. >> thank you supervisor avalos and supervisor kim and supervisor tang, i'm chris bowman. i'm [inaudible] the city attorney basically defined what measure is going on the ballot which is the measure supervisor kim and her colleagues introduced on the 16th, because the item that was on the agenda is not the samitem. in fact it leaves out 3 sections on findings and purpose of the measure, so i'll speak to the measure that will be acuring on the ballot unamended and would ask that the priority on housing be changed so that we solve what the mayors office said that 19 percent of housing needs of people between 80 and 120 percent for medium income are addressed versing roughly 80 percent for those below 80 percent. i think it is important we put that as a first priority and for mixed housing and work for a average work force housing, low income work force house{homeless at the 4th because if you only have 4 thousand potential units of housing you might never get to the middle class or even the working low income working class because you'll be focusing strickly on the homeless.

chris bowman, this is my third hearing on the surplus public lands ordinance. i would make a request to the committee, that if you should go forward and you have six vote and you replace the other measure that is the place-setter. that you put the original, the complete current ordinance basically sections 1-14 and then you make the amendments to that. so that the voters can see what the amendments are within the context of the entire chapter. which is 23a. there are a number of sections including the advisory committee and surplus housing that are not included within the chapter, and i think that for truth and to the voters that you need to have it in there. the other thing i'm not concern, if the committee is aware, that the times for implementing the new list, the surplus property has been delayed by eight months. so the implementation would begin on november 1st of 1916. because it says november 1st. the election is november 3rd. so it's going to be another year afterwards. and everything else is basically delayed by basically seven to eight months. i have

chris bowman, this is my third hearing on the surplus public lands ordinance. i would make a request to the committee, that if you should go forward and you have six vote and you replace the other measure that is the place-setter. that you put the original, the complete current ordinance basically sections 1-14 and then you make the amendments to that. so that the voters can see what the amendments are within the context of the entire chapter. which is 23a. there are a number of sections including the advisory committee and surplus housing that are not included within the chapter, and i think that for truth and to the voters that you need to have it in there. the other thing i'm not concern, if the committee is aware, that the times for implementing the new list, the surplus property has been delayed by eight months. so the implementation would begin on november 1st of 1916. because it says november 1st. the election is november 3rd. so it's going to be another year afterwards. and everything else is basically delayed by basically seven to eight months. i have

chris bowman, this is my third hearing on the surplus public lands ordinance.ould make a request to the committee, that if you should go forward and you have six vote and you replace the other measure that is the place-setter. that you put the original, the complete current ordinance basically sections 1-14 and then you make the amendments to that. so that the voters can see what the amendments are within the context of the entire chapter. which is 23a. there are a number of sections including the advisory committee and surplus housing that are not included within the chapter, and i think that for truth and to the voters that you need to have it in there. the other thing i'm not concern, if the committee is aware, that the times for implementing the new list, the surplus property has been delayed by eight months. so the implementation would begin on november 1st of 1916. because it says november 1st. the election is november 3rd. so it's going to be another year afterwards. and everything else is basically delayed by basically seven to eight months. i have 30 s

barbara bowman and beverly johnson will join us on "new day." chris? >> thank you, alisyn. a man gets charged multiple times with crimes and deported only to sneak back into california. he's due in court today. the sanctuary city is also under fire. >> a lot of this comes from the man's own words saying in an interview he returned to san francisco was it was a sanctuary city. >> that's right. he knew if he came here he would be protected. now the mayor put out a press release trying to quell the uproar saying all agencies need to review their policies. he says san francisco doesn't have it in place to protect violent and serious felons. francisco did not have a record of being violent. he was deported five times. that's why there's so much outranl here. the sheriff's department did not notified immigrations officials because of the so-called sanctuary. take a look. >> i believe that ice needs to catch up. we need a court order or a warrant and ice was told this many many times and they have yet to produce that document. >> now california officials are saying we should take