they have been chomping at the bit to be in room 204 years.y generally votes more moderately on the whole. >> there is one in term mayor from the progressive side to make sure in the next year, it will be a progressive mayor with a progressive majority board. then maybe in the election, they can have another elected progressive mayor. >> another issue was to consider selecting a caretaker mayor. several may run in november and preferred that the interim mayor be a caretaker. >> the board of supervisors should respect the people's current choice, which was extended a few years ago, and at least have a caretaker that is awful, judicious, fair minded, -- they do not have to agree on anything -- everything -- but they will not play the kinds of political politics that one might play. >> that would really get the hornets' nest stirred up between the mayor and board of supervisors. if you are incumbent mayor and you decide to run for office, you have a leg up. some say, that is not fair. how about david chu, who is considering running for mayor, giv

he's chomping. he's chomping. >> jimmy: agh! >> all right. you almost got him. you almost got him.i'm trying to get his eyeball! i'm over heating! cliff, you got to help me out. >> yeah, yeah. >> jimmy: i'm breaking a sweat. this is insane. >> you softened -- you softened it up for me, jimmy. here we go. we got it. we got it. we got it. >> jimmy: come on, buddy. >> you're tough today. king of the fight. die, you bastard. >> jimmy: "die, you bastard?" that was talking to the game, right? >> i know. that's pretty harsh language. >> jimmy: all right. good. yeah. i didn't know if you were talking to me. i know what was going on. >> this will not pop today, man. >> jimmy: oh, this is tricky. >> we might actually lose today, jimmy. >> jimmy: no, come on. go for the eyeball! >> go for it. go for it. go for it. >> jimmy: cliff, get the eyeball! >> can i get a little help from the crowd on this one? >> jimmy: come on, guys! [ cheers ] oh, my goodness. >> i can't get it, man. it won't pop. >> jimmy: come on! come on, cliff. get that eyeball! >> it won't go, jimmy. it's too tough, man. i can'

as you can see burrows chomping down on his finger.eve he did not intentionally by his finger. that is in the press release. he did not do it intentionally. [laughter] >> you know what to do with kids that do that in school? >> exactly. >> now we have a fun interacting parts, the audience in tracks. but are you one of the people that do not want to communicate verbally so you send them a message? >> you are the only one that does not do it. >> exactly, because i want to talk to them directly. >> hey gary, full-time in the outfield, and nate has earned it? >> i would agree with you, he knows his baseball, but i bet you for a couple of weeks it will be cody at left, because we have the best defensive outfielder to catch against the dodgers. morgan should see met his spot in there. this was a good call by the man with the shade on his head. >> what do you think, bop era and toast? >> , see the interaction? i would say if the a's do not make the playoffs, bob airing got the job but he was the best man at the wedding, he does not have a big

they will review that play, not nice, not nice, boys, chomp.wo of the stanley cup finals saturday at 5 p.m. see it right here on nbc bay area, maybe it didn't hurt that see it right here on nbc bayss t invented the flip video camera? something very strange. we willkdb t it.í>m÷ >>> good morning to you. it is 5:53 right now. you know, the fate of northern california's elite big wave surfing competition is up in the air, as jeff clark and ex-wife are battling for control. x-wife, intkerine, 009. eoicatç meeting on august 1st. we will keep you posted. >>> all right, how is the traffic moving along there e. í' e the eleofefgcnfho"6&bled co gwell. yorba buena, right near the tunnel, the he lower deck coming through the same area, we still have reports of a disabled vehicle there as well. now, these are two separate incidents, details enough where it does sound like there are separate incident there one on the upper and look, see the span x san francisco remova wscoliseu northb lightert% relatively good ú no v delays e. and@? no adv b2jpvfytnv> shot

pitch second game tomorrow and chomping at the bit to get back on the mound. >> something that you doy years and you don't miss a turn and then you do and kind of forget all the joy that comes with being out there and so it is something that i have just been counting the days to get back out on the hill. >> donovan sanchez on the dl. pl. >> thanks very much. >> that's this edition of 7 news at 9:00 here on tv 20. stay connected 24-7 at abc 7 news.com. the for all of us here, the i'm dan ashley thanks for watching. we appreciate your time hope to see you again in an hour on the big 7. your time hope to see you again in an hour on the big 7. goodbye for now

who was chomps like in its lack of comprehension to a person who doesn't understand that language. and it was demoralizing and i graduated less skilled, less motivated and i was a waiter. my education was their lack of an education. and so, i was waiting tables right after graduating from college and it missed my lunch shift and i go home. >> your friends as a way waiter you doing this? >> it was embarrassing, humiliating, best thing that ever happened in my life. the people i was always up to and trying to impress were looking down on me. i started to pay for my own. >> your parents cut you off? >> it was brutal. that's why i dedicated the book to my father who cut me off and clarence thomas at the same time. both of their guidance in my life: faded. >> that's a good segue. >> well, i went from a weight chart that started watching, wanted to refer the tape down of clarence thomas. i watched the television sets and the television said tony this is is a bad man in the newspapers told me was a bad man. and i remember alan archdale, patricia schroeder balking at the steps, saying we'r

and this new center for tobacco products move forward but not at these chomping, gargantuan increases because they felt it's catch-up time. everyone can say it's catch-up time. under this huge deficit, we can't continue to look at agencies like this during this period of time getting a 500% increase in funding. so with that i ask my colleagues to support my amendment. the chair: the gentleman yields back. the gentleman from california is recognized. mr. farr: i rise in opposition. the chair: the gentleman is recognized for five minutes. mr. farr: first of all, i hope we don't have one of these ambush amendments that we haven't had a chance to really look at. this one really has serious implications. what this -- it seems that this amendment does is first of all reduce the tobacco industry's fees that they have to pay the federal government. this is a big help to the tobacco industry. cuts fees that the private sector has to pay the federal government. and what do these fees go into? into campaigns for -- to reduce tobacco consumption and to treat issues related to tobacco. that's the

kingston: we know fair well on this committee because we have been chomping at the bit to do a little bit of authorizing but the authorizing committee keeps a pretty strong eye on it. let me yield back but i certainly 'dry -- agree with that point. ms. richardson: i'm watching and paying attention carefully, sir. the other point i wanted to point out is that as i stated in my comments, $37 million has been cut over the fiscal year 2011 and given the $5 million that you did earlier accept and i'm suggesting $10 million, we would sill be suggesting only less than 50% restoring from that level and i would just urge you, sir, in these tough times, i understand in future times but in these tough times not all other mechanisms that could help our seniors, again who are only making at or below $14,000, this would be in dire need and i would strongly urge your reconsideration. mr. kingston: reclaiming my time. do i want to point out and i'm sure the gentlewoman knows that this bill actually does increase snap $5.6 billion and therefore i think sometimes we do need to, even though that is an a

rosenberg, i know you were chomping at the bit, but i was running out of time. where we left off, mr. tatelman, you agreed with the assertion that congress as you read the constitution as an unfettered absolute right to seek information irrespective of the judicial consequences of the executive branch. subsequently to the chairman's question, i think you indicated, but, of course, a court ultimately adjudicate the dispute, should there be a dispute between the two branches, am i reading you correctly? >> your question, congressman, was whether not congress has the right to access the information. and the answer to that question i will stand by my original answer was absolutely a right to subject of countervailing constitutional privileges being asserted, but that there may be reasons, either political or otherwise why congress may choose not to assert that. >> i sure that. i was just trying to establish what your view was. but you would agree that in the event of a dispute, the ultimate arbiter of a dispute is the court of law? >> not necessarily in a dispute be

derrick has also done a lot of work on foreign -- chinese foreign investment, and he was kind of chomping at the bit. he got one question in, but that wasn't enough. so when dan and i were walking out, i get this sms and it's from derrick. he says, how about a debate between dan and i? and i turned to dan and i said, what do you think? he said, great. so now we've got it today, and thanks to the state for putting it together with doug spellman, so it should be interesting. in one corner, i won't say he's the champion, but he's the lead contender is dan, and we have the challanger in derrick. so it should be fun. >> our format is going to be dan will lead off. we've given him up to ten minutes to lay out his case regarding chinese foreign investment in the united states. derrick will then have up to ten minutes to make his response. we'll then have perhaps some give and take up here, and then we'll throw the floor open for input from the audience to explore this issue in greater depth. sam, over to you. >> state, thank you very much, and good morning to everyone. it's a real pleasure to be

i can't picture a bunch of middle school students chomping down on octopus.us will be designed to appeal the kids, yet still be healthy. >> i buy that. >>> check this out. a hungry lion has her eye on a 1-year-old visiting the exhibit! >> this was shot in cheyenne, wyoming, zoo. the good thing, of course, for the glass barrier in between them. the mom was watching the whole thing. didn't like it and scooped up the little guy. he started to cry so she put him back and so you see. >> that lion is licking its chops. he just wants to eat that kid and that would just be a snack. >> look at that! oh, geez! >> trying so hard! >> i think it's cute. everybody is going, ah. >> the poor lion has been tortured. >>> it appears fewer americans are quitting their jobs during, you know, what is a recovery, but doesn't feel like it if you're at work. according to a bloomberg business week between january 2009 and this past april, 2,000 americans stuck with jobs that they would have left during ordinary times. >> we asked you today if you would change your job if you could. he

and the guy chomping on a big cigars that he wrote this? who wrote this? i've only been here an hour and a merit in trouble. and he said, kid, you're a press secretary. [laughter] of course i didn't hesitate to turn to someone i've been talking to inside what exactly is a press secretary? that literally was my start and presidential candidate politics, right off the street. so that is the kind of opportunity available to the young person who is interested, motivated enough to jump in, be a volunteer, take a chance. if you can't communicate any of that opportunity, that would be a really great. >> what would help your students join the presidential debates and learning about politics? >> one of the challenges for educators is to capture the imagination of student. and certainly the interactivity with technology, video libraries, it all helps to get the more engaged. we have to balance that with substance of over teaching. i think one of the concerns going into the political debate is there going to be a lot of interactivity. i hope it's not a moment is mere

i see two of you chomping at the bit. >> we have a recent example of when iraq was the opposite of that, so i think it is pretty clear that in our interests that we have a stable and democratic government in iraq, especially in that region, surrounded by some less stable and less democratic governments, so -- >> why is it? >> well, it is for our own security, but it is also for the security of the region, and it is also for our economic benefit and for the potential boat that iraq, you know, has the potential to become what it was before, a middle-income country, a stable country, a partner of ours, a partner of other democracies in the world. i think we of only to gain from iraq being a democracy. frankly, we have a lot to lose if we would have them revert back. >> iraq historically has always been in an aggressor state in this part of the world, and it is our hope that a democratic iraq will be a more moderate actor that we can work with in a region that is vital to our interests for all of the reasons we talked about before. i would also point out, given the mosaic communities in ira

and i see two of you chomping up to bits. >> i agree -- we have a recent example of when iraq is just the opposite of that. it's pretty clear it's in our interest that we have a stable and democratic government in iraq, especially in that region surrounded by some less stable and less democratic government. >> i know that. but why is it that >> well, it's for our own security but it's also for the security of the region and it also is for world's economic benefit and for the potential that iraq, you know, as to become what it once was before. a middle income country, a prosperous country, a stable country, of ours, a depart of other democracies in the world. we have only to gain from iraq being a democracy. we have a lot to lose if they were to revert back. >> dr. kahl? >> i would add that iraq historically has been a source of instability and aggressor state in this part of the world and it's our hope that a democratic iraq would be a more moderate country that we can work with in the middle east which is, you know, a region that's vital to our interest. i would also point out that g