we know people vote with chuck schumer -- we know he will vote with chuck schumer because he is already bought and paid for by chuck schumer. >> the next question is related to tax cuts. americans benefited from tax cuts but those have contributed to increases in the federal deficit. how concerned are you about our national debt and what measures will you support to cut the deficit. >> the tax cuts. way that was handled as a perfect example of the dysfunction in washington. the idea of tax reform was a great idea. what happened when it got to the congress was the hard part. the reform got put aside and the tax cuts is what went forward. you have to do both sides of that equation to make it work and not drive the deficit up. $1.5tax cut program adds trillion to the national debt. there are ways of addressing that. about theked recently idea of holding spending constant. do not try to reduce it. let the revenues grow into that. that would take about six years to get back to zero. it isdo not try to reduce it. something possible to do if the congress has a willingness to make it happen. >>

chuck schumer spends more. when it comes to dealing with health care and our rural hospitals i want patient-centered health care that is going to focus on that. i want to secure the borders and build the wall. he calls that political theater so there are some differences between us. you have heard a little bit about us and where i come from in my background. i grew up on a farm went to college on a 4-h club scholarship. chuck and i have two children, two grandchildren. we have worked in williamson county to make it a great committee. served in the state senate and lead that fight against the state income tax and it was not protesters are with tennessee and standing up for their right to be safe. a majority of tennesseans agree with that. now i'm running for the u.s. senate to take your values to washington. i'm asking for your vote. >> two minutes governor. >> i have come into this and i still have a high school civics a few of my country. i think we have a brilliantly designed government. i think our governmen

chuck schumer, who has bought and paid for this campaign, he is chuck schumer's number one recruit, chuckumer spends more when he comes to phil and says vote for to spend more, he'll be there to do it. when it comes to dealing with health care in our rural or hospitals, i want patient-centered health care that is going to focus on you. he wants a government-paid system. i want to secure the border, build the wall, he calls that political theater. so there are some differences between us. you've heard a little bit about us and where i come from with my background. i grew up on a farm, went to college on a 4-h club scholarship, came to tennessee. chuck and i have two children, two grandchildren. we've worked in williamson county to make it a great community. served in the state senate, led that fight against the state income tax and, no, it was not protest theres, it was the tennesseans standing up for their right to be state income tax free. and a majority of tennesseans agree with that. now i am running for the u.s. senate to take your values to washington. i am asking for you to -- >> th

did chuck schumer fail? >> schumer has a huge mountain to claim he may not able to. but democrats are probably judging him on a different standard. he's been steam rolled by senator grassley and mitch mcconnell over the last 2 1/2 years. they cheated. they blocked a confirmation hearing for merrick garland. they changed the rules to get kneel gorsuch in. and they are not seeing hundreds of thousands of documents before this confirmation process is completed. this is how democratic activists are looking at this. where are you, chuck schumer? kennedy: the left is upset because chuck schumer told some of those red state democrats in the senatorial fight of their lives to keep their powder dry. >> to be sure, i think a lot of the base of the democratic party, i don't think they grasp how all this works and they are confused about why the senate blocked the merrick garland nomination. the reason is voters put republicans in charge of the senate and the senate is schmoesed to be the one to confirm the nominee. kennedy: like democrats will have that power. >> and they will

that is coming from chuck schumer. the hearing should be delayed.r part of valor would be for the the to step aside. what do you think of that? >> a horrible precedent to set, if that is the standard just being accused, that you throw it out, for the record, no corroborating evidence. with dr. ford more people come on the record, penalty of perjury swine sworn statements to the senate committee kavanaugh wasn't there. this didn't happen. you have no corroborating evidence in that case. you certainly don't have any evidence in, you know a drinking party in a yale dorm room for the second one and, i mean how are we going to get corroborating evidence of this so-called gang train rape thing? i don't know how you prove that, or disprove that either. so there is going to be no evidence. but just on the basis that you throw these allegations you throw them all at him, you have to step down which is their playbook from the beginning. they don't want the seat to be filled. they want it delayed after at election. look, i don't think the republicans should le

chuck schumer led the call.t one point the atmosphere in the hearing is so chaotic, so absolutely unhinged by the left that kavanaugh's daughters were rushed out of the room. of course these kinds of disruptive tactics is nothing new, sarah sanders, secretary nielsen run out of restaurants, ivanka trump harassed on an airplane, and betsy devos chased down a street, florida attorney general pam bondi threatened with physical violence just to name a few. one referred to the hearing as being overwhelmed by mob rule, this is what is at stake in 63 days, take a look. >> i have not been in as many confirmations as some of my colleagues, but this is a first confirmation hearing for a supreme court justice that i have seen basically according to mob rule. >> sean: all of this over who is a well-qualified judge with an incredible and impeccable record, and remember that judges must be confirmed based on the ginsberg standard, 1993, ruth bader ginsburg's confirmation making the case that no impartial judge should ever ans

>> laura: oh, well, no one knows anything about this yet apparently, she hasn't testified, but chuck schumer is supremely confident. the very idea schumer or anyone is going to be able to get to the bottom of a 36-year-old allegation is ludicrous. and chuck, as you know, lie detectors aren't admissible in court for a reason. lindsey graham made a point by the way, earlier today, he said, it's a little odd that she even decided to take a lie detector test and wanted to remain anonymous. huh. the fact is, no way to ensure brett kavanaugh will receive due process here because allegations such as this, they should have been examined in any of the six f.b.i. background checks that brett kavanaugh underwent, but instead, this was dropped less than a week before his committee vote and as such, a lot of reasonable people can conclude that this is all part of a political hit job, a well orchestrated olinski-ite maneuver trying to cause maximum damage to kavanaugh, president trump, and the mid-term election for the republicans, put maximum political pressure, especially people like corker or flake. th

brett kavanaugh has two senators to thank, harry reid and chuck schumer. they got the filibuster for judicial appointment votes, no matter what democrats do, the republicans have the votes on the floor and what you are seeing here democrats are not really trying to take down brett kavanaugh because they don't have the votes but they are using it for some other purpose whether appealing for their base or some people using it to establish a platform. >> the democrats took down the filibuster down to 51 for lower court nominees. it was republicans who decided they would do it for the supreme court as well and that got as neil gorsuch and possibly brett cavanagh. we will watch again tomorrow. thank you very much, good to see you. 13 progressive group stepping up criticism of chuck schumer. the liberal coalition says his efforts to stop brett kavanaugh are failing. that may be why chuck schumer failed to agree to a request from mitch mcconnell to allow the senate judiciary committee to continue meeting beyond the 2 hour limit while the senate is in session and

well, chuck schumer is local about this. chuck schumer's vocal about everything.ruth is brett kavanaugh has already produced 80 times more documents than justice so to mayor produce. he produced four times more documents than any nominee in history and the most important documents have been public all along. those are the 300 opinions he's authored from the second most important court in the country over the past 12 years and 13 of those opinions have been vindicated by the supreme court and unparalleled record of endorsement for lower court judge. cheryl: senate judiciary said the majority of staff has not completed their review of each and every one of these pages, but i want to listen to what senator richard durbin had to say on fox news sunday about the idea maybe they are trying to protect capital-- cavanaugh. >> the assertion of executive privilege by the white house to take 100,000 documents obtained the american people will not get a chance to see them as they reflect on brett kavanaugh's background is the first time in history this denial of access to doc

senate minority leader chuck schumer calls the decision a friday night document massacre. democrats claim republicans are trying to force through kavanaugh's nomination without the proper scrutiny. let's go to cnn white house correspondent boris sanchez. boris, what is the reason why the white house is withholding by way of executive privilege withholding this 100,000 pages of documents? >> hey there. the trump administration citing constitutional privilege for withholding these 100,000 or so pages worth of documents related to brett kavanaugh's time as an attorney at the white house under president george w. bush. william burk the attorney charged with reviewing these documents sent a letter to chuck grassley friday night explaining the review process for these 660,000 plus documents. in that letter he explains his rationale and says former president bush reepds out to him asking him to be as transparent as possible. well as you saw there in that statement from minority leader chuck schumer, democrats do not feel this has been a transparent process at all. he referred to

remember what chuck schumer said? the intel community will get you six ways from sunday. i hate to say it, i think he's right. and breitbart has obtained footage of tech giant google and their first company-wide meeting after the 2016 presidential election. all our fears have been confirmed. the people of google to test the president you elected and everybody who voted for him. you are going to see this video for yourself. it we are now also 55 days away from one of the most important midterms in your life. we will show you how the tactics of the left are beyond out-of-control, full of lies, and we do have a lot of good news for republicans and information they should be using to win in 55 days. sit tight and, buckle up, it's time for tonight's breaking news, multi-prolonged opening monologue. ♪ it is now a full-blown psychosis. it is a psychological level of enhancement i've never seen. trump derangement syndrome, out-of-control. if your dog bites, if the bee stings, the baby cries and you're feeling sad, it's all president trump's fault. if you literally cures cancer th

chuck schumer. we're band to where we were as a matter of custom for 200 and some odd years down to the 2000 election which is you don't filibuster nominees on the executive calendar. so i'm comfortable with where we are. that is the way we operated when i first got to the senate before they started routinely filibustering nominations. i think a majority is appropriate for the executive calendar, including judges. >> now the antics we've watched this week have led some to observe that the body is as polarized as its ever been and do you agree with that because you have a lot of years here that relations between the two sides of the aisle are at their nader. >> it is a difference between putting on an act in a committee hearing room and how you act on the senate floor. there is no lack of collegiateality in the senate but what the democrats are doing is putting up a good front, knowing they're going to lose and trying to convince their left wing base which is demanding of them something they can't de

reporter: we are expecting more fireworks here, especially since senator chuck schumer instituted or 2:00 p.m. rule. there should be some discussion from senator chuck grassley and we will figure out exactly what's going to happen at 2:00 p.m. back to you. neil: edward, thank you very much. now we turn to susan li. reporter: we are in midtown manhattan where uber is rolling out new safety features for both passengers and riders as they service more than 15 million rides a day. in the future, they will now have a ride check-in feature if the ride takes too long or if they sense there has been an accident along the way. we talked about that and also talked about antitrust, big tech and yes, a possible ipo next year. take a listen. you are celebrating your one-year anniversary. >> i made it. >> you made it. very true. now people want to know, are you still sticking with your timeline of an ipo in the back half of 2019, because your new cfo who will start in a few days -- >> starting next week. reporter: he says he's not on board for 2019 listing. >> i would expect nothing less of nelson.

chuck schumer invoked this and mitch mcconnell counter punched.et as long as the senate was out. they determined that the brett kavanaugh was more important. kavanaugh picked up a new supporter. john kyle the republican senator from arizona. sworn in the successor to john mccain. he will support kavanaugh. the balance of power right now. 33 republicans are yay's and 28 democratic nos. the democrat from hawaii came out against kavanaugh. more protests and disruptions in the hearing today. more than 50 disruptions. if you are charged with disrupting congress you get charged $50. they take you out. you can come back in. if they arrest you again they will take you out for a couple of days and make bail and appear before a judge. >> shannon: thank you very much. last august santa rosea california police officers had his wife with him when they ran into a homeless woman. she called and asked if they would adopt her baby. they were honored. they are our midnight heros and that birth mother too. good night from washington. i am shannon bream. ah, mr. blac

here is senator chuck schumer. >> leader mcconnell owes an apology to dr.labeling her allegation as a smear job and he should apologize to her immediately. >> within the last hour, we have learned a lot more about precise format of thursday's hearing. first off, there will be opening statements from top republicans and democrats on the committee. then the accuser, florida, willg give an opening statement with no time limit, followed by a five minute round of questions atfor each senator, as well as judge, and kavanaugh. they will be able to turn over questioning to an outside fema counsel if they want to. >> sean: kristin fisher in the washington bureau tonight. joining us now is chief counsel for judicial crisis network, harry severino, and, by the way i got the first copy, "why we fight." thank you for my copy. you are a patriot, and this is an important issue. you have been through these fights. you watched robert bork, they won. watched clarence thomas went through and the powerful statement he made. went on to be one of our best justices in modern time

let me show what you chuck schumer said about it.y unprecedented, in the history of scotus noms, but it has all the makings of a coverup. this is what chuck schumer tweeted etweet ed e tweeted earlier this week. >> i'm not sure there's evidence of a could have averup. i would be asking the question, what are we hiding here? what is being kept away from us? an important wrinkle is the bush administration, which kavanaugh worked for, has said, go ahead. the instruction has been, turn over as much as you can. it's the trump people who have said, no, we're going to hold back the 100,000 documents. i think it's appropriate for the senators on that in the to ask why and what's being kept from us. >> it's not as though we don't know about kavanaugh's background, particularly his background as a judge. he has hundreds of court decisions. the pushback from republicans in particular, the senate judiciary chairman chuck grassley, is that they wouldn't reveal anything about judge ckavanaugh's legal thinking in particular because any advice he pr

he's made more movement from his side of the issue than chuck schumer did. vote on the issue he said he supported. you've given two fisted opportunities for donald trump to go on the campaign trail and say they are keeping us from getting the agenda done. we've given them everything they have asked for and they are still not moving. it's a perfect mandate for him to take his number one issue back to the people and say you've got to give me more people in congress. >> harris: i would just question and add to that whether some of the horrible things that have happened, and the discussions have come because of illegal immigration. gentlemen, thank you very much. president trump on the ground in north dakota. we are awaiting his remarks after he broke news on air force one. you learned about it here on "outnumbered overtime," about what he expects his justice department to do when it comes to the controversial "new york times" op-ed. we know who that person is, stay close. some debt you plan for, some just... (crash) ...happens. putting it all on credit cards ju

caused by dianne feinstein and chuck schumer not requesting her confidential. it has to be tested against the evidence and against proof. we would have known that confidentially inside the judiciary committee -- >> dickerson: are they wasting the time? >> i don't know what the fbi is going to find. the committee staff has already interviewed all the witnesses that miss ford cited, interviewed miss ford and judge kavanaugh for six hours. >> dickerson: mr. judge sent them a letter that wasn't an interview. >> they have either interviewed them for received letters under penalty of perjury. >> dickerson: these are actual interviews. >> if any of these people under penalty of perjury change their claims. >> but that's why we have investigations. have a neutral fact pattern, clearly the members which of the tee want kavanaugh to be confirmed. so why should people want him to be confirmed why not have neutral observessers wrestle the facts to the ground so it's not a waste of time. >> john, we already know what everyone who is alleged to be at the party has said. they

senators there, chuck schumer, mitch mcconnell, the republican leader of the senator, orrin hatch, an often adversary of john mccain. jeff flake, the junior senator said he'd always be known as the other senator from arizona. matthew dowd, we saw chuck schumer right after the death sete oice builor john eusse mccain >> yes, he thought it would be a bipartisan honor him and the vast majority of the senate wanted to do it but it stalled as things happen in washington, d.c. these days. >> there you see john bolton, the president's national security adviser. his chief of staff john kelly there in the third row. and james mattis the defense secretary. the president's daughter ivanka trump, jared kushner, his son-in-law. vice president gore. they shared a commitment, terry moran, to clooiment change, doing something about it. >> they did. that was another heresy in some ways from the party that john mccain shared but looking at all these senators, i'm struck by the line that joe biden used in his eulogy. he said it was just great to see the onccain's face as he stepped on the floor to start

senate minority leader chuck schumer calls the decision a friday night document massacre, a reference to watergate. democrats claim republicans are trying to force through kavanaugh's nomination without the proper scrutiny. for more, let's go to cnn white house correspondent boris sanchez. so what is the reason the white house is giving for not turning over these documents? >> reporter: they thehey there,. yeah, lawyers citing constitutional privilege as the reason to hold back these 100,000-plus pages related to brett kavanaugh's time as an attorney for president george w. bush. now, we should point out that the attorney who sent that letter to senate judiciary chairman chuck schumer kind of explained the process of why he was holding these 100,000 or so pages back out of 660,000 plus. in that letter to chuck grassley, i should say, he did point out that former president george w. bush actually asked him to be as transparent as possible in this process, something which democrats do not feel has taken place. you saw that tweet from minority leader chuck schumer, who called it a friday

chuck schumer is out with a statement on that.writes this story in "the new york times" must not be used as a pretext for the corrupt purpose of firing rod rosenstein. he goes on from there. but clearly there is speculation along the lines of what i said to you earlier, that this leak is designed to embarrass rod rosenstein and perhaps get him removed from office. >> well, it's certainly -- whether or not the story is designed to do it and interesting. usually it's the president or the president's team that criticizes the "new york times." now it's the minority leader in the senate, chuck schumer of new york criticizing his own hometown newspaper. but this brings up exactly the point that i had earlier, this will raise questions about rod rosenstein, precisely at the moment that he decided to name robert mueller to run the special counsel investigation. is the man that set this investigation by the special counsel in motion, is that a guy that was talking about wearing a wire? is that a guy that was talking about trying to survey

. -- the committee announced announcement that was made, chuck schumer spoke briefly about the allegations on the senate floor. that president, for the past few days, new allegations have come to light about president trump's nominee to the supreme court, brett kavanaugh. these allegations ought to be treated with the utmost gravity. the allegations are extremely credible. they were made by someone who voluntarily submitted to a lie detector test, and had been discussed in the past, long before kavanaugh's nomination to the supreme court with a family therapist. i believe her. many, many americans believe her. who many women in america have been taken advantage of certainly believe her. long, women have made serious allegations of abuse, and have been ignored or dragged through the mud. disgrace if this body and our fellow republicans let that happen. chairman grassley must postpone the vote on judge kavanagh's nomination until at a very minimum, the serious and credible allegations are thoroughly investigated. the fbi conducted a background check on judge kavanaugh before these allegation

including dianne feinstein and chuck schumer. chairman chuck grassley called the times of the allegations disturbing. the committee's vote on kavanaugh is still scheduled for thursday afternoon. supreme court reporter diane duvogue has more. >> reporter: dave and christine, the woman has come forward and alleged that brett kavanaugh assaulted her at a party more than 30 years ago while both in high school. kavanaugh denies the allegations. she attended a party in 1982. kavanaugh and a friend were drunk. she was allegedly corralled into a bedroom. at one point she said he tried to take off her clothes and put his hand over her mouth. she shared the details years later in 2012 with a therapist and her husband. according to the article, the husband recalls the wife using kavanaugh's name. the notes reviewed by "the washington post" do not mention him. the other man alleged to be in the room that room, said last week he never saw kavanaugh act that way. christine and dave. >> thank you. christine fourd struggled to come forward accord

i've been at meetings with him and chuck schumer, for instance, andrew cuomo, cory booker. i've seen him at the meetings. he doesn't feel there is a response coming. there was an agreement on the omnibus bill. there are instances. we are in a very tough political arena. i would hope, maybe at least after the november elections, no matter how you they turn out, we do make an effort. i would ask the president to try to do that. also, if he does, certainly chuck schumer, who i also consider a friend, if he would also extend the hand and try to find a way to get around the killing fields we have right now. if you disagree with someone, right away, you're ten he enemy. i served under mccain. media loved him in 2000 against bush. against senator obama at the time, they looked the other way, when a lot of terrible things were said about john mccain. >> the "new york times" also talks about what he perceived to be hypocrisy at that service. he saw it a little differently. he points out that a lot of the folks who were there to celebrate john mccain's life haven't been upholding the

you know, peter, i listened to chuck schumer. he thought this hearing should be delayed and that he went so far to say that the judge should just step down. what is the sentiment building ahead of this on the hill? >> neil, it's all systems go. 18 hours from now, this room will have brett kavanaugh and christine blasey ford. the hot seat is there in the front seat getting ready. the way that we understand it, the room empty now but once republicans are in there, they plan to yield most of their time to rachel mitchell, the experienced sex time prosecutor from arizona taking leave to be here. both sides are bringing their own evidence. brett kavanaugh will be his calendar from 1982 where the month of may lists cutting the lawn, being grounded and basketball related activities. dr. christine ford is bringing evidence in the form of sworn affidavits signed by friends that tell the committee that later in life she mentioned that she was sexually assaulted by someone who became a federal judge including one that says it came up during

>> i feel sorry for chuck schumer, looks like he is going through the motions.hing matters except republicans have vote and with john mccain after death, picked up another vote. along is mitch mcconnell keeps his pocket together which looks like they are together now they are going to win. all this stuff is attempting to delay or find a moment, this won't happen, brett kavanaugh is too smart and republicans are used to this game. >> any merit to the argument over documents? >> the number of documents we had, stacked higher than supreme court. democrats are not even talking about a large swath of available documents called his opinions, there's nothing in his years of digital opinions they can get anything out of. >> he has 300 of them giving a good indication. what do you expect from democrats? i think they are more or less conceding he will be confirmed. can they use these hearings to show how terrible this is, to mobilize their vote for supporters for the elections? he is going to repeal roe v wade or do away with racial preferences, you will hear a lot about

chuck schumer blasting the administration for releasing 42,000 pages of kavanaugh documents last nightvolving republicans could be a drag on the g.o.p.'s midterm candidate and pointing a finger at his attorney general jeff sessions. >> not only am i burning my favorite pair of nikes you are burning your sales. >> angry customers protest this brand new ad campaign featuring collin kaepernick. >>

that was chuck schumer there speaking today in the u.s. congress here are some of the other stories now that are making headlines around the world the wife of malaysia's former prime minister has appeared before an anti-corruption agency rosmah manso or was questioned over the alleged misuse of a multibillion dollar state investment fund police found what should be goods and cash during raids on apartments linked to the family shortly after her husband. election defeat in maine a russian member of the anti criminal act of his group pussy riot has been released from a berlin hospital peter a bit of believes that he was poisoned by russia's secret service for investigating the deaths of russian journalist german doctors say that it is highly plausible that he was poisoned but can't determine how it happened or who could be responsible. but here in germany chancellor angela merkel she suffered a serious blow this week when members of her conservative bloc rejected her personal choice and close ally as their leader in parliament it came as a s

investigates all of these very serious and very troubling allegations of a senate minority leader chuck schumer there here is some of the other stories now that are making headlines around the world thousands of palestinians have a rallied on the border between israel and the gaza strip some burned tires and hurled rocks at israeli forces who responded with tear gas gazans have stated near or staged in their weekly demonstrations since last march calling for an end to the israeli egyptian blockade that has crippled gaza's economy a danish appeals court has upheld a life sentence for inventor months and he was found guilty of murdering the swedish journalist killed wall aboard his homemade submarine last year matz and had appealed to the court for a time limited prison sentence. a russian member of the anti kremlin activist group opposing riot has been released from a berlin hospital peter selloff believes that he was poisoned by russia's secret service for investigating the deaths of russian journalist german doctors say that it's highly plausible that he was poisoned but they can't determine h

>> it is all about this resist movement it is chuck schumer's base not even chuck schumer, he is beingley congressman not a moderate but a liberal beat in his primary, by a communist their party is drug so far to the left unfortunately you are seeing people like chuck schumer, kind of play into that communist left base that is not where america is we are a center right nation when you see socialism taking over their party my goodness. >> extraordinary keeping government open if week we have been looking for, in terms of whether or not the government is going to shut down the house going to vote on "minibus" spending bill to avoid that shutdown tell us about that, in terms of the debate and vote on this bill to fund two sections of government and avoid a shutdown. >> yeah, maria the most important vote we are going to have today is to vote to fund our defense, actually gives full year funding has hat happened, by the way, in i think nine years, where we've had a full year funding for men and women in uniform to give tools and pay raise they deserve that is going to be a really important

chuck schumer calling the hold back a friday night document massacre.aying it has all of the markings of a cover up. a cnn review of documents released found many are schedules, talking points, announcements and news clippings. >>> george papadopoulos, the convicted campaign trump adviser under testimony in a court filing. papadopoulos says the a.g. and president supported the meeting between the president and vladimir putin. contrast that with sessions' description of the conversation. >> i pushed back at that. you made statements that he did in fact at the meeting -- i pushed back. >> a department spokesperson declined to comment. papadopoulos pled guilty to investigators. he asked to be sentenced to probation. >>> frustration growing over the embattled archbishop of washington's response to claims he mishandled misconduct claims of clergy. i want you to listen to what happened on sunday as cardinal donald wuerl handled the scandal. >> he is the object of considerable -- >> shame on you. >> that is a protester shouting shame on you at cardinal wuerl.

there is nothing kavanaugh can say which will convince chuck schumer to vote for him and i think that ford as no evidence other than her own word, which is going to count -- they can't provide any witnesses and and can't even provide to the best of my knowledge, what was the date, where was the house, and at what point is the burden of common sense on the accuser, and if it's a burden of common sense, this hearing wouldn't even be held. it's only in the current hyper environment in which senator r can say, men can just shut up. i mean, what has happened to america when random left-wing totalitarians think they can violate private property, trespass and a restaurant, go in and intimidate a citizen who is simply trying to have dinner, and they think they are heroes. apparently, the police are called and nobody is arrested for trespass and no one is arrested for intimidation. we are watching. where, what we ought to understand is, this is about raw power. if the left can stop cavanaugh, we will not get another conservative justice in our lifetime on the supreme court. >> sean: if you tal

you know who the accuser's real lawyer is, right. >> chuck schumer.you the memos, they're orchestrating the whole thing. have you noticed every democrat says virtually the same thing, they get before the cameras and say virtually the same thing and it's always political and the accuser is always right, and they believe the accuser and remember, this jury of democrats already said that they would vote against kavanaugh. so the democrats timed this thing. then they want to know why the republicans for a rush. but, of course, the fact that the accuser withheld the supposed information for decades, and withheld it right up to really essentially a few months ago, that's not allowed to be questioned. and now the accuser ford and her lawyer, are insisting that the elements that they require for her to appear before the committee be accepted before she will appear before the committee. she will not come on monday. she insists that kavanaugh not be in the same room. she insists on a fair system that's set up. i have never seen anything like this, where an accu

. >> i think we know is that there was a coordinated effort, chuck schumer orchestrated this, mr. blumenthal can say all he wants, if you talk about tainted, you talk about senators who said before president even nominated his nominee for this position, they would note vote t vote that is tainted. i am voting no because i am a democrat and i don't like this. he knows what -- they know who this is, they know he is a brilliant legal mind, they know they can do nothing about it but watch the process and pitch a fit, i commend mitch mcconnell, and chairman grassley for moving forward, not giving in to temper tantrum today. liz: let's get to next case, tech executives heading to capitol hill this week, starting tomorrow with senate intelligence committee chase book ceo, twitter, and google executive on hot see th seat bee lawmakers this week. those stocks today, facebook down more than 2%, and twitter and google ending lower, shares of snap, touching an all-time low. congressman, here is the thing, we know that the democrats need 23 seats to retake control of the house. the cook report

pressure on those democrats and juan knows this better than i, to hu the party line and follow what chuck schumer the democratic leaders wants. if every republican votes to confirm judge kavanaugh the democrats can vote their conscience. the outcome is a done deal. some of these democrats need to say we supported this conservative judicial nominee so vote for us for reelection. >> juan, your final words on the judge's remarks. >> i don't have any point of disagreement. i would raise this point, though. in addition to abortion, in addition to torture, big issue today is judge kavanaugh's stand that the president should not be under investigation and distracted while in the white house. and if that's the case you will see a lot of questions about what he believes is the case given the president is under federal investigation at this moment. >> judge napolitano and juan williams. thank you for joining us this morning. we're awaiting the high stakes hearings to begin. >> 8:53. father of two. we're going to find out more on kavanaugh. the surprise announcement at the white house that was delivered in

chuck schumer is on the record.the attorney in this case is in videos at resistance rallies saying they will do whatever they can. the other attorney works for mccabe under investigation for lying to the fbi. it's a delay tactic. republicans will have to decide whether they will hold the line on thursday. her attorneys are putting all of these conditions out. she gets questioned by the fbi too. will they ask her for her therapy notes and yearbooks? >> yes, yes, and yes. >> and the attorneys won't turn it over. >> "one more thing" is next. . liberty mutual accident forgiveness means they won't hike your rates over one mistake. see, liberty mutual doesn't hold grudges. for drivers with accident forgiveness liberty mutual won't raise their rates because of their first accident. ♪ liberty. liberty. liberty. liberty ♪ what's going on? oh hey! ♪ that's it? yeah. that's it? everybody two seconds! "dear sebastian, after careful consideration of your application, it is with great pleasure that we offer our congratulations on

a statement from chuck schumer is that the judiciary committee -- there are now senator schumer says multiple corroborated allegations against judge cavanaugh made under the penalty of perjury, all made under -- that's chuck schumer's view, that the hearing should be postponed until the fbi investigates all these allegations. >> can i just hop in, john, because there's some news here, chuck grassley just told reporters on the hill that they're going to move forward on tomorrow's hearings, that there's going to be no delay, tomorrow is very important. republicans still at the moment still going to put this to a vote. >> and mcconnell and more important the president of the united states is going to have a response to this. we'll continue our breaking news coverage in just a few moments, stay with us. this isn't just any moving day. this is moving day with the best in-home wifi experience and millions of wifi hotspots to help you stay connected. and this is moving day with reliable service appointments in a two-hour window so you're up and running in no time. show me decorating shows.

lou: grassley's talking about trombones and being in chuck schumer's orchestra. mean, what kind of madness is that? >> republican madness. >> well, this is a man of impeccable credentials who should be on court and on this court quickly. lou: all right. ed rollins, michael goodwin, thank you -- >> happy birthday. lou: thank you very much. and thank you for letting me get a word in. >> first time ever. [laughter] lou: president trump previewing his plan to sit down with deputy attorney general rod rosenstein this week. >> we'll be meeting at the white house, and we'll be determining what's going on. we want to have transparency, we want to have openness, and i look forward to meeting with rod at that time. lou: we'll take it all up with congressman jim jordan. he joins us right after this very quick break. stay with us, we're coming right back. ♪ ♪ racing isn't the only thing on my mind. and with godaddy, i'm making my ideas real. when i created my business, i needed a way to showcase it. ( ♪ ) with godaddy, you can get a website to sell online. and it will look g

. >> want to read this -- by chuck schumer -- frank, let me turn to you, so much of this new york timesece centers on the state of mind of rod rosenstein after he got that appointment. the fact that the president trump brought the russian into the oval office and spilled some secrets as well. how much interest is that to you, frank. >> i think what we're seeing is yet another senior official who realize that he was dealing with a very unstable executive. the president of the united states. so whether or not we get bogged down in the question of what he making a sarcastic joke, was it just dry sense of humor, was he trying to deescalate a tense week or tense day by making these comments? that's almost beside the point. we have the deputy attorney general of the united states allegedly even joking about recording the president about invoking the 25th amendment and we've now heard this on and on and on. the recording is actually occurred by other officials, omarosa, we keep hearing it is common to raise the 25th amendment. here's what really matters. we've got numerous senior executives wh

and chuck schumer calling it a friday night document massacre as far as holding that back.t review of executive power and privilege and in light of the russia probe, how do we expect that to be addressed by kavanaugh. >> everyone expected kavanaugh to say he will remain open minded and independent about the investigation but to be noncommittal and to pretty say he won't recuse himself from that case. so if any hypothetical cases come up where we -- on whether or not the president could be charged or indicted for crimes given whatever is found by mueller in his investigation, kavanaugh will say and every indication is that he won't recuse himself but he'll keep an open mind and listen to both sides of the case and decide it like any other supreme court justice would. >> and when it comes to that -- what do you see the direction will be taken when it comes to the kavanaugh confirmation and the mueller probe. >> juris prudent suggested he may see the president as unindictable and not able to be prosecuted or arrested. it appears that kavanaugh's view of the world is the sole r

chuck schumer said i'm going to do everything i can to stop this. that chuck schumer had thoroughly vetted brett kavanaugh within 30 minutes of the announcement. that's not true. this is a partisan attack on him. >> that would suggest that the allegations are part of a partisan attack. do you believe that? >> this is not only a judge, he is not a robot, he is a person, and he has been called evil, despicable and a gang rapist. of course you're going to respond emotionally. we can argue whether it was a good strategy to look back angry. we would all be the same if we were accused of something we didn't do that's so serious and awful. >> it is not about the anger. i think there are people that understand the anger because he says he didn't do it. >> right. >> he is passionately defending himself. he wrote that. that wasn't a spur of the moment response to a question. he wrote it the night before. had time to think about it. the next day came in and went on this diatribe about democrats and the clintons and revenge for the 2016 election. this isn't som