so when will you see rain let's check forecast with meteorologist chris lamb betters. most of that rain arriving tomorrow afternoon. take look at the radar and satellite composite. and a some are beginning form low level moisture from a south and east overnight tonight. so don't be surprised to see few patches drizzle even early tomorrow morning. bigger part of storm system, that's down through the southeast. this is marching off to the northeast. as it does so, it will work through southern new england tomorrow, bringing us a higher rain chance we get into afternoon through the evening hours. so out of two morning commutes expect more issues more issues more sustained wet weather for an evening commute patchy drizzle around for morning commute. in terms of temperatures tomorrow afternoon, warming up low to mid 50s, down through southeastern massachusetts. holding in low to mid 40s farther north you go. so a little bit tough to scour out that cooler air farther north you go up merrimac valley into southern new hampshire. colder over weekend. seasonably cold and right b

but the bottom line is that chris lamb's model does work. there's evidence of that.and there is a new generation of military leadership that gets it, i think. and we should support that, encourage it. and through your oversight, mandate it. >> admiral stavridis. >> core question going forward. and what mitigates against it, what makes it difficult and you know this is the built-in structure of the military. this is an organization where a million people get up in the morning and put on the same outfit. i mean, this is why we call it uniforms. and you've got to start cracking that mentality. we will, i think general schwartz is spot on because there is a generational shift. the question here is this is not an on and off switch between a highly chaotic, silicon valley-like entity and a military. it's a rheostat. we need to gauge that rheostat towards strategic communication, all of those smart power things without losing our ability to deliver lethal combat power. i think we can do that. we need to think of it as a rheostat that's turning in the direction you identify.

command is potential for abuse, for excessive exercise of one's authority, and underlining, as chris lamb mentioned, the fundamental principle of civilian authority. that is the downside. but i believe that, and given my experience, the chairman and the secretary operate so closely in today's environment that there is a level of supervision which mitigates that possibility. but that is a legitimate consideration. putting the: chairman of the chain, he was still be supportive? general schwartz: of course, exactly. correct. senator reid: so the practical effect would be injecting him between the service chief and the service sector? what does that look like? general schwartz: the practical effect is there an authoritative referee, and he is either the deputy secretary or the secretary. and it seems to me that having someone in uniform with executive authority, probably toervised and contributes effective activity. reid: on both of these issues, the chairman and the chain? admiral: let me take the chairman position first. we have correctly identified it as one of the cons. i will give you an

here's chris lamb weather with a check on forecast. >> chris: you guys with the red and green. 56 in boston. nice, comfortable, mild start to the day. 38 in bedford. we have areas of dense fog out'd the city of boston from bedford to norwood all the way down the southeastern mass. it's sort of hit or miss. not all towns seeing it this morning. quiet in terms of dry weather in southern new england for now. a couple showers back through upstate new york and a few extending through the ohio valley. can't rule out a couple sprinkles rolling through this evening, but much of the day itself is dry and mild. this a little bit overdone this evening by 7:00 p.m. maybe a couple showers near the south coast of new england and a few sprinkles working in from the north and west. that should be about it. otherwise partly sunny through the day. mild, temperatures a few degrees either side of 60 degrees this afternoon. above freezing tonight. upper 30s to lower to middle 40s. so still relatively mild for this time of year, but not as warm tomorrow as what we'll have today. and today not as warm as y

and undermining, as chris lamb, mentioned, the fundamental principle of civilian authority. that's the downside. and, but i believe that, and given my experience, the chairman and the secretary operate so closely in today's environment that there is a level of supervision which mitigates that possibility. but, that is, that's a legitimate consideration. >> let me follow with a question. even in your concept of putting the chairman in the chain he would still be supportive of secretary of defense? >> of course. exactly correct. >> so what, practical effect would be injecting him between the service chiefs and service sector? >> no. >> what is the practical effect? >> the pracht call effect is there is an authoritative referee in uniform. at the moment that thor trait tiff referee is either the deputy secretary or the secretary and it seems to me having someone in uniform with executive authority properly supervised contributes to effective activity. >> to your points on both these issues, the general staff, stand alone general staff and chairman and the chain? >> sir, let me

lamb: chris matthews gave a speech back in october 2013.t relates to something you said in the book, and i want you to have a response. matthews: the party went on all afternoon. champagne.ed for it is amazing, this guy ordering of champagne on afternoon, on a weekend. the offers up a big toast, over-the-top. ,if i had a ticket to heaven give awayd not giveo, hell."d i'll go to [laughter] matthews: and they were great friends together despite being political rivals. mr. lamb: is this true? mr. shirley: there's a lot of mythology. if you want bipartisan cooperation, look at bill clinton and newt gingrich. he did not want to cooperate, but did though for political survival. people repeat the stories long enough and it becomes fact. irishmen, one from congress, when the presiden -- one the president. but so is the time and avoi -- thefills the time and avoi void, but it's not true. he did not collaborate that much with tip o'neill. he signed this bill, and can't find against it. gingrich fight against it. there was an insurrection among the re

the bottom line is chris lamb's while does work, there's evidence of that.new generation of military leadership that gets it, i think. we should support that, encourage it. through your oversight, we should mandate it. general schwartz: core question going forward. what mitigates against it, what makes it difficult is the built in structure of the military. this is an organization where one million people get up and that on the same outfit. you have to start cracking that mentality. there is a generational shift. this is not an on and off switch between a highly chaotic silicon valley-like entity. we need to dial that more toward team approaches, international cooperation's, strategic to medications without losing our ability to deliver lethal combat power. >> you spoke about the coast guard having a different model. one of the things i remember after the bp oil spill when they are talking about the response in rescuing people -- not the oil spill, hurricane katrina -- was that the coast guard was very effective in responding both of and on the bp oil spill

but the bottom line is that chris lamb's model does work. there's evidence of that. and there is a new generation of military leadership that gets it, i think. and we should support that, encourage it, and through your oversight, mandate it. mr. stavridis: core question going forward. what makes it difficult is the built-in structure of the military. this is an organization where a million people get up in the morning and put on the same outfit. i mean, this is why we call it uniforms. you've got to start cracking that mentality. we will, i think, general schwartz is spot on, because there is a generational shift. the question here is, this is not an on and off switch between a highly chaotic silicon valley-like entity or a president bush-style military. we need to deal that more toward team approaches, interagency, international cooperation, strategic communication, all of those smart power things, without losing our ability to deliver lethal combat power. i think we can do that. we need to think of it as a thing that's turning in the direction you identified. ms. s

lamb. >> the traditional thinking of having the chairmen in the chain of command as potentials for abuse, for excessive exercise of one's authority. and undermining, as chris laman mentioned, the fundamental principles of civilian authority. that's the downside. and, but i believe that, given my experience, the chairman and the secretary operate so closely in today's environment that there is a level of supervision which mitigates that possibili possibility. but that's a legitimate consideration. >> follow-up question. even in your concept of putting the chairmen in the chain company would still be supportive of the secretar secrf defense? >> of course. that's exactly correct. >> so with the practical effect would be injecting between the service chiefs and the service sector? what is the practical effect? >> the practical effect is that there is an authoritative referee in uniform. at the moment that authoritative referee is either the deputy secretary or the secretary. it seems to me that having someone in uniform with executive authority, properly supervised, contributes to effective activity. >> on both of these issues, the general staff, standalone ge