the project is fully funded for the 5 year cip. it is a 10 year project and we are going to have to continue to pursue discretionary funding to close gaps. this is not unique. many of large infrastructure projects are following a similar effort and think the frequent has proved to be competitive. for outside funding source. jon, is here top answer the harder questions i'm sure that will follow related funding process. i will turn the presentation over to dan and between us we will field questions. >> thank you, julie. >> i'm the project manager for the train control upgrade project. and moving to the presentation i want to give we have new board members, an over view of the project benefits and when we expect top accomplish. obviously our system is over 30 years old. will be over by the time we replace it. it has worked really safely. that has been the major up sides of the system we have. but it is showing age. and showing flaws in the design that we could improve upon in more modern technology. it is separate from the surface. ev

on enforcement, it turned out of 8 contracts with a cip, there were 4 or 5 contracts that have gone through the life of the span and the firms had not done the things they committed to do. and there were no teeth and no (inaudible) and no enforcement. we have now looked at every single contract, we have contacted everybody and have a process in place to insure and communicate when those people are meeting their obligations. this links to the transparency portion. every single contract that has a cip commitment is now publicly available on a dashboard on the puc website. that dashboard includes the firm who made the commitments, the people who are getting those commitments and how well the firm is a making those commitments so if someone is half way through the project and done half their commitments they have a green. someone half way through the project and done 25, they have yellow or red and we have to work with them to up their commitments to the community that they made. that transparnt portion was one of the criteria that the audit wanted us to meet and so really wanted us to come up