interesting scene by gustav flabert, when, already quite bored, being in a family relationship with charles bavariehing, to flow with him in everything, nod your head at everything, yes, listen to him, why not a quote visualized in the novel. becoming flaubert from the same teachings of jean-jacques ruso, who should a woman be, so she should raise him as a man while he is young and growing, she should honor him in his old age, when he, so to speak, grows up, i don’t agree with you, oksana, because this is with ruso’s zhanzhak, this not with me, well, with zhanzhak ruso, they found an excuse, it seems to me that emma, ​​emma bavarie also does not agree, because she... somehow has completely different ideas about how a woman should behave, how she should live , feel, and it just seems to me that her entire attention is immersed in inner world, into the world of experiences, she is the person who wants to make a novel out of her life, cool, by the way, very, very accurate, yes, yes, and it seems to me that just when i started working on the role... i read the novel, the last scenes were especially har

oksana, as an expert on french society, please tell me, here is emma bavari and her husband, charles bavari our point of view, because it seems that the doctor, it seems it seems that they have servants, they even have some kind of estate that she is secretly selling at the same time. there they ride on some kind of, well, relatively speaking, minibus, yes, it goes to rouen, on this carriage, where everyone is packed, well, this is our minibus, yes, or there they tie up some kind of wooden shoes - so that with these yes , and her mother-in-law scolds her for the fact that the upholstery of the chairs costs two francs, the material, a meter of two francs, is very expensive, it should be a maximum of 10 sous, and - only the senior member should have a chair families and a lot of armchairs - it’s too luxurious, new curtains are too luxurious, in general, it’s stra, well, that is, i want to somehow correlate this with our reality, that is , what class do they belong to? i’ll answer in flaberian style, they belong to the bourgeois class, but only in flaberian terminology, a direct translation of

oksana bondarenko, director of the moscow transport museum and an art critic and... her husband charles bavariich they have secretly sells, at the same time they ride there some kind of, well, relatively speaking, minibus, yes, they go to rouen on this carriage, where everyone is packed, well, this is our minibus, yes, or they tie up some kind of wooden shoes so that these shoes can click.

circle in the novel, firstly, charles, ball, yes, nabokov, he has an absolutely wonderful lecture on foreign literature, one of them is just about the novel, madame bavariand the burial place, yes, the burial place of em in three coffins, in general, this is all multi-layered, in my opinion, she was buried in three coffins, again, and this impoverished charles, they tell him it’s expensive, but he says, nothing i don't want to hear. again not i can agree with you, it seems to me that again there is a circle symbol in this too, charlie is so closed in on himself that uh, i can’t say that he loves emma for who she is, it seems to me that he doesn’t know her, he fell in love in her, for him, well, in her appearance, it turns out, well, maybe inside, she was a young girl who lived on a farm. again, this is society, it seems to me that the novel is a kind of quintessence or the last drop, as it were, the cherry on the cake in the context in which french society found itself at that moment, and not at the time of the narration in the novel, but we understand that flaubert wrote it there in the fifties, and the narrative takes place in the 19th century. in gen

oksana, as an expert on french society, please tell me, here is emma bavari and her husband, charles bavari, who are they? is this average? class or what, they are rich, they are poor, it is difficult to understand from our point of view, because it seems that doctor, it seems that they have servants, they even have some kind of estate, which they secretly sell, uh, at the same time there they go on some kind of, well, relatively speaking, minibus, yes, she goes to rouen on this carriage, where everyone is crowded, well, this is our minibus, yes, or is there some kind of wooden shoes tied up there so that these heads can knock? yes, and her mother-in-law scolds her for the fact that the upholstery of the chairs, two francs each, the material, 2 francs per meter - this is very expensive, it should be a maximum of 10 sous, only the the eldest member of the family, and a lot of armchairs - it’s too luxurious, new curtains are too luxurious, in general it’s strange, well, that is, i want to somehow correlate this with our reality, that is, what class do they belong to? charles, this is such pet

oksana, as an expert on french society, please tell me, here is emma, ​​bavari and her husband, charles bavarihey are rich, they are poor, it is difficult to understand from our point of view, because it seems that the doctor, it seems that they have servants, they even have some kind of estate, which is secret to them. sells, at the same time there they ride on some kind of, well, relatively speaking, minibus, yes, it goes to rouen, on this one here in korea, where everyone is packed, well, this is our minibus, yes, or they tie up some kind of then wooden shoes, so that uh, yes, and her mother-in-law scolds her for the fact that the upholstery of the chairs, according to two francs, material, 2 francs per meter - that must be very expensive. maximum 10 sous, only the eldest member of the family should have a chair, and there are a lot of chairs, it’s too luxurious, new curtains are too luxurious, in general, well, that is, i want to somehow relate this to our reality, that is, they in general what class do they belong to? i’ll answer in flaberian style, they belong to the bourgeois class, but

is clear, this path, you can describe what is happening to her in general, so she married this charles bavario disagree with the character, and you are just doing what you justify him, you justify him, you justify him, you come up with why did she act exactly like this, more logically you are still looking for these moves so that it fits on... the emotional background, it was prikotenko brought forward charles’ inner world, here everything is a little from the other side, because in our performance director andrei simply, yes, it was very, very difficult, as emma’s husband sees it, the viewer sees it, and many moments that are told openly in the novel, in our performance they seem to be hidden, hidden, and with a shadow side, because charlie until the very end doesn’t know about his wife’s parallel life, right? wants about this is to know, he is so, ah, he really is the only, perhaps, character in this, in this work, who simply loves her madly, the way she is, yes, and he is very accommodating to many. sacrifice - in this work, for her sake, well, again, not because of his knightly nature or,