funded by the state, but i didn't see anything specifically about, you know, like, like an overall comprehensive plan to move the departments towards both purchasing those vehicles and, you know, the electrification improvements that the infrastructure improvements that are needed for that, but i also noticed that some of your costs are going up because we need to dig up and replace the underground storage tanks, as is mandated by the state of california by next year. so i'm wondering if we've done a, you know, an analysis of a cost benefit analysis of, of that specific thing. so we have to dig it up and we ha

chan i chan i we have five ayes. the motion passes. so, i assume we don't have any other business, that concludes our business, madam chair. thank you. the meeting. today's meeting is adjourned. >> i don't want to be involved in the process after it happens. i want to be there at the front end to help people with something in my mind from a very early age. our community is the important way to look at things, even now. george floyd was huge. it opened up wounds and a discussion on something festering for a long time. before rodney king. you can look at all the instances where there are calls for change. i think we are involved in change right now in this moment that is going to be long lasting. it is very challenging. i was the victim of a crime when i was in middle school. some kids at recess came around at pe class and came to the locker room and tried to steal my watch and physically assaulted me. the officer that helped afterwards went out of his way to check the time to see how i was. that is the kind of work, the kind of perspect

peskin i peskin i chair chan i chan i we have five ayes. thank you. the motion passes and with that we'll go to the mayor's office. good morning. supervisors. there's one policy recommendation outstanding for the mayor's office budget. and i'll refer to dan gonter from the bla to speak to that recommendation. and then i can respond, oh, thank thank you, through the chair. so this, policy considerations on page 33 of our report and the policy consideration is for a position in the mayor's office. it's a mayoral staff. seven. and, what we say is that the board could consider deletion of a vacant mayoral staff seven position for the. and the position has supported some of the work of the office of victim services and broader police alternatives. work being led and facilitated by the mayor's office in collaboration with other departments. the incumbent in this position was just reassigned to the office of victim and witness rights, and so it's now vacant. and so we believe that deletion of this position, it would result in general fund savings of $149,388

chan i, chan i, we have five eyes. thank you. and the motion passes. mr. clerk, please call item number two. yes. item number two is a hearing to discuss the controller's nine month budget status report for fiscal year 2023 to 2024. and yes, thank you, madam chair. thank you. and today we have the controller's office here. thank you so much. good afternoon. supervisors michelle al-azma from the controller's office, i have a very short deck of slides to go through, to present the contents of our nine month budget status update, which is talking about the current fiscal year. so not the budget. i think they're coming up. are you going to bring the slides up? it's already on your screen on your computer actually, through the chair. it should be right on the desktop. it should, it should be right in the middle. got it. sorry, i didn't see it. okay okay. i have it pulled up. i'll just get going, the bottom line kind of improvement from our last report is. and this is covering the general fund again, is $28.5 million from our previous report, which was in march,

peskin i peskin i chair chan i chan i we have five ayes. thank you.otion passes and with that we'll go to the mayor's office. good morning. supervisors. there's one policy recommendation outstanding for the mayor's office budget. and i'll refer to dan gonter from the bla to speak to that recommendation. and then i can respond, oh, thank thank you, through the chair. so this, policy considerations on page 33 of our report and the policy consideration is for a position in the mayor's office. it's a mayoral staff. seven. and, what we say is that the board could consider deletion of a vacant mayoral staff seven position for the. and the position has supported some of the work of the office of victim services and broader police alternatives. work being led and facilitated by the mayor's office in collaboration with other departments. the incumbent in this position was just reassigned to the office of victim and witness rights, and so it's now vacant. and so we believe that deletion of this position, it would result in general fund savings of $149,388, but

chair chan has been leading on. and just wanted to before before turning it back over to the committee, i do want to ask you on the small sites, just what the, current balances for small sites, acquisitions. supervisor preston, so last year at this time, we talked about small sites, balances and, and what we've done and what you'll see. i believe in the blass report when it's issued, i guess at the beginning of next week, they, they will include a specific table that shows all of the projects that we talked about last year at this time, all the small sites, projects, as well as some additional ones that we have been able to fund and all of the various small sites, funding sources and balances. so how we're funding each of those projects, but at the end of fiscal 24, 25, we are currently projecting that we would carry over into the next fiscal year $5 million, that sorry, at the end of 23, 24. sorry, at the end of so we have a list of known projects that we know are going forward in this in the next few months and or

chair chan. members of the committee, dan gonter with the budget and legislative analyst's office. item eight is a proposed ordinance that would authorize the department of public health to bypass the competitive solicitation requirements of the administrative code. chapter 21 g. for the purpose of providing a one time grant to planned parenthood northern california. the grant would provide funding in an amount not to exceed 456,000 for up to a two year term for security personnel at the planned parenthood in san francisco. as you might recall, on april 2023, the board of supervisors approved an ordinance authorizing the department of public health to award a $400,000 grant to planned parenthood without adhering to the competitive solicitation requirements. according to df staff. the grant will fund planned parenthood's ongoing contract with ludlow security, which provides planned parenthood with 2 to 3 guards six days a week for 8 to 12 hours per day. the agreement has a two year term that begin

chair chan. reasonable to ask for, detail about operations. i also think it is something that we can probably get before the board meeting. and i think, you know, particularly for not knowing a ton about, you know, what's going to happen in this space. i do know that we have you know, we're cutting the funding for street violence intervention, you know, it's there are there are concerns about a tough summer. so i think we probably should be, you know, trying to support efforts to give kids things to do that are not bad. so i would be inclined to support this. director pinnock, i'm sorry, chair chan, you asked me about, retroactivity. i can speak to that issue if you want to hear, the 141 industrial lease is not. retroactive, it's a new lease as you just mentioned. it will start if and when the board and the mayor mayor approve it, with regards to the cafe mÉlange lease, that lease is retroactive, that started out as a permit to enter for them to do site prep and, and to build out the space, once

supervisor chan, present. supervisor dorsey, present. supervisor engardio, present. supervisor mandelman, present. supervisor melgar, present. supervisor peskin, present. supervisor preston, present. supervisor ronan, present. supervisor safai, present. supervisor stefani, present. supervisor walton, present. mr. president, all members are present. >> thank you. the san francisco board of supervisors we acknowledge that we are on the unceded ancestral homeland of the ramaytush ohlone who are the original inhabitants of the san francisco peninsula. as the indigenous stewards of this land and in accordance with their traditions, the ramaytush ohlone have never ceded, lost nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. as guests, we recognize that we benefit from living and working on their traditional homeland. we wish to pay our respects by acknowledging the ancestors and relatives of the ramaytush community and by affirming their sovereign rights as first peoples. colleagues,

supervisor chan, present. supervisor dorsey, present. supervisor engardio, present. supervisor mandelman, present. supervisor melgar, present. supervisor peskin, present. supervisor preston, present. supervisor ronan, present. supervisor safai, present. supervisor stefani, present. supervisor walton, present. mr. president, all members are present. >> thank you. the san francisco board of supervisors we acknowledge that we are on the unceded ancestral homeland of the ramaytush ohlone who are the original inhabitants of the san francisco peninsula. as the indigenous stewards of this land and in accordance with their traditions, the ramaytush ohlone have never ceded, lost nor forgotten their responsibilities as the caretakers of this place, as well as for all peoples who reside in their traditional territory. as guests, we recognize that we benefit from living and working on their traditional homeland. we wish to pay our respects by acknowledging the ancestors and relatives of the ramaytush community and by affirming their sovereign rights as first peoples. colleagues,

chair chan.ink it's reasonable to ask for, detail about operations. i also think it is something that we can probably get before the board meeting. and i think, you know particularly for not knowing a ton about, you know, what's going to happen in this space. i do know that we have you know, we're cutting the funding for street violence intervention you know it's there are there are concerns about a tough summer. so i think we probably should be, you know, trying to support efforts to give kids things to do that are not bad. so i would be inclined to support this. director pinnock i'm sorry, chair chan, you asked me about retroactivity. i can speak to that issue if you want to hear, the 141 industrial lease is not. retroactive, it's a new lease as you just mentioned. it will start if and when the board and the mayor mayor approve it, with regards to the cafe mÉlange lease, that lease is retroactive, that started out as a permit to enter for them to do site prep and and to build out the space, onc

thank you, chair chan.nd thank you, chief, for your work and for your department, for your presentation, you know, i will say that for me, one of the, concerns or frustrations that i heard the most from my constituents, you know, certainly through the early years of my time in office and through the pandemic was a feeling that san francisco was somehow becoming de policed and that people were seeing crimes committed, and, and not really feeling, you know, like there was a police response and there were a lot of reasons for this, i do feel like that is changing. i think we're seeing it, you know, in small ways. not to the extent that i would like, but around, traffic enforcement as an example today, there was apparently a drug bust with like half $1 million in currency and a significant amount of narcotics, seized. i think the work that's been happening in the tenderloin and sort of the pushing back on, you know, giving up on a whole neighborhood, basically, and turning it over to the drug dealers, like, i t

chair chan. i think you hit it on the head when you mentioned the mellon grant, that is a grant that for which all, 3 million, will be received in the current and next fiscal year. so we do not. it's a $3 million grant and a three year performance period for the grant , the programing. but the all of the revenue is recognized in the budget in fiscal 24 and fiscal 25. so that's why you see that 1.5 dropping down to zero. and what are the charges for services, i don't have that number in front of me, but it may have to do with our civic design fees. i'll, i can look into that and get back to you. thank you. because here it listed about 1.8 million for 23, 24. and then again, or. yeah. and then 1.7 for 2425. and then you're going down to negative, but then it's like you're coming back at 1.8 and for 25, 26. so i'm just trying to understand like what what that could be. it's a significant. yes, give me one second. yeah. as i mentioned. thank you. as i mentioned, i thought it might be including civic

chan i chan i we have five ayes. the motion passes. so, i assume we don't have any other business, that concludes our business, madam chair. thank you. the meeting. today's meeting is adjourned. >> who doesn't love cable cars? charging emissions and we're free which we're proud of you know, it's not much free left in the world anymore so we managed to do that through donations and through our gift shops. you got a real look and real appreciation of what early transit systems are like. this was the transit of the day from about 1875 to about 1893 or later, you know. cable car museum is free, come on in. take a day. come down. rediscover the city. you can spend as time you want and you don't have to make reservations and it's important to be free because we want them to develop a love for cable cars so they do continue to support whether they live here or other places and people come in and say, yes, i have passed by and heard of this and never come in and they always enjoy themselves. people love cable cars and there's none left in the

supervisor chan? >> supervisor chan. >> let me try to understand this, i think what is happening here, i, i can kind of understand, there is a lot of confusion going on right now. there is awe community base organization and have existing contract and winding down. some of is through rfp and you open up the rfp and once you open up the rfp. so the expert are expiring so with that, the new rfp process, the organizations that previously or have existing contract expiring now receiving a new round of contract, and to any organizations now there is thinking this is less dollars to to them it's a cut but it's really the new rfp round, the new contract, contract dollar comes as such with new transitions and new dollars. and i think that the question there is a gap here and then, that is that gap, the funding gap. meaning if i have this contract at 250,000 for the last five fiscal years and constantly in the last five fiscal years i'm getting so-called ap--so my 250 becomes 300, 500 thousand a year. now my 2

. >> absolutely commissioner chan absent. >> commissioner dorsey presents. >> commissioner engardio present. >> chair mandelman present. >> commissioner melgar absent. >> commissioner peskin present. >> commissioner preston present. >> commissioner ronen absent. >> commissioner safai absent. >> commissioner stefani absent. >> present commissioner walton present we have quorum. >> thank you, madam clerk i've received requests from commissioners commissioner safai and commissioner chan also objections upcoming to grand that request i believe you have a public comment announcement. >> for members of the public interested in participating in this meeting we welcome our attention in-person in the elective chamber in room 250 or serve the meeting live add sfgovtv.org remotely the best way dial the number on your screen. >> legislative chamber, room 250, city hall watch sf cable channel 26 or 99 (depending on your provider) watch 2663 506 8858 # # to make public comment on an item, when the item is called, dial '*3' to be added to the queue to speak. speak. when your 2 minutes are up, we will move

thank you, chair chan.hank you for, for all your work and all of your all of your great lawyers and staff work, i don't necessarily think this is. i don't expect to have an extended conversation about this now, but i would like to follow up on kind of the expanded work around care court and conservatorship, i think on care court in particular, i think some of us have been wondering what this would look like, with concern that it would take a lot of time and also concern about what would outcomes be looking like or how would this program be used. so i'm curious how it's impacting the attorney or attorneys working in your office so we can follow up offline on that. and then on on the conservatorship, it sounds like you're saying the expansion and work is largely about sb 43 implementation, and also, we'd be curious to see how that's working and what, you know, sort of how that's playing out. so, not necessarily for now, but, when the dust is settled around budget, maybe in july, i can follow up with your offi

supervisor chan chan i. supervisor dorsey. dorsey i supervisor engardio engardio.i supervisor mandelman i mandelman i supervisor melgar. melgar i supervisor peskin i. peskin i supervisor preston. preston i supervisor. ronen i. ronen i supervisor safaÍ. safaÍ. i supervisor stephanie. stephanie i and supervisor walton i walton i there are 11 eyes the motion is adopted. madam clerk are there any immemorially? i have none to report. mr. president, we are adjourned. >> [music] in the town inside here i'm young. he was putting art, music and drinking together upon today have a nonpretentious pretentious spitz that the community can enjoy each other and the time off we get in this world. [music] >> spends energy elevating artists and credit a safe place. a place to have a community. >> it is i great neighborhood the art district because we have the contemp refer museum of sf. yerba buena for the arts all of the operators and businesses here we get together and xhoukt and support each other this is a very cool neighborhood to be a part of. [music] paint on canvas is primar