that same thing was carried through what the speaker chuck rosenberg. >> have you been to washington before? many times? you are involved in all of this. are you going to run for congress? >> absolutely not. [laughter] >> why not? >> i remember coming to congress at different points. my grandfather was a labor lobbyist. the districts change as well. so it is systemic. the idea of using the filibuster or a motion to adjourn to use the bathroom, it really changes civil discourse. i think the same thing happens in districts. we're gerrymandering, it is so extreme. >> you undoubtedly heard it on the newspapers and on the blogs that people are saying that people your age are in trouble based on what my generation and others have done to this country, with the expenditure of money. are you worried? >> absolutely. not just on the expenditure of money it is the environmental degradation. one of the key things is that petroleum is a finite resource. what is that next chapter? that chapter is really blank as of now. in addition to the forces of mounting debt. the economy is based on economic g

>> probably chucked rosenberg. i am very interested in cloth. >> when you see a speaker -- you have seen a ton of them -- what is it that impresses you? and what does not impress you? >> being well spoken in your answers and not being too partisan or extreme or trying to turn a question for his or her own means. >> let's go back to the question, the fairness doctrine. didn't know, i don't think we need a fairness doctrine. i think it was probably more necessary when there were only a few networks that people primarily get their news from. and when you have multiple searches including cable news and the internet where you have sources from every viewpoint, you do not necessarily need to regulate bayh's. i also don't believe the government should be regulating the media. i think we can do that. and there has been a lot of talk this week about that tragedy out in arizona, who is to blame. do you point your finger at anybody or anything? >> you cannot really. the finger at a specific group. i think that person, that on

debate about the -- and we're going to see this, we're going to hear about this on friday when chuck rosenberg comes to talk to us about the zacarias moussawi case. the ability and the vitality of the so-called article 3 courts -- those are the courts created by the constitution, the supreme court and the other courts created by congress under its power to create the, to create federal courts -- whether or not these, these courts will be adequate to deal with the problem of terror suspects. there was really recently a case in new york involving a man named gal landny --gallani who received a 0-year term for terrorist acts but was acquitted on nearly everything else. and it raised the concern the article 3 courts would not be up to the task of trying these terrorism suspects, they would have to be tried by the so so-called military commissions. and we're going to hear a lot about this debate now, too, because, of course, president obama has been thwarted in his efforts to close down guantanamo and to transfer the people who were in prison there to the united states to civilian courts. so there

about bob -- and we will hear about this on friday when chakra rosenberg comes to talk to us -- chuck rosenberg's comes to talk to us, the vitality of the courts created by the constitution -- the supreme court and the other courts created by congress. whether or not these courts will be adequate to deal with the problem of terror suspects. there was recently a case in new york involving a man who received a 20-year term for terrorist acts, but was acquitted on almost everything else. it raised the fear that some of the article 3 courts would not be up to the task of trying these terrorism suspects. they would have to be tried by the so-called military commissions. we will hear a lot about this debate, sooth. president obama has been thwarted in his efforts to close down guantanamo bay and transfer people to the united states civilian courts. there are a lot of challenges that are emerging that may well cause us to wonder about the adequacy, when more, i think, of federal law than the constitution itself, but certainly the novelty of the challenge posed by julian assange is really quite remarkabl