[laughs] fact checking their own chyron.ll" has a facial twitch and joins us tonight; joe,ha chyrons, we should be fair to wolf blitzer who does try hard to keep it straight, they don't write the chyrons, but like nobody saw that and said that's too far, we can't do that. >> oh, no, obviously that was a decision in the control room, tucker. and same with erin burnett. i have been on her show an d hundred times. i respect her professionally. i think she does a good job. they don't have any decision as far as those chyrons. afterwards they can read the criticism and say hey, guys, it's my face that's on the screen. i'm the only one that's going to get criticism for it but and an end to it, chyrons we are seeing below our screen right now.. editorial opinion show like yours, it's fine like your newspaper. you go to your editorial page and that's fine. but on news programs, that's something that plays into the narrative if you are cnn that you are the opposition party, that you are leading the resistance against the trump campai

now the word liar appears in chyrons on television and appears in headlines, including in the pages of your old employer the new york times, on a semi-regular basis. so hasn't the whole conversation around how we asses people like this president changed? - i don't think that it's changed in that, or maybe it's changed because the presidency has changed, but i as a person think a lie is a lie. so if you say a lie, you could call it an untruth or call it something different, but it's really just a lie. there's, so i think that if you say something that's racist, you could just say that it's racist. even if you're not a racist you could say, saying that mexican are criminals and rapists is a racist comment. - but that doesn't make the individual, in your mind, a racist so much as you have to call them out for that. - yeah i think you have to call them out for that. we have family, i have family members that say stupid things. does that mean that you're a complete idiot? maybe not. but it means that you really have to stop saying stupid things. to stop saying stupid things. - and just leav

hallmark from chyron, we're using 7.5% at assumed great return. we know there will be bad years. the question is at this two deviation level, are we understanding that we're going to use 2.5% this year. that's ok. we don't ensure for that. that is your tolerance. let's put in that strike price at that level. that is what i'm trying to understand. because at the point when you do want to buy insurance, there is a time when you don't need it. you go to the markets a long time. it's more expensive. we discount that all back into it. when to do it, when not to do it. what is the effect on the total portfolio for adding value because that is when we turn around and say, ok, contributions have to go up because of that. >> so, just one point on page 24. we had all five strategies here. that is managed volatility you can see. there is a highlight on the top. this is actually a chart of a different strategy which i can't explain, but essentially a strategy that dynamically increases and decreases equity exposure based on market volatility. historically, that has been a good strategy. typi

. >> i was an adviser on the campaign and they started carrying me on chyrons in the press, after that of the transition and i was not involved in the transition. so in order to keep things straight and not fly under a false flag, i just put out a release saying i was not part of the transition. if they asked me to be part of the transition, i might have set aside some time and done it. but i didn't, and it wasn't right to say i was a senior member of the transition. >> fair enough. did you have tension with him about his vision on intelligence -- >> not on anything related to this, no. >> do you worry about what all this done to the rank and file in the fbi and beyond? >> sure. this is something that we need to make sure it works in a straightforward and routine fashion. classification is important, and messing up classification can cause serious damage to the country. but it's also true that this whole classification system reports ultimately to one individual, the president. so it is his entire -- it's entirely clear that it's his right under the process to say i have decided this w