christine griffith again. i want to quickly address some of the points that were raised. he cited that the eir does show how access would occur. that is true. it does show how to access would occur. but it does not show is the impact of traffic on local streets, how garbage trucks and cars that would normally be in the valet area will be parked on already-busy streets. similarly, he cited that the design analyzed in the eir is consistent with the design recently released to the public. if the design was consistent, i wonder why the museum waited to release it until after the eir was certified. in fact, if you look closely, you will see the materials and design are different, and that does affect the visual analysis. the easement referred to was not part of the eir analysis, and thus cannot be a negation measure or mitigating factor for the impact that should be analyzed in that document. the easement that of the moma has offered is not permanent and irrevocable. it's specifically allows unilateral termination. with regard to construction traffic, if the volume of trucks a

my name is christine griffith. i am, an attorney here in san francisco. i am representing kss enterprises, the owner of the w hotel in san francisco, the appellant in this case. we challenge the certification of the eir that was adopted by the planning commission to support the expansion of the museum of modern art. although my client support this project in general, they have concerns about the environmental review that was performed, and the process for the product approval. that is the subject of our appeal. we have submitted letters and appeared at all the hearings on the project. you have all the information in front of you in your packets. we are asking today that you send the eir back to planning for revisions to fill in gaps in its original analysis. we have attempted to work with members from the moma to resolve some of the issues raised by this appeal, but we have not men successful so far in reaching an agreement. to the extent that the supervisors are not ready to send the eir back to planning, we would ask for more time to try to reach an agr

christine griffith again. i want to quickly address some of the points that were raised.cited that the eir does show how access would occur. that is true. it does show how to access would occur. but it does not show is the impact of traffic on local streets, how garbage trucks and cars that would normally be in the valet area will