charlie: thank you for coming. tiger: thank you, charlie. charlie: tiger woods for the hour. you for joining us. a conversation about not only performance, but the will to win. ♪ >> will trades at its highest in a year as we count down to global production cuts worth almost $2 billion a day. a third ofhas lost its value after forecasting losts. >> john kerry set to lay out his vision for peace in the middle east. >> turkey seen as the

charlie: love it.o for all the conflict with gangsters, this becomes your competition, doesn't it? >> yes. part of the morality story, he's competing for the souls of the people. you know, and its about -- it's complicated and interesting and i wanted her character to really have -- to be making a very salient point, not to hold up the prohibitionist as a caricature because we decided it was to end prohibition, but to look at the public health issue that alcohol was. it was viewed as a crisis and it was a serious attempt to get rid of it. charlie: to legalize morality. >> exactly. and it was an interesting thing that happened. hallbody who drank out the went overnight from being -- alcohol went overnight from being law-abiding american to being a criminal. it made criminality all of a sudden -- a look different in the american psyche. it changed our relationship to what our laws were. charlie: it made people like al capone very rich. >> once you make something illegal, you create an illegal market, as

charlie: safer?ndrew: when disasters happen, there will be fleets of robotic devices coming in to render aid, fast triaged to get people to safety, autonomous vehicles coming to pick up severely injured folks, large pieces of heavy equipment coming in to move things in the way. if you could imagine a world in which just like now we have learned to build houses to protect us from the elements, we are using machines to give us and are using machines to give us far greater protection. then, 50% of the planet currently living their life in fear almost every year as to what will happen to them, they may have a much more secure and pleasant life. ♪ charlie: you can't stop technology. andrew: that's right. and if we the united states said, we are not going to do this, we could sit on our hands you and let europe and asia do it, we will not want to do that. that's not what the united states is all about. charlie: who stops us? our collective will? is it a legislative function, some ethics board decides here

charlie: what did you do?> basically what we did, i was honored to serve with tom as the private sector counterpart to this. we looked at areas that we were -- in the executive order looked to focus on. primarily kind of -- in broad terms, the issues around the security of the internet itself. identity management, internet of things, which is the area -- it's no longer your phone and computer, it's cameras, it's sensors, it's traffic monitors, health devices, all those things now are potentially devices where, a, hack or some issue -- where a hack or some issue could occur. in addition to that we were asked to look at government itself. the appropriate systems within government, the processes of government, how government responds to cyber versus counterterrorism and the like. and then we went off and did our work. international standards and consumer -- charlie: how did you do your work? experts, hearings? >> we had hearings across the country. started with new york financial services, the financial community

charlie: this is you. [laughter] charlie: it is.hat you are because you cared more than anybody else. to be good. it really is. amy: i am surprised other people don't work harder. right? that is why you are who you are. charlie: yes. amy: you know. charlie: and they don't understand it -- they sort of -- amy: why am i not doing the thing? i had a phone interview the other day and this person said, you are the senator of new york's daughter. i said, goodbye. charlie: this is going nowhere. amy: and there are people you meet and they say you really care and you work your ass off, too. like goldie hawn. i got this movie with her and she hasn't worked in 14 years , but she trusted me and chose to do this project and we had the best time. and it's funny. and it's an action movie. and so, and i did it because i really care about it. don't --ant to do -- i i'm not trying to make money acting. standup, ifny for it is something about finance -- i'm going to do stuff that i can be really proud of. charlie: is it because people know that and t

it seemed like charlie tan had the whole world ahead of him, but then charlie's father was killed in the tan home, and everything changed. police were being told one story, but the evidence was telling them another. and there were also three 911 calls. did one of them hold the clue that would unlock what really happened on that wintry night? here's dennis murphy with "house of secrets." >> cayuga. that's cayuga lake in ithaca, new york. it's where you'll find one of the most prestigious universities in the nation. cornell, the ivy league. more than 13,000 undergrads here working towards degrees will with good fortune take their places in medicine, the law, the arts. there's no doubt a cornell education can be a gold-plated entrance ticket to adult life. and only the best need apply, students like charlie tan. he was so kind, his classmate featured him in a video, random acts of kindness. giving gifts to complete strangers. >> not just a great kid but the greatest of great kids. >> charlie was the son of chinese immigrants who became "mr. everything." scholar, class president, the guy

charlie: thank you for coming. tiger: thank you, charlie. charlie: tiger woods for the hour. you for joining us. a conversation about not only performance, but the will to win . ♪ anchor: asian futures, good game today on the bad of positives. -- back of positives. anchor: losses for toshiba could reach into the billions. hackersalleged saudi trading on stolen information. respect but no apologies. abe visits pearl harbor. this is the second hour of daybreak asia.

charlie: you did.aw it when i was a young boy, 10 or 11, and it made a huge impact on me in a negative way because it's a powerful work of art. but it is a powerful work of art partially because it silences the vietnamese people. as a young boy growing up, i was both american and vietnamese, and i was completely split in two by my experience of watching that movie. as an american, i see it through american eyes and i'm rooting for the american soldiers, and then they kill vietnamese people. at that moment, i think, am i american or am i vietnamese? am i the one i'm supposed to identify with or am i the one that is being killed? that has driven me partly to write "the sympathizer." charlie: but it really is one more example of how hollywood has defined our sense of history. viet: yeah, and i teach a vietnam war class. my sentence that come take it are all born in the 18 -- 1980's or at this point. 1990'sor even 2000, so shocking. but their history, the war is defined through stereotypes and through the

charlie: back in a moment. stay with us. ♪ ♪ charlie: jim and tom steyer are here.e founder of common sense media, the nation's largest nonprofit dedicated to children's issues. his younger brother tom is an advocate as well, retired from a billion-dollar hedge fund he started in 1986, to focus on climate issues. he is now president of next of next-genate -- climate, a nonprofit. for their dedication to democratic causes they have been dubbed the liberal answer to the koch brothers. i'm pleased to have jim and tom at this table. we were wondering where you were because your brother was here: , and i said where are you? >> standing by the phone waitinng for an invitation, charlie! [laughter] charlie: what do you think of 2016? >> i think there were two overwhelming issues in the campaign that are obvious in retrospect. one is that the majority of americans just feel as if their economic opportunity hasn't improved for as long as they can remember and they're worried about it and they don't think their kids are going to do better, and they think that's not the america

charlie: often? in cases where watson has had sufficient data and sufficient time to learn, it will be as good or better than the best because it has more data to ingest than any other human being. charlie: success is termed by return on investment? john: it is in business. this may separate i.b.m. it is the core of our strategy. it is one of the reasons we are 105 years old in addition to the ability to change. but we want to help society. we chose health care as the first place to aim watson. yes, it is big, and digitized and we want to have a big business there. but we felt the impact that we could have on human lives was beyond anything we could have in any other industry. we are started there. charlie: but you have to be careful. you can't over promise? john: that is correct. but the potential of this, i have been in this industry-0 over 3 1/2 effect aids. i have built some of the largest super computers. i was involved in the system that beat kasparov. this is like something i have never seen b

announcer: this is "charlie rose." charlie: brian moynihan is here. he is chairman and ceo of bankamerica, the second-largest bank behind chase. bankamerica has success continues to hinge largely on the fate of the u.s. economy. the incoming trump administration has signaled it will roll back some regulation and pursue a massive program of agenda. over the last month, bankamerica's share prices have risen more than 30%. i am pleased to have brian moynihan back at this table. welcome. why has your stock risen? brian: i like to take credit, but if you think about what the election has sparked, interest rates will go up, and they anticipate a better economy. the fed has been signaling it. it would be a surprise if it didn't, quite frankly, rates going up. but mostly, a view that regulation, even if it doesn't go backwards, will go forwards. that is good for a bank's ability to turn capital. and it's good for growth. at the end of the day, if capitalism succeeds, the economy grows, and banks facilitate that. charlie: will rising interest rates create a dr

charlie: you don't seem afraid. >> no. charlie: one more clip here. here it is. >> i need id, chief. >> i expect you would feel that way. you know what happens if you don't help me? >> no, i don't. >> bodies are going to pile up. more articles about slaughter are going to get written. chief's going to get pushed out. >> you too. >> maybe. difference is, you get pushed out. someone does it with a bullet to the back of your ear. charlie: you have also worked with ben when he was directing before. >> in argo. charlie: is he getting better? >> he's been great from the beginning. charlie: how do you explain it? he really came out of the box good. >> thank you. i got lucky with my first movie as well as the other ones. we have a great cast and really good material, that is so much of the battle. just took a very simple approach , have the characters have the right accents and hit the right few keynotes in the story. dennis had created a very powerful ethical moral dilemma in that movie. you are as good as the material and people you are working with. this i

>> from our studios in new york city, this is "charlie rose." charlie: bono is here. the 40th anniversary of the rock band u2. it has sold more than 157 million records and 122 emmys. he is also known for his rockstar status and for his philanthropic work around the globe. celebrating its 10th anniversary. over the weekend, it made $100 million to fight aids and malaria. he recently returned from a trip in nigeria. he visited with refugees. i am very pleased to have him back. welcome. you are a traveling man. bono: i am a traveler, that is it. i guess i signed up when i joined a rock and roll band at age 16. charlie: tell me about how nice and how close that was. bono: when you talk about these things, it is easy to forget your drama is such a tiny shard of the dramas going on around you. we were there. it was bastille night. we were looking at the fireworks. we first realized something was wrong when a police car reversed down a one-way street. then there was a stampede, tables and chairs thrown everywhere. this woman and her son, huddled. we got under tables. we bro

charlie: yes.ustice sotomayor: when i went for my nomination process, i was told everyone should have had a marty ginsburg as a muse in their life. [laughter] justice sotomayor: he apparently came into the preparation session with folders including all of ruth's speeches, her entire schedule for her entire life, and binders filled with information. justice ginsburg: that part the press reported inaccurately. because they said the reason ruth ginsburg had no problem with the taxes or the babysitter was because marty was a tax lawyer. [laughter] justice ginsburg: but in our home, our personal life, i did all of the taxes. [laughter] [applause] charlie: and guess who did all of the cooking? justice ginsburg: when all the presidents men, and there were only men, when they descended on my apartment to go through my papers, marty made a delicious lunch for everybody. [laughter] charlie: it was at one point, he would do the special occasions and you would do dinners for the kids during the weekdays. final

charlie: you wanted her badly. >> yes. charlie: why was that? only character in all three films, she is the bedrock, and i thought it would take a lot of skill to do the things she was doing, dark and ugly, and preserve the humanity of the character. and i thought somebody as amazing as naomi could pull it off. charlie: how does kevin change? >> the changes drastically. he is acting out this performance of masculinity, particularly in the second story and by the third story he has become much more vulnerable and open. he has found a way to reach out and he is liberated, reaching out to this guy. charlie: what was the most challenging thing for you? >> getting past the hurdle. i thought, our lives are so similar move this is his biography in tt myself out of it, but it was difficult to get to the point where i was like, this is my story. charlie: what are the autobiographical elements for you? >> the relationship between the sun and mother. it is a composite of myself and tarell mccraney. it was the first thing i saw in it. how did he know the th

charlie: nathan?his with "his girl friday," a great idea, to make the character a woman. they created a screwball comedy but the play is not a screwball comedy. it is dark comedy mixed with melodrama and by the third act it's a farce. it is highly unusual. it was put together by jed harris, who said it needed to be fixed. it has the hand of george kaufman. it is a three act structure and very much in the tradition of his plays. the first act is set up, the second act is complications and then the third act is hilarious and everything pays off in a delightful and satisfying way. but it is interesting for audience today, the best thing you can tell someone about a play is that it is 90 minutes with no intermission. they're thrilled. [laughter] nathan: this is asking people to have a little patience and it is worth it by the end because these guys knew what they were doing. it is the most fun i've had in a long time. it is technically a hard place to be. it is demanding. charlie: what does this say about

charlie: asking what?el: amos was interacting in a three-way conversation with a statistician at yale. they were referring to amos' work. it was up in the air. they were present and i did not realize it. i think it was a very small world when james starts writing in the early 1980's. people were saying a lot of conventional wisdom is wrong and now we have tools with the computing power and tools showing how it is wrong. charlie: and theo epstein -- is he a disciple of this? michael: key, as a child of this. he would distance himself a little bit because politically you cannot weld the old baseball world and the new baseball world together without deference to the old baseball world. he had a tight rope to walk. but, theo epstein -- virtually everyone was successful this year in the playoffs. the indians and the general managers also were heavily reliant on sophisticated statistical analysis. but that is not to say that there is not a role for human beings. but the role is different from what it has histori

charlie: oh! [laughter] charlie: we have a debate going.ustice ginsburg: i started out my life in the law. as a clerk to a district judge. i was a clerk in new york for two years. 59-61. justice sotomayor: do you see appellate practice as being the same as trial practice? even accepting your premise, which is being a lawyer is critical. there is a difference between trial and appellate lawyers. justice ginsburg: there is an enormous difference. the trial level it is to build a record. justice sotomayor: and to know how difficult that can be. justice ginsburg: yes. charlie: when you decide cases, do you think about -- are you looking in saying we have to do what the law tells us? looking at precedent, looking at the constitution. do you say to yourselves what is going to be the impact on people, these decisions that we make? justice ginsburg: i think those are harmonious. when the constitution says no person shall be deprived of life, liberty or property, nor shall any person be denied equal protection of the laws, the constitution tells us

charlie: why unease?starting with brexit and accelerating over time, we see a wave of populism and nationalism and golfing the continent. the vote in italy, although there were specific issues at stake and not everyone voted against the referendum can be seen as a populist, it was beating this wave of unease with the establishment, with the european union, with the elite, a great deal of anxiety that has turned to anger, leading people to take a stand and say we want change, we want to do it differently, we don't like the way we have been doing it. charlie: the great irony is here is a prime minister trying to change italy and make it more competitive. he faced accusations he was trying to get too much power for the prime minister's place and into the executive wing of government, but he was the establishment because he was prime minister but he was trying to change the establishment. then people come along and voted no because they wanted to change it more. ivo: that's right. he was trying to work within

charlie: ok, go ahead.on: we saw it as -- so the headline for it on "the huffington post" would be, stewart eviscerates arguments against gay marriage. and we would think of it as, "daily show" comes up with a somewhat humorous look at what they think is a hypocritical stance on personal freedoms. and that's the weight that it should be given. charlie: but you licked your chops when you saw hypocrisy like you had not seen before. if you thought it was hypocritical, you would just say -- jon: it was animated by visceral feelings, no question. because that's the stuff that -- this show is basically just -- if you imagine in general, and i hate to do this to your audience, i don't know if this is pbs, so, you want to go a -- to do a trigger warning, but, "the daily show" was a satirical expression of me sitting in front of my television in my underwear yelling at the television. now i just get to go back to doing that. chris: there's a point in the book where a lot of different people, among them a guy named l

charlie: on aleppo.e said he thought about it every day and he looked for lots of ways, he asked every day was there a better approach, his military people and others. but he did not think he could change the situation without a massive input of american troops. we had other priorities, as well. tom: i totally sympathize with anyone who has to deal with the problem. i don't pretend to be any smarter than anybody else. but i think there was a middle way that the president could have chosen and did not. i think in retrospect it was a mistake. i was a real dog on syria but i began to change my view over a year ago as i saw -- we talked a long time ago, five years ago, i made the point that libya implodes, but syria explodes. and it would explode around it, destabilizing jordan, iraq, turkey. most of all, from our point of view, it is destabilizing other great centers of democratic free centers in the world, the european union, because of the refugee outflow. i don't think the choices were either take over a

seriously, charlie!ou were at aur -- our dinner table you would never get a word in edgewise! charlie: i can tell! you need me to ask the questions. >> certainly our parents were in there talking and our older brother too! >> where we are in california we had some big victories in 2016. i thought my brother might mention that. it's really investing in birth to 5. every child in america, no matter their socioeconomic background or status or what color they are needs good health, nutrition and early childhood education birth to 5. this is a no-brainer. ost industrialized industries, even many nonindustrialized countries provide it. we do not. so with all the political rhetoric about rolling back the a.c.a. and obama care, what is going to happen to kids? the losers always when you cut important government programs are children. they're always the biggest losers because they're the poorest americans. i think you have to look at early childhood, quality stuff like e steyer kids had, we gave our children. and

charlie: why now? they have been talking about this for a while, we thought they would do it but held back perhaps looking at economic factors perhaps now more positively. >> in september they did not move, they held off, in november it was too close to the election and they wanted to get past the election uncertainty. they got past yesterday but created a new uncertainty, donald trump is now heading for the white house and there is some kind of fiscal moves and janet yellen was asked about that. the fed was taking a step they have known that they needed to take. she said they do not know what donald trump will do and they cannot make policy based on that but some members look at the possibility of more stimulus, more spending and tax cuts and that may have made them say we need to give more rate hikes next year. charlie: on wall street and within the financial community, will this be looked upon with enthusiasm or will there be some people who say -- no, this is not the right time. >> it helps banks,

charlie: should you? sen.ccain: i would welcome a conversation with him on this or any other issue. charlie: you knew very well the nominee to be secretary of defense. sen. mccain: i know him very well and i have had conversations with general mattis, a man i have known for the last 12 or 15 years. charlie: your colleague and mutual friend, lindsey graham, an admirer, said i'm going after russia in every way you can go after russia. i think they are one of the most destabilizing influences on the world stage. i think they did interfere in our elections and i want putin personally to pay the price. sen. mccain: my friend lindsey graham is always shy and retiring. charlie: no, he's not. sen. mccain: i think the point is we need to have that as part of our overall processing of the situation, and not only what the situation is, but what we need to do in order to counter this threat to our national security. that is a part of it. according to most experts i talked to, the russians are the leading offenders, but th

charlie: christmas, jon stuart, thanks for doing this. charlie: this is the today show. chris, why an oral history. >> come on. >> the title, if i did it, was taken, so we had to go with the other title. >> because it is an oral history. >> and the people who performed this show are so interesting and are really not terribly well known outside of the 22 minutes a night that jon and everybody else did for 16 years. but the actual process of making the show, that wasn't kept secret but kept close because jon was so focused on those four days a week and just getting it done and that's a hard job. the actual process, the making of the show, the evolution, the growth, internally and externally, was a story best told by the people who lived it. charlie: go to jon and say, will you do this and cooperate. and you said yes, let's do this. it was i thought he was really well done and we were involved in the 16 years and people say, what was it like and what was your favorite parts? i said i don't know. charlie: you learned something? jon: the perspective of the men and women. if i

announcer: this is "charlie rose." charlie: brian moynihan is here. he is chairman and ceo of bankamerica, the second-largest bank behind chase. bankamerica has success continues to hinge largely on the fate of the u.s. economy. the incoming trump administration has signaled it will roll back some regulation and pursue a massive program of agenda. over the last month, bankamerica's share prices have risen more than 30%. i amply to have brian moynihan back at this table. welcome. pleased tod -- am have brian moynihan back at this table. welcome. why has your stock risen? brian: i like to take credit, but if you think about what the election has sparked, interest rates will go up, and they anticipate a better economy. the fed has been signaling it. it would be a surprise if it didn't, quite frankly, rates going up. but mostly, a view that it doesn't even if go backwards, will go forwards. that is good for a bank's ability to turn capital. and it's good for growth. at the end of the day, if capitalism succeeds, the economy facilitatebanks the til that. c

charlie: what was the challenge for you?when i had the privilege of meeting so many people, and it was thanks to mark who brought me to that community. bostonians are extremely friendly but they are also guarded. ,hen we try to get information the victims and survivors, these are victims who are not inclined to tell us their story right away. but once they did open up, they started telling us their stories and we met people like a young, beautiful couple in the beginning of their marriage and they were blown up and lost their legs. we saw their spirit and inspiration they passed on. the biggest challenge was making sure we did them proud and making sure we did the commissioner proud of. mark and i took that very seriously. our jobs paled in comparison to what they had gone through. we just wanted to make them feel respected and that we got it right. you said this was the most intense filmmaking experience of your life. peter: and i have done three nonfiction films together now. they are all intents, but nse,e's -- they are a

charlie: it is true.kes a while and then you see a series of books humming out with different people and different experiences. me two decades, three decades to figure out what was happening. charlie: you talk about the industry of memory. what is that? viet: we like to think our memories are all equal, but in actuality, certain groups memories dominate over other groups and those are the groups that have control. hollywood is one example. publishing is an example. even though the united states lost the war in the at nam, it won the war in memory because it controls the industries like hollywood that the vietnamese don't control. people thinken about the vietnam war, they think about hollywood. charlie: are there great books and movies written about the vietnam war in the anon? books which, by any degree, a great ward awful, people don't know about it. people don't know about it because the publishing industry in vietnam doesn't have the same reach. charlie: how about movies? there are a lot of movies mad

charlie: and the spontaneity.interviewed before, you interviewed him last time with the evil and all that. you go back a week ago, how was he? was he different anyway? nancy: i would be the first to say that there is every chance that because i expected he would be different that i saw a difference. but i did see a difference, the thing thating, the struck me so much, i'm interested in the relationship the between president because of what that job does to you. , he had been on the phone for 45 minutes with president obama, talking with him about ideas for his cabinet choices, and other topics that were on his mind, and he spoke with extraordinary warmth and respect. he talked about the chemistry he felt between them. he felt that he expected that day he went to the white house and they sat together, he he said, everyone would have thought that would have been an awkward moment. we started talking, we talked for a long time, i found it very gracious and helpful, and we talked since then, and, you know, in listenin

scott filling in for charlie. a new film from director pablo larrain tells the story for a different point of view. here's the trailer for "jackie"" >> people like to believe in fairy tales. >> are you ready? >> of course. >> and you? >> i believe in the character we read about on the page being more real than the man who stands beside you. jack. i love you, jack. >> they need to know that real men actually lived here. >> i have grown accustomed to a great divide between what people believe and what i know to be real. >> how would you like him to be remembered? >> there is no crying. >> what is wrong with you? >> you don't have to do this. >> i will march with jack. alone if necessary. >> i'm guessing you won't allow me to write any of that. >> no because i never said that. a.o.: joining me is the director of the film, pablo larrain, and natalie portman. this movie tells a story that is very familiar. people remember where they were, seeing the zapruder film. what new dimensions were you looking for? pablo: i am f

big charlie and diane were dead.nd the old farmhouse they loved so well was now a crime scene. >>> coming up -- charlie and diane parker lying dead in their own home. the investigation begins. at a grisly crime scene, some small stray drops of blood might provide a big clue. >> someone was a bleeder. >> that's great evidence. >> it is if you can match it up. >> when "dateline extra" continues. >>> welcome back. bambi bennett collected an inheritance worth a fortune. but when her mom thought bambi's taste for painkillers put the family farm and her boys at risk, she stepped in and took control. then mom and stepdad were brutally murdered. was this a random act of violence, or did the victims know their killer? here again is dennis murphy with "the deed." >> hurry up! hurry up! >> give me a minute. >> the horror discovered inside that farmhouse confused both the caller and the 911 operator. but what happened to charlie and diane was all too clear. she was found lying next to her bed, big charlie, sprawled on the bathro

charlie: thank you.d congratulations on this, this is quite something. regina: thank you. charlie: you're quite something. does the reference to joni mitchell please you? regina: very much so. to me, she's one of the most incredible and unique musicians and when i discovered her music, it actually gave me the realization that i could maybe try and write some songs too because i think in my mind it was sort of relegated because i loved so many bands like the beatles or queen or the moody blues and then there were the russian bard singers. it was all these men and for some reason, i just thought -- i don't know what i thought but i didn't think that i should be writing songs. charlie: tell us about your musical journey. from russia to the u.s. regina: i think that my journey has a lot to do with kind people who decided to help, because both my parents are artists and artistic and they really believed in, you know, share art, share classical concerts. music was always playing in the house and they decided t