lead, arsenic, chromium, cadmium, others. . and it even s radioactive substances. >> it's these pollutants, many of them known to cause cancer, that have people worried. and the big question is, where are all ththese toxins ending u? >> there's fly ash and coal dust... we'll go on the front porch and do the same thing. >> you can see as you look up there the fresh ash. it's like an orangish color. when it's windy, it can get into their homes, it can get into their cars, and god forbid they're walking across the street or whatever, it actually gets into their lungs. >> in n the unitited statetes, e are ovever 500 coal-fired power plants. and untntil recently, the dangers of coal ash have largely beenen hidden from publc view. this is one of the largest coal-fired power facilities in the country. called plant scherer, it's located in juliette, georgia, and is majority owned by georgia power. each year it produces 3 1/2 million kilowatts of electricity. generating that power requires a lot of coalal. over 1,200 tons of coal are bu

reportedly provided them a copy of the presidents initial memo, justifying the removal of fbi director chromium was questioned about it. you believe that poses in conflict of interest and should the deputy rosenstein consultant the ethics official at the department of justice about the issue? if you could comment, i would like to have your opinion. >> i haven't investigated that sufficiently to give you a good answer mr. chairman. >> is that the same for all of you? okay. let me move on. there's something that's very bothersome to this committee. i want to bring that up.al dec s1735 requires the attorney general or acting attorney general to submit his removal decisions to a three-judge pane panel, making a finding that the removal special counsel is appropriate under 1735 for cause provision 1741 that permits the special counsel himself to seek review of any removal decision. in your opinion, is the approach taken by 1735 or 1741 preferable from aal constitutional perspective. >> i will take that first. i address that a bit in my written testimony. i think it would be safer to take the approac