. >> i'm charles marsel. that well be possible given the timeline and i explained the timeline that the may exist on the people that maintain in the files of the people that maintain the mainframe of the computer. so it used to be the department of information services or something. they change their name several times. but the question for this body is whether there is a role to publically state to the interest of this commission that those documents that they are of interest to this body and that they be preserved. i don't think you have to formally issue a subpoena or anything like that, but because mr. white, i believe it was, made a reference to the retention laws and cited a section about the destruction of information once the question was raised or the documents were requested. it might be that you want to go on record in someway that these are critical documents that should be preserved effective this date so that there is a statement on the record that under the state retention policy that then part

i'm charles marsel for the record. i want to congratulate commissioner kopp for being here and thank the board for his appointment. i also am doing so on behalf of friends of ethics. the commission should have received by e-mail a copy of the final letter signed by friends of ethics and not by mr. bush, the one by mr. bush is in a document that was in process. this is the one you received signed by friends of ethics are the legal points we wanted to make on these several items on our agenda tonight. i said many times before this body and to the public that the law for public financing was clear. we have a proactive an concurrent enforcement mechanism so the use of public funds is in fact indemnified by the process set up which is you and me and friends of ethics and other individuals in the public sector who are interested in the integrity of public financing. that promise must be maintained. so 5 years is not acceptable. however, i think in this case, it's useful because we will see by an examination of the process ex

i'm charles marsel for the record. i want to congratulate commissioner kopp for being here and thank the board for his appointment. i also am doing so on behalf of friends of ethics. the commission should have received by e-mail a copy of the final letter signed by friends of ethics and not by mr. bush, the one by mr. bush is in a document that was in process. this is the one you received signed by friends of ethics are the legal points we wanted to make on these several items on our agenda tonight. i said many times before this body and to the public that the law for public financing was clear. we have a proactive an concurrent enforcement mechanism so the use of public funds is in fact indemnified by the process set up which is you and me and friends of ethics and other individuals in the public sector who are interested in the integrity of public financing. that promise must be maintained. so 5 years is not acceptable. however, i think in this case, it's useful because we will see by an examination of the process ex

i'm charles marsel for the record. i want to congratulate commissioner kopp for being here and thank the board for his appointment. i also am doing so on behalf of friends of ethics. the commission should have received by e-mail a copy of the final letter signed by friends of ethics and not by mr. bush, the one by mr. bush is in a document that was in process. this is the one you received signed by friends of ethics are the legal points we wanted to make on these several items on our agenda tonight. i said many times before this body and to the public that the law for public financing was clear. we have a proactive an concurrent enforcement mechanism so the use of public funds is in fact indemnified by the process set up which is you and me and friends of ethics and other individuals in the public sector who are interested in the integrity of public financing. that promise must be maintained. so 5 years is not acceptable. however, i think in this case, it's useful because we will see by an examination of the process ex