between cca, cigna, going in not that far, connected by 16th street. you have obviously mission bay and ucsf and their new hospital that is going on in. there is this tremendous need for housing that is coming in to the area. and we often deny yet -- do not yet have a situation where jobs and housing starts to come together at the same time. hopefully if this goes forward, we will have it in this case. i did not mention -- with their 6000 employees boosting possibly up to 8000 and trying to house them. we have heard recommendations from the two major neighborhood groups in the area plus the business community group in the area. i think has been very well -- it has been well vetted. the architectural details, buildings and sidewalks, still in conjunction with conferencing with the department. that standard -- that is standard for anything we do, especially on large projects. as to the exceptions, every once in awhile we get something of size that comes to us without any variances or exception but very rarely. the largest project, the larger the project,

other literature at cigna -- suggests other less pure motives may be a place. there are certain air reporting requirements imposing obligations on businesses to self-report events causing injury. these go to, for example, the consumer product safety commission or the japan -- joint commission's n.y. on safety. one reporter suggested that under reporting to those agencies is rampant and that some of the time, not all of the time, companies are hiding behind the judge's signature and failing to disclose this information by hiding behind a gag order they invited the judge to sign. those who wrote in to oppose our role in south carolina suggested three principal arguments. litigants should not share their privacy -- shed their rights to the courthouse door and they should agree between themselves to keep things confidential. this argument misses the mark because our ruling had nothing to do with bilateral agreements on confidentiality, rather it dealt with court orders requiring the parties to maintain confidentiality. the second argument is advanced by over 90% of