the economist commented on the government-forced chrysler pwrup -- and i quote -- "it has ridden roughshod over legitimate claims over the carmakers' assets. at a time when many businesses must raise new borrowing to survive, that is a big mistake. the treasury has also put a gun to the heads of g.m.'s lenders." end quote. in a recent bloomberg article, bradley quio nebraska warns of some of the problems that citigroup and other banks incur as a result of partial government ownership. among them, pressure for stricter compensation rules, directors to focus on state-approved social objectives instead of increasing earnings, scrutiny of advertisings or being force to exit risk-taking businesses that are profitable for competitors. mr. president, there's plenty of, i think, thought out there from people who understand the economy and the importance of the private market. its tradition, its contribution to the success of the american economy and the prosperity that we enjoy today as well as lots of anecdotal and other evidence that when the government gets into these particular situations wher