what the committee wants is for path cip pat cipollone to go on the record. it's really important the american people hear from pat cipollone because he knew so many things that other people can't or won't tell us about. people like mark meadows refusing to testify so it's really important that pat cipollone testify. he came off several times a couple do i haves ago and she said that, for example, pat cipollone said if the president went to the capital on january 6th, it would break every law plajable. they want to hear whether he said this on january 6th. >> he would be charged with every crime imaginable if they help trump get to the capitol on january 6th and that didn't happen. does that cipollone have any criminal exposure over january 6th? >> i don't think pat cipollone has any criminal exposure. quite to the contrary. empg i know suggests that pat cipollone is one of the guys who was trying to stop donald trump from doing bad things and encouraging him to take efforts to try to stop the attack on the capitol. that's the kind of thing that the committee

on enforcement, it turned out of 8 contracts with a cip, there were 4 or 5 contracts that have gone through the life of the span and the firms had not done the things they committed to do. and there were no teeth and no (inaudible) and no enforcement. we have now looked at every single contract, we have contacted everybody and have a process in place to insure and communicate when those people are meeting their obligations. this links to the transparency portion. every single contract that has a cip commitment is now publicly available on a dashboard on the puc website. that dashboard includes the firm who made the commitments, the people who are getting those commitments and how well the firm is a making those commitments so if someone is half way through the project and done half their commitments they have a green. someone half way through the project and done 25, they have yellow or red and we have to work with them to up their commitments to the community that they made. that transparnt portion was one of the criteria that the audit wanted us to meet and so really wanted us to come up

we'll have a new specific ba 5 specific booster ready to go in late september, a cips september other doctor bob wachter, chair of ucsf department of medicine says not only is it unlikely the new boosters will be ready to roll out by then. but even if they are ready, those under the age of 50 will be at the back of the line behind older americans. that group will have their vaccines available to them more like november december. >> rather than september. and that means another 4 or 5 months of vulnerability. they don't get a second booster. now. it is unknown when federal health officials will make a final decision on that second booster. >> the bart board of directors will vote this week on whether to bring back the mask mandate. the meeting will be held on thursday afternoon. the previous mask mandate expired last week. so if you're bart rider, you do not have to wear a mask for now. but bart is still encouraging riders to wear masks will let you know what the board decides when they meet later on this week. now in los angeles, they may not be going back to a mask mandate today, a c

we had originally estimated five to six million in our cip plus to deliver the comprehensive plan. over the course of three to four years. i understand that we're all certainly frustrated by the recent bond and i am not getting why we would not have five to six million dollars -- that is a relatively small sum in terms of for a comprehensive speed management plan when we know that speed is the number one cause of traffic related fatalities. so i think my request and suggestion would be that we just get more concrete about presenting that plan and implementing it and i don't know why it takes three years to implement and i don't think it's the funding at a five to six million price tag that should be standing in the way of doing that. a couple other questions on the quick build and this is something we talked about and i don't want to go back over this because we talked about with m.t.a. at a prior hearing. and so i want to both commend m.t.a. on the quick build work which has been transformative for person blocks, certain neighborhoods, but also recognize that we continue to do thi