now picking aside noam chomsky and edward as herman wrote the book manufacturing consent back in the 1900 eighty's. and by chomsky and harmony definition of manufactured consent, are these global idols manufactured and what sort of consent are they trying to serve? yes, i would. the answer to this question, because you know, for me, the manufacturer, a phone sent need or needs to be constant. you cannot see, you cannot interrupt the fabrication of the constant manufacturing of content. so you need to do it every day, every week, every month, every year. because if you interrupt it, if you use it, you know the attention of the public is collapsing, is my mission. so you have to renew constantly your narrative. and that's why you need all styles are coming from to move the ball for music or any kind, you know, all stars. why not? but you need also to create new stuff. for instance, as is now mr. the landscape is a new star since peace europe, because before february 23rd 20022, you was only a new quinn and president not, not better, not worse than your door. exactly corrupted or the pa

a lot of noam chomsky. i did not want to write another book on war writing war, a force that gives us meaning, which was drawn out of my own experiences. a war correspondent for 20 years, five years in el salvador, seven years in the middle east. i covered war in sarajevo and kosovo and then of conflicts in between war and sudan. i was with the spla in the southern sudan, i six weeks in the punjab at the height of the fighting, the the civil war in algeria, civil war in yemen. i was in the south on the losing side and were certainly days when i couldn't write at all. i was just overcome emotionally. it wasn't cathartic. it wasn't. i still to this day, cannot reread the book but i felt that given the familiarity with and the peculiar subculture of war, i had a response ability to set it down. the book was published by public affairs, a small publisher, the advance was rather modest. $25,000, and we didn't expect to sell. it exploded hit that particular zeitgeist with the inception of the war in iraq, sold hu

uh, chomsky performance, everyone was elected, that is, this is, uh, we now have 100 people in the tubeuse extras, uh, the brothers of the ramazovs, which means that the father of the karamazovs are dirty, which means brothers are tin. teplov jur chatter, then valerka cautious ir muravyova is the game. that is, there is a theater - it was all buzzing. that's all this feeling was generally amazing theater and and it all began, because chomsky hmm and that means, uh, the performance began without a curtain. uh, the main characters were all standing on the stage, that is, at fifteen minutes to seven, everyone came to the hall. and we are all on stage. and we mean these from the wet. i just came to the theatre. we mean, in what kind of shirts, it means that everything is extras extras and around. uh, the beach is gone played. relax, i played the father of karamazov sergei sergei chechens amazing actor is not just extraordinary, and he was sitting on a chair right on the bathroom stage, and we are around him. and i'm like the smallest young, which means i'm so walking out of the wet. i sat o

he co-headlined the event with noam chomsky.first time they had done a public event together. harry spoke about donald trump who had just been elected president. >> i believe that trump, in bringing a new energy to the realization of the vastness of the reach of the ku klux klan, is not something that has been out of our basic purview of thought. the ku klux klan, for some of us, is a constant -- has a constant existence. it isn't until it touches certain aspects of white america that white america all of the sudden wakes up to the fact that there is something called the klan and that it does its mischief. [applause] what causes me to have great thought is something that's most unique to my experience. and as i said earlier tonight, at the doorstep of being 90 years of age, i had thought i had seen it all and done it all, only to find out that at 89 i knew nothing. but the most peculiar thing to me has been the absence of a black presence in the middle of this resistance, not just the skirmishes that we've seen in ferguson and b

i dare i say it. manufacturing consent. noam. chomsky and edward as herman seems to be, i guess more of a prophecy than, than a book of research these days. so recently republican congressmen, matt gates, i like to call him the new de facto leader of the squad, brought to the floor of the house, a resolution to bring all us troops home from syria where they have effectively just been guarding the oil and wheat fields. some say the u. s. a stealing that stuff, but that's a different conversation for another day. but what got the us troops there in the 1st place was advisement from samantha power to brock obama, when she was on his national security council that the u. s. needed to go to syria . was that sound advice? should obama have listened to power? no is terrible advice for obama to listen to samantha power factor, anybody to listen to samantha power, the idea that we were there in syria syria illegally. of course, other both american law and under the un charter to protect the syrian people from, from the assad regime. what, in fact we're talking about supporting a bunch of jiha

[applause] amy goodman: i have never heard noam chomsky be so concise.r. the ballroom here at the national press club is packed. over 5,000 people are watching online. you can get the link of this whole event at democracynow.org. spread it far and wide. go to where the silence is, and say something. [applause] srecko horvat: don't worry, it won't be a long speech. i just want to thank all the members of the tribunal today. thanks a lot for being with us today. i also want to thank especially amy and denis, behind the camera, and the team of democracy now! [applause] i also want to thank all our partners. the list is very long, so i won't name all of them, but i want to especially thank the wau holland foundation. i also want to thank the national press club for hosting us. and i want to thank all our volunteers for making this possible. [applause] so, what are our next steps? today we provided convincing testimonies and convincing evidence on the case of julian assange. and now it's up to the biden administration to drop the charges. but it's also up to

the media now picking aside noam chomsky and edward as hermine wrote the book, manufacturing consent back in the 1980s. and by chance get home is definition of manufactured consent. are these global idols manufactured and what sort of consent are they trying to serve? yes, but i would the answer to this question because you know, for me, the manufacturer of consent needs or needs to be constant. you cannot see as you cannot in corrupt the fabrication of the concept, the manufacturing of constant. so you need to do it every day, every week, every month, every year. because if you interrupt it, use it. you know, the attention of the public is collapsing is my mission. so you have to renew constantly, your narrow it to you. and that's why you need the old stars are coming from the movie, poke her music or any kind, you know, all. ready for the stars, why not? but you need also to create new stuff. for instance, as use now this does the landscape is a new star since this year, because before february 20 to 20022. you was only a new queen anne, president. not, not better, not worse than y

uh, in ukraine one of them is, this is the most influential philosophers of our time us chomsky, whoent. listen to a short excerpt. escalation war in ukraine lead to huge losses. the ukrainian army is apparently practically destroyed. much of the world sees this as a proxy wall between russia and the us, and it's getting harder to avoid that conclusion. if the war escalates, very serious damage will be done to ukraine, us policy in ukraine remains stable , the war must continue to seriously weaken russia . the uk and the us intervened directly last march to convince ukraine not to move towards negotiations with russia or the us very clearly made it clear that we are not ready to negotiate an official position to wage war to weaken russia if you think about it only from a practical point of view. it's a kind of sadism. in fact, almost the whole world suffers from this ukraine most of all, but also africa and asia are experiencing a reduction in the supply of food and fertilizer europe is in decline. even moving towards the day of industrialization due to the rupture of natural trade r

and what i make of mccall statement is the fact that is what norm chomsky terms manufacturing consent. in other words, preparing the american people for the coming war with china over taiwan. now president and g of china said one month ago that he looks forward to a peaceful reunification with taiwan. but statements like mc calls and mccarthy's are didn't design to prepare the american people for war and are what motivates? mccaul, in particular, and mccarthy, ah, are there is the domestic audience in the states? the republicans like to accuse the democrats of being too soft on china while the democratic use the republicans of being too soft on russia. in actuality, they're both part of all of a singular war party that can't see any other way out of their a declining status. and loss of prestige in the world other than war and i it, we what really they need to do is to tone down the rhetoric and start treating countries that are other countries around the world that are rising in their development status as enemies and sequence staff to realize that we're living now in a multi polar w

before we turn to noam chomsky, a tierney -- is formally word for the united nations word crimes to juneyugoslavia and -- she is a founder of the post project, a new york-based research journalism organization supporting civil resistance around the world. >> [applause] >> thank you, and one an honor to share the stage with people you've grown up respecting, your idols. i'm going to keep this very short. and you start with something that julian assange famously said. you have to start with the truth. truth is the only way we can get anywhere. without truth, there is no reality, there is no way for us to challenge the power. and almost everybody who spoke here today spoke about this idea of truth, because there are two things that are human to us. truth, the capacity to understand what's before us, and our capacity to tell stories and pass it on. truth is also all right to know our original. without it there is no way for us to fight for the values we hold dear. freedom, dignity, and the moral equality of all people. the persecution of julian assange is not just about first amendment. it's

every realist in the west, from noam chomsky to, to henry kissinger, every one said this plot of land has to be neutral. it's a no brainer. everybody understood it and still we have these war which leads me to the question. all these people ideal, ideologically driven, or if they're just that, the faction that wanted it, i'm having it, and we are the propagandized masses at the moment, all over the place in russia, and in and into west your old before. and you just said it. now that the, the warning ukraine could have been avoided if the west and ukraine hadn't misinterpreted russia's demand for security guarantees. and i remember when those security guarantees was put, were put on the table and openly discuss back in 2021, especially during the last in person meeting within biden. and putin and geneva, russia had a sizable contingent on the cranes border, at least $80000.00 troops. and that strikes me as a pretty direct expression. oftentimes they, you know, like, there's not much room for misinterpretation here. why do you thing the west that didn't take the rush and signaled the wa

figures as goals, the famous american theoretician says that the tension between israel and america to chomsky's name has reached its peak, in a conversation with al jazeera english tv channel, he said that the leaders of israel have distanced themselves from the leaders of the united states. regarding people like benzville, the minister of national security, and smoot rich, the minister of the zionist regime, he said that these people openly say to the united states, "go away, get lost ." he believes that this is the first time that the confrontation between israeli and american officials is so unclear. how the united states wants to react to this issue . the spokesman of the ministry of defense of the united states said that the publication of confidential american documents in cyberspace is a very serious threat to our national security. classified and confidential documents of the united states have been published in the cyber space, which is a top-secret topic of the united states in social networks. in these documents, details related to the american spying on the russian war machine in uk

i dare i say it. manufacturing consent. noam chomsky and edward as herman seems to be, i guess more of a prophecy than, than a book of research these days solution to bring us troops home from syria where they had to barack obama when sterile advice for obama to listen to samantha power . in fact, for anybody to listen to samantha power, the idea that we were there in syria syria illegally, of course, other both american law and under the un charter to protect the syrian people from from the assad regime. what, in fact we're talking about supporting a bunch of jihad terrorists against a secular syrian government, is just it just a terrible advice in a, in my, by the way, let's not be naive. this was not unintended. we knew very well. we knew as far back as 2012 that supporting these terrorist groups and syria was going to lead to an anti he like isis. this is not a unintended consequence of a bad information or bad judgment. this is an intended outcome by people in washington to crate terrorist entities to use as weapons against regimes we're targeting for removal. so the, the idea tha

all of a sudden, this feeling was generally amazing theater and and everything began, because chomskythe main characters were all standing on the stage, that is, without fifteen families, everyone came to the hall. and we are all on stage. and we mean these from the wet. i just came to the theatre. we mean, in what canvas shirts, it means that everything is extras extras and around. uh, the beach is gone played. relax, i played karamazov's father sergei sergeevich, an amazing actor, not just an extraordinary one, and he was sitting on a chair right on the bath, and we were around him. and i'm like the smallest young, which means i'm so walking out of the wet. i sat on his lap. and so he told everything for 15 minutes, who is with whom. who goes where who why does it mean about all the rules about moretsk, and i'm young, out of stupidity, nothing. it wasn't really recorded. not well, there is some sort of prosir valentine, my beloved crazy and that's it. this is this, this is 15, and we were sitting what he had to talk about something quietly, and he means that all these stories are yo

noam chomsky, in a conversation with the english al jazeera tv channel, said that the heads of israel should scientifically distance themselves from the heads of the united states about people such as bangari, the minister of national security, and osmotik, the minister of finance of the zionist regime. both janaki believes that this is the first time that the confrontation between israeli and american officials has become so open and it is not clear how america wants to react to this issue . in cyberspace, there is a very serious threat to our national security. in recent days, photos of classified and confidential documents of the united states were published in cyberspace. topics of top secret documents of the united states in social networks. fifth, a large amount of confidential documents of the pentagon in several social networks. it goes hand in hand. in these documents, the details of the american spying on the russian war machine in ukraine have been disclosed. also, in these documents , the evaluation of intelligence data about america's allies, including south korea and isr

noam chomsky, in a conversation with the al jazeera tv channel, said that the leaders of israel publicly distanced themselves from the leaders of the united states about people like bengo air. the minister of national security and smartis, the minister of finance of the zionist regime, also said that these people are saying in the language of america, "get lost." shansi believes that this is the first time that the confrontation between israeli and american officials has become so obvious, and it is not clear how america wants to react to this issue. the spokesperson of the government announced the management changes in the government, mr. bahadri jahormi, without referring to the details of these changes, said that in order to better use the capacity of the managers of the management transfer in the agenda of the government, the government announced the management changes in the cabinet , mr. bahadri jahrami, without referring to the details of these changes. the said changes are in order to better use the capacity of the managers , the management transfer is on the agenda of the govern

and so so one pattern i've noticed across your career is you on several occasions interviewed noam chomsky who was a legendary professor, and you on multiple occasions you referenced his most famous book, manufacturing on how the media to manufacture consent for an uninformed american public to get them to vote for candidates who are, i guess, only serve the interest of the elite. so across your career you know, your records have been very clear. your you're a staunch critic of israel. you're a staunch of human rights. my question going, i'm guessing, i'm guessing in my stomach with homework. is that your staunch critic of saudi arabia and in right violation you you criticize u.s. military camps you have the best positions in afghanistan iraq, libya, others. so my question for you is how and how does an anti-establishment figure like you of work for a corporate establishment such as msnbc? so let me so so let me ask you this. you will choice. you don't want to fire as a weird was that a question or a speech? no it was a question because but normally when you ask a question, you wait. they

here, uh, chomsky in this case. well, it's really such a kind of marker you know.erent information space, unlike us completely, that is, he has this uh, it sees the socio-cultural space, of course not not done. there from cnn it is not made from fox news and so on, but it is not made from the first channel either. there are some other media, and when there are such influential thinkers, and he, by the way, in the past sense of the word, has a flock in america and in the west in general, he is extremely, dear person. it starts to say it, it ceases to be a taboo topic. and this, it seems to me, is an important marker that suggests that the intellectual elite has already understood everything about america, the problem is only in time, but history is this process, if we we will move this process forward, as we said together with china, for the first time in 100 years. yes , the changes that were not, that is, it's great. that's right. and actually here, looking at it all. a little longer perspective. yes, i think let's be honest, but 14 months. there in february march

sro kiev's entry into the alliance this year, but the famous american historian and philosopher, chomskyly the west threatened russia, provoked the conflict with promises to take ukraine into nato and purposefully disrupted the istanbul talks between moscow and kiev for 30 years , not only russia, each of its leaders, but also every us official has stated that if ukraine joins nato, more than one russian leader will not accept this. see what happened in 2021 the buydn administration proposed an expanded program for ukraine to join nato increased arms shipments 2022 russia said if consider our security concerns. we can negotiate and reach a settlement through negotiations. this offer was categorical. rejected what was even worse last march were the negotiations between ukraine and russia under the auspices of turkey and what britain did prime minister boris johnson flew to ukraine and said that britain and the united the states do not believe that now is the right time for negotiations, followed by a similar statement made by lloyd austin, us defense minister who sent a clear signal that