but there are still hundreds of people still working in circuses.apoli children have been rescued from circuses in india. according to nepal rescue agency many children struggle to readjust. >> most of the children they don't want to express how really abused. main problem is the memory problems. many children the education will be very, very weak because of the beating on the head, you know. they beat mostly on the head, because on the body if they are beat you can see the mark. >> they are going to change the culture and history of circus in nepal. they are not aware of it, but they are the first circus company in nepal, and they are going to change people's perceptions of what circus is. ♪ >> reporter: and already with each performance, these children are doing just that. trainers who volunteer with them say they are now good to go, and perform around the world. with luck, circus katmandu will go global soon. >>> the government in nepal was not comply with the minimum stand with doing away with human trafficking, but is taking significant efforts

these children were rescued from circuses in india. were trafficked there and forced to work under harsh conditions. >> back in 2006, this is a circus in india. indian supreme court banned the use of children in circuses two years ago. activists believe there are still as many as 300 children from nepal working in indian circuses. more than 300 have already been rescue the. she was 12 years old when rescued. she finds talking about her past too traumatizing. many children struggle to readjust. >> theman problem is the memory problems. many children, education is very, very weak because of the beating on the head. they beat mostly on the head because they can hide it thunder the mask. >> they are going to change the culture and history of the circus in nepal. by just doing the work they're doing, they're going to change people's perception. >> already, with each performance, these children are doing just that. trainers who volunteer with them say that they are now good to go and perform around the world. with luck, circus kahmandu will

it is a country so repressive it once banned circuses and operas and where the state department saysitrary arrest, toort torture, and disregard for civil liberties happen frequently. >> stephen: okay, maybe, but the chinese state oil company was in a terrible position. they had to get j. lo to single happy birthday because you can't fit kurbanguly berdymukhamedov on a cake. ( laughter ) ( applause ) now, now,-- ( applause ) lovely couple. now, my friend kerbie's done some questionable things, yes, but that doesn't mean j. lo was wrong here. >> j. lo's reps say, "had there been knowledge of human rights issues of any kind, jennifer would not have attended." >> stephen: thank you. how could she have known about turkmenistan's appalling human rights records? google? the point is, if you're a megalomaniacal despot get yourself an american celebrity because if the price is right, they will perform for anyone no matter how much they have crushed the little guy. i mean, alex baldwin does those capital one ads. we'll be right back. ( cheers and applause ). >> stephen: welcome back, everybody

indian supreme court banned the use of children in circuses two years ago, but activists believe therere as many as 300 children napoli children still working in the circus. she was 12 years old when she was rescued. according to that pole rescue agency, many children struggle to readjust. >> most of the children don't want to express how abused. the education, they will be very, very weak because of the beating on the head. they are beat mostly on the head, because on the body for their beat, they are see the marks. >> reporter: for these children circus katmandu has given new help. >> they are going to change the history of circus in thnepal. ♪ >> reporter: and already with each performance, these children are doing just that, trainers who volunteer with them, say they are now good to go, and perform around the world. with luck circus cat mon due will go global soon. >> the government of nepal does not comply with the international standard for trafficking, but attempting to do so. >>> while it may be warming up globally, locally tonight it's cooling off, and fall we have chilly temp

. >> we did not want them to be like the primary debates which became circuses. the republican primary debates were atrocious. to be fair when you have eight or 10 people on the stage, it is hard to have a debate. you are lucky if everyone gets to speak for three minutes. the networks made a fortune. you have the absurdity of having a debate on a saturday night in new hampshire followed by a one the next morning and new hampshire. hard to have a debate. you are lucky if everyone gets to speak for three minutes. the networks made a fortune. you have the absurdity of having a debate on a saturday night in new hampshire followed by a one the next morning and new hampshire. -- in new hampshire. >> what the chairman said when he declared the debate atrocious >> there are also other noxious by the way. >> you can see the dilemma that we have. these are presidential debates. there is an expert nation that comes with that that elevates it beyond some of the more theater of the absurd that we saw on some of the primary debates. sometimes the primary debates were very ente

they used to do this in circuses, okay? now, here's a dude up here. he's gonna jump. and let's suppose up at the top there, he has 10,000 units of energy. that's his potential energy, isn't it? he's at rest. so being at rest, what would his kinetic energy be? zero. zero. we'll just say zero. and here-- [makes noise] right into the bucket. when he gets down to the bottom of the bucket, the potential energy is what? zero. zero. 'cause we took this with respect to the ground. so down here it's got a potential energy of zero. i know you're sitting next to someone knows what the kinetic energy of splat is. i know you do. the--just double check to be sure. what's the value of the kinetic energy here? how much kinetic energy? 10,000. how many people don't say 10,000? --you guys. it's gonna be 10,000. 10,000 units. hey, when the dude gets halfway down, the potential energy is only half. 5,000. 5,000. there are people who can calculate what the kinetic energy must be. see if you're sitting next to one. what's it gonna be, gang? 5,000. 5,000. let's suppose when he gets three qu

. >> we did not want them to be like the primary debates which became circuses. the republican primary debates were atrocious. to be fair when you have eight or 10 people on the stage, it is hard to have a debate. you are looucky if everyone gets to speak for three minutes. the networks made a fortune. you have the absurdity of having a debate on a saturday night in new hampshire followed by a one the next morning and new hampshire. in new hampshire. >> what the chairman said when he declared the debate atrocious -- >> there are also other noxious by the way. the dilemma that we have. these are presidential debates. there is an expert nation that comes with that that elevates it beyond some of the more theater of the absurd that we saw on some of the primary debates. sometimes the primary debates were very entertaining. their purpose was to help republicans decide who they want to nominate. they may have helped clarify some things here and there. we moved to the general election, our commission only has responsibility for the general election debates. there is an

did not want to happen and didn't, we didn't want them to be like the primary debate which became circuses. the republican primary debates were atrocious. when you get 8 or 10 people on stage it's hard to have a debate. you're lucky if everyone gets to speak for three minutes. but the way the networks played it. they made a fortune. you had the object serd ity of it. clear leer >> what the former republican national party chairman said when he declared his debates atrocious, what he meant to say was -- good they're also obnoxious by the way. >> but, you can see exactly the kinds of -- the dilemma that we have. you don't want these things. these are presidential debates and there is a dignity and an expectation that comes with that now that elevates that beyond some of the more stuff we saw in the primary debates. on the other hand,, sometimes those primary debates were very entertaining and they fit their purpose which was to help republicans who to dominate. they clarified things there. when we move to the general election our commissioner only has a responsibility for the general electio

first of all, i want to say that i had given up watching today's america's bread and circuses which is a dallas playoff football game just to listen to you three and ask you a question. and my first question i will direct to donald, the curmudgeon, who said that there were some people who wanted to help. well, one of the persons who wanted to help was john f. kennedy in 1962. he signed an executive order, 11110, which called for the united states treasury to print silver certificates. he was going up against the federal reserve. the day he was shot, lyndon johnson stopped those printing presses. so i have a three-part question about the federal reserve. one is, is it true that our income taxes go to pay the government's interest to the federal reserve which is a private bank? secondly, why do you not in the two books of yours that i read and or thoroughly enjoyed did i not see more about the federal reserve? why is it that a private banking consortium determines the economic policy for the united states? congress and ron paul spent a career trying to explain the federal reserve to us a

. >> we did not want them to be like the primary debates which became circuses.the republican primary debates were atrocious. to be fair when you have eight or 10 people on the stage, it is hard to have a debate. you are lucky if everyone gets to speak for three minutes. the networks made a fortune. you have the absurdity of having a debate on a saturday night in new hampshire followed by a one the next morning and new hampshire. -- in new hampshire. >> what the chairman said when he declared the debate atrocious >> there are also other noxious by the way. >> you can see the dilemma that we have. these are presidential debates. there is an expectation that comes with that that elevates it beyond some of the more theater of the absurd that we saw on some of the primary debates. sometimes the primary debates were very entertaining. their purpose was to help republicans decide who they want to nominate. they may have helped clarify some things here and there. when we move to the general election, our commission only has responsibility for the general election debate

to love it and would give up their liberty, would give up their freedom in exchange for bread and circuses and yet 3 1/2 years later, we say obamacare is less popular now than it was then. and that's true, by the way, all over the country. that's true in every region. that's true among republicans, among democrats, among independents, among libertarians. now, there's several reasons for that. one is just simple facts. forget party ideology or affiliation. the simple facts is this thing isn't working. if you just look at it, on its face it is a train wreck, as the democratic senator who was lead author of obamacare has described it. on its face it is a nightmare, james hoffa, the president of the teamsters, has described it. obamacare in practice is killing jobs all over this country. it is causing small businesses to stay small, not to grow, not to create jobs. it is causing americans all over this country to be forced -- forcibly reduced to 29 hours a week. and you know who's being reduced the most? it ain't the rich. it ain't, as the president likes to put it, the millionaires and billio