tv thought he not chang kai-shek should be running china and thought if they deny anita military man at the helm he might have been right. he did not get along with chang he had reformed chinese banking and resented the vast sums of money that chang spent on the army and nor did he get a vote along with his other brother-in-law the husband of his sister. said very first thing i was told is that he was a 75th lineal descendant of confucius. like any normal stupid american i burst out laughing and tell i was informed in all seriousness that they do keep track of these things in china. a sweet man his breeding was more impressive than his brain but his highly ambitious wife pushed and prodded and until she got him up to the position of minister as of finance. anxious to be loved he happily supplied chang kai-shek with all of the money that he wanted for his army. there were two major books ringgit -- written about madame chang when i started my. one was by a an extraordinary writer and journalist who published something like 50 bucks and wrote to innumerable articles for "the new yorker.

she could change the fact that chiang kai-shek's son had said he and rush and his outlook was very different from hers. and she would thinking perhaps she could revive a nationalist movement, which of course was impossible. but she continued to believe what she believed, and she would occasionally issue a bulletin from the united states saying xyz, but it made no difference. she had long lost any power, which you have to feel sad after so many. >> will your book be published in china, translated? >> that already bought it, which may be almost pass out when they told me this. [laughter] >> they are even paying me money. now my assumption is that they will change certain things. i don't think -- it will be very interesting to see what they do with it. anything else? gai'm sorry. i nodded in the same direction. >> who bought it, taiwan? the book. >> mainland china. that's why i assume certain things are going to be changed. yes? >> was she ever reconciled to the events in china, the development into modern capitalism in china? >> absolutely not, never. no. not so far as one can -- no, no. know,