. >> hi, my name is a charles steiner, i live at a veritas green tree owned property and i'm urging the committee to support the legislation and subsidy for speculative behavior. i would like the legislation to be passed without any amendments. my experience in the neighborhood is that green tree has offered default evictions, unlawful detainers, three-day notices to vacate without cure. and permits are missing when renovations are being done. so i think that this legislation is important. it's significant. very reasonable. and i urge you to vote yes on this legislation without any amendments. thank you. >> good morning. my name is glen, i'm a tenant at 300 buchanan street. the apartment i've lived in is the same for over 24 years now. we are urging the board of supervisors to fully endorse this and move it through. i'm concerned to hear that five members of the board would not speak with tenants and advocates to discuss this specific legislation. it's interesting to see this side of the room is empty. they are not present. i know the schedule is busy, but why supervisors wouldn't meet

my name is charles steiner, and i live at 1424 polk street. it's a green tree veritas owned building for the last five years. i'm a long-term resident, and i represent four other long-term tenants in this one minute of speaking here. i'm not the longest long-term tenant, i'm not the oldest. one of my neighbors received a three day notice to vacate even though the check was sent on time, it arrived at headquarters from a previous address that the -- had moved -- headquarters had moved, and so they did not receive the check, and one day after the first of the month, my neighbor received a three day notice to vacate right on his door. another neighbor -- [inaudible] >> supervisor sheehy: thank you. thank you. >> clerk: your time is concluded, sir. >> supervisor sheehy: sorry. yes. next speaker, please. >> good afternoon. my name is kathy lipscomb. i'm a tenant in noe valley. i've been in building for 26 years and it's a 36 unit building, and we really fare the wors the -- fear the worst, i'm telling you. i tell you after the consideration of the

of the saxons the ex down steiner me a modern day death more it were a sacred site. charles was convinced he had already dealt a final blow to the heathen saxon it's. a first step in and seeing their territory for the good and active submission of the saxons all to acknowledge his rule and pledge then fail to. back out. they can't yet still you men of the saxon people now agree that you wish to submit to the mighty christian king of the franks for all eternity through all its side. hello t.j. gained by force. what choice did the defeated have submission or death either they betray their culture or they lose their life. without let there be peace between you and us. charles believed the saxons were defeated was he mistaken. there's under the saxons were not a united front there was a whole number of sub tribes the westphalian was the angry ends and the east fairly ends are the best known so that they were not under central command from the military perspective either these wars are waged by these different tribes meaning that one victory by charlemagne definitely doesn't mean