part number 1 was to exploit the dossier which had been pinned by christopher steele. the fbi was unable to verify, they tried mightedly but you can't verify something that doesn't exist, simply a lie. but part of the plan was to leak it to the media and they assumed that the media would run crazy with the story, it would damage trump politically and ensure hillary clinton's election in november of 2016 and while it's true that many members of the media did pick up in the story, it didn't quite gain traction and resinate with american voters when trump was elected but the insurance policy was plan b, the insurance policy famous from the peter strzok-lisa page text message, we have an insurance policy, the insurance policy was the fbi's investigation that if donald trump won, we would kick it into overdrive and really go after him and make our investigation of him as, you know, potential or alleged russian asset public and, in fact, they did it in january of 2017 before he was sworn into office, comey, clapper, brennan, you know, concocted this plan to ambush trump at t

but that was just public information anybody could find on the internet. >> did christopher steele or brennan did they use allies to handle this in these dark spots that they could wash their hands that the information was dredged up to stop trump? >> the cia under john brenna brennan, they are not allowed under us law to spy on american citizens. they are prohibited. >> but it's strange how they are able to. >> but they did and are outsourced to foreign governments and foreign countries. they were able to do are some key people in the trunk campaig campaign. they were minor figures. so they could feed them information to be used to justify their investigation for go they used confidential informants like long time cia asset. and the fbi or cia, we are not sure, since in the fbi analyst under a fake name who is described as a sexy blonde to seduce george papadopoulos who is a minor peripheral volunteer junior advisor on the drop on - - trunk campaign so what they did get was intimidating information because there wasn't they got exculpatory information which would then was hidden in t

also, the author of hillary clinton's dirty russian dossier, christopher steele himself.s is big news tonight. now the walls seem to finally be caving in and we are going to get to the truth. one of these four men, what do they have in common? they all possess a rage and psychotic hatred for all things donald trump and two, they should all be very, very nervous tonight because u.s. attorney john durham, bill barr, they're pushing to add to the truth. one other good sign that durham and his investigation is gaining serious traction. you have his current colleague at msnbc, that would be area 51. ross dwelley rachel maddow, mst and c, they're trying to spend the upcoming findings. they know it's going to be bad with a brand-new conspiracy theory. they were peddling conspiracy theories, lies, propaganda, misinformation, day after day, week after week, month after month. went on for years. in other trying to prepare themselves for one the real truth is coming out. let's take a look. >> it seems like they're going to use the power of the u.s. justice department to help them ma

christopher steele? i think i've heard that name before. it's those kinds of answers that makes you seriously doubt the credibility of comey. >> host: so if jim comey who really brings ruin to the reputation of the fbi, that's undeniable, but then you have this question about the policies, using your power to stop trump, to push this russia hoax. what, who hires andy mccabe to be the deputy -- [laughter] in this process? like, how does the cast of characters around james comey come together? is that his doing? is it an internal process where it was just kind of inevitable? because how do all these people with left-wing politics and animus toward the duly elected president, how do they all get into the upper echelon? that can't happen by anything other than purpose. >> guest: comey surrounded himself with sycophants, and it didn't matter their qualifications. so i've talked to several former top fbi officials who said mccabe was in the qualified to be -- was not qualified to be deputy fbi director and eventually acting fbi director. >> host:

christopher steele? i have heard that name. but those kinds of answers that makes you seriously doubt the credibility of comey. >> so he really ruins the reputation of the fbi. >> but then you have questions about policies and the power to stop trump with the russia hoax so who hires andrew mccabe to be the deputy? [laughter] how does the cast of characters around james comey come togethe together? is that an entrant - - an internal process? because how do all these people with left wing politics and animus to the duly elected president get into the upper echelon? that doesn't happen then by purpose. >> comey surrounded himself with sycophants it doesn't matter their qualification so i spoke to former top fbi officials who said mccabe was not qualified to be deputy fbi director even though with politics 21st century america but even this question to have a spouse who is so politically active in the commonwealth of virginia. you think they would say that he should have recused himself. >> eventually did but it was too late at th

first of all, we have christopher steele, who we know is working for a russian oligarch olig f derigaska. we have the producers of the steele dossier from fusion gps they were also working for russian oligarchs. of course, the press has picked up on none of these things. these are the different things that they turned a blind eye, and instead they fabricate relations and alliances between the trump team and all sorts of figures. >> l laura: i went back and looked at some of the liberals who were writing about schiff and this guy, pasternak, who did some fund-raisers for him. nothing illegal about doing fund-raisers for him, but liberals were kind of concerned that someone like schiff would be going after -- would be the one they choose to go after trump. because schiff was, at that time, a middle-of-the-road, even trending toward more of a, you know, war hawk. raytheon pac had given him some money at that point. the liberals weren't all that wild about the idea of this schiff character pushing the trump narrative, because they thought, he's kind of a pro-military expenditure, ra-ra get m

. >> the allegations in this christopher steele dossier, you went through the timeline very well a fewents ago, are stunning. >> there are substantial portions of what was in the steele dossier that has checked out. >> based on our reporting and numerous sources, the dossier is in fact far from bogus. >> we're going have to stop calling it the infamous dossier. it's the accurate dossier. it's the damning dossier. it's the dossier that's going to hang around the neck of the trump administration and drag them down. >> oh, the dossier. it was totally fine. in case you've forgotten, you may have, because why would you remember, but christopher steele who wrote the dossier was a foreign intelligence operative. he gathered his material abroad in foreign countries, some of it clearly from foreign government officials. at the time, that was absolutely fine with democrats. they weren't embarrassed to say so. we'll give you millions. here's the tweet. i regret i didn't know about christopher steele's hiring in preelection. if i had, i would have volunteered to go to europe and try to help him. o

part number one was to exploit the dossier which was penned by christopher steele and the fbi was unable to verify. they tried but you can't verify something that doesn't exist that is simply a pernicious live. part of the plan was to leak it to the media and they assumed they would run crazy with the story and damage him politically to ensure hillary clinton's election. and while it's true that many members of the media did pick up the story didn't quite gain traction and resonate with american voters when he was elected but the insurance policy was plan b famous when he sent that text message we have the insurance policy that was the fbi investigation that if donald trump one we will kick it into overdrive and really go after him and make our investigation of him for potential alleged russian asset public. and they did. and they did. . . . . >> watch all of the in-depth reporting on it and everything else. in all of this work that hillary clinton campaign, all of these things that we've come to know, is there any truth to any of these things that donald trump did and that he had any ki

wanting the oligarch to set up a private meeting with none other than christopher steele without any of his republican colleagues on the committee, knowing what they are doing or what they accused trump of. actually texted the lobbyist for the oligarch, i would like to do a preliminary call. you, me, no one else. you, me, no one else.1 warner also texting not have a paper tale with his messages colluding with the russians. senator indicating he be willing to travel abroad, to meet with steele to get the dirt on trump and manafort. what they are blaming trump of! not a good look for someone who disavows all foreign election interference, and he's not the only democratic senator guilty of which they are accusing trump of. send letters from senator menendez, durbin, lahey, they threaten to withhold aid if the government of ukraine stopped investigating trump on the trump-russia side. meeting with ukraine's new president zelensky, democratic senator chris murphy threatened to cut off u.s. aid if the president down the country opens an investigation to biden. do not forget politico's repo

we've known for some time it's been publicly reported that the dossier, or the hiring of christopher steele, was initially on the behalf of one the republican candidates and later on behalf of democratic candidates. that application and those renewals have been vindicated in substantial part by carter page's own words. well, i certainly think he's acting like someone whose compromise and it very very well may be that he's compromised by the russians who have information on him. >> according to christopher steele, and former british intelligence officer who has reportedly been held in high regard by u.s. intelligence, russian sources tell him that paige had a secret meeting with ceo gas giant russ net. offered brokerage fees on a deal involving a 19% share of the company. i hear what you want. i have a favor i want from you, though. and i'm going to say this only seven times and so you better listen good. i want you to make up dirt on my political opponent and understand lots of it. on this and on that. >> sean: he is a liar. he is a pathological -- frankly, congenital liar. it's not just ab

fusion gps is work with christopher steele through the department of justice and nellie ohr through fusionthey are coming out with a book, the title should be confessions of conspirators or something like that. lou: they will never confess. confession or atonement on the part of any of these corrupt actors in the justice department or fbi. fusion gps is in the private sector. paying more than a million in 2016 to investigate trump. fusion paid steele $170,000. they should be writing a business book because those are the margins any enterprise would want to achieve. how in the world is it that no one laid a glove or announced an intention to investigation fusion gps and its founders? >> i don't know. it should be on the list of things to do at the justice department. remember they were paid over $3 million by dianne feinstein's former chief of staff who managed to raise $50 million following the elections to continue to fund fusion gps and push the russia hoax. so it just goes on and on. >> explain to me why the chairman of the senate judiciary committee, senator lindsey graham is not inves

fiona hill it turns out she also had a working relationship with christopher steele, the author of theous, fraudulent dossier. this is a very small world we are watching encamp on the shores of the to tomorrowic. it seems like everyone, people working in schiff's office. we find out there are cia officers. they come? twos apparently, and none of them have first-hand evidence. but they are trotted out as star witnesses. this gets more bizarre by the day. >> it does. and mr. schiff is in it up to his sigh balls. he was meeting with glenn simpson in aspen a couple years ago. he has his fingers in all parts of this operation. fusion gps is at the epicenter of it all, working with christopher steele helping run the back channels of the fbi and the department of justice through nellie ohr and fusion gps. they should come out with a book "confessions of conspirators." lou: we have not seen confessions or atonement on the part of any of these corrupt actors in the justice department or fbi, fusion gps at least is a departure in the private sector. perkins coie paying a million 16 to investigat

nothing about the christopher steele allegation warranted the activity it got.ve this fisa extend three times. people need to know that getting a fisa is not an easy thing to do. once you get it and it's approved. it then takes a certain amount of time to get installed. before you have much of that fisa running, you have to go back and work on rejustifying it. to do that you have to have new information that builds on the previous information. two years after the mueller report and millions of dollars. there is no other information. so it's going to be interesting to see how they were able to you justify this three times and keep it going. and you know, we already know there is a lot of anomalies in the way the steele information, the fisa was handled. trish: that was paying for foreign intel, let's be clear. they hired a foreigner, christopher steele who called up all his buddies in russia, got information from them, airport was bought and paid for by hillary clinton's campaign. that was opposition research conducted on foreign soil right there. >> to add to th

director of national intel james clapper, former fbi special agent peter strzok, and british x spy christopher steelesource is also telling fox news if the rumors are true than the findings in his review will blast the conduct of the fbi's russia investigation and justify drums warnings about the deep state. jenny ma to mike joining me nows mike huckabee and chris swecker former fbi assistant director, how significant are these reports that he is closing in on particular individuals connected to how this whole travesty started? >> he is a bulldog and i think it spells trouble but probably more as well when you incorporate the fisa abuse and potential abuse by some members of the intelligence community who aren't accustomed to be held accountable and accustomed to be held up to the daylight because most of what they do is in secret. i think john durham and a very incapable investigator jack eckenrode and bill barr are getting to the bottom of things that we need to get to the bottom of. >> laura: john brennan i think it was back on august, excuse me, october 3rd -- he expressed his concern that bill b

our viewers why this is so important because everyone thinks someone wrote the dossier named christopher steele. >> right. >> laura: is that necessarily the case? first of all i want to thank the gentleman next to me for the deep digging he did to come up with some information for us. because it would appear, obviously, they should be the coffin in the mail for the russian. if this took lace within the fbi so from hillary clinton to infusion gps to the fbi's, where they actually wrote the dossier, no wonder christopher steele seems to know so little about it. it was like mueller and his interview, he didn't seem to know much about that either. so this is really huge, in my opinion, and i want to think this man for doing it. >> laura: so almost certainly an author like the primary author of the protodossier. >> right, there are some documents i found which i describe in 2016 this is a month before the first steel report. this protodossier as i call it in the book, this describes opposition research and slipping into the trump ties to russia. it is the skeleton of what later became known as the s

i deny i didn't know about christopher steele's hiring preelection if i had i would have agreed to goeurope and try to help him. okay. and by the way if foreign interference is such a concern and by the tway should be a concern, then why aren't we more worried about foreign companies sending de facto bribes to the family members of connected politicians? there are a lot of those. we are picking on joe biden's son because he is in the news. it could be a lot of people's sons. trust me. s in the case of biden's son, nobody thinks is he expert on ukrainian energy policy. he got the gig because of his dad who was influence peddling, obviously. in this case that's okay though for some reason to believe. be totally honest. let's stop lying if we can for a second. i know it's hard in america where everyone is required to lie all the time. in washington there are no actual rules. partisans simply invent standards for the purpose of destroying their political enemies. just today hillary clinton tweeted this from the late democratic member of congress. this quote if the impeachment provision in

matter which party would do this, if you give certain evidence to a secret court, like the christopher steele information which turned out to be whatever want to call it today. i will let you use the legal term where you think it needs to be inserted about the material from christopher steele. the fbi determined he wasn't someone they were going to further get information from. if it is given to the court, should we know about that process? if they are being given wrong information or false information, how do you hold accountable those who gave it if you didn't know what was happening. >> i think you hold the fbi agents or whoever it was who submitted the material to a court accountable if they knew or they should have known that was bad information. in many cases i think judges do push a little bit. they say what is the provenance of the information? how do we know what's good? where did you get it? is there reason we want want to be distressful? you rely on the good faith of fbi agents but even if that doesn't work, they are submitting it with the signature either authenticating it, submit

christopher steele? i've heard that name before .answers make you question the credibility. >> so he really brings rack and ruin to the reputation of the fbi so this question of the policy using power to stop trump to push this, so who hires andrew mccabe to be the deputy? [laughter] how does that cast of characters around james comey come together? is that an internal process where it is inevitable? because how do all these people with left-wing politics and animus toward the newly elected president get into the upper echelon? that cannot happen other than purpose. >> comey surrounded himself with sycophants and it didn't matter their qualifications so i talked to several former officials that andrew mccabe was not qualified to be deputy fbi director and then as acting fbi director. i have a spouse that's involved in politics a lot of people that even this question being politically active in the commonwealth of virginia you would think the ig's the optics of that is not great. >> he should have recused himself and he eventually did

the dirty russian dossier with funneled money hiring an operation research group and an am i christopher steele there. as "the new york times" called it, russian disinformation from the get-go and then it was used of course to spy on the trump campaign transition and even the president of the united states one of numerous ways, this president has dealed with things that no other president ever had to deal with before. now with the ukrainian collusion. in 2016, a dnc contractor was paid hundreds of thousands of dollars. why? to pressure ukraine and ukrainian officials to dig up dirt on donald trump and trash his campaign and as an added bonus, oh, we do have four u.s. senators let's see, mendez, murphy, lady oh, dick durbin. they are all on records running threatening the government of ukraine with untold consequences that if they don't comply with their anti-trump demands and their investigation witch hunt from the russia issue. where is all the hysteria over that those? quid-pro quo close? for example, hillary paid for influence thend campaign. nobody said aa thing after she stole a primary, r

so you had christopher steele former british spy calling all his buddies in russia. you have to look at the information gathered overseas on this round. and putting together a so-called dossier. it seems the fbi thought was credible enough to actually spy on members of the campaign. and that's hugely troubling in so many ways. and for the governments we are in the democracy and the system we are. >> that's exactly right. it would appear that some at the top of the fbi collaborated to make up the evidence so to speak, and then sought to investigate as legitimate intelligence. i think that's where bar and durham -- i think -- i also think it's interesting that it's opened up as a criminal case before talking to brennan, comey, clapper, et cetera. who has the attorney general been talking to? when he brings those folks in what kind of information is going to be verified. those folks i think would be very concerned this evening. trish: i'm sure there are a lot of democrats who are really nervous. this is not going to play so well for them. they are trying to say this is

in just a couple of questions about something that the sender, christopher steele his dossier. so mr. mckay, if you would would you be able to see with best estate 50 but the fbi verified in whose dossier before using it. i've heard generally that specifically what was verified in the dossier before it was used. it also if there's an explanation for why in these applications, the fbi didn't just see directly or indirectly, that christopher steele is being paid by the clinton campaign. a lot of caveats and footnotes but i was just wondering if you'd be able to answered those two questions. >> the answered to your first question is no. i will not go into specifics of today about the with the fbi verified prior to or after. in answered to your second question is i will wait is i'm sure you will eagerly to see what mr. harwood his conclusions are the report. that is a matter that he is i assume at the center, is at center of the investigation am anxious to see what his thoughts are on it. is you've mentioned, there was an extensive and detailed explanation inserted by the departmen

i had a couple questions about something that's at the center of it which is christopher steele's dossiermr. mccabe, if you would, would you be able to say with specificity what the fbi verified in the dossier before using it in the applications. her generally, ever generalities but specifically what was verified in the dossier before it was used and also if there is an explanation for why in the five applications the fbi didn't just say, directly or indirectly, that christopher steele was being paid by the clinton campaign. there are a lot of caveats and a lengthy footnote but i was just wondering if you'd be able to answer those two questions. >> the answer to your first question is no. i will not go into specificity about the what fbi verified prior to the fight that we are after an answer to your second question is, i will wait until he relieved to see what mr. horowitz's conclusions are in that report. i'm anxious to see what his thoughts on it are. as you mentioned, there was an extensive and detailed explanation inserted by the department of justice into that fives a package that e

that hillary clinton paid her lawyer fusion gps to get dirt on trump from a foreign person, christopher steele, so he's a foreigner. >> josh, let me tie this back to poll in our conversation,d are you concerned about foreign interference in the elections or does it not bother you? >> it's going to happen and you are a fool if you think it's not going to happen, so the key is being fair about both sides doing it, i think is the question here, it's not if it's going to happen, how to be fair about it to be fair. i think that's the question. >> okay reid wilson. >> painteresting point. the cybersecurity experts who pay attention to this and foreign policy experts say josh is probably right, they'll be some effort at foreign interference and i'm not talking about rudy giuliani or anything like that, efforts to change the way we as americans think about our politicians and maybe even change the way we think about voting and whether or not it is safe and secure. these are worrying numbers. only half of us think that our election system is -- elections will be open and fair. i mean, this whole system

kennedy: that is wrong, i will give you that, so is using fbi asset christopher steel to drum up information from the kremlin. kremlin. >> would people on left any american, prefer we not investigate this? what if people sitting here ready to attack this country electoral process a year from today, we have the opportunity too find them, stop them, we have a new president, zelensky saying i am against corruption, can you please fine them or be we it don't investigate and a year from now, same people would attack. >> deroy, deroy,. kennedy: okay. >> fbi. mueller -- >> everyone is saying, guess what there is no -- >> john brennan did they say that? >> yes. >> i think you are mocking -- >> but you know -- >> no antipatriotic antiamerican hack. >> everyone is deep state except trump, you are kidding me? >> a new president. >> dedicated to fighting corruption. would you look into this, find out who people who tapped into our election make sure they don't do it again. >> juan. kennedy: attack trump for not investgating. investgating. >> same people screaming why didn't you investigate it. kennedy:

we know christopher steele was not a u.s. citizen.pposedly gathering information from russia and other non-u.s. certain seasons. we knee non-' u.s. citizens were involved in setting up george papadopoulos. there are a lot of questions to be asked overseas. we know the obama administration went to the same ukrainian government and asked them for information just like president trump did about paul manafort. that's not necessarily wrong, it's not wrong for the president to ask for information. it wasn't wrong for the obama administration. but it raises a lot of questions and they are obligated to go investigate. trish: trying to figure out what happened in 2016. you have got the democrats saying the russians manipulated the election. donald trump is saying, i'm innocent. and the mueller report prove that. he's trying to figure out what did happen in 2016 and who was intentionally trying to conspire against him or members of his team. he has a right to know, and the american people have a right to know. but i have a feeling a lot of peop

we were accepting information, from christopher steele who is a foreign former spy for mi6. he was funneling information, that information was well-known to the cia in london. of that information was well known to those fbi agents that went there and spread these malicious lies. what do we know now? we know none of it was verified. this dossier they used to target president trump and his administration and his campaign, that was based on lies and it was handed over to the fisa court and the foreign intelligence surveillance court said this has been verified, the fbi handed it to us, now we know that isn't the case. john brennan, james comey, james clapper, they are a disgrace. this was a soft coup against president trump. >> laura: another member is very nervous about john durham's expanded investigation. >> what the then commander-in-chief president obama told us to do which was to assemble all the reporting that we could that we had available to us and put it in one report -- it's disconcerting to be investigated for having done our duty and done what we were told to do by

to talk about russian collusion, let's talk about the simpson infusion gps, let's talk about christopher steel, let's talk about the fact that document on an american citizen in order to get insight into the president's campaign. the money was laundered through the law firm and the infusion gps into the higher for the nature and. at the absurdity of it all after one side is investigated but not the other is really disappointing for someone like myself who has been a prosecutor or judge for 30 years. i mean, it is just nonsensical. >> host: you take that further by writing the following why isn't the chie chief justice ofe united statesis supreme court reviewing what is painfully obvious to the nation but a make-believe story paid for by hillary clinton written by the former operative became the basis just by on the trump campaign. >> further thoughts on washington journal, c-span. but as you see you get six to seven democrat callers to one republican. caey are just as bad as the cnn. they are talking just as much as anybody. so enjoy it while you can because you probably won't be invited back.

who is this character, he seems to have a lot of connections with a lot of other people like christopher steelend others that were involved in early stages of the infamous dossier. >> who is this guy? >> we need to learn about that. once upon a time the democrats were about finding everything that had to do with the russia collusion and smaller report but now suddenly they don't want to know everything, they learned enough, they think it is too much, too far to go. you have attorney general bar and mister durham doing their job by getting into the weeds to figure out how this thing started, something mueller should have done but didn't and they have got to get to the bottom of it and i'm glad to know they are going to do that, find out how this started. >> a lot of reporting out there that that is what the attorney general and us attorney durum is doing in italy allegedly was looking into him, trying to get information about what role he played, where he is now. >> he is a big mystery figure, like a dimestore novel guy. the main thing, i have evidence to suggest he was working for the democrats

what was done, papadopoulos was a set up, you had christopher steele, you had hillary's people, didn't put in a phis application, a material fact that goes into impartiality, to survey all in american citizen and the civil libertarians on the left are like, that's fine! i've never seen anything like this. >> it's not fine and the one thing out there that rises to the level of severity that was raised during the nixon impeachment and the involvement of the cia during watergate. anybody who equates anything else with regard to the trump administration is apparently the flavor of the month not to say this is as bad as watergate or worse than watergate. that's flat out wrong. the president is right about the deep state. this one should be of concern to every american. this is a real problem. >> laura: we had a duly elected president of the united states and because he's -- he is revolutionary in the way he approaches issues but he doesn't worry about protocol that all the old elites use but he doesn't care about how much they love china, how much they love making money and all the endless

so you had christopher steele former british spy calling all his buddies in russia. you have to look at the information gathered overseas on this round. and putting together a so-called dossier. it seems the fbi thought was credible enough to actually spy on members of the campaign. and that's hugely troubling in so many ways. and for the governments we are in the democracy and the system we are. >> that's exactly right. it would appear that some at the top of the fbi collaborated to make up the evidence so to speak, and then sought to investigate as legitimate intelligence. i think that's where bar and durham -- i think -- i also think it's interesting that it's opened up as a criminal case before talking to brennan, comey, clapper, et cetera. who has the attorney general been talking to? when he brings those folks in what kind of information is going to be verified. those folks i think would be very concerned this evening. trish: i'm sure there are a lot of democrats who are really nervous. this is not going to play so well for them. they are trying to say this is

he did call british agents and get them involved and interesting to know christopher steel, and thats the rumor for over a year. everything democrats accused donald trump of doing, investigating a political rival with a foreign country, all the same questions should be asked of democrats. rob: the president and his supporters waved two high-profile reports, one on anti-trump bias. and the fisa warrant, back in 2016. fox news alert, iraq warning the united states any troops leaving syria are not allowed into their country. the statement contradicts mark esper who said those soldiers will travel to iraq to continue operations against isis. more than 700 troops being pulled from syria in its entirety, the president defended his decision telling sean hannity time to come home. >> they were supposed to be there 30 days, they were there for ten years but it is time to bring our soldiers home. rob: the us cease-fire deal with turkey expires today. the senate foreign relations committee will hold a hearing today on the turkey syria conflict. >> bernie sanders found something they can agree o

ukraine or macedonia or russia for opposition research, say, that did secretary clinton know that christopher steele millions by the dnc . >> she did not know about that project until after the election, i know there is no one will believe it. kennedy: that is weird. >> not weird, you pay your legal team to do what they do. kennedy: that is what they do with the money? with millions of dollars. >> -- >> hold on, i am glad you brought it up, the millions of dollar paid to her law firm were legal fees. kennedy: that is how -- >> hold on, hold on. we could have a another show about how lawyer bill their china, what of paid to go, programs os -- gps was 200,000. kennedy: paid to steel was more. rear running out of time, secretary clinton said they are going to have to run in third party, as a libertarian, and nonaffiliated voter, i find that offensive, i know people who are liberty minded who are not running to upset the election, they have a set of principles they ar tellinger -- tethered to was gary johnson a russian asset. >> jill stein voters, she had a few million in 1 1/2% changed their vote we w

elizabeth: it has been delayed to things like interview with christopher steel of steel dossier, andws says now john du durham got a green light to probe. reportedly found something significant. basically that federal prosecutors are asking about bias. anti-trump bias. for certain individuals in this case. your reaction. >> this is great john durham u.s. attorney is looking into this, we should. it is really on a separate track, durham is looking at intel and fbi and obama administration abuses and horowitz, is looking at fisa abuse for donald trump this could not come at a politically worse time, if he had some of this ammo to push back on his current critics who are harshing conspiracy theory number two to remove him from office it would be helpful with nancy pelosi's narrative. we never -- democrat never wanted to get to bottom of russia conspiracy is shows level at which they will go to destroy a political opponent. elizabeth: about principles of how our country is run. this reportedly went deeper than we realized. what was going on, du durham tem interviews current and former fb

right in the middle and he will be the buffer, and he was 100% right on which he talked about christopher steeler. because you brought it up and you brought it up, they went to foreign sources, he was in mi6 british by and they went to joseph who is basically in intelligence asset for the italian and stuff on even though he was u.s. cambridge professor but a u.s. citizen, he was working at london in the time when he lured carter page in george papadopoulos overseas. steve: then they went to the russians and it was paid for by hillary clinton. steve: there we are. much more to come on the story. but now we have a quick victory to share with you. we told you in july about how amazon was using tactics to secure a 10 billion-dollar jedi a confusing contract with the defense. they even hired a government official who is deeply involved in the program. here was my recommendation to the president. >> mr. president if you want to keep draining the swamp, don't let them bail out, fill it back up. good news on friday, they announced that the contract would be going to microsoft instead of amazon, they we

documented evidence that democrats soliciting the help and also hillary clinton is the one who paid christopher steelehe opposition research which included sources that were connected to the criminal officials. >> tucker: if our viewers knew what those of our districts of columbia no, which is a huge percentage of politicians are influenced by foreign governments, it's actually disgusting. for these people to be lecturing us, foreign interference, okay, too disingenuous for me. >> there should be reform on the recitation. it be so many people in d.c. lisa boothe, great to see. >> thank you, tucker. on spewing hillary happy to accuse the president of krupp deals, but to be the most corruf all, but certainly in the running, the clinton foundation. the clinton foundation received massive donations when the world expected hillary clinton to win. when she did not win, what happened to the money? good question, they been keeping track. former analyst, host freedom pe cared deeply about childhood ob. every bit as much in 2017 i'm guessing. or no freedom >> good news we have the results of the experiment now.