have discharged from our water system that contain things we do not want in our water, such as chloramines. we actually have to get a discharge permit for that. all of this would operate under a general permit that the quality control board would issue. we are collectively cost sharing the cost of a regulator to permit -- to prepare the permit the documents. our share of that is $50,000 over two years. >> any questions by the commission? any public comment? seeing none, could i have a motion? >> i would like to move the item? second. >> all in favor? opposed? the motion carries. item 11. correct and improve and increase in the construction cost contingency for contract hh9672 in the amount of $5,786,000 and authorize the general manager to improve the future modifications for the contract for a total revised contract amount up to $55,740,000. >> i want to mention this item relates to the need to accelerate the eastern section of the san walking pipeline project that i just mentioned in my presentation. i want to make sure you made that link. >> commissioners? any public comment? could i ha

have discharged from our water system that contain things we do not want in our water, such as chloramines. we actually have to get a discharge permit for that. all of this would operate under a general permit that the quality control board would issue. we are collectively cost sharing the cost of a regulator to permit -- to prepare the permit the documents. our share of that is $50,000 over two years. >> any questions by the commission? commission? any public comment?