chi mail could find out about such issues? . ., , ., , issues?issues? of course, there was the structure are just mentioned i issues? of course, there was the l structure are just mentioned above the checks and balances. at the checks and balances due mentioned were within the post office? i'm talking about the checks and balances and you learning about things that they didn't want to tell you about? first of all, there are constant one—to—one meetings. does that place a high burden on the managing director or ceo of post office limited to be open and transparent with royal mail holdings and in particular with you? bath and in particular with you? both m self and in particular with you? both myself and _ and in particular with you? both myself and the _ and in particular with you? both myself and the board, - and in particular with you? ifizf7ii'i myself and the board, yes, absolutely. there was constant... because of what we inherited effectively on the royal mail site, a broken company that hadn't been invested in for a decade, it was the least