pivot to the to aging as well what kind of relationship is china in russia going to have moving forward. well i think. china is looking for a sphere of influence and china is a rising power as this is having a lot of lot of success and lot of it is causing a lot of irrigation in the asia pacific russia russia has a different perspective russia has always been a great power russia was a super power in the soviet union was and in the russia is as you point out in your in your interview at the russian perspective is that it has been ignored his interest has been ignored they have been ignored and there were certain policy that the united states did not abandon in the aftermath of the cold war that when they do expansion and you know the nato expansion nature nato expansion and it's an expansion i remember reading the summer books after after the collapse of the soviet union with a bit where we have we had given. assurances that nato would not expand would not come to russia's border borders and then we just went ahead and do it so from russia's perspective cont

anecdote about russia and china.so i'm in this giving a talk to the russian general staff academy in moscow as secretary, and the colonel stands up in the back and says why are the united states and china plotting to take over siberia? [laughter] and i must say, i don't get stumped too often, but i cannot figure out where the hell that came from. [laughter] so i gave some kind of comment we were not interested in siberia. then i asked bill burns, our ambassador, where in the world did that come from? he said, well, a couple of months ago madeleine gave a speech in which she said, how can russia possibly exploit siberia with the depopulation of the country? that is essentially all she said, but it is a measure of the paranoia about both china and the united states that exists in moscow. >> and deep paranoia about madeleine. i'm chairman for the national democratic institute. we do believe in western values. basically, which is a good way to answer the question, and i think we sometimes forget about the importance of w

and china four hundred billion dollars gaston is going to just edges again as a tip of the iceberg since you have russia and china in the same room at the same table talking about big money now just think about all the other possible prospects are going to happen and let's not exclude south korea and possibly japan sure it's appearance talk about sanctions south korea was likely yeah so it's funny because obviously this is a free political case very much you know makes it so to present to see you know what if this yes this is a. situation i mean you have economics politics you have international relations you have this whole context of isolating russia you have information war you have so many things i mean this case can be all things to all analyst and that's what makes its saw intriguing for me indeed all right thank you so much indeed talking to me from moscow as red square on this of all the glorious sunny thank you very much. brian i want to talk about sanctions because the u.s. and particularly the that's what everyone is focusing on and oust their sanctions. this week they have been ramped up aga

russia and china. so i'm in this giving a talk to the russian general staff academy in moscow as secretary, and the colonel stands up in the back and says why are the united states and china plotting to take over siberia? [laughter] and i must say, i don't get stumped too often, but i cannot figure out where the hell that came from. [laughter] so i gave some kind of comment we were not interested in siberia. then i asked bill burns, our ambassador, where in the world did that come from? he said, well, a couple of months ago madeleine gave a speech in which she said, how can russia possibly exploit siberia with the depopulation of the country? that is essentially all she said, but it is a measure of the paranoia about both china and the united states that exists in moscow. >> and deep paranoia about madeleine. i'm chairman for the national democratic institute. we do believe in western values. basically, which is a good way to answer the question, and i think we sometimes forget about the importance of

businesses a government are taking it very seriously and to charlie, the three major sources are china, russia, and criminals generally, right? kr criminals generally, and this is a big, big business for them. >> and why did you leave out the middle east? >> because the criminal element is to go along with the list of three. >> and adam talk to anybody about this, and know that terrorism is part of the equation? >> all right. let me get to the good news and that the cup half empty and serious, and the good news for consumers and bank depositors for example, you are insured, but it is a way bigger problem for jpmorgan than for us. >> and you are shaking the head there. little comfort? >> cold comfort. and so go fill out the form, and spend a week or two trying to get the attention of the right regulator to give you the money back and how long is that going to take? i want the guys to protect us right now. >> and you are following the financial crisis we have a huge law called dodd frank and you have brought it on the set how thick it is, and thousands and thousandings of edicts and the cyber at

dollar they're doing deals china russia iran other countries are doing these massive currency swaps and economic deals outside of the us dollar and for russia quite frankly this is the greatest thing that could happen to them new sanctions because it's going to force them to diversify their economy which they have been reluctant to do for decades have been overly reliant on the energy sector in the mill military sector and now if they're going to put these sanctions up with food and having the popularity that he has they can go in they can develop their high tech industries they can develop their manufacturing industries they can develop textiles industries they can do all kinds of things that they have been reluctant to do but with this mandate of getting around them and of the sanctions they can diversify that economy in ways that they have not done for decades so this is the greatest thing that could possibly happen but it's not just for russia it's for germany it's for europe it's for asia it's for china it's for japan it's for brazil it's for africa any more multi-currency world me

nobody seems to know, and i think the possibility of a china-russia axis can also be overestimated, mostimportantly because china has extremely hard work to do. they're going to try to make 363 reforms that are not just economic reforms, they are big social reforms, like a social safety net and the like. the road for china to sex filled reform does not go through moscow, it goes through the united states and europe. while you may have some of that relationship between russia and china, i'm not worried it becomes a long-term strategic relationship. the piece i am a little worried about is what people are now calling the call to illiberal democratic leadership, and vladimir putin does represent for people like xi jinping, an alternative to western democracy. and that is something that bears watching. terms, iure interest see neither germany moving it a long-termia or strategic alliance between russia and china. >> a quick anecdote about russia and china. so i'm in this giving a talk to the russian general staff academy in moscow as secretary, and the colonel stands up in the back and says

mean, a lot of these attacks emanate from a couple sources, apparently, a handful of -- adam: china, russia that's clearly what we hear, you know? you know, i'm not saying there's not multiple people in those places, but, you know, the names that we've been hearing since this has become an issue in the last four years have been china, russia, middle east. last time the big attacks was, you know, in 2012 we heard it was clearly the middle east. i can tell you this 2011 thing, you know, bank of america thought it was russia. it was, you know, some russian organized crime. so those are the main players. it almost doesn't matter where it comes from. it keeps coming. the question is, are the banks paying enough attention to this, or are they worried about some other nonsense more in and, you know, here's the other thing, when you have banks this big, it doesn't take atist to figure this out, you have assets and sort of risk, sort of controlled. not controlled, but houses in these -- housed in just a few places. you don't have to attack every place. a major attack that would cripple jpmorgan coul

bill clinton gave speeches in china, russia, egypt, these countries, people in countries like saudi arabiaoundation. don't you think we should be asking questions about that? >> is it worth asking a couple questions? >> of course, it's a con applicant of interest, but we're mistaking symptom for the real problem, which is big government, government that has lots of activity around the world that a lot of people support. if government were smaller, clinton's speaking fees would be smaller as would the clinton initiative. >> as the u.s. is, and i'm curious to know whether or not some of these people paying bill clinton thought they could have extra influence with the secretary of state because hillary and bill are married and share the bank account. >> i'm sure that's what they thought, but if they thought that, they were mistaken. just because bill will take the check and go on to his next speech. and he probably doesn't even remember who he spoke to five minutes ago. so it's about the money. i don't worry about a conflict of interest. i worry about her judgment as secretary of state. >> th

produce them on their own unless high tech militaries like the united states israel south korea china russia unless those who militaries and the so-called defense industries produce of them rebel groups don't have the capacity what we are. trying to do is a preemptive ban as was done with blinding laser weapons for example back in one nine hundred ninety five or ninety six they were preemptively banned we need to do this with killer robots and we're not against robots we are against weaponized fully autonomous robots that have the kill decision over human beings it's quite shocking that people think that's ok. ok i get you benny preemptively i think it's a great goal but does your complain include semi-autonomous missions like drones no it's not that there there are members of our campaign that work on drones but the legal rationale for drones and for killer robots is different and we wanted to be very clear that we were preemptively dealing with a future system that is under research and development let's not imagine that there's somewhere in the far distant future they are on our immediate

this vulnerability was discovered by any intelligence agency around the world whether it's us or china russia or u.k. or any of that sort of the big guys and exploited it probably was exploited during the weeks after it was discovered before everyone patched their systems you know i think all intel's range these do that and you know right now we've recovered security but it really was a wake up call to people who thought that open source meant magically secure it doesn't we have the potential to make open source more secure but we have to analyze the software and we're trying to do that meta it the heartbleed vulnerability because the open source community do stablished these projects to review open source software a lot of very big companies are using this they should help with the analysis and they are doing that so hopefully we're going to do better next time but hartley really was an exception it was a big deal and a little lot of all abilities that happened that aren't as a big deal this one was a big one. now nobel prize economist joseph stiglitz noted recently that it is trust more tha

you have to say well russia has its own interest and so on and so forth and you should really be afraid of the russian bear you should be afraid of the chinese dragon because china is will in the future be a much more potent force and so on so try and avoid this. this this concern. if you like the psychosis that you have looking at russia from from london's point of view russia is. has its own interests is a normal state it's not going to invade and so on and you may not like what it's doing and so on and it's very rich natural resources and so on but china you should be looking at china and so on and china is going to compete with you in the future ok we only have the last word tonight in washington it seems to me that everything negative the west sees in russia it's the west it's actually it it's a self reflection of itself it quick claims that russia is aggressive it's the west it's truly aggressive it doesn't live by it valid its values it breaks international law repeatedly and it just points a finger go ahead twenty seconds. it's a classical propaganda ploy it's called flipping the script you accuse the other guy of what you yourself intend to do and then

we're not even going to try, russia, china, u.s., get the

that had different companies from china, russia, and germany. days and got 18 rid of all the problems with all of these things at the borders. and, if you think, for instance days, we can do it in 16 days. it is very interesting for the automobile industry and when the president was here, he said we had so much exports -- so many exports and products coming back. acquiringrted with the automobiles. >> what are you shipping? we are shipping the products with the producers of audi. joining the dedicated weekly train and it was very specificng on containers. this business will grow in the next year. nevertheless, the percentage of exports to china by the land is on a complimentary basis and is very important. very expensive efforts. >> you are always hedging in the shipping industry. i thank you for your time. i will send it back to you. we are going to take the land bridge from the port to china and do it in 60 days. we are going to point you on a barge. >> a barge to china. i will pass. here is the picture of the markets. the lower opening across

now with global geopolitics starting to heat up and people start to look at their gold towards china russia in particular and they're thinking you know maybe we should divorce the pricing from london and they cause they're wed to a paper mountain of empire of paper and we want to get into the gold business it's going that way anyway because. if you look at china i mean for a start the indications i have quite clearly point to china keeping older and go production and all her in scrap production as well is that she's come to deals with mines all around the world to see for them to supply china dari which she refines and those bombs on never seen on international market in other words to kept by china so they were at a time recently as bypassing london ok so rats i rather pick up on this next time thanks for being on the kaiser report that's my passion max and that's going to do it for the other guys a report with a nice kaiser stacy her i guess alstom a cloud of gold laid out because i've got to report i think. in fish farms waters do you have a pond to me because. i saw it spread all over n

includes china, russia, france, the u.k., the united states, the countries that probably gave the weapons in the first place. [laughter] but still, throwing down an emergency midnight meeting, [bleeped] is about to get real peaceful. >> the u.n. security council called for an immediate, unconditional ceasefire. >> jon: boom! unconditional. not that such resolutions are in any way enforcable or meaningful, but still, when a resolution is issued... >> the united nations security council took action with a statement, not a resolution. >> jon: even a resolution was too much? guys, i don't know, a resolution seems pretty stern, pretty stern, guys. even a statement, i don't know. i don't... what's the death toll, 1,000 and growing? what about we just jump in with an... [laughter] hey, guys, you know, if that gets pushback, we can take it down a. no we're only a collection of the world's superpowers. turns out the security council is about as strict with the mideast as museums are with their admission price. anybody else, anybody else want to take a crack at this? >> during his weekly address, p

america, china, russia, we have to be locally very strong. liz: you just said russia.hole kind of ban on sanctions right now. is that going to hurt your business at all? >> it will. it certainly will, but fortunately, russia was not so big in terms of revenue in the country. but it's a potential market, it's very unfortunate what's happening, but we're very strongly in china. we grew 44% last quarter. liz: yeah, might be better to be stronger in china than russia. [laughter] you mentioned bentley and maserati, you're also in mercedes benz, vw, bmw, hyundai. i remember was it 2012 you and i walking around the cars at consumer electronics show, and you had such passion. your eyes just lit up when you were showing me what was going on inside the cars at that time on the floor in las vegas at the consumer electronics show. and i thought to myself, okay, car audio. why is it such a big driver for you guys? >> you know, car audio's become, again, even more critical now with the -- liz: am i wearing the same dress? no. [laughter] from 2012. >> and connected car driving each a

russia, isis, china -- all are performing outside the post-world war ii democratic norms. ssia is fighting a svelte campaign -- although somewhat less dopey after this week. asna basically wants to grab much terriry they y can without having to fight everybody. tell us strategically what do these three protagonists have in common? >> i think what is in, and what i sometimes called the geopolititics ofof resentment. the basisis is different, but yu can sefor each they really do not agree at all with what i would call the liberal western model. with respect to o china, china s an educational approach that iss built on a four character sloga they call it. never forgrget national humiliation. mr. boudin simply -- mr. putin simply does noagree with the way the west operates, particularly the united states. ices a are anti-modern. that is the basis of their entire approach. radical funmentalist approach. they simply resent the way the west comes at things. they resent it structures. they do not feel they have a place in the model we live. >> right now, one of the top issusues and