mykola , we congratulate you, why can’t we compare chernobyl npp and possibly an accident at zaporizhzhiaembers pictures of what happened after the evacuation of pollution. if such an explosion happens at zaporizhia npp, how many years will it take to even clean up this area, and why, of course, you can't compare chornobyl zaporizhzhia with the current situation in zaporizhzhia the station will be 9,000 uah . the construction of the variator did not wait for any sky of ukraine of the dermatological system . everything will be unpleasant, and again, this will have catastrophic consequences, because they were going to start exactly. that's great, in principle, stop me from the details, i don't think about it because it's more, when it's okay to do it , when we'll see a specialist if you have one today, well, you know, it's very, very cool that volodymyr ivanovich and you are with us today on the air, viewers can hear the position on and possible development scenarios from people who are specialists and not read the internet and find there some scary scenarios that russia can press a button

strelets told about this on the air of the tomarathon, everything is done on the example of the chernobyl nppaster but currently the minister emphasized that the controlled situation at this facility is likely to violate absolutely all possible rules for dealing with such dangerous objects, secondly, and the information with which we operate, which is provided by energoatom, it is open enough that today the situation is under control, indeed today such weather conditions occur when water evaporates from the cooler pond , but this level there is not critical, the situation is under the control of energoatom serhii, if the west's fears that russia will use tactical or strategic nuclear weapons are understandable and they are going for deterrence, then the potential threat from the zaporizhzhia npp is certainly no less if the russians will resort to such actions and why is the west not so categorical in this regard, because it is on ukrainian territory and it contradicts all international norms, well, the problem is that the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant is occupied and the west and can the w

cannot be a serious explosion at the zaporozhye cs, what is happening zaporizhzhia npp cannot be compared to chernobyl or my tricks, and chernobyl did not lead to any such excessively tragic consequences. as we know it over the years. everyone survived chernobyl, we saw it all, it is obvious that there is nothing good in the accident at the atomic psychic, but i am simply saying that even if you compare it with chernobyl or temptation, but here zaporizhia npp nothing will happen either. the maximum that can be done at zaporizhia npp is to achieve the fact that the radiation zone will be on the territory of the nuclear plant itself and there will be no such large radiation zone, which is painted there in various ways and captures a large part of the territory of ukraine, they are talking about a mass evacuation, there will be no threats for european countries, none of this exists, for various reasons, we are now simply, if we discuss it, you and i will be forced to talk about physics, not politics . to understand these laws of nuclear power, can they buy iodine ? it is not necessary here, they have alr

well, let's say it is at least somehow comparable to the chernobyl explosion. on the zaporizhzhia npps impossible, it is impossible due to two reasons, there are reactors of a different type, of a much safer fukushima type, let's say so. well, to understand, you need to know that the chernobyl reactor was obsolete . it was easier and cheaper for them to build them in the soviet union. this is the second time. as you said correctly, all the power units, except, well, you can say that practically all the power units are stopped at the zaporizhzhya npp, and it has been stopped for a long time already for a long time so there are really five well there are 6 power units in total five they are completely stopped uh and in such a condition that starting them up is a rather long technological procedure, well a relatively long technological procedure, it is not a matter of minutes even hours, but one and a cold hot stop, that is, it works at some very small power, but this power can be raised to quite quickly. fukushima, which was significantly less than the ukrainian one, because the reactor

of the fukusiv university, as well as the liquidator of the accident at the chernobyl nuclear power plant and the fukusiv npp, in particular , radioactive iodine will not be released, if there is such a thing, listen there, it will be small the territory is small, the territory is somewhere, let's say up to 20-25 km, which can. these are the levels of pollution that help the evacuation, this does not mean that he remains there, uh, in this zone, then she will die in two hours or in the yard, a person can live with cancer for ten years territories, nothing will happen to him here in the event of an accident at the air force, there is no need to stay in shelters, so the expert on atomic energy ludvig lytvynskyi told the public why and what should be done in the event that the russians do commit a terrorist attack, see below one of the shelters on babillya street in odesa, it is located in the catacombs. oleksandr, one of those who arranged it, tells whether it is possible to be there in the event of an explosion at the zaporizhzhya npp, for example , there is no radiation here. the first thing that is not here

i understand that the kurchatov npp is the sixth in chernobyl, which is easier to disrupt than zaporizhzhia, because zaporizhzhia is arranged in a different way, and even you can be blown up. there is no one. well, if the radiation is small, there will be, uh, there won’t even be uh, well, no repeat of chernobyl, this is an example, experts say, but kurchatov , if it breaks, it’s for everyone. it’s uh, along the river , if it’s about 100 km to ukraine, if directly there well, for example, there to bilopol' which is already near there? well, pisky bilopillia is already near the sejm. well, it’s there . well, it’s a little more, but it’s not far. it’s 120-140 km away. this is a nuclear power plant, and if they blow it up , it’s the same. there all the way to konotop. i think that we also think of konotop. well, it is not on the very siem reap, but next to it, right next to it, literally, but the wasteland is there. well , that's why podillia is the route specifically to the seventh , eh, and people are very worried, people are worried if they think eh- i don't know. well, i don't have enough

that what happened in chernobyl may seem like flowers, compared to what can happen at the zaporozhye nuclear power plant, where in reality the provocations are shelling zaporizhzhya nppthan once from the right bank. dnieper's position there. this is well known to the expert of the bogatyr, who, together with russian specialists and the military, is monitoring the dangers at the station are aware of this and in the west this week in washington they even tried to lower the degree of nuclear hysteria of his i am not going to go into specific intelligence, but i will say that we very closely following this we have seen these reports. as you know, we have the ability to observe radioactivity close to the station and we saw no sign that this threat was imminent. we see no sign that putin intends to use nuclear weapons in ukraine or anywhere else. if the wife then went. well, the closer you get yourself something you need confidence, which is scheduled for july 11-12, the topic is louder. zelensky talks about the nuclear threat. the west demands the results of aki and is trying in every possible way to divert attention from the failed offensive about the kona magazine to me