— concern was the fact that chris bryant as _ concern was the fact that chris bryant as you say, waswas that— impartial chair. so what bryant said was that he — impartial chair. so what bryant said was that he would recuse himself from _ was that he would recuse himself from the — was that he would recuse himself from the investigation to avoid that, _ from the investigation to avoid that, he — from the investigation to avoid that, he then stood down from the committee — that, he then stood down from the committee and so the committee brought— committee and so the committee brought a — committee and so the committee brought a new empty on, labour mp to replace _ brought a new empty on, labour mp to replace chris _ brought a new empty on, labour mp to replace chris bryant, harriet harman _ replace chris bryant, harriet harman. she was elected chair. she has been _ harman. she was elected chair. she has been chairing the committee throughout its investigation. lets fix to our political— throughout its investigation. lats fix to our political editor chris mason who is in westminster. wh

chris bryant was theyjust heard. agree a unified response?— unified response? i know all the members of _ unified response? i know all the members of the _ unified response? i know all the members of the committee - unified response? i know all the members of the committee and | unified response? i know all the | members of the committee and i unified response? i know all the - members of the committee and i work with them very closely. it's a difficult process coming to a shared view, but i'm sure that's what they will want to do, cos i thought they were very forensic and careful. there was no showboating and i thought they did a really good job. in a sense, this is a unique moment. no former prime minister has ever been held before a privileges committee in this way. it's important. i think the voters want to know that when a minister stands up to know that when a minister stands up in the commons, you can rely what they're saying is true, and if it's not, they'll correct the record. chris bryant, thank you very mu

and bear in mind, the first chairman of the committee , chris bryant, recused committee, chris bryantpressed his views. and bolton, a very distinguished constitutional historian, perhaps the most distinguished constitutional historian the country, has said that harriet harman should recuse herself for the same reason should sue gray have excused herself . but sue have excused herself. but sue grey's report is now valueless because we know it was done by somebody who's party pre. so the whole basis of the evidence on which committee was up which the committee was set up is if this were is rotten. if this were a criminal case, if it were going before our courts , and you'd before our courts, and you'd find that the whole investigation, like the freezer we were talking about that had broken, invalid , dated broken, had been invalid, dated the prosecution would collapse. no evidence would be offered. and that's what the privileges committee should be doing. it's a of the evidence is a whole base of the evidence is flawed, it's wrong. we're flawed, it's wrong. and we're not proceed with th

hedgerow what she wants to for the rest of wants to do, and for the rest of the committee, i mean chris bryantyant accused himself as chairman knew that chairman because he knew that had publicly criticised boris the them honestly they the rest of them honestly they are just longing for their moment of glory. but harman did the thing. mean, the same thing. i mean, she tweeted, i know. that's why. tweeted, no, i know. that's why. course she she shouldn't. i mean, herself. mean, she have recused herself. she sorry i thought she should know. sorry i thought i said that earlier. of course she except she should. it's except politically . yes. that politically outrage. yes. that she stay judge. she should stay in the judge. she's pre—decided it. of course she they've taken evidence she has. they've taken evidence from anonymously. the from people anonymously. is the only cases where you can do that. and honestly, it's rape cases the victim or cases where the victim or the alleged victim out on in alleged victim gets out on in which that which she said that is. and i mean, yes, everybody that boris s

hedgerow what she wants for the rest of wants to do, and for the rest of the committee, i mean chris bryantyant accused himself as chairman knew that chairman because he knew that had publicly criticised boris the rest of them honestly they are just longing for their moment glory. harman did moment of glory. but harman did the thing. i mean, she the same thing. i mean, she tweeted, i that's why. tweeted, no, i know. that's why. course she she shouldn't. i mean, herself. mean, she have recused herself. she sorry i thought she should know. sorry i thought i said that earlier. of course she except she should. it's except politically . yes. that politically outrage. yes. that she stay in judge. she should stay in the judge. she's pre—decided it. of course she they've taken evidence she has. they've taken evidence from anonymously. from people anonymously. is the only cases where you can do that. and honestly, it's rape cases the victim or the cases where the victim or the alleged gets on in alleged victim gets out on in which said is. which she said that is. and i mean, yes, everybody that bori

sir chris bryant. thank you, madam speaker. don't madam deputy speaker.me minister ever met lily savage or has spent a night out at has ever spent a night out at the royal vauxhall tavern. but was i can take him some time if she wants to go and the but but i think that was a yes actually. but the but lily was performing at the height the aids crisis in 1987 when police officers raided the pub, arrested her amongst others. they were wearing rubber gloves because suppose of leader protecting themselves from hiv, from touching gay men. lily said at the time , oh, lass, you've at the time, oh, lass, you've come to do the washing up. that's great. and for alter ego , o'grady campaigned assertively and hilariously for elderly people for care workers against oppression of every . isn't it oppression of every. isn't it time we in this country celebrated our naughty, hilarious drag queens and comics of every kind to inspire to us a better and more generous nation 7 better and more generous nation ? yeah can i thank you all? i totally agree . him and paul totally a

i thought when stepped aside when chris bryant stepped aside and oh, i you know, i've and said, oh, it, already tweeted out, i thought, oh, we parliament's oh, here we go. parliament's actually taking this really seriously . know, said seriously. you know, they said we actually some trust we could actually see some trust you be brought back to parliament. thought parliament. but i thought harriet the harriet harman chaired, the committee rather well, i thought she it as as she herself out of it as much as she herself out of it as much as she surprise she could, which did surprise me. didn't think we see me. i didn't think. we would see the show, but the harriet harman show, but i do a lot of people can do get why a lot of people can construe what we've just watched as a kangaroo court. i think there is some legitimate argument to it, and i think the committee some very committee has to have some very strong answers . what it was strong answers. what it was about, as just mentioned about, as you've just mentioned about, as you've just mentioned about give evidence, about who can give e

but of course, labour's chris bryant recused himself because of some of the tweets and things that he'd tweets that put out there? and, that she's put out there? and, you know, even if you defend harriet harman there , would it harriet harman there, would it not be to have not just be better to have somebody any somebody who's above any suspicion just in to be suspicion just in order to be able say, fair and square able to, say, fair and square thatis able to, say, fair and square that is an absolutely unbiased heanng that is an absolutely unbiased hearing ? well, i think the point hearing? well, i think the point here is there is a conservative majority on this committee chaired by a labour mp , but chaired by a labour mp, but labour mps are in the majority of them are concern too. so to all intents and this is a decision that will be taken by bofis decision that will be taken by boris johnson's own peers, his colleagues on the conservative benches , they will look at the benches, they will look at the that has been placed before them and. they will make a recommendation to the house of

desantis spoke to chris yesterday in des moines and davenport in an interview fox news bryant which is going to air tonight at 8:00 p.m. he answered this. folks worried about being find your governor get on a candidate yet? once you have a record of achievement, people can call you a name but that is not going to trump the achievement. we have built an astounding record of achievement. the best is yet to come. >> those achievements as he calls and prompted democrats to label desantis as extremists we heard that from the white house yesterday. today at desantis continues promoting his memoir the stop in nevada, arthel. folks thank you alexander half. want to let everybody know you can catch more of brian's interview with governor desantis on "one nation". that is tonight at 8:00 p.m. eastern right fox news channel. thank you. >> a podcast or fearing for her life asked for an order of protection against a man she said was stalking her and her husband. a few days later they are shot dead. more on this chilling story straight ahead. together we support immune function. supply fuel for immu