to break this down, i want to bring in christine harper. our executive editor for finance. rd to read much into this, given the broad-based selloff. you know, were investors cheered by what they saw? christine: what i would read is that citigroup was hurt more than wells fargo. relative play a that people are not happy with citigroup. we have a story out saying that people view the revenue as soft. they like that it is up, but when you dig down, some of it is just from selling assets. that is not really moving forward in a way that they will be able to repeat. another thing, to the point of how city has fallen behind wells fargo. citigroup is shrinking in business. the valuation that the market is putting on what they are doing is very low. they are trading at a faction -- fraction of book value. investors are looking at what they have and saying it is not worth what they say it is worth. wells fargo is growing. even though wells fargo is facing a challenging environment , they are growing in revenue. they are able to keep cost. they have a future that is more positive from