that is chris patten that as chairman of the bbc trust. mark thompson, who she is shaking hands with their. these pictures recorded a few minutes ago. she is making her first visit to the u.k. in nearly 25 years. miss suu kyi has spent more than two decades before finally being released in november 2010. those are the pictures of aung san suu kyi. earlier today she spoke of the london school of economics and science. then this visit to the bbc and the usual photographs being taken outside the building. she is going to visit the bernese -- burmese people. >> time will not heal. there has to be acknowledgement. how is this acknowledgement going to make -- how is it going to be made? what sort of procedures will we follow? are we going to go for a commission of inquiry, the kind that perhaps will be started by an external body such that as the united nations commission for human rights, or something that will be internal? >> gorda me from the bbc broadcasting house is emily buchanan. just heard a little bit from her. before we get on to the s

and that was when i find out from a think it might've been birmingham, but i can't be certain, chris patten in the opinion polls had seven or 8% behind and chris had copies of that. that's the only time i wavered. but only very briefly then because the next team at the crowds, it was a quite different feel. i may have been delusional, but i thought all the way through that we were going to win that election. i was as clear cut about that as i was about know we were going to be an difficulty in 1997. i thought it was going to be very difficult in 1997. so i generally did believe we're going to win. and as it happens, we got pretty much the biggest plurality of those that any party and had for a very long time. we actually got more votes than any political party in history in 1992. but the distribution of the vote and the knowledge distribution of the can to choose the boundaries meant we only had a majority of 21 despite a huge lead and does and the majority of 21 and so not everyone was steady on parade as we were subsequently to find out. i did think we could win always. >> what is your as

occasion i wavered in that was when i was flying back from birmingham, but i cannot be certain, with chris patten where the opinion polls had this 7%-8% behind. that is the only time i wave it. only very briefly then, because the next day it was a quite different feel. i may have been at delusional, but i thought all the way through that we were going to win that election. i was as clear cut about that as i was about knowing we were going to have difficulty in 1997. so i did generally believe we would win. as it happens, we got pretty much the biggest tragedy -- plurality of votes that any party have had for a very long time. we actually got more votes than any political party in history in 1992, but the distribution of the vote, and amal distribution of the constituency boundaries meant we only had a majority of 21, despite a huge lead in boats, in the majority were not everyone was steady on parade. i did think we would win, always. >> what is your impact of "the sun's " assessment? >> it was over the top. how much did that affect the election? the labor party thought it made a huge difference.