in 1933, march of 1933, franklin roosevelt and charles evans hughes exchanged letters. franklin roosevelt wanted to know if he could recite the entire oath, not just saying that i do. he asked him and he thought that was okay. he remarked that it was very interesting, he thought, that one former new york governor was going to be administered into another new york governor. they each expressed great respect for each other and look forward to their association and a common enterprise. roosevelt was inaugurated president in 1933. by this time, hughes had made it very strong record as a libertarian. he made some very important decisions protecting freedom of the press, for example, and freedom of association. but what got him and roosevelt on a collision course was the constitutional challenges to the new deal legislation. particularly in 1935 and 1936. the hughes court began to strike down one piece of new deal legislation after another. now, hughes was actually a centrist, he was neither a conservative nor liberal. but he wanted in the worst way to keep the core together

series of q&a interviews continues tomorrow with reducer director charles evans junior on his new movie addiction inc. the film is about victor noble and his aunt acted discovery of an ingredient in tobacco which makes cigarettes more addictive. you can see the program tomorrow at 7:00 p.m. eastern here on c-span two. up next on "the communicators", google's new privacy policy. then on booktv, a look back at pearl harbor and world war ii. we will start with craig shirley's book, december 1941. after that, pearl harbor christmas. later, bert and anita poulsen talk about their book. this week on "the communicators", a look at google's new privacy policy. >> on march 1 of this year, google changed its privacy policy, and that is our topic this week on "the communicators." markham erickson is the director of the internet coalition. mr. erickson, can you explain what google did to change its privacy policy and wide? >> google announced about six weeks ago that it was preparing to change its privacy policy. the first time a company that size has given that much time and engagement in that edu

c-span: charles evans, what is "addiction incorporated"?> guest: it is a film that i worked on for a long time about the tobacco industry and about victor denoble's lifetime commitment to doing good with science. c-span: where did you get the idea to do this? >> guest: i saw victor testify on your network back in what was the senate subcommittee coverage of the waxman subcommittee -- i wanted to know more. victor got a lot of coverage -- it was front-page news. he had just refuted the seven ceos sworn testimony that nicotine was addictive, and i got his number three journalists friend and contacted him and got to know him better read i saw him -- i saw him make educational presentations about drugs to kids and came to feel that that was the story that i wanted to tell. the backdrop would be the tobacco industry and his very germanic experiences in it. c-span: and you are the victor denoble. how did you get started on this whole thing that has led to the documentary? >> guest: it began in 1979 when i was contacted by phillip morris tobacco.

we'll have two current fed reserve presidents joining us, charles evans and dennis lockhart.hat are their thoughts on rates, the possibility of q.e. 3 and much more? that's tomorrow on "squawk on the street." [ male announcer ] at scottrade, we believe the more you know, the better you trade. so we have ongoing webinars and interactive learning, plus, in-branch seminars at over 500 locations, where our dedicated support teams help you know more so your money can do more. [ rodger ] at scottrade, seven dollar trades are just the start. our teams have the information you want when you need it. it's another reason more investors are saying... [ ] i'm with scottrade. ♪ >>> we're watching shares of apple this morning. had broken the $590, approaching its 50-day moving average which had been broken earlier this month. decline of 2% here, certainly weighing on the s&p 500 as well as the nasdaq as we are down by two full percentage points so far on the session. carl, you mentioned "the new york times" article saying that apple uses all sorts of legal ways to avoid paying as high taxe

evan is right. paul ryan has a budget that has none of the spinach. he never talks about -- charles apparently has some pipeline. he knows what is in paul ryan's mine. other than $5 trillion in tax cuts -- >> that is simply false. on social security, ryan has offered to raise the retirement age and reduced the amount the rich get rid the democrats have offered zero. on medicare, for which ryan and republicans have got slaughtered, he proposes to go to a premium system. the democrats have offered zero except it demagoguery. on discretionary spending, ryan has spelled out all kinds of cuts. i agree come in when area, he talks about lowering the rates but did not specify the lo opholes. having gone out on a limb on everything else, you are asking the republicans to commit political suicide when the democrats have offered nothing on anything. >> he is much more specific on entitlements than the democrats. if enacted, it would have a shot at controlling medicare cuts. the democrats are shamefully non-specific. but both sides are not willing to tell the voters about the problem. >> the pe

evan is right. paul ryan has a budget where there is none of the spinach. it is in general and vague. charles apparel has some pipeline -- apparently has some pipeline t. knows what is in paul ryan's mine. $5 to end in tax cuts -- >> -- $5 trillion in tax cuts -- >> that is false. on social security, he has offered to raise the retirement age. democrats have offered zero. on medicare for which paul ryan and republicans have got slaughtered, the idea is to go to a premium support system. the democrats have offered zero except demagoguery. on discretionary spending, rya andn has all kinds of cuts. -- ryan has all kinds of cuts. i agree come in 1 area, he spoke about lowering rates but he did not specify where the local cuts are going but having gone out on a limb, you are asking the republicans to commit suicide by spelling out in advance cuts. democrats have offered nothing on anything to . >> absolutely true that he is more specific on entitlements and then the democrats. it is also true that the democrats are shamefully non- specific about that. but both sides are guiy of pretending we don't

. >> well, sir harold evans was replaced by mr. charlesdouglas home, who is the nephew of the prime minister. and the paper was safely return to to the tory fold, was it not? >> i think you are putting that as though that was the motive, which it was not. i only remember ever talking to mr. evans about policy once when he came to me, shut the door behind him and said, look, tell me what you want to say -- what do you want me to say ended in we take it need not leave this room, but i will do it. i said to him, this is not my job. all walk -- all i would say to you is please be consistent. do not changed sides day-by-day. i'm not taking political sides, but on issues. >> according to another book called "press gang," mr. douglas home told mr. clean slate that you were one of the main powers behind the factor throne. do you feel that is right? >> it does not sound like mr. douglas-home to me. he was a pretty modest individual. i do not know though. >> were you one of the main powers -- no. if you want to judge my thinking, look at the sun. >>

. >> howard evans was replaced by charles douglas hume. >> the long serving deputy. >> th the paper waseturned to the tory fold. >> i remember talking to mr. evans about policy once when he came to me, shut the door behind him, and said, "looked, tell me what you want to say. what do you want me to say, it will not leave this room but i will do it." all i would say to you is please be consistent. that is -- do not change sides day-by-day. on the issues. >> according to the book, "press gang," you said you were one of the main powers behind the thatcher throne. is that real or not? >> that does not sound like mr. douglas. he was a very modest individual. i do not know. >> where are you [unintelligible] -- >> not the times, the sun. look at the sun if you want to judge my paper. >> you personally were not one of the main powers behind the thatcher throne. >> no. >> did you consult with her regularly on important matters of politics? >> certainly not. >> on the issue of editorial control, you gave insight into the meeting you had with mr. evans when he was at the register. you were intervi

charles? >> well, it is early. the nice guy thing -- romney's problem is not that people think he is offensively not a nice guy, i guess that he is stiff. -- it is that he is stiff. evan is right about this. spain is a cloud on the horizon, and italy is even worse. if that is an issue leading up to election day, stiffness, being sober, a stable, even solemn will work for the challenger if economic issues are at stake, which obviously there will be, and he is the guy with economic experience. >> john boehner, mitch mcconnell, on board this week. what about the conservative base? >> the base has no where to go. it is obama or romney. blend the base at other choices, they had six others and that did not work. obama is the one who will mobilize the base. people are not going to stay home. >> i agree with that, sort of. there is no place to go. but the numbers, republican term o -- are now in the primaries, has been lower this year, which is amazing. when you are talking very small percentage is, it makes a difference. that is what karl rove determined -- the 2000 election was so close that he needed to drive the base, and george bush won reelection in 2004 because of a ve

charles? >> well, it is early, and at the nice guy thing -- romney's problem is not that people think he is often simpl -- not that people think he is offensively not nice, ideas that he is stiff. evan is right on this, europe is a cloud on the horizon. if that becomes an issue, i don't think it is going to matter. stiffness, being sober, stable, even solemn will work to the advantage of the challenger if there are economic issues at stake, which obviously there will be. he is our guy with economic experience. >> john painter and mitch mcconnell are on board this week. what about the conservative base? >> obama and romney. when at the base had other choices, they tried six others and that did not work. the last man standing, the alternative to eight romney presidency, as barack obama's. -- is barack obama. >> i agree with that, sort of. there is no place to go. but the numbers, republican turnout in the primaries, has been a lower this year come to my amazement. i am not sure -- when you are talking to very small percentages, it makes a difference. that is what karl rove determined, that the 2011 election was so close that he needed to drive the base. george bush won reelection in 2