the polynesian people rose up together and said you know mr chirac please stop. a bit just brushed it away and said something my decision is final. it one person one person decided the entire future of my children. my grandchildren and my great grandchildren. it's in c. and. january one thousand nine. hundred test. what turns out to be the starting point for a long term research. tests justified an enormous investment to build new equipment new missiles new bombs the laser megajoules and you aircraft so everything is being updated to between now and twenty twenty. only interesting things that result from countries like the united states and some of the other western nations in developing new nuclear weapons that it excites the interest in countries like korea and iran who want to join the nuclear club. two thousand and six is a landmark year the united states the united kingdom france russia and china all reinvest in their nuclear arsenals the message is clear it is necessary to their security on the other hand the same countries keep telling non-nuclear nations

the suggestion which someone has made that the articles in the sun which were hostile to president chirac it's completely wrong to associate cause and effect. the subject of the cause has nothing to do with that. >> absolutely. by the way, since i was having to deal with president chirac and in the aftermath, he behaved very graciously given we had this fundamental disagreement. the last thing i wanted was suggestions that we were winding up the media to go and denounce him. so both with him and with the german chancellor at the time i was very concerned to make sure i think we had a european council shortly after the iraq action began. we wanted a united states resolution, which we subsequently got which then validated the presence of foreign troops there. so for me it was very important we kept these people onside. >> after the third election, which was on may 2005, eventually not all, but the majority of interactions either with mr. murdoch or rebecca wade in the schedule. >> it certainly becomes at that point frankly they are the main group that is still reasonably supportive. i notic

some pieces but dominico christie type he therefore missed his teammate alex open the scoring in chirac right on the hour mark a defensive mix up would result in a goal number two and others in a roman shidduch off bumping up the mess in the italian box she recalls second and the russians then put the icing on the cake and minutes from time it's only a pale reflection of the side that won the world cup in two thousand and six russia on the other hand now travel to poland in ukraine high confidence. for italy are far from an amateur team and created plenty of chances against us they kept up the tempo by making timely substitutions throughout the game while it was physically tough for us to close out the match in the end we didn't. nearly as well as the final score indicates everyone in the changing room realizes that. now to the clay courts of the french open tennis where not one russian male has made it through to the last sixteen of to make i'll usually last in straight sets in round three the spaniard a clay court specialist was just too strong for the twenty seven seeded russian as h

and then we had the meeting with president chirac in early 2005.e agreed with him that we would leave to the iaea to define object to the guarantees for non-diversion. we left paris. when we arrived in germany we were told that has discussed with washington and washington has rejected them. even they were not ready to leave to the iaea to define the objective guarantees. and the spring 2005, i have explained in detail in my book when i met privately with three the e.u. three interlocutors. i told them, let's agree it was before presidential election. i told them let's agree four i read to have a pilot. we would export 100% of production, even production of the pilot. and then we would negotiate for a longer period in order to reach some kind of compromise to give more time to you, europeans, to define a check to guarantees. and this, even this proposal when we were ready to have one pilot, this was rejected, again by the e.u.'s. iran was not really very much eager to accelerate the program. even that time, this proposal was confirmed by the leader.

and then we had a meeting with president chirac in early 2005. we agreed with him that they would lead to the iaea to define objectivity for non-diversion. we left paris. when we arrived in germany, we were told they discussed with washington and washington has rejected them. even they were not ready to lead to the iaea to define the objective guarantees for non-development. and in 2005, i have explained in detail in my book, when i met privately with 30 interlocutors, i told them let's agree it was before presidential election. i told them let's agree for ivan to have the pilots. -- iran to have the pilots. and then we would negotiate for a longer period order to reach some kind of compromise to give more time do you europeans to define objective guarantees. and this, even if this proposal when we were ready to have one pilot, this was rejected again by the e.u. iran was not really very much eager to accelerate the program. this proposal was confirmed by the leader, but european leader not ready to cooperate with iran. spent next brief question.