remember charles mcmillin? well, the defendant explained his actions. he explained the basis of his actions to charles mcmillin. you recall that. here's what he said. >> yeah, and i tried to get in the car. >> he's probably on something. >> that was his justification for using this level of force. he's a big guy. he's a sizeable guy. he might be on something. we have to control him. control is the restraint so that's the force. his two justifications were that george floyd was big and that he might be on something. well, you know the standards. you've heard the standards many times. you know the difference between a risk and a threat. officers are authorized to use force to respond to a threat. they're not authorized to use force to respond to a risk. anybody poses a potential risk, big, small, in between. everybody is a risk. not everybody is a threat. being large, the act of being large, it's not a crime. it's not a risk. sorry -- it's not a threat. it's merely a risk. being on something. being on something, it's not a threat. it may be a risk, but it