authority that holds sequa is interpreted as enforced as broadly as possible to afford the citizenoffs california the greatest joirmtal protection. the site is on the list. the statute said if the site is on the list it can't have a exemption. [inaudible] that is thitsies words, the fact the site on the list. it could have easily done that. the parker [inaudible] case from the first district court of appeal speaks directly to issue before the board. read it closely, the city gave the project a cad ex. it is on page 2 of the opinion. on return after the writ was granted the city then issued a initial study and gave it a mitigated [inaudible] the courts ruling is directly on point and says that if you are on the cower taizy list it does want mandate a eir. with the same breath the court says the sites on the cor taizy list may not be grant adcategorical exemption and speak about a site like this site with 2 closeier letters thrks same closure letters the city is now claiming somehow exemps it from the law and creates annul: the court put its opinion that you cannot issue a cad x for that site. the