but even here in europe, there's skepticism toward sorry china to china after covid, for example. and i think, you know, chancellor schultz has talked about the turning point of germany and that very much includes looking at authoritarian powers with a new view and not necessarily thinking it'smart to do critical infrastructure trading with countries like russia and china. but if i can push back on push once again on that point, angela, in fact, china's trade with the us is three times that the worth of its trade with russia so isn't there a very real downside to the path that it's taking here? well, i mean, i think this is why i kind of also reject the idea of a new cold war because of course, as you said the big difference in during the cold war, there was a new cold war because of course, as you said not that kind of interdependency. but what we also see is that these kind of interdependencies do not stop conflict maybe it will stop a complete escalation and the third world war may still be far away as long as we see this kind of interdependence. but we see nevertheless a harde

the china is china, could gate a nuclear missile. i'm submarine and an arctic ice that would provide as he can strike to terence the china, or casual as her to was busy. major china has no military interest in the arctic usage. they will need the build military places, their north end in battleships that will trigger fear and panic among neighboring states and cause china great arm. why would china do something so stupid? tracy ah, especially as the chinese have a far more efficient weapon in their arsenal. money. china's answer to mike pompeo . speech was simple. it withdrew from the huge, alaska ellen g projects. and its promised $43000000000.00 investment. alaska found itself back at square one. the biggest question about the future of the altar in the next 30 years is not what china will do and what russia to do because we know they will continue to cooperate in energy and resources and, and, and ship it. the big question is, what will the united states to where they continue to be largely posh. if the future of the china's take

this strategic goal in china then we will understand politics and how to deal with china china china needs peace internally, i.e. a balance of socio-political peace internally and on the external contour in order to restore these logistical production chains in this document it is said that there should be no nuclear war, this is all arranged by china in order to he could build up his potential and became the number one country. and when he becomes the number one country politically, there is no need for any wars due to his influence and soft power, he solves all issues. and vanya there, the internal plan appeared now here volodymyr zelensky commented on it and i will quote it verbatim. it seems to me that this was a non-peaceful plan of china, not a resolution and not a declaration, it is not an infrastructure for something. it seems to me that china has shown its thoughts and this is, in fact , the first time that china has expressed itself to the maximum extent about how it sees this war, before that, there was only a statement that they do not allow the use of nuclear weapons , t

and course china, great hom, why would china do something so stupid? tracy ah, especially is that chinese have a far more efficient weapon in their arsenal. money. china's answer to mike pompeo . speech was simple. it withdrew from the huge alaska ellen g project. and it's promised $43000000000.00 investment. alaska found itself back at square one. the biggest crush about the future of the altar in the next 30 years. is not what china would do and what russia do because we know they will continue to corporate in energy and resources and, and, and ship it. the big question is, what will the united states to was they continue to be largely posh. if the future of the china's take may also depend on the west's level of engagement. will their rhetoric be followed up by action? greenland is a case in point. china is interested in the island country, jew to its huge reserves of rare earths and other minerals. greenland is symbolic of china's arctic ambitions. an autonomous territory in the kingdom of denmark, greenland covers a vast area, half the size of the

that because that's not going to change any way. china really needs russia and china. i would want the war done, which is also in china's fema. so i think as being neutral, china is at least pretending to be neutral in females. see so, and by presenting these 12 lines, china has taken a step further, but there's nothing really complete there that could really, you know, take us into the direction of peace. and that is where adult layers i would say in the army. so there's india, that's leading for it from mr. huntington, what he recently sent had when all of shows was bad and new to any that we would like to help. and which emma, we can and india as you know. and you'll also see that serve as the big brother when it comes to the south. so indian doesn't want to miss that chance. and india suddenly angered as well, that if china makes a mistake, if china does send something to russia, then jenna will lose its credibility. and what my next 20 points only becomes 10 or 20 points. i will not be in a position to say that v can be your mediator because now if you become part

has with china? guest: we have a monster relation, 750 billion in trade, investments, we are integrated with their supy chains. the same me, we are strategic competits where we are facing off with each other with what we want t intertionalrder to look le. we are deeply integrated but at the sa time we face monumental political stggles. we have to figure out how to collaborate, compete fairly but also deal wi the national security implications that come with it. host:he economic concerns unrlie every decision the united statemakes with chi? guest: ecomics tnational security. issueslay a large ro. we are worried aut u.s economic cpetitiveness. our employment picture, inflation as well as many different industries are going to go from autonomous vehicles and other tys of ai to quantum,emiconductors and all of that has national security implications. you can have a conversation about china witho the national security side. washington sees that economic integratiowith china is negative for our national se

china is afraid. also china sees it um important now to intervene somehow and the peace plan is maybe a very tiny step, but it is a step that china wants to try to influence this conflict. china's position certainly is complicated and there is lots of speculation about china's intentions at the moment, a crucial player in the world stage. china has many experts guessing china's top diplomat wang visits moscow a year after the russian army invaded, ukraine, he assures putin that the comprehensive strategic partnership will be strengthened further but beijing presents itself to the world as a neutral mediator. with negotiations, criticism of moscow's invasion does not get mentioned. china's allianc ith russia, warnings are coming from the u. s. government are concerned that china is considering supporting russia's war effort in ukraine with lethal assistance. real problem for china in his relationships with many other countries, not just the united states, there is speculation that china could supply co

that is, this is what china is trying to achieve. that is , actually, today china is trying to win in some way the hegemony of the united states and he is now actively involved in supporting russia , emphasizing that it is the united states that alone governs at the global level . but at the same time, it is a force that constantly undermines the world order. it creates conflicts it creates misunderstandings, and it is the united states today that is the chinese version that is constantly offered to everyone, but today ukraine and russia can negotiate with it, they can find reasons for dialogue, but there is a third hand, a third force that is not at all interested in this and xijinping even already named the united states in his context that they undermine the development of china for the first time he voiced the united states and other high-ranking officials in the context of russian aggression against ukraine always talked about the hand of the united states, and accordingly, there are more motives, for example, signals to the uni

it's hard to have an international currency based on, on china, on china's currency. china uses the dollar. china wants trade with europe. that's one of the reasons they have good relations with beller is because as see opening to europe, they're not giving up on europe because of ukraine. that is, that is for sure. so i to, i really don't see the world divided that way. i think the chinese leadership is very, very aware of china's rise. and when you have a rising power, you can afford to be a little more flexible. it's when you're on the defensive and you feel the world is really against you, which is how russia feels, that you make mistakes. and i really worry about that because china doesn't mind having a dependent roger or a weak russia, but it does not want to russia that is not stable. and that is why this meeting was so important because it shows china and russia together as stable countries. this is for a domestic audience, a lot of yes, i didn't. and something that you just said that the idea that russia is on the defensive and that china perhaps isn't. but we have been hearing so

she need threat, as he needs china and chinese enlistment in china's money. let him know if that him, you put in is, is so upset about the us and the west encroaching on russia. why would he allow russia to become a junior partner, subservient to this massive, massive power on his, on his, and to his, his east. the methods from, from moscow to the best and war does become perfectly survive without your money, without your investment, without the good relationship could yes, to the, to europe, to brussels, to berlin, to whoever in the best we don't need liberal democracy of the state concept. we are perfectly fine on our self in the look for our own partners, senior partner student, her vargas, were they were by also so be a final and also so it's a big my to the western democracies. some general sort of live china. russia don't actually use the term alliance when they talk about this relationship. so how allied are they? is this comparable this, this tie to let say, germany and france as nato allies? well, i think the u. s. administration has sort of describi

how china reacted china almost panic and the time. yeah. but it will shine it did when the full mouth. sweet. yeah. nancy pelosi has to die. one was to do a big drill of him. you know, some people were asking, why doesn't china? i don't know, she jin ping visit havana, visit havana or, or do something more than just a big military drill. right? no, no, i don't think a timing is right. but don't forget this through. this drill is not all the other 3 is a different drill. this is called the blah katie strategy. this could be, could be one of the future. i saw a military operation class. this is a actually provide the opportunity for them to really there you know, a real fire exercise a surrounding how i don't, don't forget, this is the 1st time this is b blockade could be one of the plans you see? well, i mean, certainly on fox news, they talk about it hook like that, but of course the americans, i love it, they have lots of personnel apart from all the bases that circle you in chang, i the u. s. bases 16 people, 16 chinese workers killed in

military force in the south china sea and east china sea. and at the border with india directly affect our partners and the legitimate interests. we also underscore the importance of peace and stability in the taiwan strait. any weakening of regional stability in asia, the fastest growing region in the world, affects lobel security. the free flow of trade and our own interests in the region. the grave human rights violations occurring and she young also cause of great concern as laid out in the recent report of the un high commissioner for human rights. how china meets international obligation regarding human rights will be another test for how and how much we can cooperate with china. as this, china has been ramping up its military posture. it has also ramped up its policies of disinformation that economic and trade coercion is a deliberate policy targeting other countries to ensure they comply and conform. we saw it when china responded to the opening of a taiwan office in vilnius. i taking retaliatory measures against this one you and oth

guest: it is happening to people in china and peoe outside of china.e came to power in late 2012 and he tighten the grip over chinese society over all aspects. more censorship on t internet, the trading of journalists human lawyers activists rights. and master surveillance. it is the control of the class. that is the kind of oppression against the chinese which is the majority of the ethnic groupn china. and the tibetan region and others are -- you see one gets most the -- the most attention because of the region. there's 13 million pple there and most of them are minorities. and the government h carried what we call a crisis agnst humanity in the region. many people are estimated to be in prisoin the camps. and many are subject to civilians. and not to mention hong kong. and bear is to conan -- there is national security over this population. there is all kinds of control over the population. host: last year it was said that china is responsible forerious human rights violations in the region that you were talking about area explain what the populati

yes, it is china's interests that now feel the same.s is very good for russia and they coincide for objective reasons, because the vision in principle, we have a single future e world with china recently, we talked with some. uh, well, at a conference with some chinese colleagues, one of them said that we have a common goal, uh, in creating. here e or changes in the existing world order. maybe we sometimes have different methods. here , but that's not the point. the main thing is that we have a common goal. yes, therefore, no matter what problems there are between russia and china, or different visions of some issues, in any case , the problem is china, the united states is much more in agreement. and ruslan pukhov, a leading military expert, i wanted i would like to ask, well, what is the main point in the struggle that the scattered ukraine is waging and, uh, we, of course, have a lot of strategic disagreements about security issues, but it seems to me that more and more, in general, but .

and china. in the u.s., people going to work in semiconductors come from a broader array of disciplines including electrical engineering, chemical engineering, and information engineering. in china, especially with the heightened focus on meeting specific industry needs, there is a greater emphasis on microelectronics as a whole with a little dose of physics. with some exceptions, death is emphasized over breath. as more sectors become more complex, in the short term it is useful but may not be in the right direction in terms of long-term need. there is little doubt china has made a comprehensive commitment to address his talent shortage in terms of the entire value chain of the semiconductor and i.t. industry. achieving self-reliance is a strategic national priority. will china come up with a grand solution to me is talent needs for the semiconductor industry? china has sought to utilize the same solution south korea deployed to catch up with japan in the semiconductor sector. it tries to hire

china's names are limited. we have to keep our powder dry and keep a strong defense and perhaps we have to draw some redlines. we have a very strong and defensible position. we shouldn't bankrupt ourselves to try to defend taiwan and getting crazy about each move that china makes in the asia-pacific let's imagine if china tried to defend cuba or somewhere in the caribbean against the united states. it wld be ridiculous. this defensiveaiwan is quite ridiculous. at some level, is a guns and butter question. we try to defend taiwan, americans will be worse off because we need to triple our defense budget guest: i neglected to address thpoint about racism. the countriewe are working with, we don't want to be dominated the chinese or east asians. countries like indiin sou asia. if there is racism involved, it'a dismissive aitude about the chinese. i t the chinese very serious with the numrs and i've had long experience th the personally. am concerned. this is an extremely important country. there is often a kind of

this is the position of china and for china, although china is not an involved party in this conflictat china also bears the costs of what happens from the war, of course, from these events, which they are already fighting, after all, we and ukraine has traditionally been an important partner for china if you look at the statistics of mutual trade. this is also an interesting topic, as it were interest we look at how healthy competition among neighbors has not been canceled, because, uh, ukraine was u one of the main suppliers. uh, corn grain uh sunflower oil for the market. china now these volumes are needed somewhere on the international market, they will be reflected in the price . as i understand it, the issue is not only in ukraine, because the sanctions against russia, belarus, they also absolutely impose restrictions, defined by a boomerang, affect many areas, uh, and trade, all the more so here is the position of the united states that they will now maximally pinch countries that, to put it mildly, participate in supply chains with russia or china first. who is not acceptable.

interests of china. is china now charging this war? in order to create i have economic problems, by the way , i know where the discussion is from last year, and here you have to understand one simple thing against china. russia, how much in connection with, for example, china's direct military aggression against the taiwans? then the question of landing will arise, but when we talk about the supply of weapons, here it is not about american sanctions. i think that both china and the americans will act very, very carefully in this regard issues, and if china will help russia, it will do so unofficially, not directly and on a very limited scale, a little and so that it does not become a reason for sanctions against china, which , for example, trade with russia and bypass the sanctions regime with russia. work in western markets , they avoid cooperation with russia, and in this sense the situation is more or less balanced, so i think that china will not destroy this balance . you know the economic interests

or the other extreme is if china, china reads constantly, china does not collapse, china must read others. so these are 2 extreme views of china, which has been going on for several decades. but the problem is, in the real world, there are seldom phenomena or things that black and white in nature, where the western approach to anything. internal, personal, interpersonal, or interstate relationship, is one of black and white realities. there are many, many shades of different colors, different states, and other chinese philosophy approach to the issue is, are, you know, if we are different we can work together. this is the confuses notion that the unity of the differences. ready or harmony of the differences, the western approaches, the human body of the sameness. i don't just, we are the same. you are like us, you're abandoned your cultural, social, and religious economic heritage in order to be like us and you know, why should i ask, what is it so attractive about the american way of life? i mean, look at the nbc to raise, look at this, the side rates, look at the rates are going play, i

china.ecially in the last decade. here is this one belt one road initiative. there was this element in it that we are building our own system and you all join it, and for many it began to look like a struggle between two hierarchies. there are western hierarchies and now there are non-western hierarchies. i thought it was a direction in politics. china is very dangerous, and i thought that the formation of a new hierarchy is new to us concentration camp is not needed. new america is not needed. and how we would like to think that the rapprochement between russia and china, among other things, has an element such that china abandoned the rudiments of the idea that they were not yet fully articulated that they would be the new america. 6 days after the declaration of war on japan, the soviet union concluded a friendship and alliance treaty with the government of hamildan, but in october 1949, when the communists defeated the commandant of the civil war, the ussr was the first to recognize the

and china. i'm cognizant of time so i will just point you to the three recommendations i have ithe policy recommendations and the written testimony d i look ov to the discussion. >> thank you very much. commissioner or follow you, we will start with you. >> thanks very much again to our witnesses. i'm trying to figure out where to start. dr. deng, your testimony takes us into the elephant in the room which does freedom of speech or is innovation possible in the context like the chine system as we undetand the chinese syem? you said there is a big gap in thability to defuse and i presume -- who does that cap benefit and not big gap in innovation and i would have thought it's the other way around but maybe i'm misunderstanding sometng but can you explain that more? >> thank you for the question. when i look at iovation could pacitti, i'm interested iwhich countries can produce the nov to the world innovations, which was athe best chanceo produce those innotions. by many metrics, a lot of people ci

so they're having a china plus one strategy and realising they can no longer rely on china.it differ from sector to sector? while some are saying it is not a top three priority for investment other big names like mcdonalds, starbucks, ralph lauren, a lot of those are expanding and going ahead with putting more money into china? by sector it does vary. the consumer market is probably the place for most people are optimistic. the chinese consumer has got wealthier over time, they continue to be focused on buying foreign goods are brand america so retailers are doing relatively well. there are some sectors like tech where there are rules that say tech companies should not be investing here, it is a national security concern. it is such a large economy and an important market for many foreign companies so people don't really want to divest from china. they do want to have a little bit more balanced particularly when it comes to supply chain and other issues. the chinese communist party is increasingly trying to control or at the very least influence china's private companies to

the domination of china, i.e. sorry that i'm worried lukashenko traveled to well as a vassal well he looks at kazakhstan and thinks wait yes yes i can china china save kazakhstan you remember when the odkb troops were withdrawn after after the phone call from china because nevertheless, if the family in power changed the family changed so they supported so who is in power china simply does not interfere in their political internal political schedules are different, a different approach, economic cooperation , kazakhstan made it clear that they guarantee their sovereignty, lukashenko, realizing that he is being absorbed, is being absorbed but russia is falling into an abyss , in fact, he actually went to defend himself first, second, protect your sovereignty and agree on cooperation there in order to survive, because he is actually subject to sanctions, as well as russia, why was this visit beneficial for china, and to demonstrate it as a state visit is the same thing . simply by ceremonial protocol, etiquette, rec

so we have already mentioned the peace plan proposed by china, because russia, china, they are calling on ukraine to sit down at the negotiating table and reach a certain common denominator territorial common denominator do you think that any negotiations with the kremlin are necessary or someone will agree to such a thing, it is very interesting, in fact, i think that china is calculating and this is if when ukraine wins war is clear that it is possible before that, it will be necessary to hold several rounds of negotiations and china is also interested in the development of the situation because any contribution to the end of this conflict china also wants to be proud of something by saying so, these were our efforts that we made in order to stop the war yes, this is really china's contribution to peace, that's why i think that this kind of announcement of peace formulas is currently needed by china for some of their personal reasons, and they are now asking the two sides of the conflict to sit down at the table of negotiations i think that china will also benefit from this i underst

i think china -- i do not think we have to worry about china. china are kind of screwed. they do not have a lot of population coming up. they are buying land anywhere they can get it. the u.s., our real estate is still looking fantastic. u.s. real estate is the best of the world probably. we are surrounded by mexico and canada. manufacturing -- i am an ironworker. manufacturing is off the hook as far as building new plants and it is not just manufacturing. construction -- it is insane the money put into construction. host: when members of congress describes the competition against china as an existential struggle over the world and with the world will look like the 21st century, you think that is overblown? caller: i think the same it he its have led us into all the messes we are in now. the other thing we have to worry about -- look at what they are laying down with in russia. when you lay down with -- you get up with covid. they are screwed. we haven't made here. we just keep our act together and there will be so much manufacturing in this country it is ridiculous. they

when it comes to china. isn't that a real downside of this block development that angela just described and doesn't china ultimately also, economically need the west really more than it needs russia? well, i mean, i think china is also seeing the, you know, the winds go in that direction, that both of us already has bipartisan. there's bipartisan skepticism toward russia . but even here in europe, there is some skepticism toward outside china, toward china after coven, for example. and i think, you know, chancellor shawls has talked about the turning point of germany and that very much includes looking as authoritarian powers with a new view and not necessarily thinking it's smart to do critical infrastructure trading with countries like russia and china. but if i can push back and push once again on that point, a angular, in fact, china's trade with the us is 3 times that the worth of it to trade with russia. so isn't there a very real down side to the path that it's taking here? well, i mean, i think this

it began to punish a china hostile to china and take all kinds of provocative actions against china. china, not happy about this. so not this tie states, you take your responsibility, solve your own problems. if your business, oh yeah, i can start to happen. the child had been doing all this job well and, and, and talking about the, the u. s. and what it perceives to be problems is that the bottom ministration has recently demanded that the, the, china's own as a tick tock they sell their stake in the social media or risk of possible ban of 6 out. it's the tick tock in in the, the us. but they said any sale of 6 that would have to be approved by chinese regulators. it's a bit of a mass do. and what do you make of this hysteria around not just take talk. also hallways also been the video kicked out of a lot of infrastructure in the u. k. the u. s. and i believe some cameras in australia as well were removed from some government departments. yeah. and then, i think, you know, in fact, it is about the technology, the united states is unwilling to engage as a countries in the fair compet

-china policy.anything, there has been continuity across the trump and biden administrations when it comes to taking a harder line with china. if there is grumbling of people on the left in the way the biden-china policy looks, it looks a lot like trump's. he didn't get rid of the tariffs. they were continued under this administration and we spend a lot of time talking about a lack of bipartisanship in american politics but this is a case where you see fair degree of bipartisan agreement with differences over what the right responses. if you watch the senate select committee or house select committee on china proceedings a couple of weeks ago chaired by republican mike gallagher, you saw fair degree of consensus as to exactly with the challenge is. while there were differences on the policy, i don't think you see any attempt at minimizing the challenge from either side. this is a case that is running more in contrast to some areas of american politics and there's a high degree of bipartisanship and

china's technology is the most important thing that we can and should cooperate with china to develop in the country the technology of this technological sovereignty technological sovereignty is economic sovereignty economic sovereignty is nationality. it's all simple. machine tool building electric vehicles the construction of parts for agricultural machinery, and the joint implementation of scientific developments sanctions of the president of the republic of belarus this is a new opportunity , a unique situation has developed for him, he should not miss it, as suggested. cd-ping at one time, the head of our country proposed an in-depth partnership with three provinces. this is an in-depth partnership with the central cities of tian-jin, and qingdao and chongqing are such hubs of china chongqing is logistics is e-commerce is commerce. and it's, uh, elements aren't elements in the grand scheme of things. this is the starting point for the movement of container trains from china to europe and from europe to china, and this agreement defines the possibility of working on the principle

and china.i want your thoughts on whether or not that would hurt or help your ability to build a coalition. >> generally speaking, we do not force countries to choose. they tell us they don't want to choose. most countries in the indo pacific did not need education on the threat post. what they want to know was how they can work together with the u.s. in these relationships to advance our shared interests. we are not asking countries to choose, we are working to make sure countries have choices and to make sure they can make their own sovereign decisions, free from coercion. if we do that i'm confident that , we will prevail in this competition and we'll continue to preserve the free and open region toward which we're working. >> one thing that i've heard when i was out there in the region talking to some of our vital partners there is they they do have concern about some of how we're approaching uh vis-À-vis china, our rhetoric, our posture. and i guess some of their concern was saying that the

china e, 30% of ai development is financed by china e, chipa microchips, too, china recently, the directorear plant returned. from china , everything in our space, here russia belarus believed that e processing of parts in nine dimensions e, in nine planes. it’s only the usa japan or individual eu countries no, china does everything, and the chinese are grateful to both the belarusian and russian manufacturers for sharing this technology with china in their soviet era to hide their irritation. here is what they write about alexander lukashenko's visit to china about the meeting of close allies is seen internationally as a sign of which side china's sympathy is unquestionably on. the guardian further listening to lukashenka's meeting with this pin shows the abyss between china and the united states , many westerners note the language of the conflict in ukraine. well, the most interesting things they write about it. they cannot help but write a wonderful telegram channel brought e, only a small part of those european american media that wrote about the visit of the president of belarus to ch

china is always about china. china has no allies. i even once asked those who know chinese well. me that there are many words in chinese, there are partners , whatever, but there are no serious people there in the chinese mentality. there was never any question of alliances. china is beautiful. what is happening in russia in detail , thousands if not tens of thousands of people follow it there, even at the level of analytics, china follows every day in great detail, i would say even every minute of our war, it does with but as of today, a weaker russia is beneficial to china , so everything is going well for china . both biden and the european leader talked a lot, but this european defeat does not include the logic of the collapsing sisi, and i think that the chinese will continue to use russia, they will use russia both directly and indirectly the deployment of tactical nuclear weapons in belarus, which we talked about today, is one of the examples of testing the red lines of the west. and will this be a blow to solidarity for china ? it is a complete disaster. now there is a co

china.mple, the company foxcon , which manufactures iphones, is already relocating to india, that is, it seemed oh well one company, one company, another company, and luxury brands, lighter brands, brands that are made in china will also relocate, i.e. china. i think it will be calculated that he will win now in a short distance and that he can lose at a widow's distance, well, that is, on the one hand, it seems that it is in principle it is not logical to wish for a prolongation of the war, because we know in principle that china is now walking on the edge of a blade, and if the united states will consume less and depend less on chinese goods, then china will lose very much because they exports, an independent economy and a huge social burden on the budget, this is where it appears here, it all looks very paradoxical, well, china's very subtle political game does not forget that the east is the same, they play very carefully, and how many times do you remember when china was there? well, th

the us in china. yeah, that's the kind of contradiction. because on the one hand, china twice to divide the you and the us, i mean, we have just seen this unique c security conference on china, tech the united states and said to your could be more independent to should be boy in the middle between the 2 sides and not together with the us, but on the other hand, in the context of the ukraine. well, i mean, china sees the, you're very much of course in mon front with the u. s. and that, to bring me back to your earlier question. i mean, i had been correspondent in moscow also in the time 990, to 9096 till the end of the soviet union and started the new russia. and qu, teen, and teaching ping are united because they have the same love view. they both think that there had been a you mediated by the best, especially united states. but the incentive, really, by the best on girls is stacey. it putin brings nice to get along with the breakdown, pull down off of it union, which is kind of ridiculous because i

. >> focused on china and the threats china poses economically. this morning he serves as editor is thefo foreign affairs and alo the author of the 2018 book the chinana mission. good morning to you. >> good morning thanks for having me. >> there was a hearing last week on the national security threats the u.s. is facing around the world. where does china's ambition rank in your mind in terms of the biggest threats facing the united states? >> what you've heard from administration official after official, and i think this goes back to the administration followings this one is even whie we face the threat china is the long-term and most challenging issue that u.s. foreign policy changes and military terms into the pentagon they call it this is the thing that is going to be driving us forward and defining our concern when it comes to foreign policy and national security looking at the economic challenge, the geopolitical and militaryry one. they see us as the piece of threat inng their mind? >> this has been true for decades at this point if you go

china this year, china will host the third high-level international forum within the framework of thet putin has participated in the previous two forms. the one train initiative one way is an important topic of cooperation between china and russia, so i will definitely invite president putin to participate in the third forum. well, it usually takes place in may. so in may. well, here's the exchange. these visits are already a fact. here, even if here is how it's done. here you are right. how are you like what kind of symbolism behind this is the highest level of honor protocol e on both sides respect. now, if you start disinfin with gratitude, what else can he visit like this? this, of course, to the whole world just slaps in the face. do you remember how in saudi arabia , not everyone in the west remembers how the americans were greeted there, so to speak, how it was in general. and this is what affects the rest of the world. so we'll see very soon. and this is this fixing of this level relationship of trust content. you're not just a few declaration that we are good and the rest is

modern china. it is the only country that have never invaded any countries or conducted colonialism in the world . so that's a reason why present. she is highlighting that china now is enjoining its peaceful development. and it is not posing a threat to any countries. and i think our new prime minister of, sorry might our new, foreign minister at a press conference also refer to the colonialism because he believes that it is the western style to modernize the unconscious, not only just through the industrial period process. but of course, through the clothes and china is now promoting what he called modernization, by pushing globalization, as you said, multilateralism and to create a some when cooperation benefits are all humanity. so i think that is the key message that chinese prisoners sounding the china like to cooperate with any countries to, to create a better environment, which is peaceful and also opportunities for, for countries to develop. yeah, a very inspiring station date. she also spo

and now they're starting to see a china coming forward, a china emerging, a china doing piece deal. can you imagine that an amazing piece deal that was brokered last week, and i think that's what we're trying to see. possibly here in moscow is a wait to an end of this ukraine situation. i'll pass it back to you. i alex report . if i a blogger, and political analysts, benjamin child from the center of china and globalization, and of course alex under bruno independent, political analyst, gentlemen, all of you. thank you very much, we appreciate your time. thank you. thank. thank. thank you. i thank you for joining us. here on archie international, we're going to cross live now to the russian president vladimir putin and comments coming to us from the kremlin. and of course the chinese president gigi and jason's way, we'll look into practical aspects of our a corporation in various fields in detail. i would like to remind you of that last december during talks via video link with the president sheet and pain. we agreed to think about the new goals of our a corporation and interaction,

china, are china, larger american, china, central asia. so i think, you know, in the economic global as you have to go back to the basics, the economic organization will prevail because that's really bad and bunch of everybody and i, we have to, we will see. so you know, the banks collapsing you as in europe we will have to really come to the basics. i'm not really fighting this geopolitical or let's, let's go back, let's stop the war and let's really pursue peace that they can. um, go position. it's not perfect, but let's see, let's see has on is turned in the joe and, and that's worked together that's most important. and also what was the you quin, russian conflict? let's get you 7 know, 5 plus the use. you can't talk and lots of a few somebody. i mean the, you umbrella. that's make things move or not, not really have to start some. very interesting. it does feel like i'm sorry, we're gonna have to leave it there that, but i do feel like we're seeing awhile now where economics is perhaps trumping politics here. we'll have to leave it the

and we've seen china fill that niche. -- they're going to china to purchase those drones!-- when it comes to armed drones -- that's an area where i've been following the ukraine conflict, because i think how those are implemented into warfare is really an interesting analysis we need to be doing as a community. also understanding, okay, so what's the next level after that? these have some basic a.i. and other technologies incorporated in them. but what is the next level? does this mean we're gonna have to go to -- unmanned version? there's been some debates in the pla about, could you do particular activities completely unmanned? things we historically had to do with military forces and people and equipment -- i don't think we have answers yet to those. that's where this issue for me of dual use is really difficult right now. i just don't know if it works for some of the critical in emerging technologies we are thinking about. >> thank you. >> commissioner price? >> thank you. and thank you both for your testimony. just one question. as china increases its sales of weapons

toward china by state. so from trying to point of view, there's no point in fact, at the present moment for president, she is a corporate president binding because they don't, they don't be don't pregnancy and trying to seem to think any good result can come from the cost. so that's why i think will be like an interest in the so called summit between the co leaders. oh, interesting to see if i've pounds on and so i mean, i so you know, i have you hear the west, the west still thinks or suspects. china is helping russia somehow. militarily, we know that china broke the deal between iran and saudi arabia. here we are again, then they've always said they're looking for a peaceful solution, diplomacy, democracy. but i want to think, i mean, why do you think this is so push by the west thinking that china wants to add more fuel to the fire if you like. well, try to, i tried, i tried to be a peacemaker. not only to be to use, but also between ukraine rush tech will be a whole well, no. the problem you said, you s

. ., ., china.om sector to sector? while _ china. does it differ from sector to sector? while some _ china. does it differ from sector to sector? while some are _ china. does it differ from sector to sector? while some are saying - china. does it differ from sector to sector? while some are saying it l china. does it differ from sector to | sector? while some are saying it is not a top three priority for investment other big names like mcdonalds, starbucks, ralph lauren, a lot of those are expanding and going ahead with putting my money into china? br; going ahead with putting my money into china? �*, , . ., ., , ., , into china? by sector it does vary. the consumer— into china? by sector it does vary. the consumer market _ into china? by sector it does vary. the consumer market is _ into china? by sector it does vary. the consumer market is probably| into china? by sector it does vary. i the consumer market is probably the place for most people are optimistic. the chinese consumer has not got wealt

uh, everyone including, of course, china and because china is a major power.icipates in a huge number of international relations and economic political military-technical and what others will be. and of course, in this case, china just has a moral right of this kind proposals to involve, and i think this is the most important, because of the five permanent members of the united nations, russia is the party that attacks the other three members of the security council all the time on the security. these are the united states and britain and france subordinate to them. they are just attacking russia and, in fact , neutrality is actually neutrality in china, and it is china that, from a moral point of view , has every right to offer the world its concept of regulation. e. prior to this , the ukrainian conflict became, as i said global experts regularly hear grumblings from russian experts about china’s neutrality in the current geopolitical crisis, saying that beijing is being too cautious and has actually left russia alone to deal with the very collective west th

s. china relations. and i think are from the chinese perspective, there is a fundamental miscalculation a misunderstanding between the u. s. in china. about the are the strategic, a rivalry between the world's 2 largest economy. today, the u. s. has talked to bad, so a sanctioning chinese technology benny chinese investments are etc, is essentially a out of for national security reasons. but the, that understanding of national security is also cri answer. the other words, a chinese company or technology company doesn't have to necessarily impose an ongoing national security threat to the united states in order to, to justify that the u. the u. s. believes that any chinese company, or either state or private, can pose a national security threat at the command of the chinese communist party. so that's our understanding of national security threat is categorical. but on the chinese side, a chinese out rightly rejects that whole notion of china believes, according to the new chinese foreign minister chin gon

and russia is that russia actually needs china to continue buying their energy carriers and china needsheap supplies so it's a matter of mutual interest that really has nothing in common from the territory of ukraine, i don't think that everyone jin-ping says ok volodymyr take as much ukraine as you want because he still hasn't done it like that this is an extremely important moment from the other side, gentlemen of the post. i would like you to ask about the so-called chinese peace plan, it seems to be there and at the same time it is not . in reality, although i prefer it, i am more than convinced that putin and xi jinping discussed the chinese vision and the russian vision, in particular, about possible scenarios, and since i participated in the preparation of such a statement regarding others conflicts, let's say after russia's invasion of georgia or even before it, i see in the text certain clues about china's motivation lexic justom the most important element that is not in the text is a call to russia to withdraw its troops from the whole ukraine where did they invade after febru