chuck grassly is going to be leading the investigation. good to see you. >>> well with then?owin for more investigation into the irs scandal, we're hearing for a number of lawmakers now call for a special prosecutor, something that the administration has refused to do. and today texas republican senator ted cruz issued this warning to attorney general eric holder. >> attorney general eric holder has the opportunity to do the right thing. he could appoint a special prosecutor with meaningful independence who is not a mayor obama donor. he continues to refuse to appoint a special prosecutor to investigate the abuse of power by the irs against the american people. he should be impeached. >> jean christian adams. good to see you. impeach eric holder. it's eric holder's decision about whether to appoint a special prosecutor in this case. he's not doing it so. what's the argument? he could be impeached? >> all lesser federal officials impeached. what the argument is that holder is stonewalling. he has the investigation in the civil rights division where i used to work. megyn, this

and some write and learner attempted an audit of chuck grassly. and in reality could not have done that if she wanted to. the e-mail is an official in the irs asking the question to the law. and the lawyer say no, it is not a violation of law and her dropping it. you have two different things. someone who didn't understand what would initiate an audit, yes, we have evidence of that. but not necessarily her out on a witch hunt saying we need to investigate chuck grassley and even if she was doing that, she didn't have the power. >> but it is fair to so the ball start rolling somewhere and maybe it was her way of starting the ball. >> reporter: with so many e-mails and documents missing, we don't know. so many of them are not there and not made public. >> makes it interesting work for you wes lo lowery. >> thank you. >> and supreme court blasting president obama's decision to bypass congress. it was illegal to appoint without senate confifrmation. shannon? joishgs it was a unanimous opinion and when the president decided to make the recess appointme

e-mails that were provided to congress show that lois lerner received an invitation for senator chuck grassly we'll pay for that. lois lerner decided to send an e-mail to a colleague saying looked like they were inappropriately offering to pay for his wife. perhaps we should refer to exam meaning perhaps we should audit, investigate a sitting republican united states senator. one of her colleagues said can't do this, the rules don't allow, that we need some evidence or some suspicion of illegal activity first, but this does not help her case which is already pretty bad to begin with. >> fuels the suspicion that there's a political witch-hunt motivated by politics going after conservative groups, conservative senator right now, a very high ranking member of the finance committee which oversees the irs, but we should note in that -- the irs never actually went through with the audit. there was a question about whether or not they could do that, but it does -- that's exactly what the administration does not want which is more evidence showing that there was some political mess going around going