>> on him to give me all documents related to the october meeting between christopher steele and a member of the state department. the lady question took notes about the meeting. in her note, she indicates that steele was urging to get the dossier out before the election and she also in hand written notes, indicates it was paid for by the democratic party, the clinton campaign. the dossier. the most important thing, she transferred the information to the fbi. the fbi october 11, there confidential informant is trying to get the dossier out for political purposes and the state department to get out the democrats paper. not tell the court, state department told them. >> yet, you have jim coming out doing counsel. you got him doing radio shows saying, we did everything right. in fact, i heard him say look, trump said we were after him. if we were after him, why didn't i just we get? i think it's just no big deal to leak the fact the fbi, whatever that is. >> we know christopher steele was trying to get to everybody. christopher steele went to the department of state october 11, urging the st

tonight, and that of course being, yeah, the fbi was totally, completely given the heads up on christopher steele dossier the dossier that steele does not stand behind, and he hated trump. b so why did comey lie when he signed that first fisa application? premeditated quit let not your heart be troubled. laura ingraham, where are you tonight? >> laura: i'm in the swamp. h >> sean: you yelled at me for saying, why do you say every night, i'm coming from the swamp, the sewer. >> laura: now it trips off my tongue. >> sean: in your head like a bad record. >> laura: people down in texas, where you from? i'm from the swamp. i have to stop myself, it's embarrassing. >> sean: it's a small world after all, don't ever go on that ride. you will hate yourself for a week. >> laura: hannity, by the way when the senate intel committee is subpoenaing don jr., okay, my question is, we have t

or not this state department official passed on a memo to the fbi before the fbi swore that christopher steeleeliable witness. if he signed off, if james comey signed off on that, the fisa warrant and the swearing under oath, the swearing to a fisa court that steele was reliable knowing that he was not reliable, isn't he guilty of perjury? >> director comey needs to get an attorney better than he is, because clearly, there's going to be some issues. this is exactly why we have checks and balances of having somebody in power sign off, to insure that no one does the anything up toward. untoward. that is clearly against all rules and takes out any consciousness of trying to be unbiased. dead david and finally, john, how long is it going to take to wipe out the stain of what comey has left behind? >> you know, fortunately, there's men and women while we're sitting here working this very evening keeping this country safe. we rely on the fbi agents, they do a great job. i think the american public recognizes the fbi is noter comey, mccabe, strzok or page. it's men and women working every day. david:

salacious piece of so-called intelligence from her meeting, which was not appropriate, with christopher steele. only problem was the intel was total and complete b.s., which could have easily beenal disproven with any simple level of verification. that never happened. several days later, comey used steele's b.s. as the basis for the fisa request, and he signed the first fisa application. by the way, a request he swore verified. says it at the top of the document, an accurate and true. with more on this developing breaking investigative report, don solomon from "the hill"'s with us. john, wow, this is now three, four separate instances, they were warned directly. >> yeah, and, sean, it is the first time that we know for sure that the fbi was in possession of a piece of intelligence from christopher steele that had been debunked before they went to the fisa court. they weren't in the process of verifying it. they had debunkted it. on october 17, 2017, i went tod the fbi and asked about the same intelligence, what is it? it was being peddled by everybody in the clinton world, there were computer

keep in mind kavalec and ohr met with christopher steele. issuing a warning about the credibility of christopher steele to the fbi, to the doj prior to that first fisa warrant application against carter page to spy on the trump campaign. and still after the election, documents now show that ohr and kavalec were still obsessed with using the dossier. they knew it was phony, to take the president down. on november 21st, 2016, kavalec emailing ohr a link to a "mother jones" left wing magazine article based on the phony hillary bought and paid for russian dossier. ohr emailed back, "ipa really hope we can get something going here. we will take another look atly this." subsequent conspiratorial email to ohr, kavalec gave a reference her meeting notes with christopher steele, 10 days before the first fisa application is put in.is uh-oh, he is political.ap uh-oh, it's not vetted. nobody verified. from the doj to the state department to the fbi, the highest ranking officials -- not rank and file --dash in all areas of obama's government were totally

that is christopher steele. and they are unaware of any derogatory information relating to their informant. thus the important part. they were aware of derogatory information. they have the own deputy assistant secretary of state sing his life. >> dagen: let's be clear about this, this is a warrant to spy on a member of the presidential campaign using a document that was unverified. and we know it's largely discredited. it was paid for by the said presidential candidate's opponent. and jim comey had the gall and the nerve and the stupidity to say that he didn't know the clinton campaign and the dnc paid for it? he said he only found that out through the media. roast most recently he told brer that when his book came out. in the rules, the fbi cited "news reports," that u.s. intelligence officials were investigating allegations similar to the christopher steele ones. it turned out that christopher steele admitted in u.k. proceedings in the spring of 2017 that he had briefed the report, that he had essentially pla

russia gate hoax and once again the focus is on christopher steele what he knew what he was doing with his dossier research what it was all about who was behind the dossier research and who helped propagate the dusty research and i me to the evidence as to the fact that the d.n.c. was colluding with steele was. looting a fusion g.p.s. was colluding with the government of ukraine has come bell is compelling it's absolutely compelling peter you have christopher steele speaking to the u.s. state department and admitting that the was essentially a political hit you have the u.s. state department passing off that information to the f.b.i. to the intelligence sources and what do they do a few days later they get a feisty a warrant based on that dossier based on that dossier after the u.s. state department said that this guy steele cannot be trusted this information that he has this dossier is ridiculous it is political research and i quote pull political research all all the attention now peter is turning on to steal that's right you know. there are a few fox news channel will say many thing

it's absolutely compelling peter you have christopher steele speaking to the u.s. state department and admitting that the was essentially a political hit you have the u.s. state department passing off that information to the f.b.i. and to the intelligence sources and what do they do a few days later they get a feisty a warrant based on that dossier based on that dossier after the u.s. state department said that this guy steele cannot be trusted this information that he has this dossier is ridiculous it is political research and i quote pull political research all all the attention now peter is turning on to steal that's right you know. there are a few fox news channel will say many things that we just heard say in nicosia but you don't hear that on c.n.n. and this n.b.c. and a lot of other mainstream legacy news outlets they prefer to talk about constitutional crisis well it seems to me a crisis of sanity go ahead well it's definitely a crisis of sanity because let me just quote to you one of the headlines from c.n.n. trump with. a great again i mean someone named

it was compiled by christopher steele and fusion gps, and it involves bruce and nellie ohr. here is. watch. >> it's a very unusual situation to have opposition research like that. especially one that, on its face, had a number of clear mistakes and somewhat jejune analysis. to use that to do counterintelligence against a political campaign is a strange -- it would be estranged about men. i'm not sure what role it played but that's something we have to look at. >> harris: and the usual situation paid lawrence? >> lawrence: katie alluded to this in the last block, when bill barr came to the justice department he started to ask questions. he wasn't getting straight answers to these questions. i've got to ask the democrats, when you see something like this between bruce and nellie ohr, do you think that's okay? these interactions of deleting emails, spying on the president, clearly covering up something. is that okay? >> jessica: clearly, spying on the president is problematic. we have christopher wray come a trump appointee, head of the fbi, came out last week and said it wasn'

yes, that christopher steele, the guy who does not stand behind his own dossier, the christopher steele in an interrogatory under the threat of perjury says i don't know if any of this is true. the same steele that was fired by the fbi for lying and leaking, the same steele who was back channeling we know now information to mueller's investigators after being fired through bruce ohr. of course, did you get this to the special counsel? why would you trust a liar and leaguer? mueller concluded the trump campaign did not collude in any way with the russian government. four separate investigations. we can now deduce, steele's so-called intel, he doesn't stand by it. he thinks it's b.s., and it always was. it was james comey, his high-ranking deputies, that swore that the contents were true and accurate and the word verified appears at the very top of the fisa request application. that was in tech carter page to get things trump campaign and transition and all things as president. this is why i've been calling it the biggest abuse of power, corruption scandal in our history. just to recap: t

his sealing a document from the state department that reveals all that they knew about the christopher steelend his nonsense fraudulent dossier that they used to get spying warrants. >> yeah, christopher wray, people had great hope for him. i was hoping he would come in and clean out the bad actors in the fbi. but instead what he has done has gone on and continued to perpetuate the improprieties that were started by the people before him. he, for example, not only sealing a document that showed how bad the fbi had been acting criminally, potentially, but i go back to the fact, as i asked peter strzok about it -- you remember when frank rucker came as the investigator for the intel community ig and he told you they had proof positive that hillary clinton's private server was hacked and he said something like well, you know, i remember him coming over. by the way, those records have disappeared that showed what rucker told them. but christopher wray has continued to perpetuate the lie by saying -- issuing a statement last year, well, we still have never seen anything -- any evidence that her se

christopher steele, he is the ex british spy that compiled the whole dossier.ike it was out of the national enquirer. that was the dossier that our fbi used, by the way, paid for by hillaryclinton's team , used to get a fisa warrant on carter page to spy on the trump campaign. so you know there's a lot of questions and this is something attorney general bar is trying to get to the bottom of and john durham certainly is. but now christopher steele who by the way, collaborated with the fbi in the past, is saying he will not give them any information about what actually went down. i guess that leads to more questions. a big show tomorrow night. i do hope you to an end. the man we recognize in the free world, recognizes as the president of venezuela, juan guaido, is here exclusively! also tomorrow, china global television news anchor, will be joining us live from beijing. beijing and caracas, big night! kennedy: is a big night every night here, thank you, trish! the battle between president trump and joe biden is going into overdrive. the commander-in-chief now ope

bruce ohr is blaming the doj and fbi officials for ignoring his warning about christopher steele and the dossier. that was in august of 2016. james comey is trashing strzok and page on national tv and he and rod rosenstein are attacking each other's character. andrew mccabe is attacking anybody with a pulse. it's crisis mode for the deep state. it's every man and woman for themselves. even comey's former general counsel at the fbi, james baker, he's trying to get ahead of this story by warning that horowitz is going to uncover some major mistakes in the fisa process. you think? take a look. >> the inspector general is looking at everything that we did. if the i.g. finds mistakes and i expect it to happen this time. at least from the intent of the people that i dealt with, there was no intention to do anything wrong or illegal. >> sean: mistakes? like using untrue, something that is unverifiable, russian misinformation, propaganda, outright lies? paid for by hillary clinton to literally inform the american people because it was leaked to "the washington post," david corn as the very b

fusion gps then hired christopher steele, former british intelligence officer, to

the fbi knew good and well that christopher steele had a lot of problems. i will say something else about steele. it's called the steele dossier. it's really just clinton opposition research. once we get to the bottom of this, what we will find is that steele as a small role in actually crafting this. these really were the perverted fantasies of simpson working with the clinton campaign to say what can we draw appear that we can spread lies to the american people, that we can feed into the fbi, and let's get an investigation going.ca that's really what happened here. >> sean: and comey's acting cute with the word "spy." he just signed a warrant. i know he thinks that he is a tsuper patriot and smarter than we smelly walmart people. is there any doubt in your mind that those who signed the dash those us fisa applications, that they knew well that thatri information was false and unverifiable? speak of the people that were building those applications had to have known that there were p. we have evidence. we have a smoking gun. we have emails now according to

and when we look at it, it's christopher steele who basically got his information from the russians. that was paid for by the opposition political party and the democratic national committee. now we see the democrats are trying to gear up for impeachment. there's absolutely no evidence. first of all that the president or anyone in his campaign or any american committed any crime. and you can't obstruct if there was no crime to commit. >> sean: isn't it the reverse professor? you are a great defense attorney. but if you have the evidence to indict, isn't that the reverse of what should happen in terms of creating a cloud of suspicion despite the lack of evidence? >> absolutely. first of all no prosecutor could ever say that a person is guilty because prosecutors only hear one side of the case. you don't have their cross examine, there no defense number, they ask if there is sufficient evidence to indict. let's move it to the next step. then we can determine whether a crime was committed. >> sean: remember, people like nadler wanted out of the independent counsel statute. they got it.

well, what did christopher steele do with the money he was paid by the democratic national committee the hillary clinton campaign? he goes in context kgb and fsb agents in moscow to say the do you have anything dirty to say about donald trump? >> sean: i think the evidence is overwhelming. hillary clinton violated espionage act. she had the intent when she deleted bleach bid my beat up devices with hammers and pulled sim cards. the intent for underlying espionage act. i believe the dossier, "new york times" might be onto something that russian disinformation. that was the bulk of information for fisa and one way to spy on the trump campaign and another, approaching papadopoulos, clovis and others. and page. and that to me would be fraud in the courts. and then they use the same line, russian dis- information with that underweight elected president to take him out. i mean, karl rove. >> karl: and today booker is sagging and acting as if nothing ever happened with christopher steele going to moscow, calling up his pals in moscow, got in need are on trump? same with kamala harris. she j

if the state department figure out that christopher steele, in a 45-minute meeting, was giving them falses overtly political and violating an fbi agreement, you would think those counterintelligence investigators who gave us this warrant and this two-and-a-half year investigation could have figured it out before they went to the fisa court. it's remarkable for what it says about the state of the fbi at that moment. lou: the political deadline that steele not only acknowledged, but insisted be met by all parties whether at the state department, whether at the fbi, this on its face is a problem. one would think a determinant problem for anyone who came into contact with him. he looks worse by the today and so does the fbi in nearly every way. >> yep, sadly. and that does a lot of great work for this country every day, but this was a period of time period in time where the leadership, particularly in the counterintelligence division and the deputy director and the former director, or comey and mccabe, where the fbi got hijacked for a political dirty trick, and that should concern us all. lou

there was never any credible evidence to start it and then using christopher steele and, yes, he saidll look into t hillary clinton's payments for russian information to harm her political rival. the fisa abuse, lying to a fisa court. and don't forget james comey stealing government documents and leaking them to unauthorized individuals. so i think the first thing that is going to happen in the next 45 days is the inspector general's report. and i don't think it is possible that criminal referrals will not emanate from that. so people like james comey, mccabe, peter strzok, page, don't forget brennan, clapper. i think they are all in legal jeopardy now. >> sean: we also know from peter strzok and lisa page, closed-door testimony, this walks right into the attorney general under obama, loretta lynch's office, and frankly, right into the oval office. isara, but i will let your general comments go. >> absolutely, sean, they are going to look at a very expansive investigation into this. this is not just a fraud perpetrated on the foreign intelligence surveillance court. and the fisa abuse

they met with christopher steele. >> juan: no. >> lisa: yes they did, juan. it's fact. go look it up. i would love to know about the obama administration's duration in it because we know trump officials were unmasked with michael flynn and that information was leaked that information with kislyak. we know the obama administration changed the way intel could be shared on his way out so it could be more easily disseminated and we know susan rice had sent that email to herself on inauguration day memorialize ago prior meeting happened obama wanted everything by the book. >> i want to answer juan's question more specifically in the idea that we had -- you pointed out these folks reaching out from russia trying to interfere. and one big question is why didn't no one go and tell trump that they thought that people on his campaign were working with russia as they did with dianne feinstein? and the answer we always gout to that was that they thought he might be involved. and well, what makes you think he might be involved? we were going to eventually see the evidence that he pe

court in octobero of 2016, they knew all kinds of things about the author of that dossier, christopher steele. they knew he was desperate.do this was communicated by bruce ohr to the fbi. he was desperate to stop trump. they did not tell the court that information. do not tell the court who paid for the document, namely, the clinton campaign. those are key questions that we need answers to. the good news is, bill barr is doing an investigation and i think is going to get the answers. >> sean: we know that between the inspector general, between now mr. jerome, now the attorney general, and others, te avalanches coming. you know it more than i do. i wish he would sneak the information to me but you kind of -- you are like marco. you don't give me what i want to know. thank you so much, jim jordan. when we come back, the great one, mark levin. he is chomping at the bit about what happened today, and the democrats and what they are planning. he will join us next on this busy breaking news night. stay with us. ♪ and it really shows. with all that usaa offers why go with anybody else? we know their

everybody should be transparent about the process. >> including christopher steele? >> yes. i think the dossier is out there. >> you are entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts. as it pertains to christopher steele he wants to run and hide because he was at the center of the document, violations, a presidential campaign and the heat of it. a very big deal. shannon: i think that is it. great to have you both back. european leaders see the nationalist movement taking their content by storm, frightening and anti-semitic. angela merkel and steve bannon speaking out tonight. >> the rise of nationalism and these leaders put this together so they have a critical mass in european parliament. shannon: next, live, with his analysis. ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ ♪ applebee's new loaded fajitas. now that's eatin' good in the neighborhood. >> there is to this day not a single day care center for jewish children, no school for jewish children that does not need to be guarded by german policeman. shannon: donald trump heading to britain for his official state visit and is european election results are

they launder the information to christopher steele. and the most important take away that we found out this week which i'm astonished the mainstream media even in their hackery hasn't picked up is that christopher steele actually told a state department person 10 days before the fisa that his sources were two russian disinformation specialists intimately linked to vladimir putin. it is an amazing story that the media completely missed this week. >> you know, besides what the media missed or intentionally misses or wants to mislead us. i mean the truth is that they are going after each other right now. and as far as i'm concerned, we now have james comey coming out of the woods. he has not been around for a while. we've all of these tweets of him in the woods in loving nature and he talks about you know, being in the was, think is probably looking for hillary. but he talks about after bill barr testified he said look, we've got to bring together a team. spying took place, and there is a basis for concern. and i've got both authorized su

but the intel community presented christopher steele as being credible when they applied for a warrant to spy on trump now and durham will no doubt be looking into whether or not that is legal now let's also not forget that chuck schumer waived his fist on behalf of american spying agencies take on the intelligence community they have 6 ways from sunday at getting back atcha everything related to the trump russia investigation seems to be a widely contested the words presented by one side are presented is false by the other side and amid all these allegations of dishonesty biased partisanship we're expected to believe by both wings of the establishment that what they are saying about russia and their allegations that it meddled in the 2016 elections is absolutely true. well i guess the american people will have to decide what they want to believe caleb mup and r.t. new york and this kind of mention that the new investigation does seem to raise standards about the investigate says but not about the findings in particular about the conclusion that moscow into faith with the u.s. election

that christopher steele went to the department of state on october the 11th to try to get the departmentf state to release the dossier to the public for political reasons. they tell the fbi, this is ten days before they get the first warrant application verified. so ten days before they applied for the fisa warrant, they were told in august that steele's out to get trump. in october, steele goes to the state department trying to get them to release it to the public for a political reason. >> sean: you know, you can't even make this up. >> yeah. >> sean: i understand there is a florida case and we might get information from steele, but we do know in the interrogatory where he was under the threat of perjury, he actually said i have no idea if any of this is true, 50/50 at best. doesn't that then render the dossier, the dirty russian dossier unverifiable? >> why is the support and? we should all be concerned if our government is getting a warrant against an american citizen what do we know? without accurate information. without the dossier, the warrant would not have been issued. people in

trump now a full 10 days before they applied for the warrant they were already questioning christopher steele's credibility and here's some language from a memo that surfaced. there is a technical human operation run out of moscow targeting the election payments to those recruited and made out of the russian consulate in miami it is important to note that there is no russian consulate in miami but the intel community presented christopher steele as being credible when they applied for a warrant to spy on trump now durham will no doubt be looking into whether or not that is legal now let's also not forget that chuck schumer waived his fist on behalf of american spying agencies take on the intelligence community they have 6 ways from sunday of getting back after everything related to the trump russia investigation seems to be a widely contested the words presented by one side are presented is false by the other side and amid all these allegations of dishonesty biased partisanship we're expected to believe by both wings of the establishment that what they are saying about russia and their allegati