give them the light or they'll be free. >> cincinnati post. >> yes, cincinnati post. i was a little paper boy. it remainedded -- reminded me of what our job is. our job is to get the information out there. hopefully the policy makers will look at it and use it to the betterment of our country and betterment of afghanistan reconstruction. >> how would you rate this job so far that you've had compared to all the other jobs? >> best job i ever had. >> why? >> great challenge. great people. i think the best group of federal civil servants i ever worked for or worked with. i think an important issue. i think it's an opportunity to get something done. i view this as my last federal job. i've seen problems going back. you've shown some of the hearings. you seen he lose hair. i've been doing this since the late 1970's. it's an tent to get people -- opportunity to final get people to fix some of the problems. if you read about the u.s. military, rotating troops in and out has been a problem since world war ii. we're seeing that same problem there. people with six month rotatio

. >> the cincinnati post. they always sort of reminded me.in the course that hopefully the policymakers will take a look at it. for the benefit of reconstruction. : host >> how would you fix this? the best i have worked with. i think it is an opportunity to get something done. view this as my last federal job. i have seen problems going back. have been doing this since the late 1970's, and it is an opportunity to finally fix some of these problems. in afghanistann is going on in the united states with procurement and with the issues, the issues of the staff. if you read about the u.s. military, there have been problems since world war ii. six-month rotations and one-year rotations. a lot of these problems. you have got to do something, and that is what we are hoping we can do. >> the university of pennsylvania, a law? what did you get your law degree in? >> i was a prosecutor in cleveland. prospects are on your plate as inspector general with that we are going to see you release in the next couple of months? >> well, we're going to have a lit

. >> the cincinnati post. >> right. i was a little paperboy. me of what our job is. our job is to get the information out there and hopefully the policymakers will take a look at it, use it to the betterment of our country and the betterment of afghanistan reconstruction. >> how would you rate this job so far that you have compared to all the other jobs? >> best i've ever had. >> why? >> great challenge, great people. i think it is important issue. i think it is an opportunity to get something done. i view this as my last federal job. me lose hair over the years, i have been doing this since the late 70's. it is an opportunity to try to get people to finally fix some of these problems. what i identify in afghanistan is going on the united states. if you read about the u.s. military, rotating troops in and out has been a problem since world war ii. rotations, six-month you see that the route a lot of these problems. got to do something, and that is what we are hoping we can do. >> university of pennsylvania law? >> no, undergrad. case western. what projects are on you

> a major free speech case heard in a cincinnati appeals court today and may end up affecting your life. sarah jones sued the website thedirty.com when people postedue. she won in lower court and the owner of the website appealed and boy, oh boy is that man getting help from internet giants. a fox news legal analyst and criminal defense attorney. you got google, aol, ebay, facebook, linked in, microsoft, twitter weighing in on the side of the dirty.com and it's right to post potentially untrue things about this cheerleader. why? >> because this is the first time a website has been held liable. in the past individuals have been held liable for what they have written that they should have known was false. so they defamed someone and should not have. before this case, it was only the individual. now megyn, this judge and this particular case is saying the website is liable because it participated in the posting, and it encouraged the anonymous posters to raise the volume, raise the heat, without any checks or balances whatsoever of the truth. it has to be truth. >> how did they encourage postings? because a lot of websites say, post your comments bel