i think with the chauvin case, the prosecution did a really great job. with this case, i don't think they did as good a job as the chauvin prosecutors, so i think there's going to be a lot more to go over. i think there's going to be more conversations that are a little bit combative within the deliberation room. >> what do you think the decision is? >> i think he's guilty of first degree intentional murder. >> you think he provoked the situation? >> absolutely. >> mark omara, you're shaking your head. you think this jury can find they don't believe that? >> they're going to have a tough time convicting a 17-year-old at the time of the event for what he seemed to be doing. he definitely put himself in a bad situation. the provocation is a lot more difficult to argue in this case than you might argue in the ahmaud arbery case or something like that. they may give him a lesser included. so i see lesser included. we might see a hung jury because it is so divisive and it really is polarizing as to whether or not using a gun in that set of circumstances was j

did derek chauvin's verdict have an impact on how other police will act?ch will this change -- will the change of the citizen's arrest law and this verdict cause people to think again before o they take the life of a black person in this country? >> it's a step in the right direction, albeit a baby step. we need to reform our justice system.em we need police reform. we need more accountable d.a.s. there's much more work to do. for many individuals across the country, if the verdict would ny have been different, it would f have created -- or given license for vigilante, justice, and mob violence. fortunately this judge, this jury, this community halted that floodgate of individuals thinking they have the right to commit violence and harm individuals who havenc committe no crimes, and they are now -- they wouldn't be held accountable. so i'm glad this decision is there, but it's a baby step. we have to do more to reform our laws, state by state, and federal. >> and, federally, these men have been charged with federal fences as the police officers in minnesot

you should have known this one four it was chauvin coolidge. >> what? the president. kennedy: i don't believe your, for a second. you might want to press your luck on this, which of these presidents has two grammys? l clinton, jim carter, barackk obama or mariah carey? you want to press your luck? >> i know mariah has more than two. [laughter] who has two grammys? kennedy: you want to press your luck? >> what the heck, i'll give up the car and press my luck. i'm going to say bill clinton. kennedy: she's got four. gary, you and other you have one. even if you get this right, you're still only halfway home. which of these presidents regularly consulted with an astrologer before making the decision? harry s truman, john quincy adams, ronald reagan or ms. m cleo? >> i will have to go with john quincy adams. kennedy: you'd be wrong. ronald reagan. allpr conferences, most of the state of the union dresses takeoff and landing at air force one pretty good job, everyone. congrats to you for looking up the questions in the rundown getting them right. [laughter] g

i think we see a convergence in the derek chauvin trial as in the mcmichael-bryan trial.oints to heinuos crimes committed. >> the three men convicted in arbery's murder. they tried to argue they were performing a citizens arrest. following the death, georgia repealed that law. many states across the country have similar legislation. not just citizens arrest, but things that give people impunity if they kill people in a manner that most of us would think extra judicial. do you think those laws can change? if so, who is behind changing them? >> i think those laws can change and those laws must change. the people behind changing them would be the citizens in each state. in state of georgia, for example, the legislature changed the law because of the pressure. the murder of ahmaud arbery, even before the trial, the whole video that the state and country and world saw, was so disturbing and aggravating and so much of a disturbance, in georgia, the legislature repealed the law. it was an 1863 law after all. what happens in georgia happens in the south and northern states and th

derek chauvin filed an appeal to his conviction.i: to the supreme court will hear a fast-track challenge to the texas abortion law. jobina: supreme court justices will look at whether the federal government can salute texas over the law, given how it was designed. the hearing comes two months after taxes proposed -- texas imposed a total ban on abortions. it allows perfect citizens to sue anyone who helps a woman to get an abortion. the reward for doing so is $10,000. the court will hear two cases, one brought by abortion providers, that either by the biden administration, insisting the law was designed to avoid review by federal courts. so at this in court takes up these challenges, the law in texas stays in effect, reggie. reggie: thank you. a bucket list item for many of you out there, check out that northern lights over alberta, canada over the weekend. if photographer caught the geomagnetic storm over sturgeon county. locals got a heads up from noaa. researchers issued a geomagnetic storm watch alert ahead of the aurora boreali

trial, i looked at the chauvin trial and said you know, he needs to be convicted of something.t but certainly something. it's a crazy revolutionary idea looking at these things on a case-by-case basis and taking our inherent biases and preconceived notions and maybe please god putting a pin in them and looking at the evidence. >> mark davis, i appreciate you. also, look, for all the talk about his affinity for proud boys and that, personally in reviewing the evidence i don't know who he was with. he was definitely with a group of white boys. i don't know if they had affiliation or not. the point stands that it is not part of the fact analysis of the trial. the jury's going to have to look at it. they are human beings. but they're going to have to look at what he did, why they died, and whether or not what was a murder can be justified by self-defense as an affirmative defense. we'll see what they come up with, and then we'll deal with whatever that verdict means to the ongoing battles of division in this country. mark davis, appreciate you. >> that's how the system works. thank

the real -- i'm glad you mentioned the derek chauvin verdict. that was a surprising verdict. this should have been unsurprising but what we have to think about is not only the families of the two men who died and the family, they should be in our minds now because they suffered and there are a lot of white people who have defended black lives and paid for it with their lives. that goes back to john brown and the civil rights movement but what i am concerned about is the precedent this sets for what people will believe that they can do under law when black lives matter protests happen in the future and people may use this as an excuse to go out of state and do what he did and get away with it. >> i want to keep on that point, joy. paul, that's the first thing that occurred to me after this ruling is oh, well, okay, now it's open season. like, if i'm walking around and i'm a white nationalist coward little kid with an r-15 and i see someone drive by i'll open fire and a youth group chanting black lives matter and i feel threatened, i can open fire. paul, is the ruling today rea

let's remember in other cases, kyle rittenhouse case, even the derek chauvin case, the left was veryck to jump to motive, these are white supremacists, motive was based on race and yet no racial motive turned up. racial motives were not even introduced in the chauvin trial but here where there is a racial motive, where it seems obvious this is a guy it was not fleeing from -- happened to run into a parade but a guy who intentionally swerved from left to right to kill as many people as possible driven by an apparent racial animus, very evident in his own social media the media goes we can salvage this narrative so you realize this is a classic case of how the media operates like a house of mirrors but it is not mirrors that eliminate reality, these are refracting mirrors that give you distorted pictures of reality and basically once the narrative doesn't work anymore they just turn out the lights and move on to something else. >> jens i was asked about biden potentially visiting waukesha. >> our hearts go out to this community, the people in waukesha. we've been in touch with official

it was the video of derek chauvin kneeling on mr.loyd's neck for almost nine minutes that drew national outrage culminating in his eventual conviction for that murder. the girl behind the cell phone was just 17 at the time. a bystander. appalled by chauvin's brutality. she did the only thing she could. she pulled out a phone, hit record, and bore witness. video also turned the tide following the killing of ahmaud arbery. there was no arrest made until 74 days after mr. aubrey was hunted down and shot by three white men. those arrests came just two days after the video of the incident was uploaded to the internet by a local radio station. strangely, that footage was shot and released by one of the perpetrators who somehow thought the video would help him. however it gets released, it is undeniable it is an undeniable fact it is crucial when it comes to police misconduct and racial justice. in an ideal world, police would be accountable for their actions. many communities require police to wear body cameras. more should do so. there sh

i was relieved that derek chauvin found guilty because the neighborhood would not be torched. commentary and the justice being held off bench by threats of mayhem because the media will allow the activist to write for that reason. >> katie: they have received a number of threats because of the trial. 's before that might be a sign of the time the spirit we were talking about passions but then also sound like threats and thee fbi is involved. the judge, i understand why they don't want cameras in the courtroom because some ways it is a distraction and can put the jury in jeopardy we make then perhaps change their minds, but i also think that this trial being on television helped a lot of people understand what was actually happening that night. why did kyle rittenhouse feel threatened? was it self-defense? and just think, what if it wasn't on television where the prosecution witnessed and admits he had a gun pointed at kyle rittenhouse. without that we would not have known. i'm very interested in the whole process of there is a mistrial motion and when the judge can make a deci

this is a shooting that happened as we were covering the derek chauvin trial, the trial of the officerred george floyd. it sparked protest and outcry. we heard from the family of dante wright just yesterday. this explanation you hear from kim potter is that she made a mistake, that she was reaching for her taser and instead grabbed her handgun. they said if they made a mistake and there was a conviction of another officer in 2019 for the same reason, kim potter should be convicted for the same reason. >> are we prepared to hold a white officer accountable for killing a young black man when she says it was an accident, which obviously we dispute. the attorney general's office has done an excellent job of laying out why this was not some mere accident. >> this questioning is expected to take up to a week. opening statements are scheduled to begin december 8th. according to court documents, the judge has prepared the jury and have told them to expect to be participating in this trial for around two weeks. we know they'll be partially sequestered during the trial and fully sequestered once

the shooting happened about ten miles from where the derek chauvin trial was happening in minneapolisaughter. adrienne broaddus has been watching the proceedings. we understand that opening arguments are set for next week but we got information about who might testify. >> at least 18 potential witnesses, including kim potter, yes, we learned today she will take the stand in her own defense. now, her defense attorneys were questioning juror six, and during that questioning, the juror mentioned she remembers her initial reaction when she first heard about this incident. she said, and i'm paraphrasing, how could this happen? she said she still feels the same way today. and then she quickly followed up by saying, perhaps this trial will clarify some of her questions, and this was the response she got. listen in. >> if you're selected, officer potter will testify and tell you what she remembered happened. >> right, yes. >> so, you will know. >> uh-huh. >> not just from the video but from the officer at the scene and officer potter herself. >> and jury selection continues at this hour. so f

that's when all eyes were on the trial of former minneapolis police officer derek chauvin.ttempted to pull over daunte wright for a traffic violation. he had an air freshener hanging from his rear-view mirror, which is illegal in minnesota. as they were attempting to take him into custody, wright entered his vehicle and potter yelled on that body cam video, "taser, taser, taser." and she mistakenly -- she says she mistakenly pulled her taser -- her gun instead of her taser. yesterday, members of daunte wright's family and supporters spoke out. listen in. >> daunte wright was a student of mine at edison high school. he was a joy, and his smile would light up this room a thousand times. >> reporter: and that was courtney rolf speaking, a former educator of daunte wright as well as the former girlfriend of george floyd. and erica and jim, it's really crucial, a lot of folks are saying this video is going to play a critical role. we've seen how video in cases have played a role before. even in the case of derek chauvin, we saw the cell phone video, but once trial started, all a

and the derek chauvin verdict have an impact on how police will act? will the change in the citizens arrest laws change the verdict, cause people to think again before they take the life of a black person in this country? >> there is a step in the right direction although a baby step. we need to reform our justice system, we need police reform, we need more accountable da's, there is much more work to do. but for many individuals across the country if it had been different, it would have created or given license for vigilante justice -- unfortunately this judge, this jury haunted that floodgate of individuals thinking they had the right to commit vigilante justice and violence in hard individuals who have committed no crimes, and they would be held accountable. so i'm glad this decision is there, it is a baby step and we have to do more to reform in law state by state and federal. and federally these men have been charged with federal offenses as the police officers in minnesota have. there are both sets of men that will be facing new federal trials th

chauvin was convicted of floyd's murder and sentenced it to 22 years in police. >>> meanwhile, president washington following his trip to europe. the president not commenting on terry mcauliffe's projected loss in virginia. just last week, the president campaigned with mcauliffe in effort to boost voter turnout for the democrats. and he also returns with still but not yet any scheduled agenda on the build back better. when asked yesterday if he thought that losses in virginia would reflect a referendum in virginia. he said this. >> i've not seen any evidence whether or not i'm doing well or poorly, whether or not i've got my agenda passed or not is going to have any impact on winning or losing. even if i had passed my agenda, i wouldn't claim we won because biden's agenda passed. joining me now, for politico, and son to be my colleague. rumor has it, he's not been to sleep and has been up all night covering the election. >> sure, sure. >> there's the first piece of news we broke in the interview, eugene, obviously, this is a significant night for democrats and not in a good way. since th

the jury was racially diverse, chauvin was convicted. this is typical.denied their equal protection right under the constitution. black people accused of crimes can be tried with no black people in their jury and that jeopardizes their constitutional right to equal justice under the law. >> we can't exclude the fact that voting restrictions also keep you off the jury pool. if you are barred from being registered to vote, you can't be on a jury. all of these things work together. this is why critical race theory exists, y'all. this is what they study under critical race theory in law school, because there are systems in place. when i think about these trials, especially the arbery trial, all i can think about is the emmett till trial, the milam trial, the trial of these two fiends who lynched a 14-year-old boy. and an all white jury was spit-spot, they're fine. all go home. that's all i can think about. what with you? >> now it's 2021, and we're still talking about virtually all white juries in a case in georgia about white men who lynched a black person.

it didn't in the chauvin trial. it's unlikely to come up in the trial of kyle rittenhouse that's going on right now. but in this trial, race will be front and center. it's part of the prosecution's theory about why these men and how these men came to take the life of mr. arbery. >> yang: opening arguments begin tomorrow. paul butler of georgetown university, thank you very much. >> always a pleasure, john. >> woodruff: in the days and months following donald trump's presidential re-election defeat, several american election officials were subjected to threats and an intense pressure campaign by the out-going president desperate to stay in power, perhaps none more so than georgia's secretary of state brad raffensperger. in his new book, "integrity counts", he explains his experiences and just how close our democracy came to being dismantled. and he joins me now. mr. raffensperger, thank you very much for being here. you did step in to history when president trump attacked you after the election and asked you to chang

shortly before the trial of derek chauvin, the police officer accused of killing the unarmed black man george floyd, katie g nelson and ed ou were assigned by the new york times to cover protests in minnesota. how is it unlawful? it's not unlawful! you're unlawful! the demonstrators were calling for police accountability for dante wright, another unarmed black man who was shot and killed by a brooklyn center police officer during a routine traffic stop. people were really angry that this kept happening across our state and across our nation, and so they gathered in front of the police station, first with signs and with songs and chanting, and then later in the evenings, things got more challenging, more violent. the police would come out and shoot tear gas into crowds, the crowds would sometimes throw items across the fences towards the police officers, and there was this tit—for—tat going on between the two for the days following daunte wright's death. nelson spent one evening with ebony mcmillan and her children as the mood turned violent outside their apartment. there were children

the other thing that's different from the chauvin trial, which we're not used to homing in on for the involved the george floyd killing, we were still under covid restrictions. so there really weren't spectators in the courtroom. in this trial it has been much more like what a normal trial was before the early part of 2020. so there have been a lot of people in the courtroom, including some supporters of some of the people who were testifying for the prosecutors and who participated in the rioting. and i just wonder what the effect of all that is on the jury. you have a situation where the case is very intensely covered, you have cameras in the courtroom. cameras seem to be moving around the courtroom. there has been a lot more fluidity in the coverage that way than anything i've ever seen in the way of a trial covered on television and you have people who were in the courtroom looking at the jury and what's going on. you just wonder what kind of effect it will have on them. >> dana: interesting. >> trace: i want to bring jonna back in. the conversation andy was touching on is the fac

i also know that had it not been for video, that officer chauvin would still be on the streets of minneapolis the place in which we aren't reliant upon social media to make a video go viral, until we're no longer reliant upon people to protest and march the streets day in and day out for justice to be served -- there can't be any healing. i mean, honestly, what exactly transpired over the course of these few weeks with this trial that rang different than, say, trayvon martin? which also needed protests, which needed video, which needed -- you know what i'm saying? i'm tired of going over the same cycle over and over again. so until we get to a place where we don't have to protest and march in the streets, in which we don't need 100 pastors to pray with the grieving family, when the justice system in and of itself can function without us marching and demanding justice, then i can start talking about healing. until then, we're in a hamster wheel. >> i hear you. fanny leigh hamer said, i'm sick and tired of being sick ask tired. terry, you and i have known each other for a very long time. we're

this first was of derek chauvin. in fact the potter case is happening in the same courtroom. david? >> alex perez with us tonight. thank you. >> reporter: from washington tonight former president trump's chief of staff is now cooperating with the committee investigating the january 6th riot. tonight the house committee announcing meadows produced documents to the committee. >>> to the economy and wall street reacting to jerome powell today and what he said about the uncertainty surrounding the new variant. the dow falling 652 points, nearly 2%. powell testifying before congress. >> the recent rise in covid-19 cases and the emergence of the omicron variant pose risks to the economy and inflation. >> the market reacting to news powell suting he could remove pandemic support. >>> we've been following the investigation involving former new york governor andrew cuomo. tonight the news on his brother, cnn anchor chris cuomo. i help others. but i need to help protect myself. honestly? i couldn't afford to get sick. i want to be there for this one. i can't if i'm sick. pneumococcal pneumoni

evidence, george floyd murderer was a white cop, derek chauvin the jury convicted him up murder, white convicted of killing a white man. no racism there. they didn't need to burn down the street of businesses in her cities and burned-out livelihoods. americans are fair, americans have a law, we do it everyday and every part of this country. his claim of racism comes from race and those who think that the fight for their own gain, they want to destroy america and teach our children to hate us because we are racist. d.a. in the christmas case tried to blame $1000 bail on a d.a., does this guy think he's getting? the progressives who for years let darrell brooks get away with all kinds of crimes did nothing, not ready for trial. why? is officers stated policy goes like this. we are focused on reducing the use of incarceration in all cases. overall prosecutors prioritize addressing the root cause of criminal behavior. trying to find ways to avoid prosecution in more cases and to see what can be done in terms of alternatives to prosecution. for one, i don't care what the root cause of crimi

i hope just as in the george floyd case where the police officers, chauvin, when that jury came backilty, everybody in america was like okay. that's what the jury trial is supposed to be. the comments of jeffries overstepped the bounds. you don't have to tweet about everything. keep it to yourself. they are worried that the credibility of the judicial system is at risk but then they tweet that. you can't just hold your tongue. >> all right. and finally, greg, the bottom line here is that this case is going to the jury very soon. >> yes. permission to blow your mind? >> granted. >> people say that rittenhouse never should have gone to kenosha. the dead guys should not have gone there either. one was a convicted pedophile who raped a child. another was a serial domestic abuser. they should not have been anywhere on a street. they should have been in jail or an institution. kyle's victims the two dead guys deserved better from the government. but they didn't deserve better from kyle. he did the right thing. he did what the government should have done which was to make sure these dirt ba

surely the jury wherever they were -- >> greg: the point i made after chauvin when i go like oh, i'm relieve he was found guilty so my city won't burn. i was making a comment on society. society dictates how people decide in court. we're watching businesses get boarded up on an mih, media induced hurricane. the media induces this by awaiting the coverage in a way that they want. cnn and msnbc chose not to show most if not all of the closing arguments from the defense. so what your left with is what you heard from the prosecution, which is that one of them didn't have a gun when he had a gun or rittenhouse is a racest or doesn't like blacks. he wasn't doing the attacking. he wasn't being attacked. by showing one side of this, that makes the riots more justified. when he said the judge misled the jury, that means that justice was not served so the activists can say we're we go again. we have to burn everything down. the media pushes the lie again and again that no justice can be had, this is the difference between humanity and media. for humanity, we live by the boy who cried wolf. it'

chauvin 10 hours for two days. anything that can be gleaned from that today?range case, dana, in that most cases that go to trial have factual disputes that the jury has to work out. so we usually get a window into the deliberations. they'll send notes asking for read backs of testimony. in this case the facts are pretty clear and what we're down to is a real hard legal dispute over whether this amounts to self-defense or not. and as john turley pointed out from the very beginning of the deliberations the jury has had the judge's legal instructions particularly instructions on self-defense. they may be working very hard and i agree that most of the time juries are very diligent. we may not get the usual window. by having the judge's instructions there they may have everything they need to argue among themselves how the case should come out. >> bill: what do you think about jury intimidation? the crowd outside and hear them inside the courthouse. not a good look. if i were a judge i would want to protect them from that. what is your view on it, andy? >> i'm wor

we saw in the derek chauvin, we saw it in rittenhouse.nsee these types of images. >> gillian: yeah, it's important the remember at first the state wasn't going to prosecute this case until that video that emerged. sad by we're out of time, gentlemen. we have to leave it there. wish you both a very happy thanksgiving. >> happy thanksgiving. thank you. so the charges filed now after a string of brazen shoplifting schemes sweep the san francisco bay area. we'll talk about that next. about customization. all that's why i love liberty mutual. they customize my car insurance, so i only pay for what i need. how about a throwback? you got it. ♪ liberty, liberty - liberty, liberty ♪ uh, i'll settle for something i can dance to. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ ♪ ♪ only pay for what you need. ♪ liberty, liberty, liberty, liberty ♪ ray loves vacations. but his diabetes never seemed to take one. everything felt like a 'no'. everything. but then ray went from no to know. with freestyle libre 2, now he knows his glucose levels when he needs to. a

because the autobiography chauvin coolidge the forgotten classic presidential writing. authorized expended annotated edition of the autobiography has just been published by isi books. editors emily slade and in heart quote him in the introduction saying it's a great advantage to a president and major source of safety to the country for him to know he's not a great man. we asked to give background about the week released biography originally published in may of 1929. >> chair of the presidential foundation, this week's episode of book notes. ♪♪ >> in their latest book, i alone can fix it. washington post reporters carol winick and philip looking at the final year of the trump administration. >> i think the honest answer about what we learned about donald trump is all of the basic boundaries of who he is and how he governs our pretty well known by us. he's an impulse guy, interested in his own benefit, he's not so interested in anybody else's. he also doesn't follow any rulebook and rejects norms and carries very little about washington should do, what's polite and proper

it's a good day, like the day that derek chauvin was convicted. that kyle rittenhouse was let alfano self-defense charge. i hope it sets a precedent of not having these riots and things. it's really what you wake up thinking. obviously you want someone to go to jail if they've murdered someone but you also fear for your city or your country, wherever you are. the people would go to the streets and it would turn into the summer of 2020 again and hopefully when things have gone through the legal system and it does work, the jury system does work, we can all just sit there and take in what we heard during the case and the verdict and be calm about it. >> dagen: if you have the misfortune of living in a large liberal city, you have to sit back and see people set your city on fire and destroyed businesses and never get charged with those crimes. you're from georgia. how do you feel about this. maybe not even feeling. >> joe: those cases had an element that's kind of new to the world, video evidence. one thing i took away from both these cases over the

we learned a lot during the derek chauvin trial. need to use will repel the force against you. there's an indication that that was a comment rat amount of force. lethal force against two men and wounded and if he's going to take the stand we better be able to explain why lethal force was necessary and there's no allegation he was the owner of property, that he was asked to protect the property or that property was damaged by any of the three victims. the way this is all unfolding it's a little surprise that the jury was seated in one day for such a high profile-trial and the judge didn't allow a jury questionnaire. how can they be sure that this is a fair and impartial jury, especially as you say given the emotions around this situation. >> that's the million dollar question here, and normally in cases, if it's not a high-profile case, not a high publicity case you can pick jurors relatively quickly because you don't have to try to weed out those who may know so much about the case it a they have no ability to be impartial. here is

we saw this happened in the derek chauvin trial where reverse batson challenges were made and they weree to have a more diverse jury. sadly, that didn't happen in this case. and i think it will have profound impact if there is an acquit al or hung jury. that community and the community at large will have a lot of questions whether this is a fair trial. >> it is expected to last about a month. so we will have answers as to how this has affected things. a rhee that, good to see you. >> thanks, briannbrianna. >>> a former treasury secretary who predicted the higher prices and will talk about how biden's policies have affected this issue, next. >> does former president trump have to comply with the january 6th committee. that with a judge could decide just hours from now. y sale on tp number 360 smart bed. it senses your movements and automatically adjusts to relieve pressure points. and its temperature balancing so you both sleepep just right. save $1,000 on the sleep number 360 spececial edition smart be. plus, 0%0% interest for 24 mont. only for a limited time. introducing fidelity incom

office was during the prosecution of former police officer derek chauvin. a.j. ellis and can you describe the community seeking justice after the tragic murder and let'sen pacific wesson is theren carrying out a successful prosecution. >> everyone wants to see the investigation and the prosecution be objective and independent and people do sometimes have the feeling that maybe that's not eyes the case so when my office was brought and it was brought in because people wanted to know no matter what the charges are based on the law and the facts as opposed to a prior relationship or political loyalty issue so we stepped in to help. in minnesota the governor has to appoint us or the county has to ask us to come in them both of it occurred in a floyd case. we stepped in and we tried to do oursi duty and since then a lotf the counties have called us when they have officer involved deaths and we have declined some after receiving them and review the case we have declined because we thought the backs of the law weren't there. in fact in the middle of the floyd case ther

. >> a former police officer, derek chauvin, guilty on all three counts. >> this nation, 100 years laterf george floyd in ways in which we should have responded to the death of eugene williams. >> but it's not enough. in chicago, there's still a question of home. people can't thrive if they are forever denied a place to put down roots. >> so where are we now? >> you don't recognize this? this is the new neighborhood. >> is this kind of the invisible line up ahead? >> yeah, the invisible boundary of rich, the middle class and section 8 folks. which you know is going to change. >> why didn't they put the starbucks on the other side of the street? >> i am a dunkin' donuts kind of guy anyway. >> what do you want the community to know here? >> even though we struggle, we're still striving for better because we are here. this place is worth the fight. >> chicago is a perfect example of why knowing history matters, and how what happened 100 years ago has everything to do with what's going on today. sadly, it seems like history is repeating itself and i hope it doesn't take another 100 years for

the talks fizzled and then they came back this summer after the conviction of derek chauvin and georgeyd's murder but, again, they struggled to get somewhere. then in september both coory booker and tim scott who were the main negotiators walked away. that was after democrats gave up a lot on the policies they had been demanding including changes to qualified immunity. so i think this and how the right has been mobilized shows more than ever that republicans will not want to wade into this debate. >> van jones did a notable job of connecting everything we're seeing on a national level in the wake of the rittenhouse verdict. >> we've got a pattern there where white men feel that they have the right to enforce the law themselves. when you look at ahmaud arbery, when you look at this case, when you look at trayvon martin, when you look at the white mob that attacked the capitol, that somehow there is a group of people that think that they have the right to take the law into their own hands. that is a big problem. >> does he have a point? >> there is an important point there especially whe

i was so relieved and elated when we saw that with chauvin, not because it is one side winning as opposedut the law was upheld. i think we still live in a society where if you're black, you have to be at best cautious. and hope for the best. at best. >> thank you for very much for coming to "the sunday show." >> what the build back better plan could mean for those taking care of loved ones as we mark national family caregiver's month. we'll talk about it on the other side of the break. stay with us. l talk about it onr side of the break. stay with us ♪♪ hi mr. charles. we made you dinner. aww, thank you. ♪♪ super emma just about sleeps in her cape. but when we realized she was battling sensitive skin, aww, thank you. we switched to tide hygienic clean free. it's gentle on her skin, and out cleans our old free detergent. tide hygienic clean free. hypoallergenic and safe for sensitive skin. >>> november is national family caregiver's month and the build back better social spending bill with its historic changes for older adults and people with disabilities could be a big help for the nearly

another interesting comparison to the derek chauvin composition, in a lot of cases in the black livesa, to the public they are about race, but race did not come up in the courtroom. it is unlikely to come up in the trial of kyle rittenhouse that is going on right now. in this trial, race will be front and center. it is part of the prosecution's theory about why and how these m en came to take the life of mr. arbery. john: opening arguments begin tomorrow. paul butler of georgetown university, thank you very much. ♪ judy: in the days and months following donald trump's presidential reelection defeat, several american election officials were subjected to threats and an intense pressure campaign by the outgoing president, desperate to stay in power. perhaps none more so than georgia's secretary of state. in his new book "integrity counts," he explains his experiences and how close our democracy came to being dismantled. he joins me now. thank you for being here. you did step into history when president trump attacked you after the election and asked you to change the results. you said no

center of many protests especially surrounding the killing of george floyd by now convicted derek chauvin ex-police officer. coming to police accountability, what is your plan? >> so this is a focus of my career. i went to law school in large part because growing up in harlem i had a gun pointed at me six times. three by people who were not police officers but three by members of the new york police department that caused me to focus on police accountability. i prosecuted a federal agent for lying. we have a stand alone unit to report to me and prioritize the issues and not just a fairness police accountability issue but i know from my experience when people don't have trust in the police they don't come forward as victims and witnesses. we can't make the cases we need for public safety so i see it through the dual lens of public safety and fairness. >> alvin bragg, thank you for being honest with me as you could be and i hope you come back when you have more information and good luck to you. thank you. >>> want to turn to another big investigation with former president trump. committee c

. >> that is an excellent point by attorney crump, but we have seen here and in the derek chauvin case, video serves as an impeachable witness. but is video in some cases helping jurors adjust their imaginations in all cases so they questioned racist tropes about black victims? >> perhaps. i think what oftentimes happens when you have these cases that involve some video, it kind of, and i really mean kind of, boxes some jurors in the face of harsh realities that was -- unavoidable facts. some things may not be in debate or discussion. i think it is somewhat cold comfort that in 2021 if you engage in an old fashion lynching, there may be some level of accountability. it is debatable as you indicated whether or not this is really any level of justice, but at the very least the families can have some kind of discernible fact pattern that could perhaps assist them in their long journey towards closure, if that's even possible. even with the video, the verdict demonstrates, i think that when you deputize yourself, as these defendants did under the code of law, you are not guaranteed to be a

minneapolis, who was the epicenter in the protests following the killing of george floyd by officer derek chauvin rejected a measure to replace the police department with a so-called department of public safety. and in cleveland, ohio, the newly-elected mayor has the chance to rethink policing in his city from the ground up after the department chief resigned just two days after the election. joining me now is the new mayor-elect of cleveland, justin bibb. mayor-elect, congratulations on your win. let's start with what seems to be your first decision as a mayor. the city's chief of police resigned, in part because voters tuesday decisively passed issue 24. a controversial ballot initiative that will establish a civilian review board to oversee misconduct allegations within cleveland police. this is a change from the current system, in which allegations are dealt internally. now, you ran on a police reform and accountability platform. what are you looking for in your next chief of police? >> well, i'm looking forward to having a chief that will work with me to create not just a department that's m

on the other side, chauvin and infantry are on the shorter route.uspect a lot of the stories are known by the officers but understanding the gentleman don't talk about that but i think a piece of it popped up. we received general grant first request for his surrender, he had the escape route open to him so he is obligated by his sense of honor to keep moving. when he asked for his opinion, long streets as we must fight on or the men support you, he says not yet which means it's not all pieces in place yet to do this. two days later, the conditions permit, xbox and alexander warned him he would be if you grant 1865 and his army. three closing notes. in his final address more than he attended morning when he wrote the devotion could accomplish nothing that could compensate for the loss that must have attended the continuation of the contest. i determined to avoid a useless sacrifice of those whose services have endeared them to his country. i think lee is describing everything he was doing. lee broke his connection with davis the courthouse. april 10,