speaker, no change under the conservatives. no change at all. he is supporting the predator principle in the house of lords that he is supporting -- >> order. i apologize, mr. prime minister. we must have quite that i want to hear the answer. i hope you want to be the answer as well. prime minister. >> his is about no change that it is the politics of no change at all. he supports the originally principle in the house of lords again. he supports no reform of the house of lords for a decade. he supports no referendum to allow the electorate to have. this is a party that is no change at all. they are the same as they always were. we will vote for the alternative vote. they are still voting for the hereditary vote. >> mr. stewart bill. >> thank you, mr. speaker. building on the response of the prime minister to the parliamentary institution, is he aware that tomorrow's thomas legg will public his full review about his allowances building on the creation of it so and the kelly recommendations, all of them the initiatives of the prime minister. and w

speeches are not changed. changes more than words. change is action. [applause] >> if we really are all created equal, if it really doesn't matter who we are or what they look like or who we love, then it's time for this president and this congress to take concrete steps to ensuring that the quality. [applause] >> and since the president and congress brought up the topic of don't ask, don't tell lastly, let's start there. if the administration does, in fact, implemented soon what it now states, that it can do under the existing law, the lives of thousands of servicemeservice members will begin to improve, and the witchhunts will end. and i thank the president for showing leadership in taking these steps. i really do. [applause] >> but, but let me be clear. a year-long study does not a fierce advocate make. [applause] >> a year, year is far too long to wake him and it is time the executive branch to stop these discharges now while the military and congress move to bring this shameful and discriminatory chapter of u.s. history to an end. [applause] >> mr

and we will have to change it, if we do change it, and second, you shouldn't use your power to in any way influence a discussion or evaluation of the situation. >> senator, i would say that we can't possibly evaluate the impact on unit cohesion, moral, retention and so on unless we encourage people to tell us exactly what they think, and exactly what their views are honestly and as forthrightly as possible. otherwise, there is no use in doing this at all, and again, i can't emphasize enough, we understand from the beginning of this that this must be an act of congress. >> thank you. >> senator sessions, for me, this not about command influence, but about leadership. i take that very seriously. >> thank you. >> senator hagan. >> thank you, mr. chairman. secretary gates i want to say that i applaud your efforts in commissioning a thorough investigation of the "don't ask, don't tell" policy and how to implement a repeal of the policy in order to minimize disruption in military readiness, and i am wondering within the study, how will you study, how will the study take into account the vie

change is more than words. change is action.es not matter who we are, what we look like, or who we love, then it is time for this president and this congress to take concrete steps to ensuring that equality. [applause] and since the president and congress brought up don't ask don't tell alaska week -- last week, let us start there. if the administration does in fact implement what it now states it can do under the existing law, the lives of thousands of service members will begin to improve, and the witch hunts will and spirit i thank the president -- the witch hunts will end. i thank the president for showing leadership here. i really do. [applause] but let me be clear. a year-long study, does not in a fierce advocate make. a year is far too long to wait. it is time to start using the executive branch to stop these discharges now while the congress moves to make these shameful practices and. -- end. mr. president, the ball is in your court. you have the opportunity to go down in history as one of the few presidents who acted de

and the obama administration to their credit have made some changes, some immediate changes vis-a-vis our policy toward haiti. but you know better than anybody else that the way we've treated haiti, maltreated haiti over the year vis-a-vis our public policy, is this a moment for us to rethink that? >> it's a moment for america to rethink. that but it's also a moment for haitians that are going into the 21st century to rethink the haitians constitution where there are certain changes that have to be made. one of the changes is dual citizenship. the fact of when you leave haiti and you become an american citizen, then there's a clause in the constitution saying you can't run for office. if you notice like in the dominican republic all of that has changed. i feel that real change of haiti is going to first come from the 4 million diasporas living outside of haiti that contribute many dollars a year, it's going to be them to be able to influence the constitution. i feel that haitians outside of haiti need to have some chairs inside that parliament. that's the start of a real change. >> it

the environme changes. i talked to a friend that is a captain in the marines, two other friends, no matter what you say, when you place women in an environment, men's behavior changes. >> can they become more civilized. >> it is the complete opposite. there is competition going on. and men are going to start wearing clone and -- wearing cologne and sharing aftershave now on shifts. i hate to sound animalistic but a submarine environment is a unique environment. then there is the other issue of pregnancy. on ships now, i found it interesting the navy does not keep statistics on the number of women that become pregnant under way and have to be taken off ship, interestingly enough, but it happens and what are you going to do on a submarine. >> do what they do with any other military hospital which is they now give out plan b so that is exactly with it is for. >> someone suggested that, if a woman is going to serve on a submarine they have to be on birth control or something like that, but you can't force women

the energy policy, change health care, change education, a lot of stuff like that. if health care fails-- which i think it will-- that option, which was really his offering, that's gone. so what is the sentence he is remembered? and if it's not going to be that then what is his presidency about? and i don't think he's made that transition to a post-health care world. i really liken it to the end of the cold war. but to me the options are these: he has always had even from the start of his campaign, two sides to him. there was the policy side on the campaign which was pretty coentionally democrat. but there was also the promise, which was post-partisan change the way washington works. and if he's not going to become the second new deal or the second great society with his democratic policies, then he's got to go back to the other side of him. which is changing washington. >> rose: is this as simple as running against washington, which a lot of people do to get elected and then they become consumed by what washington is. >> well, it wouldn't hurt, to be honest. to do

how has film scoring in this town changed? regard for r a change? the process of it changed?me a quick lesson on how this has changed over the years? >> i have to be very careful when iance this question. the one thing that has changed is the era of writing pencil to paper has changed. we're now in an era where a lot of software has been written and machines have been designed that enable people to come up with music, not even necessarily compose music but just come up with music that may not know about music or may learn about music from just using the machinery. so sometimes i think what happens is the filmmakers gets caught up in the technology and lose the emotional quality and i'm not being old-fashioned. i'm just saying the technology has changed. it's changed the way cameras are shot. it's changed the way special effect are used. in two years, jim's movie is not going to cost $300 million to make. tavis: the studio wishes $300 million. >> it will be half that price because the technology is going to make it come down in price. tavis: when i say $300 million, it doesn't

is it about to change?s life was protected... ♪ seems you've always been right there ♪ this life was saved... ♪ soothing sadness ♪ healing pain and this life was made easier... ♪ making smiles appear again because of this life. nursing. at johnson & johnson, we salute all those who choose the life... that makes a difference. ♪ you're a nurse ♪ you make a difference so i couldn't always do what i wanted to do. but five minutes ago, i took symbicort, and symbicort is already helping significantly improve my lung function. so, today, i've noticed a significant difference in my breathing. and i'm doing more of what i want to do. so we're clear -- it doesn't replace a rescue inhaler for sudden symptoms. my doctor said symbicort is for copd, including chronic bronchitis and emphysema. it should not be taken more than twice a day. symbicort may increase your risk of lung infections, osteoporosis, and some eye problems. tell your doctor if you have a heart condition or high blood pressure before taking it. my copd

did it change things? i think yes a change things for cloy change things drastically by the introduction of african-american voters, but it also emphasize the peculiar rights, the interesting nature of stealth politicians. it was possible and it did happen in the 1960's and 1970's that this huge influx of black voters cause segregation with politicians to wage a racist campaigns and get elected and just completely ignored this huge numbers. but it also created a setting for politicians such as butler and me to come in and decide to do things differently, to try to merge those new african-american voters with white voters. you know, one of the problems and political analysis is we tend to look at census data and voting records and judicial decrees and so forth, and we tend to see that as a mechanistic, causal factor in what happens is completely come of those things just cause different behaviors about politicians. what we are saying is that it is not so mechanistic, that stealth politicians represented a p

those changed my life. host: what is the biggest change in your diet?ddressed. the city give up dairy. guest: example, the federal infants and within children that offers food assistance to pregnant women and infants, only recently did they allow lowfat milk and fruit and vegetables to be a part of the program. for decades it was whole milk, which is really too fat laden for the children's needs. host: indianapolis, paul on the republican line. go ahead. caller: i have a quick question for the doctor. wouldn't it be better for our schools to stop all of -- stop offering the alternative could food lines like we have with the embers and french fries? you cannot expect children to make wise choices, even through high school. wouldn't it be better if we simply did not allow the kind of food in the schools? secondly, vegetables and fruits that are harvested -- that are harvested and then frozen and processed within eight hours are actually a healthier than those that were harvested a week ago and still on the farmer's market shelf. guest: the fresher the fru

this could change back.you go through the historical patterns, and you could see how the democrats and republicans have both had times when they came back, but to get this new, younger group of voters, more plug then, networks, connecting on issues, and if you take the no. 1 sentiment in the country out there, which is i want to see progress, not partisanship, both parties are facing a crisis in confidence over themselves and frankly -- i should say that a lot polls and a lot of people always like to say that the crisis of confidence in government and our institution, and i am the guy that says, there is not really a crisis of confidence in our institution. people are voting and listening before. but there really are saying in a very clear way, enough partisanship. i want to release the the common sense ideas -- i want to release a common-sense ideas adopted across party lines. as you can see from this number, this is tremendous change. the media is focused very much on a tea party republicans and sarah pali

of climate change.climate change. let me give you three reasons. the ipcc, the scientific community has been telling us for 15 years that we can reduce global emissions by 30% by taking action that will pay at all back to lower -- with lower electricity bills in three to dilute five years. i do not believe that it is physically possible to continue to grow the chinese economy at 8% or 9% a year using the current economic model. it cannot be done. thirdly, i believe that europe's target of a 20% to 30% reduction of greenhouse gas emissions is not an environmental target, but an economic target, energy security target. there is an economic agenda at the heart of this. it takes me to a very important point made by carlos. it is buying an important that park -- that we have targets. it is more important that we get to those partnerships that will design a solution -- the solutions that make sense from a business point of view, rather than throwing billions of dollars at it. >> thank you. before we get to th

hope and change and teleprompters. >>reporter: a final thread running through the conference, a record deficit. >> one party will tax and spend. the other party won't tax, but will spend. it's both of them. >>reporter: it's known for its presidential -- an early test of potential presidential candidates and this year's winner? congressman ron paul of texas. paul, who ran for president in 2008, topping the list of voters with 31 percent followed by former massachusetts governor mitt romney, who won the past three years. he came in second with 22 percent. former alaska governor, sarah palin, who did not attend, a distant third with seven percent. 10,000 people attended this year's conference and organizers say 2400 of them voted. of those, 48 percent describe themselves as students. a group ron paul has done well with previously. in washington, fox news. >>> former secretary of state alexander hague has died. he died this morning at johns hopkins hospital of complications from an infection. his long and decorated militar

finally, changing requires changing politics as usual. panel of democrats and republicans, who would hammer out deficit proposals over the medium and long term, but would come up with those answers by a certain deadline. i should point out, by the way, that is an idea that had strong bipartisan support and was originally introduced by senators greg on the republican side and conrad on the democrat side. it had a lot of republican co- sponsors to the idea. i hope the -- that despite the fact that it got voted down in the senate, that both the republican leader mitch mcconnell and and the republican leader in the house, john vader, can fully embrace what has been a bipartisan idea to get our arms around this budget. that is also why we are restored in pay as you go, a simple rule that says congress cannot spend a dime without cutting a dime elsewhere. this will help lead to the budget surpluses of the 1990's and is one of the most important steps we can take to restore fiscal discipline in washington. you can read more about the budget at b

>> but we changed the name. [applause] >> with both of this again and again that we need to rediscover that spirit, that famous, you know, maybe a comparable quote about fdr, that he would say to a social movement leaders when they would present a good idea to him about reforming legislation, to be better for workers. he would say it's a pretty good idea. now get out there and make me do it. i mean, does the dialect to. he was a very stern dialect that between social movements, independent trade union and the administration. it was congregational. and you know if there's any hope of not sort of wallowing in cynicism in this political nomad in the one-year anniversary of obama's inauguration, we need to rebuild our independent social movement. [applause] and what i pharmacokinetic and -- i'm a young environmentalist, they know their science inside out, understand carbon trading and why won't work or intimated by this issue.electing obama would do it. we need an independent movement that's going to push them. and

this is 17 years later. >> times have changed, larry, but the military's culture has not radically changedcause it's a time of war. so it's possible that, you know, we could change this, but be very, very careful because you have a military that's defending us now. you don't want to do something rash and create a risk that you don't want -- you just can't put back in the bottle. >> larry: lieutenant choi, does this policy personally hurt you? >> of course, larry. when we can all just talk about policy, i think that's fine for a great show in the evening, but for me, all of this really does affect my life. that hearing today was talking about my job. but you know how it really affects me personally and i think personally for all of us that are here, we're wearing our rings and on my west point ring, it says honor. the first day i learned the honor codes. a cadet will not lie, and you will not tolerate those who lie. but when i told the truth, i went on national tv and told the truth, i went to drill next weekend and we went on the rifle range, and as we were cleaning our weapons, one of my

a subject that changes asç circumstances change. we are going to explore this morning. at the samew3 time, it is in the context of the impact of the turbulence in the global economy, the recession and the recovery. what that means for energy security and also what it means and how it has been changed. ççmywhat has been changed ovee last two years. have a distinguished panel. the president of azerbaijani, the chief executive of bp,ç the president and ceo of saudi armco, the chief executive officer of royal dutch, the ceo of dow, and the chairman of total. w3çwe're going to dive into it. i am going to ask someçç quess toçç get thingsç started andi expect that the discussion will w3i would like to beginçç wite president and askç youçqçç>çç term energy security means from the viewpoint ofçy3 the buzzey shawn as you look atç[óo the l energy system? important for us for energy security is certification of suppliers. we have a diversified pipeline system that can deliver our exports to various regions conduct at the same

when obama was elected, we thought things would change. nothing has changed.t about their freedom and their human rights? i asked. they are living the strain contradictions of cuban life. they are some soured by fear. it is truly an island. some are experiencing back attacks by guerrillas. doctors and medical experts around the world especially to developing countries and to make a lot of money for cuba. it is one of the top five corners of foreign currency in the country. >> a familiar chant on this island, fidel. not one of these doctors is keeping. they are on their way to haiti as part of the canoe -- emergency assistance brigade from cuba. they graduated from the latin american medical school on the outskirts of havana. there are 10,000 foreign students here. discussions are paid for by the cuban government. >> i would not have been able to become a doctor without my scholarship. it is very hard to get this type of money. >> most are from poor developing countries. some come from underprivileged communities in the united states. what the cubans ask in ret

to implement the change? >> the information that we would develop during the course of this review would help inform the legislative process. >> i salute both of view for careful statements for the courage of what you said but also emphasized you balanced that in your statement. what we are looking for here is an examination of the present law. is the most damaging aspect of the present policy? you made a powerful statement in terms of the integrity of the individual as you're deciding factor. what is the great volume of this law if we were to do away with it and move on to something else and what are the parallels? where are we going? are we going in the proper direction? we can't say that today. when you say that this is something that will ultimately be decided by the congress i would also like to emphasize my own agreement with what we have been saying about how important it is to hear from people who were served because whether the ultimate decision might be with congress, that decision can't be made in

that was changed last year. i just changed sot -- so the lawyers become the lawyers that work with the people that are being charged for the crime. that's a huge change for china. we'll see how it plays out. but that's in place now. and how it plays out to the providences. getting down to the providences, as you suggest, sometimes takes a long time. this is as far as we can tell mature. it has a long way to go. >> short answers. >> oh, short, short. >> going back to the google question, there's been talk on the news of possible government sponsored china anchors have been infiltrated not only private u.s. companies but highly u.s. government as well. if this is true, should foreign nations and companies be wary of future interaction and business with china? >> well, the way you form late late late -- formulate the question, but that mean china should be responsible for the chinese, most of those are operating out of taiwan. they are foreigners that go through taiwan and to the mainland and so on. this is still a

and you ask could we see a change in the next few years and how do we achieve that change? we're not propose saying one particular policy or strategy because it does seem e quality is beneficial. we think even for the smoothest changes can help. for instance we just had a 5% rise in the top tax rate that has not been particularly controversial so change can happen. i will have rich talk about the longitudinal study. >> there are some that changeover time some of them are not very convincing. three or four of them are. one or two are pretty convincing. but there are 200 study is looking at income inequality in relation to health with different settings and time periods. they're not all cross sectional but even if they were common because of income distribution changes unless they move together together, for instance it is affected by early childhood and a lifetime of different levels of equality and positions of the social hierarchy and probably every course of debt has a different thing point*. he will find when there is higher unemployment and low wages that violence will

this is a change for the public consumption, and we're not changing how we work at the faa."s simply a sleight of hand. >> o'brien: nick sabatini worked inside the faa for 30 years, and was the head of aviation safety from 2001 through 2008. >> i never did see that there was a conflict. i could easily compartmentalize. if i'm encouraging you to do better, i'm not encouraging you to necessarily grow your business, in terms of promoting aviation. the promotion was promoting aviation safety, as we saw it. >> o'brien: under sabatini, the faa forged a new regulatory approach with the industry, called partnership programs. the faa relied more on the airlines to self-report problems and help identify emerging safety risks. >> we need to learn what those unknown risks are out there. who is best positioned to know what risks they see every day? it's people who are operating the system and have their hands on the system every single day. >> o'brien: but critics say that the faa's collaborative approach went too far. a policy directive in 2003, called the customer service initiative, id

it changes the distribution of prey and then changes where the penguins have to go to find it. >> reportercks starve to death before they parents return home to feed them. and one did while we were visiting. >> she came home from fishing. >> yeah, it was too late. >> reporter: which may explain why the population is down significantly, from about 600,00025 years ago to half a million today. >> would you like to write, as well? >> reporter: dee boersma believes the penguins are telling us something about the planet we share, and that we need to listen. jeffrey kofman, abc news, punta tombo, argentina. >> and you can see more of jeffrey's report and all those penguins later tonight on "nightline." >>> hope you have a good evening and hope you're back with us tomorrow night. we'll be right here. see you then. captioned by closed captioning services, inc. this is the "jeopardy!" college championship.

we will not plan for change and we will not wait for change. we will create change. [applause] >> there will be a day when people will wonder how our rights were even an issue. what was the big deal. this state of inequality cannot be our children or our grand children's inheritance. [applause] that means stepping up and answering the call at this moment in history. we have an opportunity to lead. it is up to us to define what must happen next, and what will happen next. if we do not step up with an expansive view of what it means to be lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender, if we do not explain that being lgt or b is simply being human, we will be making a mistake. whose calling is that, if not ours? an agenda, yeah, i have an agenda. certainly. let's fight the legislative battles, including, let's end don't ask, don't tell, let's overturn the so-called defense of marriage act. pass both an inclusive employment, non-discrimination act and the domestic partnership benefits and obligation act for federal employees. [applause] >> and state by state, let's enact anti-bu

moved so fast for a sustained change, sustained change for so long a period. and when someone says, well, china is going to be -- we met, no one has done this before. why would -- why would you bet against a china with that kind of a record? you can think that, that's fine, but you know, it looks as if it's going to go on. and we think, our guess is that china, crossing the river and getting to the other side, china is only about a third of the way. >> what is so fascinating is that when you come there and you look out of your hotel room, and this is -- it's like when you throw a stone into the water. but, of course, the ways go out. when i went there for the first time in the year 2000, that was even taking place in shanghai. you look out of the window, and where there were huts in january, there were houses in march. not march, but in september. and, you know, it was unbelievable. buildings are growing like mushrooms, and now this, what happens in, happen in the main cities early on is now going to the provinces. and the standard of living and the conditions

but the times have changed. get the facts at remax.com. today, the dream of owning a home seems more attainable than ever. nobody sells more real estate than re/max. visit remax.com today. water can be good for constipation but drinking more and more may not always help. new dulcolax balance makes water work harder to help restore balance. new dulcolax balance helps you get back to being yourself. ♪ feeling free caused by a completely blocked artery, another heart attack could be lurking, waiting to strike. a heart attack caused by a clot, one that could be fatal. but plavix helps save lives. plavix taken with other heart medicines, goes beyond what other heart medicines do alone, to provide greater protection against heart attack or stroke and even death by helping to keep blood platelets from sticking together and forming clots. ask your doctor about plavix. protection that helps save lives. people with stomach ulcers or other conditions that cause bleeding should not use plavix. taking plavix alone or with some other medicines including

-- should be changed this year. he takes questions from reporters after the hearing. this is about 90 minutes. >> said the committee is now going to receive testimony from the senior leadership at the department of defense as we began the task of addressing the don't ask don't tell policy for gays in the military. and in the policy will improve the military's capability to reflect equal opportunity. i do not find the arguments that were used to justify a don't ask don't tell took a fact -- it took effect in 1993, and they are less so now. i agree with president obama that we should repeal this discriminatory policy. in the latest gallup poll, the american public overwhelmingly supports allowing gays and lesbians to serve overwhelming -- openly in the military. they have a right to serve, and many are serving. as former chairman of the joint chiefs, the general said that he supports ending the policy. a majority of troops already believe that they serve alongside a gay or lesbian colleagues. one recent study estimate

we are committed to changing the regulations. we obviously want to make sure that the liabilities are secure, as well. >> each year, 1000 women died of cervical cancer. in northern ireland, young women can get screened at the age of 20, but in 2004, the government sought to increase the aid to 25. why does the government discriminate this way and will the government consider addressing this injustice? >> we are very concerned to make sure that we prevent and have early detection for as many cancers as possible and in this, we make sure the necessary resources are available and we have guided in the application of those make sure the necessary resources are available but indicted in the application of those resources by clinical judgments. he is not a scientist anymore than i am but what we have to do is take the best advice and act on it and make sure the resources are there to back it and that is why we have shriveled the investments. .. >> the government but there is an awareness date on this issue and will respond in due cours

and the show took off. [ applause ] >> i could see their faces change, their bodies change. their energy changed. their purpose was reinvented out there. you could see it. they were doing this for dawn and for themselves. >> reporter: trainers kept their distance from the whales, under strict orders from seaworld. the one and only time they got in the water, the whales were locked away. >> i think it was wonderful. you know, it's so hard to put into words. >> reporter: some in the audience cried not just for brancheau, but for the killer whales, who they say should not be blamed for wednesday's tragedy. >> i don't want people to think, whatever happens, it was their fault. when i see them there, it's like, wow. >> reporter: the killer whales' majesty was on full display. >> what do you want to be when you get older? >> a trainer. >> reporter: after so much pain this brought comfort. >> it reenergized me. it made me realize the purpose of what we do. and that's going out and sharing our love with these animals with everybody watching. >> reporter: while they remember her here

your loyalty to the brand hasn't changed. >> loyalty to the brand hasn't changed. >> as long as thereant that doesn't sell coke, that's your next opportunity? >> as long as there is a stomach that doesn't have some in it, yes. >>> coming up, one machine, 104 flavors, and it's spying on you. >> the machine calls home to atlanta. >> coke's high-tech gamble, next on "the real story behind the real thing." [ music ] >> it was designed by the people who brought you the ferrari. it's got the touch screen technology of an "i-phone," and power provided by the thirst of millions. >>> it was designed by the people who brought you the ferrari. it's got the touch-screen technology of an iphone. and power provided by the thirst of millions. in an age when shoppers demand products tailored to their individual tastes, coca-cola has created a high-tech, souped-up soda fountain to satisfy every whim. it's the freestyle jet machine, and it puts buyers in the driver's seat, letting them create up to 104 variations of coca-cola's sodas, juices, teas, and flavored waters. first, pick your favorite drink.

even if the law hasn't changed, the tenor in the building has changed. he has spoken. gwen: you were at the enter gone the day after the announcement, did you get a reaction? were people surprised or accepting? >> people were surprised. it caught everyone off guard. here he came out and said it with such conviction. at one point on the hill, a congresswoman on the hill said to the chairman, i appreciated you sharing your feelings. he corrected her and said these are my beliefs. at one point sessions questioned him and said this is our job to change, not ours. the chairman said this is about leadership in terms of why he said what he said. it caught the building off guard. you heard a lot of talking in cubicles and lines in serving with gays and lesbians in the military, what it means to cohesion and morale. it was an interesting discussion where people are saying it's not a matter of if, but when. >> i don't think there is in society as a whole, ideas have changed hugely since 1992, particularly among the group of people who is most likely to go into the teenagers, muc

yes, times do change.of unknown people that lead to those great moments that enter the historical record. well, i asked speaking of presidents' day, last may, i ask howard zinn what he thought of president obama in his first year in office. you know, when there was a division of whether progressive should support barack obama, howard zinn said yes or co-it is important to support barack obama for president. last may he said on democracy now, i wish president obama would listen carefully to martin luther king. i am sure he gives verbal homage as everyone does to king but he ought to think before he sends missiles over pakistan in before he agrees to the military budget, before he sends troops to afghanistan before he opposes the single-payer system. howard zinn went on to say he would ask what would martin luther king do and what would martin luther king say? if he only listened to king it would be a very different president than he is turning out to be so far. zinn concluded i think we have to hold obama t

people trying to change their flights. some people change from last night to get out of here before the snow starts falling, hoping to do not have tdeal with the canceled flights. >> i have a ticket in the nick of time. >> it is a golden ticket to get out before the skies open. with more than a foot of snow expected, many airliners and the passengers are changing plans. airlines are putting their snowstorm policy into place. >> no fees. this is too easy. it must be meant to be a. >> airports around the area are on standby. some are canceling flights. crews are ready to take off before the snow starts coming down. >> of our crews are standing by. >> they are standing by and hopefully none of these passengers will have to do that. all flights are on time. things can change very quickly with the amount of snowfall we are expecting. it is advisable you call your airline before your flight. >> thank you. >>> metro is warning riders to wait for possible service disruptions into sunday. when the snow reaches 8 inches, the abovegr

rain will move in late tonight, it will mix and change to snow. through rush-hour, after midday, tomorrow, and through friday. probably some snow showers through friday and saturday. here is what is unusual. because of the configuration of the atmosphere, it cannot move out to sea. it will move north and meander in drift out to the west and the southwest and back. it may come even further inland. it will keep the areas north of the viewing area and under the threat of long duration snow. that is where the jackpot will be. we will see lesser amounts here. a traced to 3 inches. because it is a coastal storm, this is the accumulation -- 3 to 5. a trace to 3 inches our area. the storm will start to come back south again on friday. additional snowfall. it will not be the snow that is the big story. it will be the wind generated by a deepening storm that will almost have hurricane force. that will call -- cause a winds took us almost 50 miles per hour. let's take a look at the 7 day. the snow showers and cold temperatures and winds will be the big story

what is the change?i am not a partisan, i am an analyst, and i am just saying you don't beat the taliban by military destruction. >> larry: i asked him about the chances of another terrorist attack and he said this. watch. >> the idea of there being a mass attack in the united states like 9/11 is unlikely, in my view. but if you see what's happening, particularly with al-qaeda and the arabian peninsula, they have decided to move in the direction of more small bore but devastatingly small attacks. but i think what you're seeing and that's a concern to us, the concern relates to somebody like the shoe bomber or the underwear bomber, the christmas attack, or somebody just strapping a backpack on them with explosives that are indigenous and blowing up --. >> larry: more like an attempt? >> yeah, i think there will be attempts. >> how is this shoe bomber any different than the underwear bomber? suddenly -- and he prosecuted him and 209 other terrorists in criminal courts. so the obama administration -- and fi

isn't is hard to convince people to make a change? isn't change the hardest thing?and i think alvin will agree that basic illnesses, colds, things wrong with different organs of the body, these things can be attributed to what you're eating. if you're eating the wrong food, if your diet is off, if your kid is having a soda and a bag of something salty, that all turns into a carb and turns into sugar. your pancreas is catching holy hell. it can't balance the insulin with all that sugar attacking it. >> larry: also mrs. obama mentioned, doctor, don't overlook the family dinner. you kind of forget that. running out, you do this and do that. families don't have dinner together anymore. >> that's true, because you have couples each with a job, if there's jobs available, but you have many more single mothers than ever before who are rushing around trying to keep things in order and frequently the quick heest thing to do is get fast food or takeout and junk food and not prepare dinner and have a sit-down dinner because they're so very busy. if you have dinner and there's c

policy been ineffective given the kind of internal changes or however you want to think of it as changesr threats that we see in china? >> i think over the last two or three months it's difficult to make the case that u.s. policy has been affected in moving the chinese in better directions. we saw copenhagen, for instance, the reaction on taiwan was really outsized. the way they're dealing with the google issue i think is deeply, deeply troubling. and so i think we really do need to look at our policies and hopefully push the chinese in a better direction. and i think we really need to change what we're doing at this point. >> brown: susan shirk, what do you think about u.s. policy? is it a question of managing these differences, somethat that is doable or do we need a more aggressive stance of our own? >> well, i think the obama administration approach has been consistent with what every administration starting with nixon has done, which is to try to find a basis for cooperating with china while maintaining our own national strength. and i don't see, really, any significant differences

but that is where it is explains a change in policy.if you are dealing with images, it is necessarily a liberal image, but that is not the policy from the past, which has treated it differently. as this court pointed out in prior decisions, that is because of 1654 itself. it does not distinguish between the two, and instead turns to utterances. so the commission has tried to say that images are different by necessity, but you will not find that in any prior fcc case. to the definite -- so the definition has become the fifth generic -- dictionary definition. >> we did say that they did not differentiate between different types of artest material, images and words. so it is treating both of those categories the scent. >> that is right. suburb relevant distinction has been, as the commission described in 1987 and route, whether it is spontaneous, scripted, plant, whatever. the cases cited overtime break down in those categories. >> if they are treated the same, how we analyze the categories? is it the fleeting nature of images of words to

that would have changed things for me. >> why? why would it have changed things for you?als in the milita homosexuals at all. this is about law, law in the united states. right now the law exists that we don't have open homosexuality in the military. this isn't about what i think about in the battle. >> new york cio, it is. you served in the military. you're also a member of congress, you make huge decisions. it's a decision being talked about right now on the hill. this could change the face of life for gays in the military. and so it is a very important discussion to have. is it more important than another discussion, i think that's left to everybody's opinion. i want to continue with you, but congressman massa, let me ask you, what about you? did anybody ever come out to you in the military? did you serve with any gays in the military? >> first of all, i think your listeners should understand that congressman hunter is a highly decorated combat veteran. i served for 24 years in the military and my record does not stack up against his many months overseas but we both co

and that will force enormous change.t will put a premium on patients because remember, it's everybody has to listen to everybody else because after all we are all equal citizens, then all of you who think you already have the answer will wonder why do you were going to answer the stupid people who think they are they have the answer for all of a sudden wondering why they have to listen to you. bayeux noaa peer because of their local community meetings, you know it gets really complicated and sometimes it gets contentious and sometimes people get he did. but that is the process of true self-government and with the social media are going to do is they are beginning to allow us to develop relationships and patterns, which bring us back together in ways we would never have thought possible and they allowed the creation of openness which would frankly be real constraints on government. one of the ground rules of government in the future will be that everything you spend, unless there is a deep national security reason, everyt

to change.o there are concerns about the impact of young people, and so we expect that they will reach out to the force to take their temperature to see how they feel about it and what is necessary to make this change can in policy which we've heard from the president in the state of the union address that he wants to see changed. so they want to make sure they do it right and they do it carefully, jon. jon: well, the president might want to change the policy, but it's obviously controversial. does he have enough support in congress to change the law? >> reporter: that's an excellent question, and the people here at the pentagon that i've talked to say they don't believe right now there are the votes to change the law right now, but obviously here at the pentagon it's not their job to gather votes. they leave that to their colleagues on capitol hill. but since the president of the united states has said he would like to see a change, they realize that the president wants it done, so they need to

fourth, climate change. climate change is a major challenge facing the world today. countries with a combined population of less than 1 billion achieved modernization and their modernization came as a -- at a huge cost of global resources and the environment. it represented an unsustainable model. we must enhance international cooperation. the copenhagen conference produced a positive outcome which was by no means the end of our endeavor. it only signifies a new beginning. all parties should stake to the basic framework of the united nations framework convention on climate change and the kyoto protocol. the common but differentiated responsibilities built on the cooperation of the copenhagen accord and meet their commitment but credible evidence. the chi -- through credible action. the chinese government takes climate change very seriously and adopted a series of major steps in this regard. china's carbon dioxide emissions were cut by 46% between 1990 and 2005. building on that, we have committed to lower co-2 intensity by 40% to 45% by 2020 from the 2005 level. to r