. >> i don't think chuck schumer wants to be on the air, talking about the red sox. >> oh, yes, i do. >> really? oh. >> i have a great story. i told this to major league baseball owners. one day i'll tell you why i hate the red sox. it's a great story. >> yankees are finally looking at young player. >> yes. >> red sox had a rookie go 5 for 5. >> they've done it. the team they got two years ago with all the beards, brilliant. >> yeah. >> didn't even cost much. >> scrappy little guys. >> yeah. >> let's talk about -- >> senator chuck schumer joins us. >> great to have you here. >> great to be back in new york. >> new york city. >> first 100 days. >> uh-huh. do it. >> i've got to talk first. the attorney general -- >> what's going on? >> -- sends out a letter, basically attacking the nypd saying they are, quote, soft on crime. has he never bn to new york? >> does he understand? >> the lowest of the 25 biggest cities in crime. >> they say gang crime is out of control. >> it's not. my daughters, they're young adults but they run the subway at 4:00 am and i'm perfectly happy about it. >> wow

the judicial filibuster is largely the invention of chuck schumer. in 2001 under george w. bush, boardschumer and the invented the filibuster. now today, the filibuster of the united states supreme court justices largely the invention of chuck schumer and the far left and sadly they are doing sunny context of a judge everyone agrees is incredibly qualified and so if senate democrats insist on the filibuster it will force the senate to return to the roles that have been a place for two centuries, wch

it's a real strength of the party right now. >> chuck schumer, joining us shortly. >> he has presentedd choices. i don't mean to take anything away from nancy pell owesy and chuc schumer, but donald trump could have cleeved the democratic party in pieces and instead he has made it easy for not giving them anything that they had hard choices on. >> this tom perez statement saying, you know, you must be this way on this issue or you get no support from democrats. you just stopped yourself from winning a majority. >> he's in a tough position. i was out with those guys last week, sanders and perez. he barely won the chairmanship. the party is divided on some of these issues. there are a lot of women who are very strong pro-choice advocates who feel they're in the driver seat of the resistance right now and perez is being whip sawed a little bit. i don't mean that as an excuse. he and sanders are at odds over these issues. they should be united on economics, fighting for working class people and everything else we need to be a broad church. >> by the way, you want catholics, practicing cath

chris: we will discuss taxes, health care and the economy when senate democrat leader chuck schumer, a fox news exclusive. north korea defies the world with another missile test as president trump issues this stark warning. >> there's a chance that we could end up having a major, major conflict with north korea, absolutely. chris: we will ask our sunday panel if there's a way president trump can halt north korea's nuclear program and our power player of the week using high-tech the solve crimes all right now on fox news sunday. and hello again from fox news in washington. president trump capped his 100th day in office in pennsylvania touting accomplishments and goals, while the press corps was in correspondence leaders, mr. trump was with thousands of supporters. >> i could not possibly be more thrilled than to be more than 100 miles away from washington swamp. [cheers and applause] >> spending my evening with all of you and with a much, much larger crowd and much better people, right? [cheers and applause] chris ris the president reaches the 100th day milestone as he takes another s

joining us now from new york, the senate democratic leader chuck schumer., welcome back to "fox news sunday." >> senator schumer: good to be back, chris. >> chris: you and the president has been in quite the war of words these last few day days. here's what the president had to say what about you last night in harrisburg. >> president trump: humor dominic schumer is weak on crime and wants to raise your taxes through the roof. he is a poor leader, i've known him a long time, and he's leading the democrats to doom. if >> chris: weak on crime, raising taxes, leading the democrats to doom. your response? >> senator schumer: look, the president, name calling doesn't work. let's look at values, let's look at issues. i would say the president's first hundred days have hardly been a success. he's broken promises to the working people of america, unfulfilled others. when he campaigned he campaigned as a populist against the democratic and republican establishments. he's governing like someone from the hard right, wealthy special interest. let me go over a few areas

if chuck schumer is not willing to work with the president, that says more about chuck schumer. >> nancyand chuck schumer sent a letter to president trump saying they are ready to work with him on the aca. they have not heard anything back. a keyser poll shows they will blame donald trump, not the democrats, if this doesn't work out well. >> jeffery, symone, thank you for the lively debate. chris. >>> from the tarmac to the courtroom. lawyers for the passenger dragged off the united airlines flight plan legal action today. they are asking to preserve evidence. what could they sue for and what price tag could come with it? answers. you can read through all their awards. (bell ringing) man 2: 2017 motor trend car of the year. kelly blue book 2016 best resale value. 2016 j.d. power highest quality breaking... agh! 10 best... blah blah blah. 2015... only about 90 more to go! that's a lot of awards! chevrolet. the most awarded and fastest growing retail brand in 2016. celebrate with us and get 16% below msrp on select chevy vehicles in stock. find new roads at your local chevy dealer. >>> the

. >> senate minority leader chuck schumer points out there's a first time for everyone. he says the conservative judge doesn't have the votes to get to 60 to break a planned democratic filibuster and republicans need to drop gorsuch and pick another judge with input by the democrats. >> our republican friends are attacking like a cat on the top of a tree, and have to jump off with all the damage that entails. come back off the tree. sit down and work with us and we will produce a mainstream nominee. >> reporter: almost impossible to find someone who says gorsuch isn't qualified to be on the court. the senate voted unanimously for current position on his circuit court of appeals. democrats turned against gorsuch during testimony this time around saying he refused to answer the most rudimentary questions about court cases. the democrats say it is highly, highly unlikely gorsuch will get to the 60 votes, that leaves them with the nuclear option, requiring 51 votes. it's never been used at the supreme court level. rob? robert: caroline shively tonight. >>> president trump's

chuck schumer from new york state mentioned state and local tax cuts.0. it is a subsidy for all of us around the country for states like new york that have terrible fiscal policies and it's a subsidy that overwhelmingly, 88%, will benefit people making over $100,000. if chuck schumer wants to be a class warfare populist needs to get rid of this ridiculous tax deduction for citizens in new york and new jersey. >> chris: we got a bunch of questions on president trump's tax cuts. there was a lot of concern about adding to the national debt. what will it do to the deficit? here is chuck's tweet where the budget cuts to match the reduced revenue? juan, how do you answer them and what to make of the white house contention that between economic growth and the reduction of some of the loopholes, closing loopholes and deductions at this tax cut will pay for itself? point. this is all conjecture. when you have people in the conservative side like the tax foundation people, they say this will add 4-$6 trillion over the course of ten years, but say, to the budget.

it doesn't look to me like chuck schumer. he was leaned on heavily by the left who did not want to do a deal like this. they decided they want to make the supreme court a bigger political issue. paul: they did this for their own partisan reasons. you must oppose all things trusm and we'll give you what yougi want, even if it makes it more likely that there is another neil gorsuch coming and another supreme court opening. daniel: that's what they are thinking. within seconds a fundraising went out from left-wing groupsou saying because of this, you have to send us money. they are going to run on the supreme court now.w. t paul: joe, this was a subcontracting operation to some extent. leonard leo gave that list to donald trump. gorsuch off the list. it did work. >> it's a lesson for trump that sometimes doing things in a conventional manner can actually succeed and produce results. i think going forward, you know, the more normal part of the trump administration maybe will get some more power out of this. and we might have anot

spokesperson for senate minority leader chuck schumer put out this statement. the white house gambit to hold hostage health care for millions of americans in order to force the american taxpayers to foot the bill for a wall that the president said would be paid for by mexico is a complete non-starter. the u.s. government is supposed to take care of its citizens and according to the president,

keep in mind, chuck schumer wants to be senate majority leader one day.hatever rules he makes right now, he has to operate under in the future. >> how would that influence how he makes this work or not now, emily? >> he wants to think about he's majority leader in say 2018. he's majority leader under a president trump. he's going to want to be able to have to use the 60 votes because that's harder to get. so he's probably thinking ahead that way. >> you think chuck schumer is in a box on this? >> i'm not sure he's in a box, but he has to tread carefully. he's balancing the future power of the senate versus his party and his democratic base, which he needs in order to get control of the senate. >> last question. you believe paced on the judicial record of neil gorsuch that he is that offensive to democrats? is he that offensive to liberals or just the extreme liberal part of the democratic party? >> they have some concerns about his record on workers right. that's a big part of the base, women's right. so there are some red flag issues there. whether that

chuck schumer said the president's plan makes life easier for wealthy and special interests and makes life harder

in the meantime, tops and democrat, chuck schumer, needling mr.rump to get tougher with china. >> one of the few hopes we had with president trump is that he would finally stand up to china, but up to now, it comes to chin china, he looks like a 98-pound weakling. >> melissa: fresh off department with you. that warning about them being able to reach seattle, putting that in perspective, this is a leader who uses a weapon of mass destruction in public at an airport on a relative. to think that that person would then have the capability to reach seattle by the end of donald trump's term, this is very scary. >> marie: it is and i worked and i trust my candidate on these things very, very much. this is where president trump is doing the least badly when it comes to foreign affairs. for me, that's as far as i can go. president obama told him in that first meeting that north korea was one of the most important issue that he will be facing. and he ended up listening. this meeting with the chinese is really important and he should be focusing on north kor

>> no, steve, i think it will be the chuck schumer shutdown. senator schumer promised a shutdown a month ago if the border wall funding was there and it takes 60 votes in the senate to pass it. ted cruz got tagged with the shutdown in 2013. i think chuck schumer gets tagged with it in 2017 and the big difference is the white house decides what's essential. the white house decides what gets shut down. not going to be the washington monument by president obama did, not going to be mt. rushmore like president obama did. you're going to see a group of bureaucrats go home and not get paid when they get coming back. so i think there's an incentive for chuck schumer to drop his shutdown threat because it isn't that -- manhattan beltway media is convinced trump's going to get blamed for the shutdown. i don't think so in trump land. they're going to blame chuck schumer. >> karine, big picture question, 100 day, symbolic milestone, i wonder from democrats' stand poibt, point, do can you think there's a lesson, do you think they look back at the election

clayton: the president says chuck schumer's leading democrat to do. next. >> democrats in congress have no leadership. senator schumer is a god leader. he is leading democrats to do. train to welcome. quick headlines. president trump invitingly or of the philippines to the white house. the commander-in-chief congratulated roderigo to our tag. it's early and i've got allergies. cracking down hard on drug lords and president trump recognized president trump recognized an hundred day in office to two new executive orders. the president ordered a review of free-trade agreement created a permanent trade policy. the least number of executive orders by president trump. pete: can you name the rising president next party star? >> lots of people. one name. >> i'm not going to pick a name. >> who's the leader of the democratic party? >> with a bunch of leaders. i'm the leader of the senate and i help represent the democrat party. it's much too premature to handicap 2020. pete: lots of names. president trump has another explanation. >> democrats in congress have n

as senator chuck schumer said, what is the choice? continue like we are or have democracy?: but now that shoe is on the other foot. senator chuck schumer crying foul at the very prospect that senate majority leader mitch mcconnell will deploy the nuclear option to confirm neil gorsuch on the supreme court. joining me now is senate majority leader mitch mcconnell. sir, i imagine this is something that you did not necessarily want to do but you are prepared to do because the groundwork for this has been laid years ago? >> yeah, dana. interestingly enough, until senator chuck schumer, now the democratic leader of the senate in effect convinced everybody that filibuster is against executive branch appointments were okay, this is the way we did it. for 230 years, up or down, simple majority votes for supreme court, cabinet, everything, until chuck schumer invented it. so, it's a fairly recent thing to filibuster executive branch appointments. the democrats got frustrated after they invented this. and broke the rules of the senate, as you indicated four years ago to lower the thr

chuck schumer said we have ideas. we will present them. as long as they start to back up that this is going to repeal. >> rhealisticly they are not going to play ball with them. i said would you work with the president on healthcare? >> he said i would be happy to work with the president to get a public option into the affordable care act. so those are the kinds of lines -- [laughter] >> they're never going to come together. robert: so that was a showdown. there was another showdown and that's brewing right now in congress because congressional republicans in the white house over a stop gap budget bill to keep the budget operating after late april. president trump wants $ 3 billion in border spending to help pay for a border wall. $18 million would be cut to offset that and pay for part of the wall. democrats and republicans however conservative republicans are rejecting the proposal on fiscal grounds. kelly, we're facing a potential government shutdown if republicans and democrats can't get this appropriations package through. kelly: we'v

. >> that is what chuck schumer led with. >> that is who trump should be copied. >> not what she is saying. >> you are twisting my words. what i am saying is chuck schumer led with potential for compromise on health care which i think is possible now than it has been accepted that obamacare is here and we make modifications, democrats and republicans know that and on infrastructure. neil: deals are there to be made. i don't see the prospect of a second healthcare shots doing better than the first repeal and replace shot. the tax reform package -- what do you think? >> the healthcare thing as a quagmire as i told you many times, i worked on my cell 44 years ago for president next, an absolute nightmare but i am not part of that group. we need higher taxes on the rich considerably higher taxes on the rich. neil: go ahead, steal more of my money. i want to be clear, 40%. the obamacare still in place, 45%, how much higher should it go? >> inadequate instacare for the homeless. they don't worry about money. 50%, 60%. they get getting the homeless on the street is a disgrace. >> has nothing to d

does chuck schumer have a point there? >> they've been working on this.mmittee, working with the white house, their team has engaged in the process. this is a positive step toward getting health care to the finish line with the white house engaging theay it did this week. >> new york, a high tax state, do you have concerns about the way this is laid out right now. >> of course. with the issue of deductibility of our property taxes is something i've been concerned about and will continue to be concerned about. we have to reform the tax code for the american people. it is broken for everyone. i was glad to see the white house engage on the corporate side, the business side and the individual side. it'll be a benefit for all american people. >> if you had to vote on it the way it is presented, would you vote yes? if not, what needs to be changed? >> the devil is in the detail in the tax code. having a one-page proposal is good in the sense of furthering the debate. we have to look at the legislative text. this is why it is a long term process. >> you're also

. >> that same day senate democrats held a news conference on the rules change with senator chuck schumer, harry reid, and patty murray. >> thank you, first i want us -- want to thank senator reed for his leadership. we all know today's a sad day. things should have never gotten to this point. an extreme group has waged a successful war on government. thatlieve firmly government must function to help average families. but unfortunately there's a group on the hard right who wants to stop everything dead in its tracks. executive nominees and legislation. we have seen their success. we've seen the wings of the republican party and believes -- when aysfunction judges blocked their goal is served. when a cabinet post goes unfulfilled for months on end they think they win. dysfunction is their goal. as soon -- 9% rating is a cry by the american people for the congress . our income is declining. our lives are becoming more difficult. stop the gridlock. republicans are grinding the senate to a near standstill. and they're using rules intended to bring people together the terrace apartment the age

john: this is a test for snore chuck schumer and the admin -- for senator chuck schumer and the administrationi'm confident we'll come up with something everyone can live with. chris: next up, we'll bring in our sunday group to discuss the *'s military strike, the gorsuch vote and drama inside the white house. what would you like to ask the panel about the decision to hit syria? what does it mean for the president's foreign policy? we may use your question on the here's something we bet you didn't know. nearly half of all cancers can be prevented. that's right -- half. nearly fifty percent. mostly by making small, everyday changes in your diet and controlling your weight. walking more, eating less. and eating foods that help you and your family to seriously reduce the risk of cancer. and of course, by not smoking. visit the cancer prevention, together we can website and get a free 30 day planner filled with tips, recipes, stats and more about protecting your family. go to prevent 50 dot org. a 401(k) is the most sound way to go. let's talk asset allocation. -sure. you seem knowledgeable, profe

chuck schumer now is trying to delay this vote.s almost like postponing the inevitable. >> jon: exactly. if you want any indication that chuck schumer would dump the work, he has proposed that a revote on this failed culture vote, the one that republican's essentially lost, he wants to postpone the revote until monda monday. that is not going to happen. the republicans have the votes to shoot it down and that sets up the likely confirmation of judge neil gorsuch to the u.s. supreme court sometime tomorrow evening or maybe tomorrow night. almost certainly now, using simple majority vote in a way that has never been done before in the u.s. senate, neil gorsuch will become a supreme court justice. confusing times, we'll do our best to keep you updated on what's going on in the senate, but the senate works in its own mysterious ways. back with more in just a moment. >> julie: we will see you back here and one hour. >> jon: "outnumbered" starts right now. >> harris: we are near zero hour and that means the republicans are ready to pull

, we just collected confidential information on chuck schumer. we are going to pack it up to various intelligence agencies and leaked out to the press. >> you are putting it backwards. we are surveilling foreign agents of foreign countries, especially foreign countries that happen to be enemies of the u.s. if someone like chuck schumer happens to talk to those people, that information is going to be collected. unless chuck schumer is engaging in improper activities or we suspect him to be involved in criminal activity, his name should remain masked unless we have to know his name to understand the intelligence. there were lots of conversations that were surveilled that involved trump campaign officials that were not unmasked but certain ones were unmasked. >> tucker: i've heard this explanation from the very beginning. this is what we do, it's totally cool. when you want someone -- someone inside the obama white house, susan rice, say wait a second, this guy is running a campaign, a republican for president. maybe we should pull back. it is being

he has more in common with chuck schumer than he does with his vice president mike pence.e should be reaching out to expand the base but all he's been doing is preaching to it. judge jeanine: lisa, is this a good response to ways going on? lisa: the reason he wouldn't election is he sent a message to the american people, i stand with you. there is no better representation of washington elitism than the correspondents dish. he's in harrisburg, pennsylvania standing with the people who helped elect him and turned a state red that hasn't been in republican hand since the 1980s. this is exactly what he needs to be doing. when he went to wisconsin for the buy american-hire american -- judge jeanine: he said pennsylvania steel. he wants to see pennsylvania steel in the spine. america. his approval rating is 45%. disapproval, 48%. i'm wondering how accurate those numbers are given the fact that the trump supporters who elected him. how can you say they are not approving of him. chris: i wouldn't trust a poll right now about whether he's going to be re-elected or not. but if he do

this isn't an argument over whether chuck schumer was right when then senator chuck schumer said that heck, over the last couple of years of the bush administration we're not going to allow a justice to be confirmed. that's not what we are arguing about today. we are arguing about whether a brilliant legal mind, a judge who has proven incredible legal temperament over the past several months since his nomination, a judge who has agreed 97% of the time with the majority decisions of the court should receive an up-or-down vote. make no doubt this is a historic opportunity for this chamber to come together to prove that we believe in that 230-year precedent of confirming supreme court justices. this is the opportunity that we have to come together on a judge who just 11 years ago was confirmed unanimously by voice vote. there was no opposition 11 years ago to then judge gorsuch when he was confirmed to be placed on the tenth circuit court which is based in denver. remind you, denver district-based court, the tenth circuit court based out of denver, colorado, covers about 20% of our natio

chuck schumer. they thought he might speak trump's language. even though they come from different places, it's possible had donald trump would have found a kindle dread new yorker. i askedschumer whether he thinks the president has been successful in his first 100 days. >> he know you've pen on the phone with the president personally over the course of this spending bill negotiation. do you think he is a great negotiator? >> so far not. his forays into the congress have been bad. that's why i give -- his 100 days have been 100 days of broken promises to the working people. he campaigned as a populist. he said i'll be against the democratic and republican establishments. he is governing as a hard right special interest guy. so his health care bill failed because it was so far to the right. his attempt to force us to take the wall. nearly caused a government shutdown. his tax bill, they can't even say it will help the middle class at all and it helps the very wealthy. you cannot govern from the hard right and that's what he's doing. i don't know

dagen: the reason you heard chuck schumer or nancy pelosi or those who are reasonable and on the left come out in favor of the strike is the diplomacy president obama chose instead of strikes didn't work clearly because bashar al-assad still had chemical weapons to use on innocent civilians and it open the door for greater russian influence and control over that very country and thanks to the $1.7 billion in cash iran, iran has greater influence in the region. we were left with no choice given women and children were killed in this horrific chemical -- >> i hope that empathy will carry over to our syrian refugee policy. russia was supposed to play a role getting rid of those chemical weapons out of syria and that is where a lot of people -- neil: one thing that changed is the left, the united nations, they put a lot of sovereignty into the un to police this and they avoid a us active military role weeding out the syrian dictator and put trust in the united nations to broker chemical weapons policy and get chemical weapons out, the united nations got back and got rid of this, the russi

the reason why, senator chuck schumer is a smart guy. he's been around the block. it's hard for us to understand how intense the pressure is from liberal and special fun it groups on the hard left, how hard they are pushing these guys to be ideologically pure and block donald trump on every single move. kennedy: you can see some of the talking points coming up on social media, and there is no free thought. there is no contemplation about this. it's very dangerous environment. >> senators elizabet warn and se pushing farther to the left. kennedy: lawmakers take a two-week break at the end of this week. that leaves a handful of days to beat the april 28 deadline. the democrats happy some to sit this one out. playing chicken for political points rather than for the good of the country. this doesn't make any sense to knee like the gorsuch thing because democrats like big government. if you shut down the government, you are proving how worthless it is. >> the hangover is paying the government salaries. republicans get blamed whenever this a government shutdown no matter

and senator chuck schumer came up with the 60 vote threshold. president obama wanted to flood the lower courts with liberal judges in 201. 3. we had a problem because of the 60 votes thing. that is what harry reid with nuclear to make it -- went nuclear to make it 51. that is just to give everybody a little bit of enlightenment at how we got to this pretty poor deal with the senate. host: thanks. thank you for adding your voice to the conversation. some of your tweets. send us your comments. we will read them. this morning, from page of the "washington times" focusing on taking on history and hypocrites. looking at the gorsuch nomination. a sidebar story. they write the following. "back in 2013, harry reid triggered the nuclear option. republicans who pondered the nuclear option a decade ago and opposed it in 2013 are now pushing it." the story this morning from "the washington times." from lincoln, nebraska, christine his next on the democrats line. your take on all of this. caller: i think everything you are covering is excellent. thank you fo

tom: i wouldn't be surprised if chuck schumer assigns a you vote yes, you vote no -- i'm going to bet they're going to do it without a filibuster. that's my guess. >> i think you're right. tom: always good to see you. thank you so much for coming on. >> you're welcome. tom: meanwhile we're coming right back with so much more. so stay with us. >> defense secretary james mattis calls for a unified effort to stop the north korea threat. >> this is a threat of both rhetoric and growing capability, and we will be working with the international community to address this. tom: ambassador john bolton joins me next. and president trump's strong immigration policies already producing great results. >> the entries at the border are down 60% just because of president trump's strong leadership. tom: we'll take up the president's crack down on illegal immigrants and the sanctuary cities harboring tom: well, defense secretary james mattis in london today saying they'll lead out north korea as a threat that must be stopped. >> they're working with the united nations, we're working with our allies, an

molly: "fox news sunday" had with chuck schumer. if he backs off repeal, work within.is it to back off repeal? is part of the semantics everyone will want to win? >> yes. they are backing off repeal. part of the plan keeps it in place. there's no full repeal happening. chuck schumer is saying if we do it on our terms, you heard trump play that soundbite where i've really not if i don't get this done. that sends a signal to me is willing to do whatever it takes to achieve one of his major campaign goals. i wouldn't put it past time to sit down with democrats if he gets not enough they are not able to accomplish a period they are running out of time. they may involve a 2017. 2017 is fast approaching at the end. it's going to have to come in a much different form. >> a while couple weeks in washington. thank you so much. >> thanks a lot. eric: molly, isn't it almost made? after a storm dumped up to snow here. while the race could have implications for midterms. eric: the state's only congressional seat is heating up. republican grade support they sparred over taxes, campa

you have heard the minority leader chuck schumer and other democratic senators say that neil gorsucht qualified to sit on the supreme court. you have argued a number of cases in front of the supreme court justices, many of them notable. what do you think about that assertion? >> i think it is nonsense. judge gorsuch is a fantastic choice. i understand there are partisans and folks who disagree with judge gorsuch just view on the law, ideological and political opponent. i don't think any reasonable person could look at his record, listen to what he said in his confirmation hearings and come away with the conclusion that he is anything other than superbly qualified to sit on the united states supreme court. >> jon: we are getting to the place where judges are going to be chosen by their political beliefs, aren't we? if you have thrown out the possibility of a filibuster, if you have one party in power in the senate and the same party controlling the white house, you're going to get a judge of that particular flavor. >> i don't think today's rule changes in any sense cause for celebrati

it's not the chuck schumer i've seen and covered for years. it's the level of strategical stupidity and democrats are so beholden to their base for maximum opposition to donald trump they're forcing them to do foolish things because it will be no problem for mitch mcconnell to invoke the nuclear option. instead he's going to make it easy for him to do this and next time do you think they'll send another neil gorsuch down from the white house? do you think they'll send somebody with these impeccable -- >> martha: don't they say if we're going to have a nuclear option why not do it now? what do they have to do? >> next time they might have republicans peel away. i think they're making a serious strategic error. i think it's going to have enormous consequences for nominations in the future and we're going to see a more bipartisan supreme court and judges put on without bipartisan vote and go back and forth. they're making it worse. >> martha: what do you think people in places like pennsylvania and missouri and places where they went for trump an

on that was chuck schumer. there is some donation dollars in the history with their current president when he was a private citizen that went to the gang of eight. a few dollars, not a lot went to senator schumer at the time for the cause they were working on. they have some history together. does that give you some hope that we can go forward with some sort of bipartisanship? >> it does give me hope. senator schumer has moved away from where he was in december which was to work with the president. >> harris: where is he now? >> he's in the opposition can. resist, resist, resist. i think of the president reaches out we can get a deal potentially on healthcare, tax reform, even immigration. >> harris: would you be willing to broker that? i'm not kidding. you have experience. >> i would do anything i could to get that done for the american people. >> harris: i wisconsin man who please consider national threat please consider national threat is at large at this hour. did you know slow internet can actually hold you

progressives by and large have been on board with chuck schumer and pushing him in this direction. the question is whether their more conservative members would go along with it too. well, tonight, centrist democrat claire mchaas kel announced which way she is going, and she is going for the filibuster. the senator saying i cannot support judge gorsuch because his opinions reveal a rigid ideological that puts the little guy under the boot of corporations. he's shown a stunning lack of humanity. this decision by the senator takes away a vote that republicans has been counting on for gorsuch. they need eight democrats on their side in order to get around the filibuster. they have two. will democrats stick together and successfully filibuster the gorsuch nomination? will republicans respond by using the nuclear option and taking away the power to filibuster altogether? the stakes are super high, the outcome quite unclear. happy friday. we'll we'll be right back. >>> this is a check for $7.2 million. it's an old which he works hard to read. obviously a ton of money. but back when this

senator chuck schumer still says he doesn't think he'll make it to the magic mark to avoid a filibuster. >> it looks like gorsuch will not reach the 60 vote margin. instead of changing the rules which is up to mitch mcconnel and the republican majority why don't they come up with a mainstream nominee? >> that won't happen. the president said he'd encourage mitch mcconnel to encourage the nuclear option if he doesn't get 60 votes and saying neil gorsuch will become the nominee regardless of what the democrats do. >> bill: analysis on this this with byron york a fox news contributor from washington. good morning to you. he sent a tweet saying had a great time today with president trump. in the spirit of easter is it back? >> after the first bill collapsed donald trump said i'm going to tax reform and the democrats said we can't walk away from this we've been yelling at it for seven years and say we didn't do it. there's work going on continuously. i think you see a couple things going. donald trump is talking to the senate. the round of golf with rand paul and threatening the house freedo

chuck schumer was on the program.e saying in response to questions from democrats who say, why are you doing this now, given who president trump might nominate for the supreme court in the future? what's his answer? kevin: when you look at what has happened over the weekend with president trump and his interview in the financial times, he has been dangling political caret saying -- carrot saying he might negotiate with democrats. this is assigned coming from schumer that he's not ok with it. cirilli,ank you kevin joining us from capitol hill. you can watch the proceedings of the senate judiciary committee live on tv on the bloomberg. biggest rival's inside russia will have a story next. this is bloomberg. ♪ david: this is bloomberg markets, trumps first 100 days. i'm david ra. returning to international politics, vladimir putin -- whirring about his elections. matt phillips about the russian presidential tone. >> election new quality is perhaps the man that vladimir putin fears the most. he is an opposition candi

chuck schumer / -d- minority leader: "it looks like gorsuch will not reach the 60-vote margin."sen. minority leader: "why doesn't president trump, democrats and republicans in the senate sit down and try to come up with a mainstream nominee?"echoing mcconnell, majority whip john cornyn made it clear on c-b-s's face the nation that senate republicans intend to push gorsuch through this week -- with or without democratic support.sen. john cornyn / -r- majority whip: "if they filibuster neil gorsuch, they're going to filibuster everyone that this president might propose." on sunday, senator joe donnelly of indiana joined a small group of democrats publicly supporting gorsuch -- adding a statement adding that the senate "should keep the 60-vote threshold for supreme court nominees."...but isn't clear yet whether republicans can convince enough democrats to help them reach that threshold.i'm andrew spencer, reporting senator john mccain took to the sunday morning shows today to voice his concerns about russia. mccain says that russia did in fact try to change the outcome in our election.

chuck schumer says he will be hurting low income people.t did the president tell you about his plan? >> he left it very open. he said he hadn't made a decision about what he wants to do and he put it out there. he did it several times specifically naming chuck schumer. saying the democrats should be smart to negotiate with me. he is leaving it open for negotiating room hoping democrats will negotiate. he has things he wants from democrats. including health care and other issues. and so he's using it as large to try to get something going with democrats which he has not been able to do. at the same time, he doesn't want to hurt people. he left it undecided and laid it down as something as to try to get negotiations going with democrats. >> david, this is another example of how the president makes his magic. facts first. you can't not pay on existing contracts. you can delay it. that could have almost a definite reverbration of slow walking service. that would have ripple effects. it would hurt people. as a tactic, how do you see it? >> i thi