there are many parts of the world including china or russia or wherever

there are many parts of the world including china or russia or wherever that don't subscribe to that approach. and churchill wanted to push it forward. and he saw the english-speaking peoples as away of insurancing that that was guaranteed. >> rose: also this evening, a new film called foxcatcher starring steve carell, vanessa redgrave, channing tatum and dected by ben the-- bennett pillar. >> hi seen capot, and obviously steve said that piece of work speaks for itself. and i knew i wanted to work with himment and then we started just talking about the story. and i done think he had a script then. and so i wept and rezferpd the characters and i hadn't-- i didn't have any knowledge of the story beforehand. and really just fell in love with the idea of this world that i don't think nip's seen before in film. in a deep way. >> rose: we conclude with the essayist daphne merkin, her book is you will cad the famed lunches. >> ef retime i start an essay again, i think hear we go again. i think a mixture of skin, placing and some interesting idea about the-- about the person in that-- in set

if we get attacked by an adversary with the resources and capabilities of a nation like china or russiaor iran, it is not a fair fight. the u.s. government has an obligation to help the private sector by sharing this threat about potential attacks before they might happen. hoping that this hearing can help focus members attention on this issue and the need to pass cyber threat information sharing legislation before the end of 2014. for a damagingy cyber attack against our critical infrastructure. if the senate does not act quickly, both houses of congress will have to start from scratch, moving new bills. this could mean an unnecessary and dangerous delay when we are so close to an agreement that protects privacy and our economy and our national security. admiral, thank you for being here. we will turn it over to the ranking member. >> thank you for having this hearing to let the american people know how serious this cyber threat is. thank you, admiral rodgers, for appearing before us today. you have a tremendous job. i know that you have been in six , and weow, seven months are ready t

we can't count on a deterrence if we're already in an adversarial position with a nation like china or russia. and we can't count on the fact that less rational actors might also gain access to those critical systems. it's not hard to understand how difficult it would be if the power or the water was shut off, but imagine if one of our adversaries was able to shut down key financial transactions. our economy would grind to a halt. even worse, imagine if a foreign cyber attacker altered or deleted key financial transaction data so that we couldn't verify account balances or what companies owe each other from day to daty? -- day to today? most of our critical infrastructure providers are doing their best to secure their networks, but if they get attacked by an adversary like china, russia or iran, it certainly isn't a fair fight. the u.s. government has an obligation to help the private sector by sharing this threat information about potential attacks before they happen. i'm glad we have the opportunity to talk to the american people today about this vital issue. i'm hoping this hearing can foc

vulnerable when we cannot count on a deterrent if we are already in the adversarial position like china or russia. we cannot count on the fact that less rational actors need access to the critical systems. it is not hard to understand its power was shut off but to the financial transaction is. and then what they owe each other from day to day would be chaos. it with those resources same capabilities in to have an obligation to the private sector by sharing this information about potential attacks before they have been. we talked today about the vital issue and hoping we can focus attention on the need to pass cyberthreat legislation before the end of 2014. request me ready for of attack and then they left to start from scratch next year with the threats that we face as an unnecessary and dangerous delay to protect privacy on national security. the queue for being here now i will turn over to the ranking members. >> we let the american people know how serious the threat is. they key for appearing before us today you have done a tremendous job and it has been six months or seven months earlier will

part of the world which countries are the greatest threat to world peace they don't sarah ran or china or russia but overwhelmingly the greatest is to countries and israel. so sometimes it is the perspective in that part of the world but sometimes it explains what we are it is critical nobody likes to think of themselves living in a society that is propagandized. but to demonstrate how this works is narrow but very powerful is one that happened in 2009 and iranian journalist was detained while in iran doing journalism works and the iranian government said they arrested her because they suspected she was a spy issue was there three months and tell the court ordered her release that there was no evidence and during that three months her case was one of the most celebrated cases in america us media circles people would go on every day to say free her and demand all the outrage let's dash iran a of a country that is so tyrannical the imprisoned journalist there is indignation in whole or over what they had done and then a few months later to victory in journalist to release them huge amounts of atte

b, the united states, c, china, or d russia? stay tuned and we'll tell you the correct answer.'s book of the week a walter isaacson's "the innovators." everything a writes a compulsory readable and this book does not disappoint. there's chapters on the rise of the computer, the microchip, the transiters, the internet. this is the one history to read about our age of technology. and now for the last look. despite the ugly discord of the recent midterm campaigning it's heartening to hear democrats and republicans share some surprising common ground. according to some new analytics from facebook. facebook looked at everyone who liked pages of candidates and examined tha ed their other pag. the more an artist or author is liked by one side or the other the farther it appears to the left or right. republicans' taste in music skewed toward country artists while democrats, also not surprisingly, love the beatles and bob marley. members of both parties like taylor swift. as does my 6-year-old daughter who as far as i know has no party affiliation. i'm scratching my head over this one.

whether it is china or russia, ponsored hacking or underground hacking, the recent j.p. morgan chase -- many people think that there is hack into ebody could a bank unless you have a very sophisticated state-sponsored system. but the retailer hacks, you can buy that software on the dark side of the internet. to any little hacker in short basically by the hacker for retail systems. host: four countries have put the chip and pin system in place, has there been a of data breaches? guest: chip and pin is really the solution. in those countries, there is much less fraud at the retail level. the question is whether the fraud is going to migrate online. right now, america is one of the easiest places for the hackers to play because our so easy to hack -- because we are using the magnetic stripe. the real question is, what is going to happen and development of better systems? -- and the -- quite frankly, the work is still being done. host: has there ever been efforts to bring debit cards up to the same security standards as credit cards? guest: well, consumer groups report putti

is it, a, turkey, b, the united states, c, china or d, russia?y tuned and we'll tell you the correct answer. >>> this week's book of the week is "walter isaacson's the innovators." chapters are on the rise of the computer, the microchip, the transister, the internet and each one is populated by fascinating countries. this is the one age to read about the aging technology. >>> and despite the ugly recent midterm campaigning, it is hard to hear that democrats and republicans share some surprising common ground. according to analytics from facebook, facebook looked at everyone who liked campaign pages of democrats and republicans running for governor, the senate or the house and examined their other page likes. take a look at these graphics, the more an artist or places disproportionately was liked by voters of one side or the other, the farther it appears to the left or the right. the republicans' music is skewed toward country artists while democrats also not surprisingly love the beatles and bob marley. ♪ everything little thing is going to be al

pyongyang or islambad they were driven by their own calculations pakistan has to look towards india and north career harassed to look towards both the threat from the u.s. as well as russia or chinas iran has to, you know, has a fear, i think an ex- existential fear that people are trying to overthrow the regime. the idea of a potential nuclear weapon even if it's an ambiguous one i like to think the strategic ambiguity iran is pursuing that where it doesn't get the arsenal but may have one. it does deter an invasion from the u.s. or other military attacks, look at lib yeah, it learns a lesson, via north korea and it has pushed iran down the path as far as it's gone. >> over the years second lahr and clerical leaders in iran have reassured the rest of the world that the country doesn't want a bomb . for a variety of reasons it find it a repugnant or distast distasteful weapon and then contradict itself shortly thereafter. where is the rest of the world supposed to put its faith in the idea that iran does want country or not? >> i ran has been very clear from the beginning that iran does not seek nuclear weapons. it does not see it, first of all religiously it is in the iranian re

china. c, russia. or d, india. stay tuned and we will tell you the correct answer. of the week" is bret stevens, "america in retreat." ths an exceptionally intelligent, well written book filled with interesting data and analysis that's well worth reading and i don't even agree with most of it. stephens is fast becoming the most influential conservative writer on policy. as president obama gets ready to take executive action on immigration for our "last look" let's take an interesting new look at an old place for many of our ancestors journeys in this country began, not mine, but others. this week marked the 60th anniversary of the closing of ellis island. from the day that it opened in 1892, ellis island processed over 12 million immigrants, and the u.s. government estimates that 40% of americans can trace their ancestry to immigrants who passed through this isle in new york harbor. a new art exhibit on the island caught my eye this anniversary week. as part of his unframed project, the artist j.r. has placed life-size historical photos of immigrants around the dete

is russia moving closer to china because it needs to, or because it wants to? ited states and china close together threatens russia. and that these deals that we've seen on oil and energy are out of necessity. i don't see any great love between the russians and the chinese. not in the past six decades, not in the past years. lou: the largest joint military exercises in history. they're working without question together. they have a cooperative alliance now, both, by the way, selling arms to iran. they have such a vast horizon of shared interests, and by the way, both loathing the united states irrespective of their public constant. >> you see them working so much closer together. four count is joint vetoes by china and russia on the syria matter alone. last september we saw chinese and russian warships sortie together in the eastern mediterranean to oppose vessels. they are working so closely together. lou: $300 billion trade deficit with china that we maintain. it is deleterious, it is a drag on our own economic growth, yet we persist, and the chinese are inves

maybe china, going forward, the iranians, a lot of iranians are saying, maybe we can live with a deal that we can blame the americans from effectively breaking at the end. >> do we worry about russia or china breaking the sanctions because they have greater interest in not having the sanctions imposed on iran? >> we have to be worried about russia simply because they're doing their damndest. this is a country that's effectively sending bombers into the gulf of mexico for reconnaissance, and it's a country that's prepared to break sanctions just to no annoy the united states, to show obama that they can. if the iran deal falls apart, i don't think that the chinese want to actively antagonize, and on the other hand, they think they can make a deal. and the u.s. doesn't want to fight. and they might start to erode. especially if the russians are taking most of the flack out in front. >> let me ask you this, we don't need iran that much. but however, we need iraq to be a real country, and iran is probably the most influential player in iraq being a real country, so in the battle against isil and getting iraq stable, do we need iran more for that than we do for anything else? >> it's an o

and quite frankly whether it is france or russia or britain or china, that's why i believe the u.n. security council was -- to deal with this issue, because it was not in -- okay. >> thank you. >> i'm very happy to see you, i'm also a graduate, so i'm very happy to be here too. my question is considering something you said, the engagement to one issue will not lead to silence on another. i understand that you're talking about all the sanctions that are imposed on iran. does this mean that the terrorism sanctions and the human rights sanction also stay on the books? thank you. >> we have been very clear from the givening that human rights sanction us and terror sanctions are not related. so there's been discussions about nuclear-related sanctions have been discussed. and indeed, if we can come to this arrangement they will be suspended and ultimately lifted and it will make a substantial difference for iran. >> other questions? >> thank you so much, wendy, i know the focus is on the nuclear issue and it has to be so, and perhaps isles not always the right time to talk about other dim

surge in this direction it is not good or bad but what if something else happens in the ukraine or russia or china? >> ebola. looked at the other things. >> how does it pay for that? is plain irresponsible. >> from the german marshall fund, i want to get back to the question of long-term strategy of terrorism in general not just isil i worry about calling it a war on terror. obviously isil but terrorism is the ongoing conflict a state of mind as a psychology. senior officials say it is a game of whack-a-mole as you shoot a missile into a country people hate you and it is an ongoing e. fact. then we are incentivize because of the wars in iraq and afghanistan? i appreciate the narrative. can you talk about that and what is the effort to build? >> again that is what we need a public debate for. not in the next 10 minutes year but president upon the change that misnomer and called it the war on al qaeda. terry is a tactic. it is not a defined enemy but it is one that is in overuse at the moment but on the drone strike issue to some extent it is the blurring effect however those strong strikes and they

deal in the entire international community represented by the p5+1, countries as diverse or different as russia, china, the u.s., and europe, but this signature on the agreement and it comes back to the u.s. congress and they sabotage it or doesn't implement its bligations under the deal, hen clearly the blame will fall on the u.s. side and on he side of the u.s.. that will have the effect of breaking the international onsensus that has been built by the obama administration on iran in the sense that the consensus is the international community is working closely together in order to get an agreement in which the iranians cannot split this national community. if you have a scenario in which they all agree to a deal, but u.s. congress does not, the shift -- blame will shift to the u.s. side. one of the likely consequences of that is you will see the sanctions regime slowly, but surely falling apart. many countries agreed to the sanctions. they have paid a very heavy price. the costs for the europeans incidentally has been more than twice between 2010 and 2012 the with the u.s. economy has paid. the u.s

are there any differences in recent weeks or months with china, russia, germany, great britain, and francemy conversations with russian diplomats, they have stressed that we are very much a part on this coalition. with anyot want a deal more concessions than the u.s. is willing to offer. the hardest-line coalition appears to be france. reacty in which they will to whatever is negotiated, that is most concerning. plus israel. saudi arabia has decided if a deal is made, are we going to insist on nuclear programs for the rest of us? that is a big proliferation. then you are heading towards a region where everybody has a bomb making program. they said they are going to do that. do they mean it? that is more dangerous. he has set himself absolutely against this deal and said over and over again that it is dangerous. what is he going to do about it? there is always the risk that israel might decide that this deal has been negotiated and leaves israel more insecure and takes some kind of military or unconventional actions. , there are so many branches in the road that people will need to think ab

. >> we don't have to be dictated to by russia or china. we can also create jobs not just in the u.s. but mexico. >> the ceo of the pipeline company said that it needs 50 permanent jobs when you could have so many more millions of jobs if you embrace clean energy. >> so right at this moment the vote started five minutes ago as we came on the air. we'll know 15 minutes or two whether the effort to go around president obama and the approval process is going to be successful. >> what might we expect the president to do with it. >> it's complicated on this when you throw in the run off sheets. s she's way often, and it's unlikely this will help her in any way they'll veto this, it will need 67 senators to override this senator. right now they're stuck on 59. but keep in mind republicans take over in january. we're still in a lame duck-democratically controlled senate right now. >> thank you. >> canada has been keeping a close eye on the debate in washington. that's because transcanada corporation wants to transport oil to refineries along the g

tolerating the find of international interference in america's backyard from a you country like russia or chinahe russians now field like is being rested upon them in ukraine. ukraine is absolutely the single most important foreign policy interest that the russians have in terms of respite tour cal -- historical influence and legitimacy in terms of the bases in crimea, in terms of the military industrial complex and supply chain in southeast ukraine, having that said ukraine is a sovereign state and the russians have effectively invaded it. it's clear that the americans and europeans have to stands up to that. but it's also clear that over the last several months you have seen 80% of the american and european efforts looking at punishing the russians maybe 20% looking to support ukrainians. if you ask me those percentages are exactly backwards. you should have been focused much more on what you can do help kiev and we are fighting the russians to -- >> i know you follow this other topic i will get in trouble for make this is comparison by somebody. if you have a strong and acceptable government

. >>> the asia pacific economic corporation or apec summit just ended today in beijing. and president obama joined russia and china in pledging to consider a chinese chinese-packed trade pact involving all three countries. the proposal appears to be china's answer to another free trade -- the trans-pacific partnership. i told you about it today but i'm going to tell you about it again because you're going to be hearing about this a lot. the tpp, trans-pacific partnership is about countries that border on the pacific. it's a 12-country free trade zone being negotiated right now. china is specifically being left out of these talks by design straining bilateral relations with the united states. instead, china is looking west toward russia in search of trade blocks. it has proposed new silk roads as they call them to try to boost trade with the rest of the world. russia, in turn, is embracing china with gas pipelines and trade deals. but that's fuelling tensions with the u.s. and the west. it looks like the world powers are fracturing back into a bipolar world. this time though, they're engaging in war fair and compet

government is never going to go to russia or china and track these people down for us.n terms of investment i like palo alto. i think the stock is doing very, very well. you are going to see a lot of something called firewall refresh where people have to change their infrastructure. if we are in a new cold war things like fire walls and malwear devices are the weapons. you have companied like palo alto who make a brand new next generation firewall. you have a company called check point which is the leader in the firewall space and a company i like called fire eye which recently tracked down some of the chinese hackers and they are doing very well. >> i believe you sold the first commercial firewall in canada back in 1990. you do know a thing or two about this. >> i am actually 78 years old but because i'm in hollywood i have had a lot of work done. >> you look great. we were speaking to the guy behind the new etf that deals in cyber security firms called hack. what do you think about that etf? >> i like it. i was about to say the problem in investing in some of the inte

this weird dance between the u.s., china and russia where china seeds ms to be playing a nice with both sides. where do we stand vis-a-vis with china and are they helpful orthey're not helpful. clearly, putin is trying to device a wedput a wedge between us and the chinese. the ruble is in very bad shape. oil prices have hurt the russian economy, so what putin wants to do is get closer to china to be a counterattack against us by having a natural gas deal with china, working closer on regional issues. but what we must do is we have to engage china. we need china on climate change. if there's no climate change talks, successful talks, it's because china doesn't participate. we need china to lead on north korea. we've got this trade deal that basically excludes china, that was announced today. so, there's really three-power tension. what we need to do is try to find areas with russia and china where we can work together despite the massive differences. with russia it's iran. we can possibly work together. terrorism and nuclear proliferation. the rest of the yashissues, syr ukraine, we're both heading in different directions. >> you mentioned trade and part o

multitude of thousands of companies trying to share malicious source code that they've originated in russia or china or iran or north korea, or some international organized crime element. i just want to make sure we have the full and open discussion about what that looks like and why there are concerns about limiting the number of companies that participate. it has more vulnerabilities to the whole system. i just wanted to make sure we made that clear and was on record to admiral kime your saved by the bell. the clock shows is your but again i want to thank you for your service to the country. thinks are stepping in at a difficult time. thanks for improving the brow of the nsa folks and hope you will take back as a committee to in a bipartisan way is pretty does oversight. i think you've seen that already. that we have the utmost respect for the work that the doing and thanks for their patriotism and staying on mission, despite what they might read in the newspaper. so thank you, sir, thanks to the men and women of the national security agency. >> thank you, sir. [inaudible conversations] >> i say t

fossil fuel and natural gas contributes to climate change and is a greater threat than russia, china ormist terrorism. if he vetoes it, what then? >> if he vetoes it, he vetoes it and it will not be built. there are enough enough votes in -- there are not enough votes in congress to override a presidential veto. it's interesting to see the forces lined up against the pipeline. the greens and environmentalists. russia, venezuela *. iran. they don't want cheap american oil. it's undermining their own economics. there is a strange alliance between the greens and russia, china and iran. the president doesn't want the pipeline. you are looking at a long, long drawn out political theater operation and it's nowhere over yet. eric: also the mullahs in iraq, as you point out. stuart varney is on the fox business network. log on to foxbusinessnetyork.com/channel fi foxbusinessnetyork.com/channelfi nder. martha: the keystone pipeline would carry 830,000 barrels. it would equal half the daily amount of oil we import from the middle east. supporters of this expansion say building the pipeline co-wou

or bad, but we're not debating it. what if something else happens in ukraine in russia, in china. >> or ebola.ook at all the other things. >> how are we going to pay for that? this is just plain irresponsible. >> i wanted to get back to the question of long-term strategy. not just against isil but terrorism in general. and i worry about the language we use sometimes in calling it a war on terror. obviously isil is an actual war. but terrorism is sort of an ongoing conflict. it's a state of mind. there's so much psychology involved. you have senior officials saying that the drone strikes are basically a game of whack-a-mole and they keep coming. every time you fire a missile into a country, people hate you. and then more keep joining and it's hard to discern cause and effect. but how much of the current terrorists joining isil have been incentivized to do that because of our wars in iraq and afghanistan? and i really appreciated the article as a strategic narrative that the wilson center put out. i was wondering if could you talk about that. what's our long-term strategy and narrative and effor

are the greatest threat to world peace, people in they part of the world don't si iran and china and russia ornorth korea. they say the greatest threat to world peace are two countries two close allies of canada, the united states and israel, and so it may be true in some cases that sometimes what explains this disparate perspective in the world is that the part of the worldes propagandized, but sometimes what explains it is that we are. and i think it's critical to accept that fact and to confront it. nobody likes to think of themselves as living in a society that is propagandized. i think some of the most vivid examples demonstrate can how this works that is a seemingly narrow one but to me very powerful, is one that happened in 2009 in 2009, this woman who is an iranian american journalist name roxanna was detained while in iran, doing journalism work, and the iranian government say they had detained her and arrested her because they suspect she was a spy, and she was imprisoned in an iranian prison for three months, until an iranian court ordinary orderer her released on the ground there w

and globally as well because there's a lot of areas that are either not growing or slowing growth, right? china, russia, brazil, eurozone, japan. >> the cumulative pounding, right? they interviewed the federal reserve today, the exact reaction which was add that on top of all the other places, and it's a head wind for the u.s. economy that could be doing better. >> at the same time, it's relative. there's a chart out there that is a central bank access as bank of japan, and that's the trajectory way up, everybody else is like this, so everybody else is looking like sunshine compared to japan at this point, just on a relative basis, that's what currencies are about. >> right, at the same time, investors beg the ecb, for example, to do exactly what japan has done, and it's not clear, well, it's left juice in the target for sure because the nikkei hit multiyear highs, but whether it does anything for the economy remains to be seen. they have 1% inflation, a big improvement because of the deflation for 15 years, but still -- >> thank you very much, michelle. time to play a game of threes here. what are the

the countries of p5 plus one divers and russia as china or europe put their signature on this agreement. to the u.s. congress either sabotages directly or doesn't implement the obligations that has the effect to break the international consensus built by the obama administration said that is the fault is on the area inside and the community works close together without a certificate division to get an agreement in which they cannot split if you have a scenario that they all agree to a deal but the u.s. congress does not that it will shift to the blame of the west and the consequence is you will see the sanctions regime slowly but surely falling apart because many countries reluctantly agreed to the sanctions and they have paid a heavy price for our image and our city from july the cost of sanctions to u.s. economy for the europeans has been more than twice between 2010 and 2012 the u.s. has lot of lot of -- lost a lot of revenue. if the deal is struck but then collapses as a result then you will see the sanctions regime collapsed in as the pretext of the constraints in iridescence to ge

or britain. in russia and vietnam and china, you did have equal societies that form the backbone of communist movements. >> so other steps that need to be followed in order to a private democracy? can you put the cart before the horse? >> well, i guess it depends on who that who is because there's nobody left this power to say, for example, in east asia, in korea and taiwan, you had a lot of economic growth under an hour terry machine. in the 1980s, both of these countries democratize and many people say this is the best way to do it. this is what the europeans did in the 19th century. your economic growth on the democracy later. the fact is if you look around the world, most recently in hong kong and brazil and turkey in the air of spring in many other countries, people are going to way. they are unhappy with the quality of government. democracy in a sense of a popular grassroots to repress. ideally in some sense maybe with one more economic development before you had democracy, but in most countries that is not an option. >> westerly survey. let's look at democracy in certain parts of the world. let'

or china. and surely don't want to be in russia. but i do want to be in the u.s. in terms of crude, it is going to be a huge positive for the u.s. and the best thing about it. i don't think i don't believe the decline is driven by lack of demand. it driven by supply. so i think it sets up nicely in the u.s. could we have another 5 to 10% correction? absolutely. but i don't think we have it near term. >> murph, these months are th y typically good between now and the end of the year. >> i think the market is poised to continue to move higher. but i this i you get pullbacks, as steve just pointed out. phil brings up energy and cost of fuel. that is a mamg positive. however we've gone from 1820 on s&p to 2040. so 220 s&p points. you are going to get some pause in this market at some point. i'd like to point out facebook. they came out and had a great quarter and they have been stuck down here about 10 or 11% off all time highs in low to mid 70s. look at technology, look at apple taking a pause. facebook taking a pause. alibaba finally selling off a little bit today.

not silicon valley or china, where is the next so can valley? you're looking at russia.king at europe with companies like rocket. where the next hotbed? >> the problem is it is very hard to reinvigorate the whole structure, a combination of -- mentors. and investors. venture capitalists. and university. takes thousands of years to build. but also, it is part of a network effect in a way. it is extremely difficult to have just created this from scratch. takes dozens of years to put all the various pieces together. so i do not know where the next silicon valley is. >> will there be another? >> it is possible but difficult. >> there may never be another silicon valley according to that tech investor there. cory, i will steal your thunder for a second. i'm here with david fitzpatrick, founder of the tech economy package, and he has the bwest bite. came this year for three days. we are excited about it. jeff later this afternoon. we are so excited. >> thank you for having us there next time, we will have to have the sun come out. >> emily chang, thank you very much. enjoy the

multitudes of thousands of companies trying to share malicious source code they have originated in russia or china or iran or north korea or some international organized crime element. it is want to make sure we have that full discussion about what that looks like and why there are concerns about limiting the number of companies that could participate. just as more vulnerability to the system. i wanted to make sure we made that clear and it was on the record. you were saved by the bell. the clock shows zero but i want to thank you for your service to the country. thanks for stepping in at a difficult time and thanks for recruiting the morale of the nsa folks and i hope in a bipartisan way it does tough oversight. we have the utmost respect for the work they're doing and thanks for your patriotism and staying on mission despite what they might read in the newspaper so thank you sir and thank you to the men and women of the national security agency. [inaudible conversations] [inaudible conversations] >> i was born and raised in new orleans. i'm the second youngest u.s. attorney right now in our coun