chuck there's two chuck's. oh, yes, there's two chuck's, staten island, chuck and chattanooga. chuck. uh, chuck, there are a few others around the country as well. >> you know, if this town in new jersey can't find a groundhog, i got an idea. okay, what about a brown frog? oh close enough. >> i don't think peta would like that either. >> andrew, you can't be an animal, andrew. it's got to be like a stick of butter or something. yes, or a rock or a giant coin. >> giant coin. i just want to see you flip a giant coin. >> now we need something for tomorrow. so what can we use? oh, this graphic. >> if you're on supplemental oxygen, heavy and awkward tanks are a burden. now you can leave home and leave the tanks behind with innogen one, the portable oxygen concentrator. you can take almost anywhere with this little device. >> now i'm able to do the things that i've always loved. i just press the button here and there's my oxygen. >> the innogen one is so small and light you're free to leave the house without the hassles of an oxygen tank. i could play golf again. >> i could go grocer

chuck here. nobody knows this, but chuck was one of my sort of key, my early political education in the early 2000. i worked in the in the watergate building at the atlantic monthly, a political reporter. and chuck was the editor of the down on the third floor and the way i learned about politics was i would take the elevator and hang out in chuck's office and, kind of absorb all his story ideas. and he's very generous with his political contacts and. one day in early 2004, we had a piece through and the editor came to me and said, hey, could find somebody to profile really quick? and so i shot down to office. i said, like, who should i write about? you're going to remember this? and he said, you know, you should go out to illinois to democratic senate primary. there's two really interesting candidates there. one of them is a math genius who made his fortune counting in las vegas and then spun it into a hedge fund. the other one, the guy, chuck, that i should write about, was this charismatic, yo

i want to get your thoughts on what chuck schumer said yesterday.e came out of the meeting yesterday he was telling us he did a press conference, wanted to explain what the meeting was about addressing the fact that congress, the senate wants to send money to ukraine, we will deal with the border later. do we have a soundbite? i want your reaction. listen to this. >> the overwhelming sentiment, we got to do ukraine now. there are other issues including border we should address but not now. we said to the speaker get it done. >> first priority of the country is the border into making get sure it is secure. time for action. it's a catastrophe and must stop. maria: do you agree with that? money to ukraine has to go now, to the border later? >> the senate put forth -- >> answer her question. we can talk about the senate bill. i know the senate bill very well, we can talk about why it failed. nobody, certainly the republicans did not ask any senators to start from scratch and come up with a gargantuan immigration policy. that's not what the republicans w

chuck schumer and the senate would not even take it up for debate and that's on chuck schumer, but athe core of the entire question. the number one job is to secure the country and joe biden doesn't need legislation to secure the country, he can do that right now. he can undo all of his executive orders that he put into place when he became president of the united states. that's what created the crisis that we have today. >> congressman, as you know, executive orders often get tied up in the courts. that's what happened under former president trump, but let me ask you big picture because the government is careening toward another potential shutdown? just days. are you willing to shut down the government over border security? >> i believe joe biden is willing to shut down. -- >> what are you willing to do? congressman, what are you willing to do. >> hold on, kristen, let me be clear. i'm willing to fund the government as long as our border is secure. the first job of the government is to secure the border. any business that provides a service, if they don't give you the service, do you

. >> and back with us, chuck rosenberg, chuck, just your -- we've been fascinated by just the way thissupreme court asks questions, the way the justices ask questions, and sometimes even kind of interrupt each other, but this is pretty much how the supreme court is run. >> the dynamics are interesting. the justices ask whatever questions they want in whatever order they want. they can revisit questions. they can persist in their questioning. and of course they try to be courteous to one another and to the litigants, but the justices ask whatever is on their mind, presumably, jose, they've read the briefs, presumably they've discussed the case with their clerks. but you're quite right, the dynamics are fascinating. >> did it surprise you that the issue of insurrection, how it was defined or not defined was not a big part of that conversation. >> it wasn't. it wasn't until justice jackson brought it up that we even heard discussion about it. i thought mr. trump's lawyers response to that was quite interesting. he said a couple of things he said it was a riot, and he said it was shameful.

i worked very well with chuck schumer. when chuck schumer comes to town, everybody pats him on the back. i used to whisper too him, chuck, the river front needs this. it's important to humanize that message in a way that keeps them on their toes. if they feel comfortable and confident that they don't have to work for your support, they won't. we're in the same boat. josh is very difficult to work with. i have to work hard for his support. but bipartisanship, nonpartisanship, consensus is hard. you should be making it hard for the folks in your party and welcoming those across the aisle who stand with you when they do. mr. gottheimer: i think that's spot on. i think the other thing, we've got a bunch of mayors from jersey here who are phenomenal. what helps us a lot and when we're working on doing the infrastructure deal, our work on veterans, our work on environmental issues, the best, i have found some of the best ideas we have worked into legislation have come from mayors actually calling and saying hey, we're doing this

this is impolicemennatic the way chuck schumer does it.ulaimi last moment to sort of come down from like moses with the 10 commandments, no one can amend it, nobody has time to review it. certainly not going to a committee. we should spent weeks talking about this amending of it, it's not going to happen. it's ridiculous. >> this effects the entire future, the culture, the economy, of the united states of america. but we have congressman like republican dan crenshaw slamming republicans for not just jumping on board with the border bill. watch this. >> will the height of stupidity is having a strong opinion on something you know nothing about. i'm extremely disappointed in the very strange maneuvering by many on the right to torpedo up apotential border reform bill. we have a bill that on net significantly decreases illegal immigration and we sabotage that, inconsistent with what we told other voters we were going to do. people will make up whatever reasons they want to. there is a number of them, i'm sure. it would be pretty unacceptable

chuck todd, mark mckinnon, thank you so much. >>> we have breaking news now. details on the nature of a national security threat that the house intelligence chairman sent a cryptic warning about. nbc national security and global affairs reporter, dan deluce what are you found out. >> a foreign military capability, and that foreign military is the russian military. now, specifically why he chose to make his statement when he did and why he didn't choose to wait until we understand tomorrow the national security adviser is going to be briefing the house intelligence committee about this threat but that apparently is what he was referring to, some type of russian military capability that is a threat over the medium and long term. and you had today, congressman himes, his democratic counter part, the ranking democrat on the house intelligence committee saying people should not panic. this is something that's serious and is being addressed but it's not sort of an emergency. now, that will lead to many questions. is this somehow related to russia's space weapons or

but this is emblematic of chuck schumer, the way he does it, to cra it. sorm thing last minute to moment to sort of come down from, you know , like moses, nobody with the ten commandments. nobody can amend it. nobody has tim has time to revig it's certainly not going to a committee. we should spent weeknding ofs tt about this amending of it. it's not going to happen. it's not going to happen. it's ridiculous. th >> this affects the entire future, the culture, the economy of the united states of america. >> but we have congressmen like republican dan crenshaw slamming republicans for not just jumping on boaritd with tht border bill. >> watch this. stupiditis havstrongy is havingg opinion on something you know nothing about. i'm extremely disappointed in the very strangge be by many on the right to torpedo a potential border reform bill. we have a bill that on netio significantly decreases illegal immigration and we sabotagetoldo that. that is that is inconsistent reth whath votert told our votee would do. people will make up whatever reasons they they wana

well, i'll say right away that it can really be considered historic, at least that's what chuck schumer thinks, and the law was voted for a bill that contains three main national security priorities: ukraine, israel, taiwan, and as well as humanitarian aid. 60 billion in aid is allocated to ukraine, the majority of which goes specifically to military orders, and of those 9 billion... which will go to humanitarian needs, part of this money should also go to ukraine, in case this draft law is approved, well, actually for this bill , the debate lasted 6 hours yesterday, it ended early tuesday morning, and it was voted for by, as you said, 70 senators, 29 voted against, almost all democrats voted for, except for two, except for two democrats, also bernie sanders independently voted against, and chuck schumer, as you said, called it historic. welcomed this draft law, and let's listen to another part of his speech, where he talks about the importance of this draft law for ukraine. with this bill, the senate kept its word to the ukrainians, who desperately need ammunition. today we made vladim

chuck schumer don't understand it or care. what we saw with our own two eyes, don't know when chuck schumer went to the border, i can tell you what we saw, an absolute humanitarian catastrophe. broke our hearts and infuriated us at the same time. it cannot continue. the people on the border who are charged with enforcing it are the ones who told us those are the necessary components to fix it. that's why we are so insistent about it. the supplemental seems to be on life support in the senate. we can't wait any longer. that's why you heard we are going to move forward on the israel package. the clean stand alone. the reason we have to do that is because as ken calvert explained and tom have said here this morning, this is a dire situation. we passed the israel with a pay for, early, maybe on day two i had the gavel, very early in my leadership as speaker, and we put a pay for on it. that's an important principle. we want to put that flag in the ground and set a new standard here that supplemental spending has to be paid for. we

chuck, rosenberg and kristy greenberg, thank you for your time, and analysis on this.eciate you. tomorrow night, starting at eight pm eastern, speaking of the 14th amendment that will be joining our colleagues in our primetime special coverage, a recap of oral arguments at the supreme court, all about that 14th amendment case, you are not going to want to miss it. coming up, secretary of state hillary clinton weighs in on the war in gaza, and what she thinks needs to happen to prime minister bibi netanyahu. that is next. is next. keep g fresh waaaay longer than detergent alone. if you want laundry to smell fresh for weeks, make sure you have downy unstopables in-wash scent boosters. hey, you should try new robitussin honey medi-soothers for long-lasting cough and sore throat relief. try new robitussin lozenges with real medicine and find your voice. you know? we really need to work on your people skills. marlo thomas: my father founded saint jude children's research hospital because he believed no child should die in the dawn of life. in 1984, a patient named stacy arr

i think chuck is on the money on if biden. we saw this by the way, when biden won the presidency, we saw this state of bipartisanship, the chips bill, the infrastructure bill, people, republicans, the gun bill, republicans, excuse me, were all of a sudden willing to work with democrats to get big things done that you wouldn't otherwise see them get done. if biden wins, i think you'll see that in droves. if trump wins, i think it's going to be a different kind of get things done. i don't think, though, katy, that the house, the senate is going to turn into the house any more than it already has. i think there is some -- and maybe i could be proven wrong here, but there is some more heft in the senate than the house. there are people that take themselves more seriously, i think probably in a positive and constructive way. i think all of this, and this is what we all go back to, there's a race, already, katy, breaking out on the other side of the building where senators are positioning themselves to be the next leader. it feels s

also back with me now is chuck rosenberg. that letter in essence beside the point because frankly individual justices decide whether to recuse him. obviously thomas didn't, in fact, he was the first questioner today. >> right. thomas should resign. here you have a guy who's been flying on all of these billionaires' private jets, his kids tuition gets paid by his billionaire buddy. he got a loan forgiven by another rich buddy. this is not behavior we would tolerate in any government official, much less a supreme court justice. is anything going to happen? no. and, like, the trump case itself, the case that was argued today before the supreme court shows us why. you know, president trump incited an insurrection that attacked the united states senators themselves. he put their lives at risk. and yet we couldn't get the 67 votes we need in the senate to remove trump from office. so if you can't remove the guy who literally sent a mob to attack the senate from office, you're not going to get republicans to vote to remove clarence

senate majority leader chuck schumer is bringing the standalone foreign wit aid packe without any borderecurity to the floor for about. grady trimble is live in d.c. with the trip entry details. >> senators are voting on the second bill right now as wes speak. it is possible it could wrap ane minute it is getting a little bit closer than the previous vote to the 60 vote threshold. as we speak it's not 56 yes votes, only four more and theyst could open it up for debate, to back things up, the senate shot down the border deal which also included aid for ukrainewh and israel a final vote of 49 yes,d 50 no, aass you said the bill needed 60 for the senate to oper it up for the debate, the second vote live on your screen going on right now and what senate majority leader chuck schumer stripped out the border component and left in the international aid aroundd $60 billion for ukraine, 0 bi14 billion for israel and at $5 billion for the indl o pacif5 region, you ca mn see there getting awfully close as were still at 56 yes, 41 no, moreus r republican supporting this than the previous round of vo

were needed for to move forward and got nowhere near that so what comes next will senate majority chuck schumer is now bringing a standalone foreign aid package, without a border security unit 440 found an brady travel is live the details hey grady to have this in are voting on that second bill right now as we speak in effect coming it is possible they could wrap any minute and it is getting a little bit closer the previous vote, to that 60 vote threshold as we speak and it is at 56 yes votes, only for more than they can open it up for debate and to back things up to heaven we got here come the senate shut down the border deal which also included aid for ukraine and israel, i final vote of 49 yes and 50 no and as you said, bill needed 60 for the senate to open it up for the vote in the second when you're watching the screens going on right now when senate majority leader chuck schumer son is essentially stripped to have the border component of this bill and left in the international aid in our around $60 billion for ukraine and 14 billion for israel at about $5 million for the indo paci

with this right now, adrienne elrod as well as chuck rocha. on set, the reverend al sharpton. rev, a start with you. as we await the initial numbers and what we should be looking out for, give me your take on how you are reading the importance of south carolina and, more importantly, the voices coming out of south carolina in terms of what this will mean for whoever wins tonight, presumptively, the biden administration. >> i think that a lot of what we are looking, at one, we don't know how to measure the turnout, because it's no real speculation that biden will win the primary. the question will be, do a lot of people come out, and what do a lot of people feel in terms of the general election is going to be a lot of anti trump, but i think that some people are saying that they want to send a message. well i think that we have not looked at well is that none of those who have challenged biden has been able to plug into whatever the transaction that we're hearing, because i don't think what we are talking about is, not only will biden definitel

chuck, rosenberg and kristy greenberg, thank you for your time, and analysis on this.ciate you. tomorrow night, starting at eight pm eastern, speaking of the 14th amendment that will be joining our colleagues in our primetime special coverage, a recap of oral arguments at the supreme court, all about that 14th amendment case, you are not going to want to miss it. coming up, secretary of state hillary clinton weighs in on the war in gaza, and what she thinks needs to happen to prime minister bibi netanyahu. that is next. that is next. that is next. only sleep number smart beds let you each choose your individual firmness and comfort. your sleep number setting. and actively cools and warms up to 13 degrees on either side. now save 50% on the sleep number limited edition smart bed. plus, free home delivery when you add an adjustable base ends monday. only at sleep number. only sleep number smart beds let you each choose your individual firmness and comfort. your sleep number setting. and actively cools and warms up to 13 degrees on either side. now save 50% on the sleep n

west amount of this report, these are the actions that have to be taken, chuck smith should drop any movement against president trump. claire is fundamentally different rate yells politically motivated to move forward. and second, this is different as president biden when he was vice president but there's a .20 emphasizing greater that you brought it up, also part of being a big so i would get classified documents that at no time could member of congress is senator ever remove one of the classified documents from the skip and if you removed it from this gift, right then you knew your breaking the law any other document all employment third think and think should be most concerning to every person in america every democrat or republican, this specifies that president biden is not for the job personally witnesses the oval office and experiences with him, he's not at the capability of doing this job. and he talks about, to the searing when israel was attacked, he put a lid talking to the world is the free for leader of the free world having four breakout you cannot do it at the time it

okay, now to be clear, we do not know if no chuck indeed causing of all these tests. but if he was killed by, know if he took what would be the tell tale signs on his body? indeed it is absolute emptiness. pixelation at the moment, um or the nerve agents can be found in blood as to creation products or simply by looking at the body. you probably won't, won't see much. it's uh, it depends on the circumstances, but from a analysis of tissue. blood is difficult to get after. um, the body um is from a dead body, but from tissue samples. and there are specific markers there well established laps around. the world can do this, including russian lapse by the way, um and these blood analysis or tissue analysis would reveal the presence of the agent and within a couple of hours, how exactly does no veil kill? like like the other nerve agents didn't. it inhibits a crucial enzyme, s a chill, clean esther race, which is responsible in the mechanism that switches on and off your nerve systems. and if, if that doesn't work, your muscles can be controlled anymore. that normally mean

but here in new york, we have our own groundhog named staten island chuck. [ light laughter ] it's aing. yeah, this is true he is a little different than phil i'll show you what i mean. for instance, phil emerges from a hole around 7:30 a.m while chuck emerges from a a hooters around 4:00 p.m. [ laughter and applause "long night. next up, phil knows that there are six more weeks of winter if he sees his shadow while chuck knows there are six more weeks of winter because he "knows a guy." [ laughter and applause and finally, phil, he didn't see his shadow but with chuck, he didn't see nuthin'. [ laughter and applause a little different a little different a lot of people are talking about this - today apple launched their $3,500 vision pro headset. yeah, $3,500 if that's too pricey, there's also the vision pro nano which looks like an eyepatch [ light laughter ] if you haven't seen the headset, here it is. yeah >> steve: oh >> jimmy: might cost you a lot, but at least you look cool [ laughter ] can we see him again yeah [ light laughter ] pretty sure that guy is using an app called "ge

chuck, help us understand what really happened here?ye to read between the lines or share with us from what you may have learned in conversations you had in the last hour since he made this announcement. >> this is very unshocking news. you know, look, the fact of the matter is he was losing his grip on the conference. you just saw it with the border bill. right? this was something he insisted on trying to get ukraine funding and the border done together, and usually when mitch mcconnell insists on this is the way it's going to be done. this is the republican point of view, james langford is our point person, there's no debate. well, not this time, and he lost it. and so look, he had been challenged for his position in a way he had never been challenged before at the start of the first congress. he does not see eye to eye with the trump wing of the party. he and nikki haley, you know, nikki haley did an interview the other day where she acknowledged that, yes, she feels out of step in donald trump's republican party. well, she and mitch

senate majority leader chuck schumer and the white house, but because it is a highly partisan election year, senate republicans are divided, and senator chuck grassley at least said it out loud, quote, passing a tax bill that makes the president look good may allow checks before the election, and means he can be reelected. well, the bill does not include checks for americans, but it does include a tax credit. what happens now? nbc's sahil kapur, also with us eugene daniels "politico's" white house correspondent and an msnbc political contributor, brendan buck is former aide to house speakers paul ryan and john boehner, partner at seven letters and an msnbc political analyst. okay, sahil, this wasn't even close. 357-70, but what about the senate? >> that's right, chris. well, the path is still unclear in the senate at this time. this was a huge bipartisan vote, unusual in these times. this particular bill would expand the child tax credit, it would lift the refund blt cap. the biggest benefits would go to low income families, especially those with multiple children, and it would also in

republican chuck grassley expressing concern saying this. i think passing a tax bill that makes the president look good mailing out checks before the election means he could be re-elected. and then we won't extend the 2017 tax cuts. joining us right now, democratic congressman from new york, dan goldman. thanks for coming on. the level of bipartisanship, it's almost shocking. 357-70 is how it passed in the house. you just heard chuck grassley's take when he was speaking to reporters, you heard his hesitation, less on policy, more on not wanting to give joe biden a win. is that going to hold this up? >> i agree with you that it was a somewhat shocking example of bipartisanship and what has been a horrifically partisan congress, especially here in the house of representatives where the republicans have expressley made it clear they're not interested in any bipartisanship, and the child tax credit is essential for many families. it certainly doesn't go far enough, but it's better than what we have. for me in my district in new york city, the ad

meteorologist and lieutenant colonel johnme shoot chuck says this documents clearly show that 96% of us temperature reporting stationst are improperly located where many produce unrealistic warming through the urban heatle island effect. the solution is simpleff either move the cities, move the thermometers. we hav i think we're going to havee e to move the thermometers. but if w e do, the gazillion dollar green energy industry goes bankrupt. krupt. we can't have that. since global warming is athat big business sin . ll in order to sell you a solution, there needs to beth a probleere nem. and it turns out the scientists created the problesm. th i wonder who paid the scientists who created the problem. coulo created d it be the gover? be the green energy industry? indust

chuck barkley, also known as chuck, made some negative comments about the city while seated next to warriors star draymond green during saturday's nba all star pregame in indianapolis. >> draymond of course, pushed back on those comments now. district four supervisor joel engardio says he's fed up with the trash talk. well san francisco definitely has challenges, but we're far from a dystopian city. >> i would invite charles to come to the very next sunset night market that we're going to produce later this year to see, uh, thousands of people, san franciscans in the street, enjoying each other's company and good food and music and entertainment and living their best lives. >> we'd love to see the vegas odds on if chuck is going to come to the next san francisco night market. we've reached out to turner sports to get further comment about chuck and his comments, but so far we have not heard back from him. >> a group of pastors hopes divine intervention can help curb the rise of crime in oakland yesterday, leaders from various congregations gathered at acts full gospel church of god in christ

close, obviously, joining us now, andrew weissmann, former fbi general counsel, charles coleman, and chucknberg, former u.s. attorney and senior fbi official. it was a dramatic day in court yesterday, and we last heard fani willis herself on the stand. she was pretty confrontatioal, she had lengthy answers to show she had nothing to hide. were you surprised the state did not bring her back to the stand today? >> i thought it was a really smart move. i agree with you, yesterday was a roller coaster. it was sort of like up, down, up, down. that's the way trials work. we're not at the end of it. we could have a lot more as katie just said. i think it was a really smart move for the state not to ask any questions. why? one, she got her story out. she spoke at length for hours so there's not a lot to gain by asking her more questions, and what did they do by not asking any questions? one, they signaled to the judge we didn't -- she wasn't damaged at all. she wasn't hurt. there was nothing -- they didn't sort of lay a glove on her so you don't need to ask any questions. second, by not asking que

chuck got it completely right. it was so interesting listening to the liberal justices because, you know, it's clearly against their partisan interest to argue the way they were and to see it the way they did. it is a lesson for us all, right? be intellectually honest. when elena kagan spoke first yesterday, i remember the moment, she really took the care out of the balloon of people that want to see donald trump excluded from the ballot. she said, wait a second, does it really make sense that one state could decide this for the rest of the nation? you know, then she went on to sort of argue and explain why she thought the 14th amendment didn't say what the plaintiffs said it did. and ketanji brown jackson said it's not in the provision, that it'd be excluded. it was a fascinating, interesting day of reading the text of the constitution and learning about the intent of the people who wrote the 14th amendment. the end of the day, if people want to get rid of donald trump, they'll have to vote against him. he's not g

however, santa ran paul of kentucky, strongly disagree with chuck schumer. this is what the republican senator from kentucky had to say. opened the champagne pop the court. the senate democratic leader and the republican leader are on the way to have. they've got $60000000000.00 they're bringing. i don't know if it'll be cash in pallets, but they're taking your money give that they didn't have much time, really no job and no money to do anything about our border. we're being invaded, a liberal invasions coming across our border, 800000 people came illegally the last month. and all they had time to do in the senate was get the money, get the cash pallets load the plains, get the champagne ready, and slaughter key of. now there has been back and forth debate between democrats and republicans in the us senate surrounding this bill for months. now the original bill did have of funding for the us border and border security. however, that funding was removed to add. many republicans were anger that seemed more funding is going to ukraine, them to protecting the am

mike johnson did not convince them, and let's let's listen to another direct speech of chuck schumer,hom we heard a little earlier. there is logic in solving the border issue. we also want it, but now we need to deal with ukraine, as it can be done quickly due to a broad pre-party consensus. and the border issue needs additional attention, and we are ready to work on it, but at the same time we are not ready to delay. well, when donald trump gives this go-ahead to mike johnson and says: that 's all, let's drag it out, let's finally put this issue to a vote and already finally vote, because really , russia is advancing and we need to help ukraine, by the way, the director of the us central intelligence agency, william burns, was also present at this meeting yesterday, and he just told the people present there that russia has... certain advances on the battlefield, and precisely because of delays by congress, the unblocking of financial and military aid to ukraine. and by the way, it is also interesting, i found information that in the american media this group that met yesterday, well,

joining us now is chuck rosenberg. chuck, it's great to see you.or being here tonight. >> my pleasure. >> did i explain the basics of that correctly, that he's trying to effectively get the supreme court to take away that russian tactic, that tactic by which appeals court was trying to tell him you've got to end this appeals process at some point and get to trial? >> yes, good description. three-stepladder. step one would be the trial court. that's where the prosecutors want to be. that's where a jury would be seated, a trial would be conducted and verdict rendered. prosecutors want to be there and mr. trump does not. step two on that matter would be the appellate court. and what he'd like to do is be on number three, step three, the supreme court, or back in the appellate court. but by all means, rachel, to avoid step one, the trial court. >> what do you make of the strength of his argument and the strength of this filing overall and this approach? >> there's different arguments. the underlying argument he has absolute immunity i think is a weak a

educated , so he took proverbs from the treasuries of national folklore, and the uneducated bandit chucklittle tricks himself. but it belongs to him wonderful phrase: there were criminal faces, but now the guys are even, in fact, conveying the general meaning of the entire series. there is absolutely nowhere for the smooth guys to find refuge in the new world; at some point, out of grief, they even come to the disco. started to joke, then he will approach the matter like a marathon, run in circles and joke, joke, joke, joke, by the twelfth episode you already feel that you are running next to him, you still have to laugh, when the jokes start to slip, the screenwriter defrosts from cryogen , prostitute, which in general is possible calmly raise three more episodes under the slogan of princesses: to relieve stress, when once again the phrase is heard: again chuck saves the common fund, you begin, in general, to strongly empathize with his redhead, because she, of course, is in love, and she still has to live with for a very long time with all these jokes and jokes , which is quite difficu

the leader of the democrats in the senate, chuck schumer, also caught fear, leaving the white house,ck said that the story of... was looking over johnson’s shoulder and that victory russia in ukraine could happen in 2-3 months, after which the us and nato will lose the war and collapse. that is to say, the democrats dropped their masks and openly said without hesitation that the war in ukraine is a war of the united states. johnson himself called the meeting frank and honest, and confirmed that biden introduced him to the cabinet. and theta said, it didn’t work out, first america’s needs, and this is the border with mexico, the shutdown, only then ukraine, so he said, the next round of negotiations at the end of march, that is, the money is 61 billion dollars stuck. this morning president biden told congressional leaders that now is the time to give ukraine more money. i think that every day the consequences of inaction for ukraine are disappointing. house speaker mike johnson, who refused to hold a new vote on ukraine funding, was pressured by everyone in the room, including his rep

after that stunning defeat democrat chuck schumer put a second bill on the floor. it strips out the border stuff and juste funds aid to israel d taiwan and ukraine, which is what the democrats wanted in the first place. 58 voted to advance that bill. that is just shy until the 60 they need for final passage. now the senate has end the of the day tomorrow to convince two more to support this bill before they leave town for two weeks. even if they manage to convince those two senators, that aid bill is going to face an uphill battle over the republican controlled house. republicans are not willingll t help ukraine because they are terrified of donald btrump's retribution. ip' asked former secretary of state hillary clinton about all of that today. we're here because it's a day of events, really it's the future of ukraine. and i have to ask you watching the sort of spectacle unfold in washington around thee basic ia around ukraine funding, what's your reaction to what the republican party has done on this issue or not done? >> you know, it's fascinating, alex, because