personally felt this united states and chinarelationships might get worse at beijing no longer saw the united states as the declining power. >> it is a deepened probing questions that youlw asked, most always opposes questions are concerned the alternative which is housed for ten gently slid from its dominant global position, prior to the first world war into semi retirement, and unfortunately there were strategic up circumstances rather saw opportunities a risig in t isolations so proud of that and then ofte course, strategic opportunity is created for the rise of fascism in europe. i think in terms of the preservation of the international order, there is no other fundamental underpinnings of which exist other than americans strategic and economic power prayed can be an expanded concept whereby what is a critical mass of the american poet economic and military reality is augmented by a much ♪ ♪ is set of relations with major european and asian allies and for example, an economic argument heard i'm not a member of the united sta

his main partner, which for him is russia, and, accordingly, the position of the united states in the fight against chinaened. wherein. why is the united states so at the same time, they are pumping up an escalation, because they have no other choice, because the united states understands that they are weakening relative to china every day, the balance of power in the world is shifting not in their favor, and in economic terms, militarily , geopolitically and as a weakening side. she is forced to go to the acceleration of this conflict. china would like to wait some more time, but the united states does not give it an election. after all , the united states imposed this confrontation on china as well, you know, i politics and a statement on world problems. we've been watching for many, many years. just like you, vyacheslav alekseevich and uh, maybe you, uh, will argue, but from my point of view, we see that they are talking more and more openly, openly, openly conflicts, but all over. that is, they really had a lot of illusions about the american -centric globalization on which they made money and that t

china and the united states had years of a stalemate that stabilize the world which galvanized the world where the climate diplomacy launched in 2013 between china and the united states, unleash global momentum that produce the paris agreement. last year at cop 26 the united states and china issued the glascow joint declaration to work together to address initiatives from methane to coal. climate is not about ideology, it's about math. there is simply no way to solve climate change without china's leadership. the country that produces 28% of global emissions. the international energy agency made clear that if china sticks with its current plan does not peak its emissions until 2030, than the rest of the world must go to zero by 2035. and that's simply not possible. today, about 20 nations are responsible for 80% of admissions. china's number one, united states is number two. unless we all do much more, much faster, the financial and human cost will be catastrophic. plus, competing on clean energy and climate policy can produce results that benefit everyone. the progress the united states

to abstain from china will not end it is absolutely existential the united stateswell, the united states in the last few months 3 months is proud that the main achievement of their foreign policy is the phenomenal, unity that they have achieved within the collective west but in fact in their anti-china policy. i do not think that they are ready to fully support them, even their european allies, not to mention the countries of the asia-pacific region, and moreover , we see some cracks even in the anti-russian policy. e in this, a euro-atlantic monolith. we have already said that regarding the expansion of nato and turkey and croatia in e. they had their say, but even without nato expansion, there are disagreements within the bloc, the washington post wrote today, namely that the baltic countries are using the current situation around ukraine in order to achieve what they actually wanted to build up their military for a very long time . the presence of the united states and other nato countries on its territory. yes, and they say that on a permanent basis they should

in it you take on what you describe as a world views that have become dominant in both the united states and china that you see as pushing the two countries toward war. this would be of course a war that given the capabilities for lethal force that the united states and china would bring to a conflict. would not just be costly it would be as you say catastrophic. as australia's former prime minister twice. it's foreign minister and diplomat china scholar in your own right and in the last few years in 18 and and in and engaged observer of us policy and politics. you're quite uniquely capable of helping united americans think through what the trip wires are and other issues that could cause the two countries to go to war but what i really like about this book is that you try to do much more than that. you're pushing back against the idea that conflict between the united states and china is inevitable you argue that this isn't a voidable war. so, let me start by asking you why it is that so many policy observers many smart people believe that what war is likely if not inevitable and why you although

none the root cause of course, is the hostility pulse by the united states against china. because the united states view china as an enemy. why? because they worried that china is surpassing the united states as the largest economy in the world. china is already larger than the united states, if we use purchasing power parity. china produce is much more than the you asked us for more than 200 important items. and the chinese production is not only larger than that of the united states. china produces more than 50 percent of the girl girl production in the world. so the united states need to come to terms with the fact that they live with a larger china, more impact full of china. and they will not serve the fundamental interest of the american people to view china as an engine. the china is certainly quite the powerhouse and we wait to see how those relations between china on australia evolve under albany. and i'm sure we'll have you on again, victor out before too long to discuss them. we take our vice president for the center for china globally, but globalization excuse m

europe and you are right, and china remains committed to partnership with russia in the united statesssue. they are very perplexed. how is u china u not willing to opt for its uh several hundred billion uh trade with the united states and the trillion in debt it owes to the united states. why, for china , us trade economic interdependence turns out to be less important than, uh, partnership with russia. but that's very good. it seems to me the chinese position on this issue. yes why china does not give up partnership with russia and will not refuse, as well as what position under what circumstances he can take with respect to the united states a, just the other day, on the pages of the american magazine florin ferz a, a very prominent one of the most authoritative and influential chinese political scientists, yan suetum, explained. this is the dean. and the faculty of international relations of tsinghua university. let's hear russia being china's largest and most powerful military relation neighbor is not a power that beijing would like to be with. feuding only one can change beijing'

have a lot of very influential countries in the next, the caves that are not just russia, china, united states and in europe for instance. it will be also a lot of other countries. and this is one of the reasons why i, for instance, invited indonesia and india synagogue in south africa are fine to participate in ard meeting in germany this year in the summer. because it's a starting point for understanding the voice of something that we have responsibility together for. and this is the basis for a move to lead or what, where are we not just see a lot of different adventure countries, but countries that corporate for better. what role does africa plans, if you will, up against china or russia here without business africa? a continent with a lot of countries and states that will have a future that is better them today that will have a lot of people living there. and so it is necessary that we do all which is feasible to make it happen, that this would be a good future and cooperation. konami cooperation support and the development is the basis for this. what most surprised you on this trip. it w

will have a lot of very influential countries in the next few cases that are not just russia, china, united states, and europe, for instance. it will be also a lot of other countries. and this is one of the reasons why i, for instance, invited in denisia and india findig out in south africa or argent. fine to participate in ard meeting in germany this year in the summer. because it's a starting point for understanding the board. it's something that we have responsibility together for. i'm just is the basis for the move to lead. what, where are we not just see a lot of different adventure countries, but countries that corporate for better. what role does africa play in this? are you more up against china or russia here without visiting africa? a continent with a lot of countries and states that will have a future that is better them today that will have a lot of people living there. and so it is necessary that we do all which is feasible to make it happen, that this will be a good future and cooperation. economic cooperation support in the development is the basis for this. what most supplies do on

and i hope the united states will realize that china is not an enemy of the united states . right. and the chinese people are not enemies of the united state of it. so don't bark at the wrong tree when you want to figure out which country is our enemy, nor i, law is no enemy of the united states. okay. let's hope you'll be a lot less barking up any trees than the world can move towards a more peaceful direction with her. thank our guests so much for sharing their perspectives. it's been a wide range of diverse perspectives or thank you for bring it to the table and to the show. i know kink vicks a gal tama he co tally gucci and thank you to for watching and can see the show again. any time by visiting our website al jazeera dot com and for further discussion head over to our facebook page. that's facebook dot com, forward slash ha. inside story. you can also join the conversation on twitter handle. there is at a j inside story. from me, sammy's aidan, and the whole team here in dow half, and now it's good bye. ah oh, shoot films of hope. and inspiration, a series of short puzzled s

the heart of it is about ah, china's challenge to the position of the united states. i just like to endorse one point henry made, which is that, you know, this is a, this is a caricature, actually, of china's relationship with the international system. because everything ever since done shopping, china has, are absolutely committed itself to the international system seeking in the 1st in the doing it. and when it is joined, it has been a very strong proponent of it and has always changed in a, in a, in a very reasonable way that it's been ok, great, great beneficiary of it. so this is really not an accurate presentation of the situation. what i would add to that though, the, of course, let's be realistic about this, that when you get the rise of a country, the size of china and the speed with that transmission transformation has taken place. it is bound to change the world in profound ways. and no one can do anything about that. that's not. that is a reality. that's a historic, the great historic trend of our time and it will continue into the future. henry, one of the

the confrontation of the two most important antagonists of the 21st century, the united states and china, and these days it is there in asia that the epicenter of the world geopolitical game is located. there continues the asian tour of the president of the united states, biden visited south korea over the weekend. and today began his visit to the capital of the most loyal and most important ally of the united states in the region. tokyo there biden was received by the emperor of japan naruhito and held talks with the prime minister of the land of the rising sun, but alas, descending into recent months subjectivity fumioksidoy. tomorrow. the summit of the so -called quantum will also take place in tokyo. this is a four- way partnership of the united states of japan india and australia, and biden and kisidia will be joined respectively by indian prime minister render vogue and the new australian prime minister anthony albonese. the main goal of this biden tour. consolidate as much as possible asian allies and partners in the united states against china and russia, and also make sure that

we have towards the other, china is a concern to the united states and to other countries in certain ways. but the biggest concern, as i often tell people, is not specifically china's threat to the west or other countries. it's the threat posed by the kind of interactive worst case in 0, some dynamic that is increasingly coming to the 4 in interactions in relation between china and the united states and some countries of the west. it's that dynamic, it's driven by these kinds of grows large, simplistic narratives that don't account for the different complex and cross cutting interest of the countries phase. is that kind of narrative, that's really the threat to the goal or martin in this speech that was delivered by secretary of state blank. and he out why washington grievances with b jane. he said the china has become more repressive at home and more aggressive abroad under president. she's in ping. why deliver this speech now? how significant is it and what does it do to this relationship between the u. s. and china? that is already really yet at a record low point. i think this is

for dillard mark, was senior, tried to hedge between great powers in the region, notably the united states, china and even other countries. so this is the default position of any new president. with exception of rodrigo, the deb instantly pivoted to china and almost abrogated the visiting force agreement with united states. a marquess junior presidency. and we've seen some, hence of that with him meeting with the officials from the united states, from china, from, from other countries, japan, et cetera. marcus doesn't have the personal baggage, unlike rodrigo de terre de, in has actually not rent in ah, the mutual defense treaty. on the other hand, we also know that marcus junior has very close relations with china. when he was governor of his province. he set up a consulate of china in his home province. that's how he wanted to be close to china. so i think what will happen here is that the marcus junior will try to of do a, a delicate balancing act. but as we will see, this my change in the coming years, depending on how that hedging will, will be successful or not, shall professor you mentione

exception of rodrigo, that there will instantly pay with that the china and i'm almost obligated visiting for disagreement with united states, a marquess junior presidency. and we've seen some, hence, of that with him meeting with the officials from the united states, from china, from, from other countries, japan, etc. marco's junior doesn't have the personal baggage, unlike rodrigo the terror day and has actually not read in the mutual defense treaty. on the other hand, we also know that mark was junior, has very close relations with china. when he was governor off his province, he set up a consulate of china in his phone province. that's how he wanted to be close to china. so i think what will happen here is that the market junior will try to do a, a delicate balancing act. but as we will see, this might change in the coming years, depending on how that hedging will will be successful or not, shall, professor. you mentioned before that marcus junior comes to power with no prior to political baggage, but as far as i understand, and he has some outstanding legal issues with the american justice system, he and his mother and

well, look at iraq, the united states lost to iran the united states could not do anything with it afghanistan lost pakistan well, look myanmar myanmar is oriented, of course, to china, of course, therefore, yes, the united states is actively fighting there, but china this is also not a whipping boy in the region, of course, we will continue south asia after advertising. permanent land on demand what wind you here commerce should keep up with aviation mr. schmidt lost the blueprints, and the prodigal son found them in the captain's cabin, alive and working. in anticipation a close military thunderstorm, many officers of the wehrmacht appeared on the sides to spain mysteries overtakes military aircraft. the soldier of the british cannon of the aircraft did not have a single alarm signal from him, but did he sound the alarm from the taba sent spelling cars to the italians, so his roof is collapsing one blue line the door pinched his fingers because she refused to point out our enemies my mistake or whose -the betrayal of alex strizhenov in the film demand land on sunday on first who are they what difference does it make who do you get worried? be at the dacha, like at

situation that was considered absolutely unacceptable by the united states in the united states, this is the rapprochement of russia and chinaa situation where the united states needs to carry out a double containment in the current environment. when from russia uh, there has been a fierce confrontation. uh, many expected that the united states would try to smooth things over with china, and uh, it must be said that some of the moves of the biden administration seemed to be directed in this direction, and therefore they were very impatiently awaiting anthony blinkin's speech on the china issue on chinese strategy the us crime was postponed several times. and here it is, finally today it sounded and the beginning of the speech sounded as if the united states was holding out to china olive branch let's hear the us secretary of state china is the only country that has either the intention to change the international order or ever- increasing economic, diplomatic, military and technological power. for that, china is also an integral part of the world economy, our ability to solve global problems from the climate crisis to covid-

, that the recent actions of the united states on the taiwan issue are contrary to their words, meaning the words that the united states supports the policy of one chinalso the yandes. he said that if the united states continues to play. taiwan card, then china will take tough steps and do what it says, what it means. you know the chinese. after all, there are also simulations of what could be the case of what, but uh, these are also about the same, who lands where? what missile strikes and so on. well, recently there was a very curious non-simulation of such a theory. and why actually land to bomb, you need to take two existing aircraft carriers and put one. to the south of the island of taiwan and the other one to the north- sharp taiwan and not to give hydrocarbons access to the island for 2 weeks a month two months and that's it and you don't have to shoot anyone to kill and so on and so forth further. ah and so, uh, because after all, we started with biden's visit. i think biden will convince the japanese in some way, but get involved in taiwanese affairs. and this is not at all accidental, since taiwan was not just a colony of japan for a long t

has always been on big us on the one china united states is always trying to contradict or explain different ways about the one. china policy in america, i'm sure always try to contradict or it's a problem miss. and also try to miss your interpretation of the word turn of policy and try and us government has already announced that again. and again, that was kind of policy is the main stone or the base stone that all congress was ready to have people, american religion were trying to move relations we're trying to, we're trying to policy can not be shaped, cannot be sure and can other if a headline story today, the president of turkey has once again spoken it against finland and sweden session to nate. so saying the block is failing to address anchors concerns over terrorism . that's tricky. chooses both countries of supporting kurdish militants. we believe that an enlargement policy, which disregards the fundamental aspects of security won't bring benefits for us or for nato. cold turkey is currently blocking sweden and finland from joining nature was all member states need to agree on the a

has always been on big us on the one china united states. he's always trying to contradict or explain different ways about the one china policy in america. official always try to contradict or it's a problem miss. and also try to miss your spirit. interpretation of the one china policy in china. us government has already announced that again and again that was kind of policy is to main stone on the base so that we can all countries what ready to have people, american religion, we're trying to move relations we're trying to when china policy can not be shaped cannot be shrunk. can other a headline stories today? the president of turkey has once again spoken it against finland and sweden session to nato, saying the block is failing to address anchorage concerns over terrorism. that's tricky cases, both countries of supporting curtis militants. we believe that an enlargement policy, which disregards the fundamental aspects of security won't bring benefits for us or for nato call. turkey is currently blocking sweden and finland from joining natur

i mean, even the united states does not have to feel medical issues, but they want. so in china, there's a lot of chuckle about this. and i think where china, the united states disagree is what is more important and what are they? in fact, talking about is it international law? what is it the so called international rules based system, right? this international rules based system kind of crept into that and not a system only the last couple of decades. and it's basically western understanding of what that should and should not happen in the global international economic and political and diplomatic system. it's and it's western understanding of what the rules are that everyone should abide by, especially what comes to trade diplomacy responsible. china says, this is all america, stuff that we should all abide by international law. and this whole rules may system. we need to agree about it all of us. so i think there's a bit of a misunderstanding there and why the america talks of international law. it's really talk to more and more, and if you listen carefully what blanket was t

with the exception of rodrigo, there who instantly pivoted to china and um, almost a abrogated the visiting forces agreement with united states, a marcus junior presidency. and we've seen some tense of that with him meeting with the officials from the united states, from china are from, from other countries, japan, et cetera. marcus junior doesn't have the personal baggage, unlike rodrigo de tara day, and has actually not read in ah, the mutual defense treaty. on the other hand, we also know that marcus junior has very close relations with china when he was governor of his province. he set up a consulate of china in his own province. that's how he wanted to be close to china . so i think what will happen here is that though, a marcus junior will try to of do a, a delicate balancing act. but as we will see, this my change in the coming years, depending on how that hedging will, will be a successful or not, shall professor you mentioned before that mark as junior, comes to power with ill prior to political baggage. but as far as i understand, he has some outstanding legal issues with the american justice system. he and his moth

china was never heard, as if it does not exist, they are afraid to raise this topic, because they understand that as soon as this topic is raised it is strange to distance themselves from the united statesto the confrontation with china the united states the philippines did not come either under the plausible pretext that i am going to rotate the rotation of the president, but i think not only in this and in this vein, because the philippines this is also a base for the united states, they also don’t want to fall, and under the fire of chinese weapons in the event of a large-scale conflict in the taiwan strait, russia’s word was in stone, and i won’t lie. but it seems to me that there was not, that is, in fact, the united states absolutely failed to drag the sides of the osians into any anti-russian anti- chinese combinations. well, for us, this situation means that we should really strengthen our partnership. because uh, yes, the west is now rallying against us, but the west is, well, 15% humanity, if we take all unfriendly countries, but only in the shanghai cooperation organization more than half of humanity is brix , as i said, 45% of humanity. there is a collective security treaty

the heart of it, is about china's challenge to the position of the united states. like to endorse one point that henry made. this is a caricature of china's relationship with the international system. china has absolutely committed itself to the international system, seeking to join it, then after joining it has been a very strong proponent of it. always says, in a very reasonable way that it has been a great beneficiary of it. this is not an accurate presentation of the situation. what i would add to that, is, of course let be realistic about this. when you get the rise of a country the size of china and the speed the transportation -- transformation is taking place is bound to change the world in profound ways and no one can do anything about that. that is a reality. that is the great historic trend of our time and will continue into the future. mohammed: one of the ways this speech has been interpreted is that the u.s. is essentially saying, while we want to china to rise we also want to make sure that china is doing so within the parameters the u.s. has set. if

that, of course, any sanctions that are imposed on china will be as harmful if not more handful for the country. imposing the sanction of the united states sanctions, china, it's going to lose as well as the united states is already suffering from a high level of inflation, which is undermining the biden administration. it is going to be a major contributor to the 2 to the but expected losses of the democratic party in the mid term elections. and so, and if it were to sanction china emerging, the economic damage, imagine where inflation regal. so these are some of the complex things that have to be borne in mind. so it seems so, so yeah, i would say that my 1st reaction is that it's not to be easy for any one. and the imposition of fresh sanctions would have to be essentially an act of economic suicide on the part of the united states. as you say, china is more integrated in the international economic community than even russia. how much can i learn from what's happened to russia and what can trying to potentially do to protect its assets? well, as in the chinese and like the russians, a chinese have already been doing a lot of things an

america there are very different and most often very critical approaches to both colossi and china to the united statestes. this creates its own poles, but there are other players in this context. we would need a doctrine not to actively join anyone, that is, to enjoy the benefits of multipolarity. instead of sticking to someone's conclusion, let's walk once again along the central lapas square in bolivia well, that's quite latin america. light yellow house is parliament of bolivia now i think it will be seen. watches won they watch yes pay attention. they are turned in the other direction and go in the other direction. this does not mean that latin americans want to turn back the clock. they just have a different perception of the perception of time and its circumstances sergey brilev alexey nikolaevich and evgeny makarov news from bolivia about latin america now advertising after watching the program moscow kremlin putin we are watching it just point the smartphone camera at the qr-code and download the application that's all you need need. now we watch all the news with video live broadcast of all t

china. and i'm almost a abrogated the visiting for disagreement with united states, a marcus junior presidency. and we've seen some, hence of that with him meeting with the officials from the united states, from china are from, from other countries, japan, et cetera. marcus junior doesn't have the personal baggage, unlike rodrigo de terre day, and has actually not read been, ah, the mutual defense treaty. on the other hand, we also know that marcus junior has very close relations with china when he was governor of his province. he set up a consulate of china in his home province. that's how he wanted to be close to china. so i think what will happen here is that the market junior will try to do a, a delicate balancing act. but as we will see, this my change in the coming years, depending on how that hedging will, will be successful or not, shall professor you mentioned before that mark as junior comes to power with no prior to political baggage. but as far as i understand, and he has some outstanding legal issues with the american justice system, he and his mother a defy a 4th order. i'm askin

china. united states. it's called the trip by the united nations human rights chief. and the state we asked why and a chinese blogger has a firsthand take on war time in, di trying out. he's up blood to put him at odds. if by june 1st manageable heather stories and much more after short breaking date of the news age. i'm at the out from 8 and the team here in berlin. thanks for watching and stay with ah, with who a bow. unfortunately. and a south a method is going to spend the rest of her life behind bars for murdering for 3 daughters. if you call me back, i went in with the site that was part of psychosis isn't awful. illness. postpartum is a nasty mothers nightmare starts june 4th on d w. one of main kinds, oldest ambitions could be within reach or what is it really is possible to re person aging researchers and scientists all over the world are in a race against time. dna molecule has 28000000 different power blocks that they are peers and rivals with one during goal, 2 out smart nature for a longer, healthier and fuller life. one of the most insightful discoveries

america has very different and most often very critical approaches to both giants and china and their united states their united states. this creates its own poles, but there are other players in this context. we would need a doctrine of not actively joining someone, then using the benefits of multipolarity, instead of sticking to someone completion let's walk again through the central lapas square in bolivia well, quite the yellow house is the parliament of bolivia now. i think it will be visible. watch won they watch pay attention. they are turned in the other direction and go in the other direction. this does not mean that latin americans want to turn back the clock. it’s just that they have a different perception of time and its circumstances sergey brilev alexey nikolaevich and evgeny makarov news from bolivia about latin america well, nowhere, i want to emphasize this, nowhere at the state level are the nazis glorified anywhere and nowhere in civilized countries are they encouraged by the authorities of thousands of people us.

with the depth of us support encouraging other nato allies to do the same and with russia and china united statesdue on —- out produce them from any place on the globe. we know the land lease bill will not go to his desk and has already asked congress to appropriate an additional 33,000,000,020 is military assistance we have javelins getting low, stingers are critical to shoot down russian helicopter —- helicopters and aircraft. we will see if the us will take the next step turning them into the arsenal of democracy. the united states are produced everyone in the world including nazi germany and japan. we are so lucky to have the senators so please stay with us at the atlantic council for the specific policy recommendations to lead this effort with our allies and to contribute further to ukrainian self-defense. thank you very much for joining us it is a great discussion and have a great rest of the day. "washington jou. host: here to discuss matters of elections particularly c >>

the state department would like to characterize china's angry outburst regarding new language on a state department website regarding taiwan and its relationship to china, with language like "the unitedtes does not support taiwan's independence, and also dropping the phrase "taiwan is part of china." >> the united states remains committed to our policy. do not support taiwan's independence, and we have made clear. >> now, the u.s. is blurring and hollowing out the one china civil by changing wording concerned with taiwan. the department insists that all it's done is update a sheet. on capitol hill today, the defense secretary defended the president's budget request. >> we are entering a world that's becoming more unstable, and the potential for significant international conflict between these powers is increasing, not decreasing. >> intelligence chief to testify this week said that china prefers to swallow taiwan and not have to rely on force, and that china would prefer course unification rather than an armed conflict, and it is stepping up military pressure on the island isolate -- confidence in the democratically elected leaders. the biden administration is pushing back on taiwan'

united states. but when it comes to this whole invasion issue, should china take military action against taiwan, will the united states come to its defense? how will it come to its defense? expectations will the united states have an coordination with its partners, such as japan? japan has a pacifist constitution, but will it actually worked together with the united states in defense of taiwan? these are some of the questions that will be very much in the minds of leadership this weekend, and it will be discussed in great detail. so, to what extent we will actually get any public statements about it i do not know, but i do know that there will be a mention of taiwan and there will certainly always be this verbal commitment to protect taiwan's economy and prosperity. host: why verbal commitment? is there a formal treaty on that? guest: so, one of the problems, of course, is that the united states does not officially recognize taiwan. that if there is a china, that goes to beijing, the prc. they are trying to do is be able to ensure support for taiwan whilst also not upsetting the apple cart. this is c