the september but the circuit breaker was not done-— september but the circuit breaker was not done. the national circuit. no- i— was not done. the national circuit breaker, no. iwanted _ was not done. the national circuit breaker, no. i wanted to - was not done. the national circuit breaker, no. i wanted to keep - was not done. the national circuit l breaker, no. i wanted to keep going with a regional approach. we had 10 million people in lockdown on the 22nd of september. it was not as though the country was not going through, large parts of the country were not going through another lockdown. the issue was whether there was any support for continued regional approach and actually commit if you look at the october, on october the 20th, in the cabinet meeting, you will see that the cmo says that the country chuka umunna i think the gdt also said, the country is basically divided into three parts by those where the disease is flat and where it is increasing slowly and those where it is rising fast and a regional approach is therefore still justified. fast and a regional approach is therefore stilljustifi

sayyed khandan and circuit circuit are other programs of this network. whats up? is the family well , thank god we are with our family. yalda is the special title of channel 3 program and chavash hosts guests from neighboring countries on channel 4. on the tehran network, by broadcasting popular reports from bazar emphasizes the tradition of visiting the sick . the qur'an and ma'arif channel, sima and afogh channel from mashhad , moqed, are with the viewers . o sit on the first page, o sit on the first page, the page of sacrifice is over there on the other side of the fence, see the joy of meeting is there, o you who sit, sit in the first row, stand up for justice, what is left on your shoulders, the burden of trust, stand up in the first row, the first row, the first row, the first row, the first row, the first row, the first row, the first row. to the people, you are a stronghold, your stronghold is this table and there is hope for you on the other side of the table , there is a martyr in your eyes, in the name of allah , the most merciful, the most merciful. we

circuit breaker. you made against a circuit breaker. you made them, did you not? i was made against a circuit breaker. you made them, did you not? ot? i was never particular persuaded _ made them, did you not? i was never particular persuaded by _ made them, did you not? i was never particular persuaded by the _ made them, did you not? i was never particular persuaded by the circuit - particular persuaded by the circuit breaker, as others weren't. that particular persuaded by the circuit breaker, as others weren't. at the meetin: breaker, as others weren't. at the meeting on _ breaker, as others weren't. at the meeting on the — breaker, as others weren't. at the meeting on the 21st _ breaker, as others weren't. at the meeting on the 21st of— breaker, as others weren't. at the | meeting on the 21st of september, and also at cobra, you showed statistics of how a circuit breaker would hit hospitality sector incredible hard with consequential damage to its runnable workforce. in the course of sir chris witty�*s evidence, he said this, in response to a question, had their perhaps been a circuit breaker in september and perhaps a tier

which it transfers its energy and heat into the water of the second circuit, that is , we have a double-circuit system, the first circuit- behind me is an evaporative cooling tower in which the circulating water is cooled, this structure , the height of which is 167 m. due to natural drafts, air from the lower part of the cooling tower enters the upper part of the tower. through atomized water that passes through the cooling tower sprinkler, and thus the circus water is cooled. the approximate cooling value is about 10-15°. hello, let's go up to the sixteenth mark. steam generator. through the transformer, the block electric current enters the power supply and from there through high-voltage overhead power lines it enters the power system of the republic of belarus. nuclear energy is, of course, a special industry where local and global knowledge is required, and it is necessary to constantly improve your level. he underwent training, a training center, if we take it from the point of view of the object, this is a separate building, it contains classrooms, workshops, in which... according to the procedure, a very import

circuit is going to do, i tend to think this d.c. circuit is going to make a decision on immunity that's more symmetrical in the rule in civil cases and say, yes, maybe the president is entitled to an i"new york now"ty where you're talking about allegedly criminal actions at the outer periphery of their official duties. but based on the allegations in this the indictment taking them on their face, what they are alleging he did doesn't even get close to that periphery and therefore the case can be tried. i think they want the cover of a d.c. circuitn a civil context in the d.c. circuit, i think the d.c. circuit is well-positioned to extend that rule in the criminal context and give the court the cover it needs. >> yeah, this is the outer perimeter sort of doctrine that is think both sort of suggested by other cases in this line and also explicitly invoked in the trump brief. george, let's talk about what's coming out of michigan because there's a few things striking to me. one is i don't know where did they get the tape from? now we've got tape and also it's so wild how in the weeds the guy was. that's the president of the united states. you know this because you have worked -- you've worked in politics and you've been around the various layers that go around principles as they're often called, right? who they talk to on the phone, what's a staff job? what's the principles job? like the president on the phone with the wayne county canvassers, it's like there's nothing he won't do. there's no lengths he won't go to get this done.

but also _ now what's happening, coming out as a little circuit but also having - a little circuit but also having zelensky— a little circuitspecially because the criticism they hear hearing _ especially because the criticism they hear hearing from - especially because the criticism. they hear hearing from publicans i’i l ht they hear hearing from publicans right now — they hear hearing from publicans right now is _ they hear hearing from publicans right now is we _ they hear hearing from publicans right now is we cannot _ they hear hearing from publicans right now is we cannot give - they hear hearing from publicans right now is we cannot give a - they hear hearing from publicans l right now is we cannot give a blank check _ right now is we cannot give a blank check we — right now is we cannot give a blank check we need _ right now is we cannot give a blank check. we need to _ right now is we cannot give a blank check. we need to know— right now is we cannot give a blank check. we need to know what - check. we need to know what ukraine is going _ check. we need to know what ukraine is going to _ check. we need to know what

eastern denomination to serve on the tenth circuit circuit court of appeals.o against the nomination ll take place 5:30 p.m. eastern. watchiv coverage of the house on c-span senate c-span2 end reminder you can wch all coverage with our free video up c-span or oin at c-span.org. >> tonight the u.s. supreme court hears oral argument of the purdue pharma, ae concerning the bankruptcy oxycontin and pote impact on opioid victims compensation. tonight it o eastern on c-span2, free follow-up c-span now or online at c-span.org. >> a healthy democracy doesn't just look like this. it like this where americans can see democracy at work, citizens are truly informed are public drives. get done treat mr. on c-span, unfiltered, unbiased. reporter: from the nation's capital to wherever you are, it is the opinion that matters the most. this is what democracy looks like a decent part by cable. ♪♪ >> she spends magic competition is back elevating years with this year's theme looking forward while considering the past. nasty middle it has for students to create five to six minute

so, on the point about the circuit breaker, i thinkl about the circuit breaker, i think we quite — about the circuitd to do, it was an option. _ we urgently needed to do, it was an option. the — we urgently needed to do, it was an option, the health secretary was against _ option, the health secretary was against it— option, the health secretary was against it and the problem with bounce — against it and the problem with bounce back and as i say, a circuit hreaker— bounce back and as i say, a circuit breaker is— bounce back and as i say, a circuit breaker is not flipping things on and off, — breaker is not flipping things on and off, it — breaker is not flipping things on and off, it is a very massive intervention, you have got to get it i’ilht intervention, you have got to get it right andm — intervention, you have got to get it right and- - -— intervention, you have got to get it right and..._ it. intervention, you have got to get it right and..._ it is. right and... likely lockdown? it is a complete _ right and... likely lockdown? it is a complete lockdown. _ right and... likely lockdown? it is a

here they are heat exchangers, where water from electric boilers of the primary circuit heats the second circuity keeps people warm even at -50, and water is pumped into the system and carried in ten-ton barrels. it’s not all that simple, right? yes, and where do you get it? on the river, on the river of the same name, which flows into there is great fishing in the east siberian sea today, both the chukchi and visitors from pivek are hunting for asian smelt. the klunki are supplied with electricity by a generator, in a tent, when it’s -45 outside, somewhere around -15, fishermen from the regional center. they are hungry, they are balancing the turbine in the morning, the process is extremely complicated, the specialists have high-precision detectors in their hands, the slightest miscalculation will unravel the entire system, but no one will allow this here. pay attention to this tolkien bulkhead, there is a nuclear reactor working behind it, they didn’t let us get closer, not only that the station is the only one in the world, so what is its essentially uniqueness, it produces not only electrici

circuit. the d.c. circuit is filled with supreme court justices in waiting. a lot of the supreme court justices, you know, over the years have come from the d.c. circuit want to respect that process. but in the end, i think a compelling argument can be made here for the speedy trial provisions and in the public interest to get this thing over with. either he has immunity or he doesn't, and the supreme court is going to have a ruling on it either way. so i think that's really what's want to drive their decision-maker. >> yeah, and of course, this is a court, the supreme court, that president trump put three of these justices on the bench. at the same time, it's also a court that has consistently ruled against him in some of these cases related to january 6th. so, is this something that you can really make bets on, or is this really going to come down to the actual arguments here that are presented to the justices? >> look, i think they really have to take a hard look at the public interest argument. i don't put a lot of stock in the fact that they were appointed by president trump when he was president, the fact that three them were appointed by him. i

circuit and by the trial judge here. >> it has not been rejected by the d.c. circuit yet. >> you are right. >> they said they are going to consider on expedited basis. i do not think the supreme court is going to grant a motion on that. if the d.c. circuit upholds that order by judge chutkan, it's going to make its way up to the supremes. the reason i misspoke about the d.c. circuit is you do have the d.c. circuit decision about whether president trump has any official immunity for civil lawsuits. which, there is a basic constitutional run through the immunity case, also this issue we could talk about now, the rejection by the 11th circuit of mark meadows effort to remove his case, which is all these cases in the lower courts have pulled this principle from various supreme court precedents which is when the president acts officially as president carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the presidency, there is some immunity that attaches. it applied civilly. whether it applies to criminal cases are not the supreme court has never decided. although the implication of these immunity cases as the lower courses have read them is you do not have immunity from criminal prosecution. if you are acting as a private citizen, when you are a

circuit and by the trial judge here. >> it has not been rejected by the d.c. circuit yet. >> you are right. >> they said they are going to consider on expedited basis. i do not think the supreme court is going to grant a motion on that. if the d.c. circuit upholds that order by judge chutkan, it's going to make its way up to the supremes. the reason i misspoke about the d.c. circuit is you do have the d.c. circuit decision about whether president trump has any official immunity for civil lawsuits. which, there is a basic constitutional run through the immunity case, also this issue we could talk about now, the rejection by the 11th circuit of mark meadows effort to remove his case, which is all these cases in the lower courts have pulled this principle from various supreme court precedents which is when the president acts officially as president carrying out the duties and responsibilities of the presidency, there is some immunity that attaches. it applied civilly. whether it applies to criminal cases are not the supreme court has never decided. although the implication of these immunity cases as the lower courses have read them is you do not have immunity from criminal prosecution. if you are acting as a private citizen, when you are a

circuit. this d.c. circuit case is moving on a rocket docket. why do they do that? when it comes down to presidential immunity, they know they have a tough haul to say that the president is absolutely immune. the judge ruled that out, so they are grasping at straws to have another argument. it won't work. >> i'm curious. you could argue that supreme court handed trump a win on in immunity case on friday. do you think this will take the wind out of jack smith's sail at all? >> well, i think it will slow the wind in his sails. we are probably not going to get that march 4th trial. i am guessing that by the time it gets back to the supreme court, we might have a delay of 60 or 90 days. nobody knows for sure. as i look at the calendar, i don't think this is going to prevent jack smith from trying his case in 2024. here's why. why did the d.c. circuit order trump to file his brief before midnight a couple days after christmas on the holiday weekend? because they are in a big hurry. they want the case fully briefed and they are going to have an oral argument on january 9th. they will decide within days after that. and then guess what happens. back at the supreme court. so i think we are most likely seeing a short delay, short-ish. of course, nobody knows for sure, but most likely 60 to 90-day delay and then trump will be back in front of judge chechen and in front of that d.c. jury. >> i want to switch gears for second. i am fascinated by this colorado case. from your perspective, will trump's name appear on a colorado ballot in 2024? >> well, that is one where there is less clarity when it comes to presidential immunity. the colorado decision is a powerful one. they have a strong evidentiary basis for saying donald trump an insurrectionists as the january 6th committee found he did nothing while the insurrection raised for 187 minu

circuit justice for the ninth circuit. so we would see each other every year at the judicial conference, we exchanged correspondence over the years. i even had an oral argument in front of her after she retired as a justice and she was sitting on the ninth circuit by designation often. so we had we had quite a long association. >> so if you were to use three adjectives to describe her, what would they be? >> well, i think everybody that knows her personally would say she was a kind and generous person. i also think she was quite confident in her talents. she was a victim of gender stereotypes and she couldn't get a job out of law school, even though she was second in her class at stanford. she went on to be the majority leader of the arizona state legislature, and she was confident, even though she was picked in some sense out of obscurity from the court of appeals in arizona to be on the supreme court. so kind, a kind and confident and path breaking. thank you. >> path breaking is a hyphenated word, but certainly works. thank you, rory. look you mentioned her stanford years. yes. she went to undergrad there and law school and. brilliant. i think she started undergrad at 16. so, you know, at least two years earlier than other people. well, but

circuit. the fifth circuit limited the injunction, but here's what the fifth circuit said. the fbi, "likely coerced the platforms and the moderating content, and encourage them to do so by affecting changes in their moderation policies." in violation of the first amendment. the fbi agreed with the plaintiffs that "federal agencies -- agents ran afoul of the first amendment by coercing and significantly encouraging social media platforms to censor disfavored speech. including by threats of adverse government action." like antitrust enforcement and legal reforms. that is serious. is the fifth circuit wrong? >> as you may know, first off, let me just say the opinions, you talked about a whole other executive agencies besides the fbi, and i'm not going to speak about the agencies are going to do. >> you weren't the only one. the white house. homeland security. your folks were there too, all 80 of them. 80 agents. combing social media every day, calling twitter, calling facebook, take that down. get rid of that account. it wasn't just on election interference. it was on covid vac

second green wire, and if we solder everything in one pile, what will happen is a short circuit, a short circuitleonid gives you a guarantee that he will make everything you need, and whatever you don’t need, he will disassemble. well, as i promised, zhanna, all the things are fixed, your bag, look, this is what i understand, all the devices, we simply cannot leave you without medals, the award of our show is in the studio, thank you, we receive thunderous applause. we reward leonid, the best of all, hold it, and the backpack, well, help them, help them, tell them, that you are the best, the new year tree is like from the cover, we decorate the tree according to science, the holiday will be hot, as they celebrate the new year... we will relieve shoulder pain in 5 minutes, the program to live healthy, what have you done with it, you can’t get away with it it will come down to you on the phone, this is not just a call, it’s from there, you will ruin my institute, you threw off the most complex preobrazhensky, why did you get it like that, will you come with us, we are interested in the documentati

circuit judge for the tenth circuit. mr. schumer: i send a cloture motion to the desk. the presiding officer: the clerk will report. the clerk: cloture motion, we, the undersigned senators, in accordance with the provisions of rule 22 of the standing rules of the senate do hereby move to bring to a close debate on the nomination of executive calendar number 352, richard e.n. federico of kansas to be united states circuit judge for the tenth circuit signed by 17 senators as follows. mr. schumer: i ask unanimous consent the reading of the names be waived. the presiding officer: without objection. mr. schumer: i ask unanimous consent that the mandatory quorum calls for the cloture motions filed today, december 5, be waived. the presiding officer: without objection. mr. schumer: i ask unanimous consent the senate proceed to legislative session, be in a period of morning business with senators permitted to speak therein for up to ten minutes each. the presiding officer: without objection. mr. schumer: i have two requests for committees to meet during today's session of the senate. they have approval of the majority and minority leaders. the presiding officer: duly noted. mr. schumer: finally, mr. president, i ask unanimous consent that when the senate completes its business today it stand adjourned until 10:00 a.m. on wednesday, december 6, that following the prayer and pledge, the journal of proceedings b

electrical appliances into 10 new ones. automatic circuit breakers, this will protect the lines from overloads and short circuits, we hide the circuite sensor will allow you to direct the air flow to the people in the room or, on the contrary, away from them, so that no one catches a cold. now the sockets and switches are next, we took metal frames, similar in tone to the walls, and the mechanisms were dark bronze color. the surfaces do not fade from the sun, fingerprints do not remain on them, the series is called bright. a giant flower will soon bloom on the ceiling, the dominant our interior. each petal, there are 70 of them. handmade, they are made of birch veneer and plywood. inside the mortgages. the center of the ceiling is occupied by the rotor lamp , it is also made of wood, we cover the lamps with a matte diffuser, we decorate the windows with velor curtains with voluminous folds, fabric with short pile and a color shift, please correct it, here, thank you, listen, well, we have already done everything, you can even close the curtains for a theatrical effect, in order to see our most important structure, glowing. chandelie

circuit, that is if the d.c. circuit were to hold, as did the district court, that the president is not entitled to absolute immunity from prosecution for these criminal offenses, then, it would be an option for the supreme court of the united states to deny review of that d.c. circuit opinion, on a timeline that i have suggested that is reasonable and possible. it's entirely possible that the march trial would not have to be delayed at all, but in all events, not delayed long, certainly no longer than 1 to 2 months. so that the trial would, in all events, began sometime near the summer of 2024, 5 to 6 months before the election of 2024. >> judge, certainly, that would be interesting to see if that is what happens. we will continue the conversation with you. thank you so much for being with us. >> thank you, brianna . >>> i want to bring and retired california supreme court judge doris, and jennifer rogers, to both of you, do you think ultimately this going to the appeals court has was planned will mean that there's not a delay and ultimately, this trial for election subversion at the federal level? >> brianna , i have to respectfully disagree with judge letter, i am flabbergasted that the court did not find this case to be of such importance that it needed and expo

out a way to— us government can figure out a way to short—circuit that and bring — way to short—circuit that and bring an— way to short—circuits been and it is time to move back, back— has been and it is time to move back, back in the newsroom. as the us back, back in the newsroom. is the us government said anything about when to expect a possible verdict? ., �* ~' ., about when to expect a possible verdict? ., ~ ~ ., , verdict? no. and we know things are under way — verdict? no. and we know things are under way but, _ verdict? no. and we know things are under way but, afraid, i verdict? no. and we know things are under way but, afraid, if- are under way but, afraid, if it has— are under way but, afraid, if it has been 250 days he is not back— it has been 250 days he is not back and _ it has been 250 days he is not back and it hasn't been enough stop— back and it hasn't been enough stop danielle, we know there have — stop danielle, we know there have been us citizens who have been _ have been us citizens who have been held — have been us citizens who have been held in russia who were then— been held in russia who were then ex

circuit quickly, and the mark meadows appeal, the 11th circuit issue, their opinion on the first business day, the monday following the friday argument, maybe it makes it a standard that the d.c. circuit has to follow. >> what is that -- i mean, no matter what has happened, judge shucking is losing weeks here for as long as the state remains in place, even if it's lifted, if the d.c. circuit court of fines for jack smith, let's say in the for -- third week of january, that is still a lot of several weeks, josh. i wonder how you think that factors to everybody's ability to get a jury selected, get all the pretrial motions in time for march 4th date. >> realistically, the march 4th date is already in a lot of trouble. i mean, the jurors, as i understand, we're supposed to come in and fill out the questionnaires, the potential jurors on february 9th. there is obviously back and forth that has to take place even before that occurs. and so, it's hard to see even if some others popped out of the court of appeals immediately. there was no other stays decided and, you know, everything was back in here by the 15th or the 20th of january. i still think there's a lot of problems getting that cas

immediately the obama administration challenged that and it went to the ninth circuit, and the ninth circuity gutted the law by saying immigration was a federal government issue and it was their federal government responsibility and theirs alone to hold people accountable for coming into this country illegally. so my guess is that texas will face a similar challenge on this, but i like that they're doing it. >> will: absolutely, because the federal government is not doing it, so might as well err to the site of action and let the chips fall where they may in the court. i have been in your county. i have been in your car. somebody has to do something about this metastasizing problem across our country. >> amen, and i'm glad they're doing it, too. they need to challenge this law. if the federal government is not going to do it, then we should have the right as states to do this and we should have the right to hold people accountable if they are breaking the law and our states. i love that they're doing it. we are going to continue to push hard. look, i realize there's only so much i can do as

circuit court of appeals. oral arguments begin january 9. if you are gaming this out, just by virtue of their recent behavior on this topic, it seems like trump could not win at the d.c. circuit court of appeals, which means he appeals at the supreme court and they take it up or they don't and allow the circuit court decision to stand. is that right? the big question is -- go ahead. >> there's one extra piece before you get to the supreme court, which is that he could seek what's called review. the panel is three judges in the d.c. circuit. if he loses -- i think he will lose there. if he does, he can then seek review of the whole court. i don't think the whole court will hear it. but that's also a potential delay. once that's decided, he can then seek supreme court review. all of that could be truncated. the key issue, the main issue that's causing the problem for jack smith is that there's an automatic stay in effect. the d.c. circuit can get rid of that when we issue their decision and say that at least the litigation can go forward. remember, that automatic stay is stopping the pre-trial work, deciding of motions, the jury questionnaires that are going out. all of the work that needs to be done to have a case be ready for trial is stayed right now. that's something that i'm really keepin

circuit , people can refuel by entering the circuit manually. do it, but let's have a review anyway, because in the previous programs of the economic desk , when the officials of the ministry of oil were present here, we had talked about the security of the fuel system. this system is working completely off-line and has no external connection. at the economics desk, we want to deal with this. basically, a system that has no connection with the outside, how was it hacked, when did this happen and for how long. all stations to the fuel circuit the information will be back and we will return as usual . we want to review this together. i have prepared a report for my colleagues . let's go back and start our conversation. i wanted to go see this. what's the problem? what's the problem? how many minutes have you been here? it's been at least 40 minutes, 45 minutes. i don't know where to get gas. it stopped for a few minutes. it's been an hour now . i came here to put gas. there is no gas, but there is gas they say that there is no gas system, they all shut it down, and it's like the system is broken . we came here to fill up with gas. i asked my colleague, he said that there is no gas , it's a problem. fueled as of 10:00 this monday morning, the supply of souq at the gas stations had a dispute. i am at the 148th station of velenjak. as you can see , experts in the field of gasoline from the national company of petroleum products were present here until the failure of the fund that you mentioned in the news. fix to according to

circuit court. that same d.c. circuit court offers an opinion today, on an unrelated distinct but related matter, which is a claim of absolute immunity for what he did on january 6th in a civil context. where it's actually even a stronger argument, because there is some real importance to the civil immunity a president has under his official duties. you can't have a situation where the presidents being sued for everything the president does while he's president. there's a real body there that they are working off of. and even in that, with a higher threshold, you find a d.c. circuit court including a panel member that was a trump appointee saying, no. this does not fly even in a civil context. >> this was a unanimous decision. and while the civil justice standard is preponderance of the evidence, the criminal justice standard is beyond the reasonable doubt. stice standard ithose standardst when trump is trying to get his case dismissed in the criminal setting or civil setting, because he's trying to get them dismissed at i have presidential immunity. that standard of review and that decision today by the d.c. circuit, his criminal case is going to be appealed and go directly back to that circuit with those same judges who have ruled already. i don't think the difference between criminal and civil, based on his presidential immunity arguments, is going to make much difference. and i'd be very concerned if i were his lawyers, and even appealing it, because you have precedent now. >> yeah, and just one more thing on this. this becomes a timing issue. it's a waiting

circuit court. the d. c. circuit overturned the district court, the supreme court is not gonna take that case empty to reaffirm what the court of appeals did. more likely they're going to overturn the circuit court and knocked down two of those counts in jack smith's case, which is basically his whole ball of wax. >> do you agree with it? >> i do think it's more likely the supreme court overturns this, as david urban just said, all the courts below have said yes, obstruction does apply to what happened on january 6th. it's hard for me to see the supreme court saying, we're gonna review this just to say yeah, you all got it right. >> david axelrod, if the supreme court gives trump a win on one or both of the issues, is that politically tantamount to him being acquitted? >> well, i think we have to see how the rest of the stories unfold. it's a huge thing for him. look, at a minimum here, anderson, it's always been the case that his strategy would be delay, delay, delay. to try to kick a everything over until the general election. yes, if they throw major pieces of the indictment, that is a huge thing for him. just the delay is useful to him, if it gets delayed long, enough it's gonna run ri

reality they do not make decisions, decisions are made in an internal closed circuit, about which we know little, this closed circuitel of well-being, these are people of the same class, well, in the case of boris johnson, it’s too obvious that he’s a clown, you know, what i regret is that today already this... the usa, britain, in fact, are sacrificing continental europe to this crisis, pulling out financial, corporate, technological resources, including human ones. andrey vladimirovich, let’s take a break for a moment. let me remind you that we have a telegram channel, don’t be silent, subscribe, ask questions and suggest guests, we are in touch. we talk about the most fascinating things from the world of science. according to experts, on average a modern person eats about 13-15 kg of this product per year. someone claims that it is harmful excludes it from the diet. today it can be said to be used by absolutely everyone, regardless of gender and age. and not only people, separate lines are presented for pets, including, more recently, for rodents. let's share interesting facts. the very first mention of sausage d

after completing a full circuit, pause to rest and repeat the circuit at least twice more.know with the ardor and heat, this cold winter time will now clear nikita belko's track in the yard, nikita, good morning, good morning, nikita, yes, we usually talk at... the new year's concert venue of good ranitsa, today we'll say at the new year's courtyard of good ranitsa, tell us what kind of track is so amazing, beautiful name, track, uh, a little different music, energetic music, perky, that’s cool, that is, i understand that i really like to sing such songs, not just sad lyrical ones, it really rocks, and i’m glad that i now have such a song, no, this song is not about new year, but listen to her you can do it at any time of the year, she will give you positive emotions, that’s that... uh, enthusiasm that we really need in our lives, nikita, but what do you wish for our tv viewers, tv viewers, well, it seems to me, boundless love, good health , don’t be afraid to take risks, don’t be afraid to make mistakes in the new year and everything will definitely be fine, the main thing

circuit. the fifth circuit basically said it will be repugnant for the doctors and the medical providers who brought this case, one of whom who is a dentist, but repugnant if they had to serve people after an abortion and they were somehow injured. the court did in fact grant much of what they wanted, which was to say that much of the expanded use of the drug would be rolled back to pre-2016. that includes not having the drug available for a up to ten weeks of pregnancy ant other advancementshat had liberalized the drug in the marketplace. >> women who live in states where abortion access is currently legal, they could still see themselves limited in access? >> yes, the fda is not limited to certain areas. it's a national association, a national organization that as consequences across the country. what's important about this, this is indicative if the supreme court chooses not to take up these appeals. there was one from the biden administration, one from a drug manufacturer, and one from the original plaintiffs that lost that small portion in front of the fifth circuitifferent fronts of the war on reproductive rights. that is important, because it's yet another part of our reproductive freedom that's being taken away. it's not just a concern that it's got to stop at abortion process, but contraception, and it will keep on going. the fact there's a weaponization of the legal system by a group of people who want to assert their conservative anti-rights position, is a problem. that's why the supreme court make a decision as to whether or not you address it, but then you have the baked-in fear that this ultra-conservative scotus will say we're going to get move involved. this could have bigger implications. >> i was just so struck by the ag writing the letter, doctors beware, if you go ahead and help, i have my eye on you. that is, michelle, very much by design. >> that's right. what we see as a doubling down. to be clear inned dobbs decision, the court said it would leave these matters to state, so what you see in this case, it would be a federal ban.

plates, causes the needle of the galvanometer to oscillate, movement arose in the circuit, then there is an electrical circuitre simply, he noticed that light can turn into electricity, and such energy... can be controlled as a result of experience 135 years ago staletov essentially created the world's first photocell. the most durable batteries, they consist of panels like these, and these are photocells. how it works? sunlight hits them. next comes the process of converting light into electricity. so, it is possible to transform not only the sun’s rays, for example, an image, but thanks to the research of the century, soviet scientists already invented television. she said, this means the initial frames and here, if you look closely, you will see a reading line falling on the photogram, a small element, a small cloud, and he brought something new to the cinema. today , photocells, of course, have changed; they are almost invisible, but they make our lives much easier. this is the device today. it’s also difficult to imagine, without the power of infrared rays they discover a suitable object, that is, in thi

that's how sad our circuit is now . circuit is now. >> i'm a celebrity. get me out of here.nally. >> we're the only ones that haven't been outed for something dastardly. >> yeah, at the moment, it's just an elimination match. waiting for some dms to be to resurface from 2002. anyway let's have a look at monday's front pages. the daily mail leads with put a sock in it. lineker per the guardian, has rival tory tribes threatened sunak authority over rwanda scheme. the telegraph leads with prime minister under pressure to amend rwanda plan. the news has sunak fights for his future amid growing threat from tory right. the times has we will win legal battles , say officials and battles, say officials and finally the daily star has used an we have a problem and those were your front pages . and were your front pages. and kicking off the in—depth look into the papers with the telegraph pole setting expectations high there with the word in—depth on on on on the front of the page is obviously nigel farage, right? >> yeah. >> yeah. >> nigel, it's huge. congratulations to nigel for comi

circuit, i suspect the d.c. circuit will rule against him quickly.ased on the ruling from yesterday. then, trump will try to take it to the supreme court, and i don't see any appetite for the supreme court entertaining such bogus arguments. >> what do you make of the appeal court noting that trump's lawyers do not dispute, that he engaged in his village reactions and up to and on january six, just that he is entitled to presidential immunity? >> yeah, look. i think the average fourth grader can tell you attempting to overturn a lawful election doesn't exactly fall within the job description of the president. and this appeals court yesterday made that important distinction official. and jonathan, notably, on that appeals court was a judge, judge cats this, who is not just a trump appointee, he was trump's deputy white house counsel. you know, so. its number two lawyer at the white house. and cat says ruled against donald trump. so, that tactic tells you all you need to know. trump can try to spin this as a bunch of obama judges, but no, these are trum

circuit court of appeals, the fifty circuit court of appeals denied a governor's ability to lay buoys on the rio grand as nautical border wall with texas and mexico. greg abbott, governor of texas tweeted, the fifth circuit court of appeals denying texas' sovereign aauthority to secure the border with marine barrier is clearly wrong and attorney genapgeneral pac packs paxton wo scotus to protect texas from biden's orders. pete: they don't have to remove the buoys till this is appealed, does it? will: unless they can get an injunction. pete: here we go. we're pulling the buoys out of the water and trying to appeal it. others have faced this trying to maintain their sovereignty. will: impedments in-- im-- rachel: we don't know who a lot of people are coming across the southern boarder and numbers are so huge and it's really hard to vet them. there's been a lot of contraversey and look at footage, this is right near barbara streisand and jennifer aniston's house. these kind of boats coming and letting people out, this is happening all over italy and spain for years now and now we're seeing it come here to the united states. we also saw some by the way off the coast of florida in the keys. a boat coming with

circuit, electrons travel outside the battery along the circuit generating electricity. the electricity goes from negative to positive flowing through the l. a. b in the middle. meanwhile, what's left in the battery is lithium ion. that's where the lithium ion battery gets its name. the ions travel inside the battery from the graphite to the cold box . when it's recharging, they go in the other direction. but batteries basically destroy themselves in the process, either they lose their ability to create electricity or chemicals build up on the electrodes. as batteries age, the electrons travel less and less efficiently and the battery loses its capacity. the metals can also grow into spikes, which can short circuit the battery in the worst case of battery failure, big night and explode. so a good battery can store a lot of energy without exploding and doesn't quickly lose its capacity. making one of those as tough stuff. one of the many reasons why left them makes a great battery. is that unlike lead or as it was only mildly talks and these new lithium batteries can store more energy per graham than any other battery ever invented. what makes with themes so great? weird lee is that it's super reactive. so i got my hands on some lithium which should be no 99 percent pure. going to try and put it in some water and see what happens. but them safety 1st. it's a really soft metal, so it, so it'd be completely breakable just with my fingers. wow, look at that. so that's the lift them inside. it's reacting with the oxygen in the air so fast that the metal is already darkening. we're going to try and put this little bit of lithium in some water and see what happens. okay? so, moment of truth, ooh. to un

that's how sad our circuit is now . circuit is now. >> i'm a celebrity. get me out of here.nally. >> we're the only ones that haven't been outed for something dastardly. >> yeah, at the moment, it's just an elimination match. waiting for some dms to be to resurface from 2002. anyway let's have a look at monday's front pages. the daily mail leads with put a sock in it. lineker per the guardian, has rival tory tribes threatened sunak authority over rwanda scheme. the telegraph leads with prime minister under pressure to amend rwanda plan. the news has sunak fights for his future amid growing threat from tory right. the times has we will win legal battles , say officials and battles, say officials and finally the daily star has used an we have a problem and those were your front pages . and were your front pages. and kicking off the in—depth look into the papers with the telegraph pole setting expectations high there with the word in—depth on on on on the front of the page is obviously nigel farage, right? >> yeah. >> yeah. >> nigel, it's huge. congratulations to nigel for comi