charles kennedy was a very special man. donald, you should be proud of your daddy. i am proud of your daddy. i left him to this. i am -- i loved him to this. i'm proud to call my friend. keith: the drawnout conflict in syria was continuing. the terror group i.s., also known as isis or i so, had taken parts of neighboring iraq in 2014. at that time, they were in favor of british airstrikes on iraq, but not syria. should british airstrikes be extended to syria? in 2015, ministers were advised strongly again. terrorist carnage on the doorstep of britain dramatically changed political opinion. three teams of terrorists carried out a plan, coordinated operation at the heart of paris. 130 people were dead. isis claimed responsibility. the world at westminster was no different. a motion was put before mps to extend british airstrikes to cover i.s. targets in syria as well as iraq. in october 2015 was the ultimate decision -- to go to war or not. >> i hope the house will come together in large numbers for britain to play its part defeating these evil extremists and taking t

charles kennedy was a very special man. donald, you should be proud of your daddy. i am proud of your daddy. i left him to this. i am -- i loved him to this. i'm proud to call my friend. keith: the drawnout conflict in syria was continuing. the terror group i.s., also known as isis or i so, had taken parts of neighboring iraq in 2014. at that time, they were in favor of british airstrikes on iraq, but not syria. should british airstrikes be extended to syria? in 2015, ministers were advised strongly again. terrorist carnage on the doorstep of britain dramatically changed political opinion. three teams of terrorists carried out a plan, coordinated operation at the heart of paris. 130 people were dead. isis claimed responsibility. the world at westminster was no different. a motion was put before mps to extend british airstrikes to cover i.s. targets in syria as well as iraq. in october 2015 was the ultimate decision -- to go to war or not. >> i hope the house will come together in large numbers for britain to play its part defeating these evil extremists and taking t

>> one of the defeated scottish politicians, the 2015 elections, the liberal democrat leader charles kennedya short time into the parliament came the said news mister kennedy was found dead in his home. >> i would like to direct these 2 mcdonald, son of charles and sarah. your father was a great man, stood up for what he believed in, led a party of centerleft with dignity, when you were older you will know your mom and dad greater than themselves. >> it is not what you have done, it is who you are and charles kennedy was a special man. proud of your daddy. i'm proud of your daddy. proud to call him my friend. >> away from these shores, in syria was considering, the terror group, isis taken control of parts of neighboring iran. in favor of british airstrikes and areas controlled by isis in iraq but not territory it was controlling and syria. should british airstrikes be extended to syria? in 2015 ministers were advised of a gain. the terrorist cottage on the doorstep of britain, changing political opinion. three teams of terrorists carried out the plan at the heart of paris. 130 people were d

key figures like former leader charles kennedy and business secretary vince cable were booted out overnighte, i must take responsibility. therefore, i announce i will be resigning as leader of the liberal democrats. he eventually handed over to this man, tim farron, whosejob it now is to give his party the parliamentary boost it so desperately needs. that was at rattle through the lib dems fortunes. let's talk to baroness susan kramer, a liberal democrat peer in the house of lords. we're joined by two voters who say they felt "let down" by the lib dems the last time they were in government. jess bowyer voted for the lib dems in 2010 after their promise to abolish university tuition fees. now, she says there's no point in the lib dems having good policies as she can't trust the party. kate pearson voted for the lib dems in 2010. she says she was "seduced" by nick clegg's charm, but was horrified after the coalition government. kate, you were seduced, but then horrified, what happened? kate, you were seduced, but then horrified, what happened ?|j kate, you were seduced, but then horrified, wh

senator kennedy: could we just say a word, please? mr. collingwood: this is charles collingwood--yes, say a word. senator kennedy: just how much we've enjoyed, and i'm sure governor reagan has, and obviously we don't agree on all of these matters. but it's so extremely important within our own country that we have a dialogue. we make major mistakes within the united states. we recognize that. perhaps we don't remedy them as rapidly as you would like to see us remedy or deal with them, but there are people -- even though governor reagan and i represent different political parties and perhaps a different point of view on some of these matters, we've recognized the fact that we are obviously far from perfect. but the world is so close together now because of technology, because of a lot of different things, that it's so important that we have these kind of exchanges, and particularly as the world belongs to you, that what we do and the decisions that we make have an effect on your lives, that you continue where you see that we make mistakes, that you continue to critici

charles collingwood. good night. >> author joining us from pittsburgh. why did california governor reagan and new york senator kennedy agree to this cbs news program? why these two individuals? >> i do not know so much from ronald reagan's side but i think it was arranged largely from the kennedy side. frank mankiewicz was the spokesman. rfk later regretted this debate and said he was the one who got me into that debate with ronald reagan. he did not appreciate that. he said don't ever get me on the same stage with that sob ever again. clearly thought that ronald reagan showed him up on the stage a little bit. >> you wrote a piece calling this the great forgotten debate. why? >> newsweek even said at the time that this looked like it could be the setup for a series of great future presidential debates. the idea that these two guys, it is quite possible they could've been two major parties, nominees in the foreseeable future. rfk in 1968, reagan a must got it in 1976. did get it in 1980. had robert kennedy not been shot and murdered one year after that, who knows? it is quite possible you could have seen ronald reagan

kennedys, and the clintons. her new book is "prince charles: the passions and paradoxes of an improbable life."nce charles is the longest-serving heir to the throne. he has been serving for 65 years. the book offers an inside look into his childhood, and his life as a king in waiting. i am pleased to have sally bedell smith back at this table. sally: it is great to be back. when he was born 70 years ago in sort of 19th century style, i have an eyewitness account of when he was three hours old and he was presented to the king's court in the ballroom. charlie: the heir is here. sally: this was given to meet by -- to me by a friend whose father was private secretary to the king. he was there with his nurse with a wimple and it was like out of the 19th century. this is someone who is supposed to walk a straight line and end up sitting on the throne wearing a crown and little did he know how long he would have to wait, or that he would end up creating a role for himself that was different from any prince of wales in history. and that he would, first of all he would have an 11 year marriage and spend

kennedys, and the clintons. her new book is called "prince charles: the passions and paradoxes of an improbable life." prince charles is the longest serving heir to the prichett throne. he's been first in line for off5 years. the book offers an inside look into his childhood, his marriages and life as a king in waiting. i am pleased to have sally bedell smith back at this table. welcome. >> thank you. it's wonderful to be back. >> rose: why is it an improbable life? >> well, you would think when he was born nearly 70 years ago in buckingham palace in 19t 19th century style -- i even have an eyewitness account of when he was three hours old and was presented to the king's court in the ballroom. >> rose: an heir is here. an heir is here. this is give ton me by a friend whose father was a private secretary to the king. >> rose: yeah. so there he was with his nurse with the wimple, and it was like out of the 19t 19th century and here was somebody who was supposed to walk a straight line and was supposed to end up on the throne wearing a crown and little did he know how long he would have to wait or create

kennedy creation a huge impression on her country. her fluency in language. when she went to france she spoke french and charles de gaulle and all the leaders almost wanted to meet her more than her husband. she was popular in europe. she had a great sense of fashion. at the inaugural we saw lie in trump almostania consciously dressing in a jackie look. she was a mother and she had what was raising to -- two little children. they had a miscarriage before and she wanted to raise those children right. it is like what the obamas did with theirs. beyond that she had a sense of rapport. she loved modern writers. i read her correspondence with john steinbeck. steinbeck broke jackie a most heartbreaking letter that her husband would live on. he was talking about king arthur in european history, what a hero means, and why a hero in history is bigger than a politician. writers loved her, artists love to her, the country loved her. she created a modern first lady by what she wanted to do. much more visible than best truman or maybe eisenhower -- or mamie eisenhower. >> the speechwriter for kennedy spoke at the national a

. >> kennedy: and crating the unlikely partnership between china and japan and having north korea baby shared photo. his >> sandra: president trump standing by his son-in-law jared kushner. charles krauthammer says both henry kissinger and hillary clinton used similar methods to connect with adversaries while in office. is the media once again over blowing a nonstory? plus, a new lien tenses -- new law in texas. protesters are bowing to fight the legislation in federal court and at the ballot box. whether it's a sign of things to come. after the show, you can join our live chat by clicking the overtime tab at foxnews.com/outnumbered. of course, you can tweet us. guy is already on his twitter. ♪ fun in art class. come close, come close. i like that. [ music stops suddenly ] ah. when your pain reliever stops working, your whole day stops. awww. try this. for minor arthritis pain, only aleve can stop pain for up to 12 straight hours with just one pill. thank you. ♪ come on everybody. you can't quit, neither should your pain reliever. stay all day strong with 12 hour aleve. manait's a series of is nsmart choices. and when you replace one meal or snack a day with glucerna made with c

charles says about not reading the bill is a factually true statement. when rand paul got to congress, this was one of his big thing. no one reads the bills. no one knows what's in there. kennedy: this comes down to price fixing. and price fixing results in venezuela. it does. on may day. >> obviously problematic. i do not consider myself to be on the far left of my party. but for some government role in delivering healthcare, i think you will see increasing support for a single payer system because people are so afraid -- they are not afraid. kennedy: they are afraid. single payer is an awful idea. >> when you have bills coming out of the republican house that will strip understand for 24 million people. they say we know congress isn't going anywhere and we want to make sure they are held to the fire. kennedy: people are frustrated that they don't have choices. >> we have have insurance kk 8 lines and keep government -- >> has anybody made a good argument for why we can't have understand across state lines? there is nothing accept the corporations -- >> both side of the aisle have that. they have a lobbying problem. they are all beholding to special interests. kennedy: and th

charles and larry, the guy who eventually win was dismissed of having no chance. look at barack obama or donald trump. they were not the heavy money favorites. that changed. i go back to john kennedy and abraham lincoln. you think given the fact that we have founded conventional wisdom we would think twice about, you know, sure bets or things -- those are very, you know, donald trump. his presidency is a mishmash after a little more than 100 some odd days. >> neil, it's the danger of forecast. the day before the election. so many said the election will be over at 6:00 p.m. and hillary will win. look what happened? always be weary of the consensus. sometimes it makes sense to get on the other side of the boat. my kids have never been in a j.c. penney but they know the amazon box has something inside of it. that speaks to where the future is. the future is brighter if you're with the right entrepreneurial spirit. >> neil: we've been belaboring this point. history is defined not by the things we thought would happen but the things that did not. we keep forgetting that. >> we always do. i think also history defined by those who just believe in themselves, which i think is the crux of

charles collingwood. good night. joining us from pittsburgh. why did california governor reagan and new york senator kennedy agreed to this program? >> i do not know about reagan's side, but i think it was arranged largely by the kennedy's side. later regretted this debate and would say of frank meikle it's, -- frank mak owitz, you got me in that debate with ronald reagan. "do notuoted as saying ever get me on stage with that . ever again..o.b >> and you call this the great forgotten debate. why? > >> newsweek even said at the time that this could be a dry run for some great future presidential debate. so it is quite possible this could have been -- they are two major parties, presidential nominees in the foreseeable future. rfk's 1968, reagan almost got it , didn't get it in 1980, and if robert f kennedy had not been shot and murder one year after this, who knows? you might have seen reagan and rfk running against each other in 19 80, 1984. -- 1980, 1984. this is fascinating to think about. >> and we take technology for granted today, but the fact that 50 years ago, students were in london via satellite was a big deal. the video