you don't have to make a big change, just the smallest change, just the smallest change.ife when i found out that my decisions had created my circumstances. if you think somebody else has created your circumstances you can become bitter, vindictive retalatory, but the moment you say, my decision have created my circumstances, i can change my decisions. the screpture that really is so big to me, proverbs 4:7, i live by it and teach from it everyday of my life. it is everything. it is quite simple, "wisdom is the principle thing." the reason he said that, everything else you want comes through wisdom. wisdom produces longevity. wisdom produces favor. wisdom produces wealth. everything we're pursuing is the product of wisdom. if you think you have a financial problem, you want to change your job. if you think you have a marriage problem, change your mate. when you recognize you have a wisdom problem you change your focus. that makes all the difference in the world. proverbs 4:7, wisdom is the principle thing. a lot of what i'm teaching is found in this book "the three most i

and societies can adapt and change in many ways. and if you take that it leaves with the question, even if we can is this the kind of world we want to live and? said drought, a sea level rise they are in danger by the team tuesday and we do have a choice. it is the fundamental question that we face today. if we look at the inability of paul erlich and julian simon with the second that they don't bring these two ideas together to make them whole. that ultimately is around the question of social values and joyce -- joyce. >> host: is anybody bridging that gap as the observer of obama and his policies it seems that he is trying to make that case. his rhetoric on climate has not changed and he is talking a little bit about loral's and the responsibility to future generations personal conviction because of his daughters. what really but it will take to get something happening. in to persuade of the nature of climate change with growing economic opportunities in new businesses wine in new in setting the framework of values is a good way.

projects that change after any manner will require a new hearing. so that concludes our recommendations of the e r o is here if you have any questions otherwise move into public comment >> i have a question for ms. rogers. so i can fully understand that. so when a project is submitted for an exemption the drawings tend to be pretty dpraefk with the preliminary set of drawings i might submit >> i would like to deter to the folks responsible for that portion. >> okay. >> so i'm just trying to understand the procedural process. if you're submitting let's say for example, your republican vavt a house and for your exemption you might have a preliminary set of drawings. if it's a project that requires the same section it's essentially the same set of drawings that would be needed. we need as much information as possible. so if it's a historic repeal evaluation if it's large we may need additional information but if it's small we wouldn't need detailed drawings. often it's quite early fairly conceptual >> yes, it needs to be done ann at an early stage. >>

change seats, change seats. yeah? okay. see what i had this change in, gang? change in. i'm getting tired of writing change in. ain't gonna write change in anymore. i'm gonna use a greek symbol for change in. what's the symbol, gang? - delta. - delta, that's right. so i'm gonna write that from now on as f multiplied by t equals change in. get it? delta mv. this is what we're gonna talk about today. so this delta mv, that's delta momentum. we have a name for force times time. what's the name of the force of an object multiplied by the duration of time in which that force acts? we have a name for that. it's not so common a name as this one, but see if you sit next to someone who knows what is the name of force multiplied by the time during which that force acts. go. talk it up. what is it, gang? impulse. what's the name of this? what? - impulse. - impulse. all right. impulse. okay. so we write. impulse equals change in momentum, that's what we're gonna talk about today. you wanna change the momentum of something then you have to apply an impulse. what's an impulse? that's

and if the change took 14 pages, how long was the entire agreement. i really think that the roll of the investigator in this matter, should have been to put himself in the position of the lawyer, who is going to decide whether it was substan ard or not. the task force had two lawyers, and i believe at the time that this case was heard. and neither of them were business lawyers. and so the whole issue, what is the subnative change to a long, long, development agreement, is not something that could be handled off the cuff. push >> and i think without that, in this separate investigation. what the law says and what the agreement provided for. and what the changes to that are two different issues. >> >> any further comment, on this matter? >> if not, commissioners. and any further questions or comments from you? >> well, i have got to say that i am... disturbed with the idea that the amendments could be introduced without the public having an opportunity to see them and digest them, and whether 13 or 14 pages of or should be deemed as non-subnative and it

and what we are changing is simply that you will file and remit monthly. instead of having the quarterly filing, and that frees up the other two payments and this is, and this is partnered with our new on-line form for parking tax filing as well as our existing hotel tax form that is also a little more complex and we have the district added on and this is going to be stream lining the tax reporting for both hotel and park operators and it will make it easier for our tax collection, but we also hope that it is not quite as confusing for folks because instead of doing this, a month that i just remit or do i file and remit every month and then you don't have to worry about the true. and then we are also proposing that the date, that the revenue control equipment, fee this is the gate on a parking lot or the finance that tracks how long you have been in there, the fee that we collect for inspecting those, be due on december f, 31, rather than january, 31, the main change for this is that the certificate of authority that you are required to get every year is t

that has all basically changed. the only thing that is not changed his readers fundamental interest in a good story or finding an information from a great non-fiction book and be moved and being transported by literature. >> what is available on-line at the new york times and the book review section? >> everything is on line. and increasingly there is more content online than is in the print edition. i personally am a huge print reader and love to see it in that format. but we offer an additional content online. hour by the book interview, for example, runs in an edited version in print and then on line runs and fall. this is a question and answer with an author or artist public figure of some kind of of their life through reading. >> new editor of the new york times broke review and has been redesigned and is debuting september 8. thank you for your time. >> thanks so much. >> up next on book tv dina cappiello. this week environmental are rare paul sagan. our gambol over its future. the yale historian analyzes the

if people are going to change their lives, they need to have services that will help them change their lives. that is an important priority. other services have been public mental health, health and human services, housing and employment and economic development and we also have went into prisons, probation and started a reentry planning. we are talking about the results which has proved if you change your approach then you can improve the results and in san francisco, three years about before realignment and evidence base probation and sentencing we had over 7,000 individuals on probation, as a result we now currently have 5500 individuals under supervision and that includes all of this population that has been realigned in the state. instead of a 78 percent failure rate which is what parole has, probation has a 77 percent success rate, again changing the focus. the number of felony probationers who were revoked and sent to state prison, 3 years ago was 75 percent in 2009, and in 2012 we sent 65 individuals. of the 1310 felony probationers, 77 percent completed successfully and of the

predict what that is like in that future because tiny changes in that slope too and how it changes through time can produce really large. changes in the future integrating for a hundred years for example. so that the use of greenland is helping tell a story at the same. i'm that it's actually influencing sea level in it's useful to zoom back in its recognize agreement is just part of a larger system that our system and then the arctic systems interacting with the lower latitudes where most people live. although nowhere as severe as the permian mass extinction the paleo scene is seen dermal maximum fifty five million years ago was apparently caused by a six degrees celsius of global warming over about a twenty thousand year period and that led to a huge extinction on the planet how does today's pattern of global warming compare with that of previous geologic erez that lead to actual extinction events. that climate epic you mentioned is a useful analogue it seems to be the most useful most recent analogue to the trajectory that that humanity is on right now we are rapidly elevating the green

impacts associated with climate change. they are not performance requirements for impact related to any particular -- >> the indicators are quantifiable. heat related debt, change in ocean, sea level rise, snow cover, those are great quantifiable, when you're telling me -- >> they indicate public health impact. >> you can't win your actions that epa to any benefits associated with those quantifiable indicators the epa itself has proposed as indicative of climate change. >> what we are able to do is to show and i hope we will show this in a package we put out for comment, what kind of reductions are going to be associated with our rules, what we believe they will have in terms of economic and public health benefit but it again is part of a very large strategy. >> the gentleman's time is expired. i recognize the gentlelady -- did you have a comment? >> quick comment. the reason academic literature does associate extremely hot days with mortality, a will provide that paper. >> i will recognize the gentlelady from florida, ms.

we can certainly change the definition, and we can change the criteria that are used to evaluate formula retail establishments but the fact that formula retail establishments require, conditional use authorization and a planning commission hearing in nc districts cannot be changed unless we go back to the ballot to the voters. i have distributinged to you and i have left copies out for the public, one page sheet and on one side there is a chart that summarizes the specific controls applicable by voweding district and including some zoning districts that have a some what new nuanced application of application controls such as geary street where the formula retail requires a cu, but for example, pet food supply stores are banned. >> on the other side of that sheet is the definition of formula retail, from the planning code as well as the criteria used to evaluate conditional use authorization proposals for formula retail, and so, well, i will not go through all of those rye tera necessarily in the report, or in this presentation, for you, and i am certainly happy to answer any questions, b

each one teach one, each one reach one, we change policy, we change practices, we change values. there is a map, there is a way we can do it. we're already doing it, let's not lose sight of it, but we have to be more focused, more clear and more collaborative and not forget to really empower our children. they are our best hope for changing the world. >> hello, my name is chris bridges. i'm grappling with trying to address several things that i've heard during the course of this program. i'll try to keep it as brief as possible. it's more of a statement than a question. a lot of people have mentioned power, the power balance between people and the trauma that people can bring in from outside and the significance of being traumatized and traumatizing other people and it also talked about restoretive justice being a model. i know we're in a room filled with district attorneys and police officers, law enforcement. i'm curious what role law enforcement can play in restoretive justice, what can be imparted as groups of people who may or may not be connected with the trauma. once you a

done to accepting the consensus that the world is changing and that climate is changing so now we needo move onto a conversation about what we are going to do about that and what that means. to the extent that the press can help with is towards that conversation and the questions that it asks in the stories that it writes i think is going to be what is important and the goal. >> host: i have trouble with this all the time. going back to the common ground question for a little bit one of simon's people that he admired was a person that talked about pollutions of commodity and obviously cap-and-trade is a market the system. i know simon isn't living but did he have a position on that in terms of basically putting a price on pollution? that seems like something that conservatives back in the day would have supported. sulfur dioxide trading as a public idea. i know people on the hill would say the waxman-markey bill corrupted the market in ways and that is why they opposed that legislation but would simon have a standing mayor to pricing carbon is a solution to this problem? >> guest: well

11 hoffman and changes to the 37 and 35. again, if there's a balance in terms of the number of people that can be served i think the environmental impact is okay. and it's close to the end of what i'm going to say i hope the mta carries on after this document has been approved. >> thank you. >> good afternoon, commissioners. i'm daniel. i'm speaking for myself today normally we serve to unit neighborhoods but i'm findings that some of the mta proposals are pitting us against each other. that's having an environmental effe effect. i live on barker street and my neighborhood has hospitals and churches and schools and hills so steep that cars are not allowed and sidewalks are stairways. the proposal would just take the 3 jackson and make it evaporate leaving cars to pick up the slack. my great grandparents took the jackson streetcar and a hundred years later we have those growing lines of cars iding in front of the schools and that's because the pacific line as eliminated decades ago and the jackson is so inreliable commissione

we have changes. they employ and i think you're going to be the reason it changes but right now supervisor 44 thousand 2 hundred and 49 employees and it's still growing and i think the office needs to change those numbers already arrest as you know i've been focused on jobs because i really believe that people can get those jobs and be part of the economy. and we're going to make sure whether it's big medium or small a they'll survive here and the supervisors will work with me to sustain this. so mr. temple used the word bubble he's always trying to get me on the bubble it will not burst if our hearts lead this economy. if all walks of life and all cultures get to participate. this can welcome in one or two people with ideas but can't afford the expensive rent by wants to start with a great idea and this is where it starts. this is why it's so incredible we have those hubs of business support. it's a model i think is going to work with a sharing economy. and the sharing economy is not just for small b

the changes and the technical changes to the committee? >> i am sorry could you repeat that question? >> if you had time to make those changes, produce the document and then there was still time to get it to the committee, how does that happen? >> is there... what if there were an opportunity to do that, would that have happened and is that the typical protocol. >> if i believe correctly, as a example for the shipyard project which was approved by the board of supervisors, around the time that i started working for president chiu, there were, i don't know, about dozens but over ten changes to the agreement proposed at the full board and some of them were, and accepted at the full board and no further public comment was given. and some of them were rejected by the board. but there was no, in a similar sense to this instance there was no presumption that there was additional public comment based on changes to an underlying agreement and all of the over all arching principals and concepts of the agreement remained. i think that there are cons

it does change them, it is a life changing event. >> j. d, everything from war fatigue to the economy in general, how do the external forces impact the situation? >> well, i think that military morale is low right now. we've seen an all time high for military suicides, they're double since 2001 and if you count the military they're triple. i think the extended words, the decreasing benefits are really pushing the military to where you have problems. and one of the problems is an increase in sexual assaults. now i think on balance sexual assaults are lower than when i first came in the military. they were 47 lent then, they are much less now. >> do you have numbers for that or anecdotal? >> anecdotal, when i first joined the military in the '80s aa midshipman sexual assaults were relatively common. they are less common now because the culture has changed. they can't be overin politicized because a lot of the gray area cases will become black and white cases. >> how do you take the responsibility and put it in the right place? members of the

the threat that climate change represents.e to, very unfortunately corporate interests front groupings tied to the fossil fuel industry, paid advocates of the fossil fuel industry have done everything they can to confuse the public and policymakers about the reality of the problem. so unfortunately as a result of that, we have a congress right now that is controlled, at least in the house of representatives, by climate change deniers. the chair of the house science committee is a climate change denyer. what that leaves is the opportunity or executive actions we've seen by the president recently. more stringent rules of epa, coal power plant emissions. so hopefully. >> go ahead. finish your thought. hopefully what? >> so hopefully, you know, we will see a change in the thinking within our congress. there is some sign that there are congressional republicans who do want to have a serious discussion about this problem. a former republican from south carolina he's heading up an effort to find free market-driven can have solutions

we have various cycles in the thesphere, the sun changes, ocean changes. expect to see these sorts of slowdowns. we expect this excel versions as well. if you look at the 15-year period ending in 2006, the rate of warming was almost double the previous 15 years and nobody paid attention to that. >> was colorado climate change, the 1000 year flood? >> we can say that sorts of events become more common. you load the dice in favor of more extreme precipitation events. you rule double sixes more often and maybe now and again you control a 13. >> our meteorologist ever going to start flashing those words " climate change" as often as they flash "severe weather"? >> they are beholden to what the producer says. some are on board and many are not. >> if i could jump in, there's a lesson from history in the united states that is helpful. if you look at when the scientific evidence around tobacco was clear and the contents -- and scared that tobacco is bad for you, there was still a very powerful lobby of scientists from the tobacco industry to actually contaminate

says with 95% certainty that climate change is real and man made. why are why down playing some well established source easy of energy. >>> also, when obamacare on the horizon, who might receive benefits and who might be hurt most financially. >>> plus, as more and more being americans become. atheist, how does that stem the tide? >> as al jazeera's courtney ceely -- keely reports, the problem could be catastrophic. >> hundreds of climate change activists protest in stockholm. >> we are frustrated and upset about how our politicians are not acting the way the science says. >>> the u.n.'s intragovernmental panel on climate change predicts worldwide temperatures could rise between 2.8 to 8.5° by the end of the century. this despite data from the last 15 years that shows a slow down in global warning. warming. the panel stress that the global warming is indisputable. do not always reflect global trends. they are now as certain that global warming is man made as they are that smoking kills. >> the report should be awake-up call. >> multiple lines of evi

changed. even though i am the one who is opposing to this project i did not get proper notification, how are all of my neighbors were informed about the date in change and time? the previously, the owner indicated that back in 2011, i have not participate in the meeting because i already have a previous commitment at that time. i have make a telephone call to the person who draw up the plan and indicated that i am object the to the project. previously, the chairman indicated that he supported the project owner by, you know, like increasing the value of his own house, so that he could live there healthily but yet he shortcut the people that are at least three houses behind and sacrifice their view and so if that is what he meant, you know, to the community. >> thank you. >> >> project sponsor you have a two-minute rebuttal if you choose. >> thank you commissioners. may i just say based on the written paper i received from the planning department about the dr, number one, the focus number one is

so the additional changes are comments that we received. many of them related to recommendation 3.1 about increasing access to appropriate care to san francisco vulnerable population. to address several comments we made several changes ; some of them more substantial than others. changes are outlined in more detail in the memo you received in advance. the first one relates to health scare services. the expansion of the guideline to support an assessment of the density of services provided within an area was appropriate and we agreed. the analysis within the health care services master plan points to this also. while it's important to increase access to care and san francisco's low income and under served neighborhoods, it's also important to see how much care is provided in those neighborhoods. while china town and bay view hunters point are considered low income area with high need for medical services, there are more services already existing in china town than the bay view. so that should be factored into the consistency determination. t

this is really changed. as these guys are describing, it has changed the politics, too. they tend to be more democratic voters. loudoun was an entirely republican bastion 15 years ago. you see dual pressures. you see the demographic pressure and you see the influx of the different type of individual and the pressure that places on the tax base, on development, on the retail mix, on housing. that is what is really fascinating, that it is not exclusive to loudoun. it happens all over the region. and that is what is driving this sort of slow shift that is happening in the urban suburbs, the fastest-growing communities in the country. >> michael? >> yeah, push the mike over. >> thank you for being here. i have worked with a lot of different folks here for many years. terrific programs. in 2004, george bush. 98 of the 100 fastest-growing counties. after the 2004 election, the debate was about the problem facing the democratic party, because the fastest-growing parts of the country -- 98 out of a hundred is beyond the margin of error. of course we had a great recession since t

>> i think the change in format has changed the dialogue. one of the reasons we got rid of the panel of reporters was that reporter number one has taught long and hard about the question that he or she is going to ask to show how brave they are to the american people and their constituents in the press corps. under the old rules, he or she would ask the question and they would have the two minutes, one minute, 30 seconds. maybe they're needed to be a follow-up on that question. reporter number two has been a lot of time on his or her question and does not want to waste be moment in the sun to follow because they have their own question. you did not get the follow-ups when you should. that is why we decided to change the format. i love this pot at 15 minutes on a subject where the moderator has the ability to let them go at each other. to step forward, one back. i like the model we have now. we take a lot of ideas. do not hesitate to contact the commission. go online to the website. be kind. we will be happy to hear from you.

this situation for a long time and we have to change it simple as that. has been in place since one thousand nine hundred ninety five and since then there has never been one single negotiated agreement multilaterally we have to change that now bali is an opportunity we're going to have the ministerial call for us at the end of the year december and we are negotiating now with smaller package it doesn't mean that it's not significantly affect it's a very significant package but it's something different from what we were doing before so who knows this next approach would begin to yield some fruits and we can not only harvest something significantly bali but also open the door for future agreements but in your approach to changing things in w.t. what would be different from your proudest predecessor because he was saying the same thing you were saying that things have been stagnating and he wanted to change stuff but he couldn't do anything really well this is the first time that we actually try to approach something different from the whole round. we have s

first i started slow and picked the easiers change to make. i changed my food.on to my air, my water, my skin care. you're getting results of years of research in trial and error. start where you're comfortable. perhaps water is easier. find a good filtered bottle of water or better yet get a pitter for your sink. it's more economical. second, i'm hard on myself to stay disciplined, but not too hard. i don't berate myself if i can't get raw out of a bank kitt. i go back for the next meal. i know i need a cheat. popcorn at hockey game. can't escape it. i go for it without guilt. don't forget, do you have a question for me? be sure to follow me on twitter. my handleis@kacarolalt. >>> until next time, i hope you're learning to be a more healthy you. @carolalt. >>> until next time, i hope you're learning to be a more healthy you. >>> fox weather alert. people living in colorado are in trouble. the weather is their enemy right now. punishing amounts of rain have been falling for days now, and beautiful boulder county just outside denver, the sheriff's department is c

a few specific things changed. it's not changing the whole world. it's not getting guns from everyone, man. it's talking about two or three small little things that i think would make america a better place. >> one of my... one of my sister's best friends started a facebook group in direct reaction to students for concealed carry on campus. it was initially called students against concealed carry on campus. and it was just a facebook group, but then it morphed into something more active, an actual grassroots movement. i think i'm doing something that my sister would be doing. and not only that, i think it's the right thing to do. our goal isn't to take away anyone's second amendment rights or anything like that, but we realize that students do not have the capabilities to do a policeman's job in a classroom setting. >> the gun dealer who sold one of the two guns used in the virginia tech shootings was on the campus thursday night. eric thompson spoke in support of a campaign to allow concealed weapons on college campuses. it's a controversial topic,

does this mean that climate change has caused?> there was a steady warming from the 1950s, but since 1998, an apparent pause. each decade is warmer than the one before, and the temperature is still rising in the long- term. >> looking at the surface temperatures, this does not tell us about how the climate system is changing. have continued to rise, ice is melting rapidly in the arctic and in glaciers, and climate change is continuing even though the surface temperature has not been rising. >> heat waves will be more common as temperatures rise by the end of the century. so will the floods that recently tore through colorado. and the sea level will rise as climate change affects even the united kingdom. >> the global patterns will bring changes in rainfall and temperatures, and in the weather that everyone will experience. the has implications for way that we use and consume energy in the united and him. supercomputers like these project that the gulf stream may be weaker, making great britain cooler. people skeptical about climat

dow more volatile, less volatile, no change at all? >> many anything, i think it might make it a touch less volatile. you know, one point in the stock, whether it's on an $8 stock like alcoa, one point ask the same amount in that kind of thing. but when you have an $8 stock, you know, it tends to bounce around a lot more. if anything, maybe a touch volatile. the volatility wasn't really a concern. these are all big, well-known liquid stocks. this is not like a merging market stock where they bounce like crazy or something. we're not worried about that. >> david, when investors hear about changes like this, they start thinking like well, why didn't this company or that company get invited at the index and the two names that came up, google and apple have a huge influence on the economy and widely traded stocks. what's the story there? >> google, apple and all the other stocks, changing an inkex is not an investment recommendation, neither positive nor negative. google is $885 a share, apple i continue know but well north of 200 or 300.

people started to change.hey started to change in the immediate surroundings, and now it is about looking at the whole country and saying, where do we have those patches of land that we still think are worth keeping like they are, preserving? about two years ago, there was a huge story, the plans to build a chemical factory. all those plans were ready. basically just waiting for the government's approval. so many people started to say no and make their voices heard that they actually changed something. the plans were abandoned. that did not happen before so often. that was an important development. >> landmark event, yes. we need to take the first break on the program. when we come back, we will continue our conversation with mr. klaus bardenhagen, freelance journalist from germany. see you in a few minutes. >> will come back to the second segment of the database program -- welcome back to the second segment of today's program. we will continue our conversation with mr. klaus bardenhagen, freelance journalist

bit of difference because it is not going to change, it is not a subnative change. >> peter war field, the director of the library users association, i oppose, adding the word handling and i have a different word that i propose would be much more realistic. and given the record and the direction of the ethics commission. i think that it should say, ethics commission regulations for dismissing violations of the sunshine ordinance. and i think that that would be much more realistic and give the public a better sense for what actually happens at ethics commission hearings. >> he also would like to propose that you put off the change so that the public might the broader public might weigh in and i am tempted to announce a contest that library users association would like to have or hold for the best title for these regulations and i would propose to bring the results and for you to solicit the results and bring them to the subsequent hearing. it could be very perfectly clear, commissioner hur, i'm speaking against this. all right? >> i appreciate it. >> >> the rationale that mr. st. croix

environment but also to the changing regulatory scheme. and so the assertion that a change in the regulatory structure that governs economic activity is going to lead to a cascading series of disasters including unemployment and stagnating economic growth, that assumes people can't figure out how to admit less pollution and that really runs counter to the evidence of the last 40 years. >> host: i'm not going to see this eloquently but ehrlich was always concerned about reaching the limit. the population would reach a level that we reach a limit in the resources that we need to have portable water and what have you. adenosine's that simon was saying as we get closer to this one at people get smart and extend the limit out further. there are so many examples of that. you look at natural gas today with hydraulic fracturing where we are now talking about the debate about exporting natural gas and we have so much of it. but i guess from a policy standpoint, i guess if the question is whether you believe it is always going to happen and whether

more change or less? more. more change. more change in momentum means what kind of impulse? greater. greater impulse. and you saw that. and it's the impulse that knocked the block over. hey, huh? huh? physics. we're not gonna talk about impulse and momentum today. we're gonna talk about a rebated idea. how hard you push to get something going is one thing, but how long you push is also important. so far, we talked about how long in terms of time, how long in terms of what your watch reads. we can talk about how long in terms of... distance. distance, that's right. and when we do that, force times distance, it turns out we'll get a change in some other quantity. and that other quantity is not momentum, it is? begins with a e. energy. energy, okay? and this is what we're gonna talk about today. force times distance will produce a change in energy. what is energy? energy is that numerical quantity which appears in many, many forms like mechanical energy. we'll talk about mechanical energy today, really. energy of position, potential energy. energy of motion, motion energy. we d

they have no idea but the island would change their lives forever but they would change the fate of the i love. you know never seen anything like this before is going to come in the house. in the fortress of ice is grown in just one hour and it's only the beginning. of mission free cretaceous and free transport charges free. range month free risk free. to tide free. download free broadcast quality video for your media projects a free media oh don the hard teeth on tom. fox but. by. digital the price is the only industry specifically mentioning the customers. that's because a free and open press is critical to our democracy track all books. that i go on i charge and on this show we reveal the picture of what's actually going on we go beyond identifying problems trying to fix rational debate a real discussion critical issues facing america by ready to join the movement then welcome the big picture. and welcome back. this week is climate week and here in the big picture we'll be talking to some of the world's leading climate scientists about the dangers of the human race the dangers that t

isn't that what the resolution the proposed changes was doing? >> and that will be our support to encourage the property owners to move forward and that's a good idea. >> (laughter). >> okay. so we don't need to do that under the resolution. >> you know it should be part of the resolution and a can we add that then. >> you want to. >> yeah. we're going to do peace plaza >> isn't it in that originally. >> the peace plaza is in the j h s not to the work plan. >> no, but i think isn't that resolution adding the peace plaza. >> yeah, but your work program doesn't. so adopting it will take care of that >> that's pretty direct. >> and we're - >> so add those two believes into this paragraph. >> we could do that but my understanding is the opposition to that is the community that spoke today thinks they don't have consensus enough but we can take the motion. >> we can yeah. >> because we want to encourage the property owners to work with staff. >> it doesn't mean it's a landmark and i want to reiterate what mr. pearlman just mentioned it's not putting t

>> i think the change in format has changed the dialogue. one of the reasons we got rid of the panels of reporters was that reporter number one has thought long and hard about the question he or she is going to ask to show how bright they are to the american people and their c constituents in the press pool. maybe there needed to be a follow-up on that question. but reporter number two has spent a lot of time on his or her question and doesn't want to waste his or her moment in the sun to follow up on -- because they have their own question. so -- you didn't get the follow-ups when you should and that's jud why i changed the format. the moderator has the ability to follow up to get them to go at each other. i think the system we came through -- as i said, two steps forward and one back, i like the model we have now. not that might not change it, we'll spends a lot of time seeing what changes we should make. you can go to our website and be behind. more than happy to hear from you. >> i really think that in that period of time the quality of

the last report from the panel on climate change concluded that climate change is occurring and the emissionnhouse gasses is likely to be the cause. a small number of errors were used by skeptics to cast doubt on the report and said it over played warming predictions, sea level rise and the role played by greenhouse gasses. the last u.n. report had risks to a broad range of human and natural systems. this report is expected to build on that, taking in more scientific data to give the world's governments, businesses and citizens the best possible idea of what is happening to the earth and what is likely to happen in the years ago. al jazeera. >> reporter: and the president says he will attend the u.n. general assembly despite being wanted by the international criminal court on genicide charges but she didn't say that the united states granted him a visa yet. >> translator: attending the general assembly is our right. it's our right of the united states itself cannot do anything. there is not a single law in america that gives american authorities the right to take action against me. i've take